1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-09 02:33:11 +01:00
git/t/t1410-reflog.sh

321 lines
7.2 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2007 Junio C Hamano
#
test_description='Test prune and reflog expiration'
. ./test-lib.sh
check_have () {
gaah= &&
for N in "$@"
do
eval "o=\$$N" && git cat-file -t $o || {
echo Gaah $N
gaah=$N
break
}
done &&
test -z "$gaah"
}
check_fsck () {
output=$(git fsck --full)
case "$1" in
'')
test -z "$output" ;;
*)
echo "$output" | grep "$1" ;;
esac
}
corrupt () {
aa=${1%??????????????????????????????????????} zz=${1#??}
mv .git/objects/$aa/$zz .git/$aa$zz
}
recover () {
aa=${1%??????????????????????????????????????} zz=${1#??}
mkdir -p .git/objects/$aa
mv .git/$aa$zz .git/objects/$aa/$zz
}
check_dont_have () {
gaah= &&
for N in "$@"
do
eval "o=\$$N"
git cat-file -t $o && {
echo Gaah $N
gaah=$N
break
}
done
test -z "$gaah"
}
test_expect_success setup '
mkdir -p A/B &&
echo rat >C &&
echo ox >A/D &&
echo tiger >A/B/E &&
git add . &&
test_tick && git commit -m rabbit &&
H=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD` &&
A=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:A` &&
B=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:A/B` &&
C=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:C` &&
D=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:A/D` &&
E=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:A/B/E` &&
check_fsck &&
test_chmod +x C &&
git add C &&
test_tick && git commit -m dragon &&
L=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD` &&
check_fsck &&
rm -f C A/B/E &&
echo snake >F &&
echo horse >A/G &&
git add F A/G &&
test_tick && git commit -a -m sheep &&
F=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:F` &&
G=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:A/G` &&
I=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD:A` &&
J=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD` &&
check_fsck &&
rm -f A/G &&
test_tick && git commit -a -m monkey &&
K=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD` &&
check_fsck &&
check_have A B C D E F G H I J K L &&
git prune &&
check_have A B C D E F G H I J K L &&
check_fsck &&
test_line_count = 4 .git/logs/refs/heads/master
'
test_expect_success rewind '
test_tick && git reset --hard HEAD~2 &&
test -f C &&
test -f A/B/E &&
! test -f F &&
! test -f A/G &&
check_have A B C D E F G H I J K L &&
git prune &&
check_have A B C D E F G H I J K L &&
test_line_count = 5 .git/logs/refs/heads/master
'
test_expect_success 'corrupt and check' '
corrupt $F &&
check_fsck "missing blob $F"
'
test_expect_success 'reflog expire --dry-run should not touch reflog' '
git reflog expire --dry-run \
--expire=$(($test_tick - 10000)) \
--expire-unreachable=$(($test_tick - 10000)) \
--stale-fix \
--all &&
test_line_count = 5 .git/logs/refs/heads/master &&
check_fsck "missing blob $F"
'
test_expect_success 'reflog expire' '
git reflog expire --verbose \
--expire=$(($test_tick - 10000)) \
--expire-unreachable=$(($test_tick - 10000)) \
--stale-fix \
--all &&
test_line_count = 2 .git/logs/refs/heads/master &&
check_fsck "dangling commit $K"
'
test_expect_success 'prune and fsck' '
git prune &&
check_fsck &&
check_have A B C D E H L &&
check_dont_have F G I J K
'
test_expect_success 'recover and check' '
recover $F &&
check_fsck "dangling blob $F"
'
test_expect_success 'delete' '
echo 1 > C &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m rat C &&
echo 2 > C &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m ox C &&
echo 3 > C &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m tiger C &&
HEAD_entry_count=$(git reflog | wc -l) &&
master_entry_count=$(git reflog show master | wc -l) &&
test $HEAD_entry_count = 5 &&
test $master_entry_count = 5 &&
git reflog delete master@{1} &&
git reflog show master > output &&
test $(($master_entry_count - 1)) = $(wc -l < output) &&
test $HEAD_entry_count = $(git reflog | wc -l) &&
! grep ox < output &&
master_entry_count=$(wc -l < output) &&
git reflog delete HEAD@{1} &&
test $(($HEAD_entry_count -1)) = $(git reflog | wc -l) &&
test $master_entry_count = $(git reflog show master | wc -l) &&
HEAD_entry_count=$(git reflog | wc -l) &&
git reflog delete master@{07.04.2005.15:15:00.-0700} &&
git reflog show master > output &&
test $(($master_entry_count - 1)) = $(wc -l < output) &&
! grep dragon < output
'
test_expect_success 'rewind2' '
test_tick && git reset --hard HEAD~2 &&
test_line_count = 4 .git/logs/refs/heads/master
'
test_expect_success '--expire=never' '
git reflog expire --verbose \
--expire=never \
--expire-unreachable=never \
--all &&
test_line_count = 4 .git/logs/refs/heads/master
