Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Recursive Merge algorithm stolen from git-merge-recursive.py by
|
|
|
|
* Fredrik Kuivinen.
|
|
|
|
* The thieves were Alex Riesen and Johannes Schindelin, in June/July 2006
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "cache.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "cache-tree.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "commit.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "blob.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "tree-walk.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "diff.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "diffcore.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "run-command.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "tag.h"
|
2006-07-30 20:27:10 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "unpack-trees.h"
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "path-list.h"
|
2006-11-29 21:07:37 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "xdiff-interface.h"
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "interpolate.h"
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "attr.h"
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-16 01:32:45 +01:00
|
|
|
static int subtree_merge;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct tree *shift_tree_object(struct tree *one, struct tree *two)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned char shifted[20];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* NEEDSWORK: this limits the recursion depth to hardcoded
|
|
|
|
* value '2' to avoid excessive overhead.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
shift_tree(one->object.sha1, two->object.sha1, shifted, 2);
|
|
|
|
if (!hashcmp(two->object.sha1, shifted))
|
|
|
|
return two;
|
|
|
|
return lookup_tree(shifted);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* A virtual commit has
|
|
|
|
* - (const char *)commit->util set to the name, and
|
|
|
|
* - *(int *)commit->object.sha1 set to the virtual id.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static unsigned commit_list_count(const struct commit_list *l)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned c = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (; l; l = l->next )
|
|
|
|
c++;
|
|
|
|
return c;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct commit *make_virtual_commit(struct tree *tree, const char *comment)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct commit *commit = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct commit));
|
|
|
|
static unsigned virtual_id = 1;
|
|
|
|
commit->tree = tree;
|
|
|
|
commit->util = (void*)comment;
|
|
|
|
*(int*)commit->object.sha1 = virtual_id++;
|
2006-07-31 12:42:35 +02:00
|
|
|
/* avoid warnings */
|
|
|
|
commit->object.parsed = 1;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return commit;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2006-07-27 19:14:17 +02:00
|
|
|
* Since we use get_tree_entry(), which does not put the read object into
|
|
|
|
* the object pool, we cannot rely on a == b.
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int sha_eq(const unsigned char *a, const unsigned char *b)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!a && !b)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return 2;
|
2006-08-23 23:31:20 +02:00
|
|
|
return a && b && hashcmp(a, b) == 0;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2006-07-27 19:14:17 +02:00
|
|
|
* Since we want to write the index eventually, we cannot reuse the index
|
|
|
|
* for these (temporary) data.
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct stage_data
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned mode;
|
|
|
|
unsigned char sha[20];
|
|
|
|
} stages[4];
|
|
|
|
unsigned processed:1;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct path_list current_file_set = {NULL, 0, 0, 1};
|
|
|
|
static struct path_list current_directory_set = {NULL, 0, 0, 1};
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-14 06:28:33 +01:00
|
|
|
static int call_depth = 0;
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
static int verbosity = 2;
|
2007-09-25 08:36:38 +02:00
|
|
|
static int rename_limit = -1;
|
2007-01-14 06:28:53 +01:00
|
|
|
static int buffer_output = 1;
|
nfv?asprintf are broken without va_copy, workaround them.
* drop nfasprintf.
* move nfvasprintf into imap-send.c back, and let it work on a 8k buffer,
and die() in case of overflow. It should be enough for imap commands, if
someone cares about imap-send, he's welcomed to fix it properly.
* replace nfvasprintf use in merge-recursive with a copy of the strbuf_addf
logic, it's one place, we'll live with it.
To ease the change, output_buffer string list is replaced with a strbuf ;)
* rework trace.c to call vsnprintf itself. It's used to format strerror()s
and git command names, it should never be more than a few octets long, let
it work on a 8k static buffer with vsnprintf or die loudly.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
2007-09-20 10:43:11 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct strbuf obuf = STRBUF_INIT;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
nfv?asprintf are broken without va_copy, workaround them.
* drop nfasprintf.
* move nfvasprintf into imap-send.c back, and let it work on a 8k buffer,
and die() in case of overflow. It should be enough for imap commands, if
someone cares about imap-send, he's welcomed to fix it properly.
* replace nfvasprintf use in merge-recursive with a copy of the strbuf_addf
logic, it's one place, we'll live with it.
To ease the change, output_buffer string list is replaced with a strbuf ;)
* rework trace.c to call vsnprintf itself. It's used to format strerror()s
and git command names, it should never be more than a few octets long, let
it work on a 8k static buffer with vsnprintf or die loudly.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
2007-09-20 10:43:11 +02:00
|
|
|
static int show(int v)
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (!call_depth && verbosity >= v) || verbosity >= 5;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
nfv?asprintf are broken without va_copy, workaround them.
* drop nfasprintf.
* move nfvasprintf into imap-send.c back, and let it work on a 8k buffer,
and die() in case of overflow. It should be enough for imap commands, if
someone cares about imap-send, he's welcomed to fix it properly.
* replace nfvasprintf use in merge-recursive with a copy of the strbuf_addf
logic, it's one place, we'll live with it.
To ease the change, output_buffer string list is replaced with a strbuf ;)
* rework trace.c to call vsnprintf itself. It's used to format strerror()s
and git command names, it should never be more than a few octets long, let
it work on a 8k static buffer with vsnprintf or die loudly.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
2007-09-20 10:43:11 +02:00
|
|
|
static void flush_output(void)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
nfv?asprintf are broken without va_copy, workaround them.
* drop nfasprintf.
* move nfvasprintf into imap-send.c back, and let it work on a 8k buffer,
and die() in case of overflow. It should be enough for imap commands, if
someone cares about imap-send, he's welcomed to fix it properly.
* replace nfvasprintf use in merge-recursive with a copy of the strbuf_addf
logic, it's one place, we'll live with it.
To ease the change, output_buffer string list is replaced with a strbuf ;)
* rework trace.c to call vsnprintf itself. It's used to format strerror()s
and git command names, it should never be more than a few octets long, let
it work on a 8k static buffer with vsnprintf or die loudly.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
2007-09-20 10:43:11 +02:00
|
|
|
if (obuf.len) {
|
|
|
|
fputs(obuf.buf, stdout);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_reset(&obuf);
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
nfv?asprintf are broken without va_copy, workaround them.
* drop nfasprintf.
* move nfvasprintf into imap-send.c back, and let it work on a 8k buffer,
and die() in case of overflow. It should be enough for imap commands, if
someone cares about imap-send, he's welcomed to fix it properly.
* replace nfvasprintf use in merge-recursive with a copy of the strbuf_addf
logic, it's one place, we'll live with it.
To ease the change, output_buffer string list is replaced with a strbuf ;)
* rework trace.c to call vsnprintf itself. It's used to format strerror()s
and git command names, it should never be more than a few octets long, let
it work on a 8k static buffer with vsnprintf or die loudly.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
2007-09-20 10:43:11 +02:00
|
|
|
static void output(int v, const char *fmt, ...)
|
2007-01-14 06:28:53 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
nfv?asprintf are broken without va_copy, workaround them.
* drop nfasprintf.
* move nfvasprintf into imap-send.c back, and let it work on a 8k buffer,
and die() in case of overflow. It should be enough for imap commands, if
someone cares about imap-send, he's welcomed to fix it properly.
* replace nfvasprintf use in merge-recursive with a copy of the strbuf_addf
logic, it's one place, we'll live with it.
To ease the change, output_buffer string list is replaced with a strbuf ;)
* rework trace.c to call vsnprintf itself. It's used to format strerror()s
and git command names, it should never be more than a few octets long, let
it work on a 8k static buffer with vsnprintf or die loudly.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
2007-09-20 10:43:11 +02:00
|
|
|
int len;
|
|
|
|
va_list ap;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!show(v))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strbuf_grow(&obuf, call_depth * 2 + 2);
|
|
|
|
memset(obuf.buf + obuf.len, ' ', call_depth * 2);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_setlen(&obuf, obuf.len + call_depth * 2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
va_start(ap, fmt);
|
|
|
|
len = vsnprintf(obuf.buf + obuf.len, strbuf_avail(&obuf), fmt, ap);
|
|
|
|
va_end(ap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (len < 0)
|
|
|
|
len = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (len >= strbuf_avail(&obuf)) {
|
|
|
|
strbuf_grow(&obuf, len + 2);
|
|
|
|
va_start(ap, fmt);
|
|
|
|
len = vsnprintf(obuf.buf + obuf.len, strbuf_avail(&obuf), fmt, ap);
|
|
|
|
va_end(ap);
|
|
|
|
if (len >= strbuf_avail(&obuf)) {
|
|
|
|
die("this should not happen, your snprintf is broken");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-01-14 06:28:53 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
nfv?asprintf are broken without va_copy, workaround them.