'
test_expect_success 'gc.reflogexpire=never' '
git config gc.reflogexpire never &&
git config gc.reflogexpireunreachable never &&
git reflog expire --verbose --all &&
test_line_count = 4 .git/logs/refs/heads/master
'
test_expect_success 'gc.reflogexpire=false' '
git config gc.reflogexpire false &&
git config gc.reflogexpireunreachable false &&
git reflog expire --verbose --all &&
test_line_count = 4 .git/logs/refs/heads/master &&
git config --unset gc.reflogexpire &&
git config --unset gc.reflogexpireunreachable
'
test_expect_success 'checkout should not delete log for packed ref' '
test $(git reflog master | wc -l) = 4 &&
git branch foo &&
git pack-refs --all &&
git checkout foo &&
test $(git reflog master | wc -l) = 4
'
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'stale dirs do not cause d/f conflicts (reflogs on)' '
test_when_finished "git branch -d one || git branch -d one/two" &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
git branch one/two master &&
echo "one/two@{0} branch: Created from master" >expect &&
git log -g --format="%gd %gs" one/two >actual &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
test_cmp expect actual &&
git branch -d one/two &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
# now logs/refs/heads/one is a stale directory, but
# we should move it out of the way to create "one" reflog
git branch one master &&
echo "one@{0} branch: Created from master" >expect &&
git log -g --format="%gd %gs" one >actual &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'stale dirs do not cause d/f conflicts (reflogs off)' '
test_when_finished "git branch -d one || git branch -d one/two" &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
git branch one/two master &&
echo "one/two@{0} branch: Created from master" >expect &&
git log -g --format="%gd %gs" one/two >actual &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
test_cmp expect actual &&
git branch -d one/two &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
# same as before, but we only create a reflog for "one" if
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
# it already exists, which it does not
git -c core.logallrefupdates=false branch one master &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
: >expect &&
git log -g --format="%gd %gs" one >actual &&
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not we actually update the reflog: 1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to it. 2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new reflog file if necessary. We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file, either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates). If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened. If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog already, and we were not told to make a new one). If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar", it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our open. So far so good. But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT, EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we should silently return success (we were not told to create it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and we fail to update the ref at all. Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch, but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT case). Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT). The first one already worked, of course. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-04 14:24:53 +01:00
test_cmp expect actual
'
# Triggering the bug detected by this test requires a newline to fall
# exactly BUFSIZ-1 bytes from the end of the file. We don't know
# what that value is, since it's platform dependent. However, if
# we choose some value N, we also catch any D which divides N evenly
# (since we will read backwards in chunks of D). So we choose 8K,
# which catches glibc (with an 8K BUFSIZ) and *BSD (1K).
#
# Each line is 114 characters, so we need 75 to still have a few before the
# last 8K. The 89-character padding on the final entry lines up our
# newline exactly.
test_expect_success 'parsing reverse reflogs at BUFSIZ boundaries' '
git checkout -b reflogskip &&
z38=00000000000000000000000000000000000000 &&
ident="abc <xyz> 0000000001 +0000" &&
for i in $(test_seq 1 75); do
printf "$z38%02d $z38%02d %s\t" $i $(($i+1)) "$ident" &&
if test $i = 75; then
for j in $(test_seq 1 89); do
printf X
done
else
printf X
fi &&
printf "\n"
done >.git/logs/refs/heads/reflogskip &&
git rev-parse reflogskip@{73} >actual &&
echo ${z38}03 >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_done