* drop nfasprintf.
* move nfvasprintf into imap-send.c back, and let it work on a 8k buffer,
and die() in case of overflow. It should be enough for imap commands, if
someone cares about imap-send, he's welcomed to fix it properly.
* replace nfvasprintf use in merge-recursive with a copy of the strbuf_addf
logic, it's one place, we'll live with it.
To ease the change, output_buffer string list is replaced with a strbuf ;)
* rework trace.c to call vsnprintf itself. It's used to format strerror()s
and git command names, it should never be more than a few octets long, let
it work on a 8k static buffer with vsnprintf or die loudly.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
2007-09-20 10:43:11 +02:00
|
|
|
strbuf_setlen(&obuf, obuf.len + len);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_add(&obuf, "\n", 1);
|
|
|
|
if (!buffer_output)
|
|
|
|
flush_output();
|
2007-01-14 06:28:53 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static void output_commit_title(struct commit *commit)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
2007-01-14 06:28:53 +01:00
|
|
|
flush_output();
|
2007-01-14 06:28:33 +01:00
|
|
|
for (i = call_depth; i--;)
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
fputs(" ", stdout);
|
|
|
|
if (commit->util)
|
|
|
|
printf("virtual %s\n", (char *)commit->util);
|
|
|
|
else {
|
2006-10-23 09:36:22 +02:00
|
|
|
printf("%s ", find_unique_abbrev(commit->object.sha1, DEFAULT_ABBREV));
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (parse_commit(commit) != 0)
|
|
|
|
printf("(bad commit)\n");
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
const char *s;
|
|
|
|
int len;
|
|
|
|
for (s = commit->buffer; *s; s++)
|
|
|
|
if (*s == '\n' && s[1] == '\n') {
|
|
|
|
s += 2;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (len = 0; s[len] && '\n' != s[len]; len++)
|
|
|
|
; /* do nothing */
|
|
|
|
printf("%.*s\n", len, s);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
static int add_cacheinfo(unsigned int mode, const unsigned char *sha1,
|
|
|
|
const char *path, int stage, int refresh, int options)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct cache_entry *ce;
|
|
|
|
ce = make_cache_entry(mode, sha1 ? sha1 : null_sha1, path, stage, refresh);
|
|
|
|
if (!ce)
|
2007-04-02 06:13:27 +02:00
|
|
|
return error("addinfo_cache failed for path '%s'", path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return add_cache_entry(ce, options);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This is a global variable which is used in a number of places but
|
|
|
|
* only written to in the 'merge' function.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* index_only == 1 => Don't leave any non-stage 0 entries in the cache and
|
|
|
|
* don't update the working directory.
|
|
|
|
* 0 => Leave unmerged entries in the cache and update
|
|
|
|
* the working directory.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int index_only = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-10 07:21:29 +02:00
|
|
|
static void init_tree_desc_from_tree(struct tree_desc *desc, struct tree *tree)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
parse_tree(tree);
|
|
|
|
init_tree_desc(desc, tree->buffer, tree->size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-30 20:27:10 +02:00
|
|
|
static int git_merge_trees(int index_only,
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct tree *common,
|
|
|
|
struct tree *head,
|
|
|
|
struct tree *merge)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int rc;
|
2007-08-10 07:21:29 +02:00
|
|
|
struct tree_desc t[3];
|
2006-07-30 20:27:10 +02:00
|
|
|
struct unpack_trees_options opts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts));
|
|
|
|
if (index_only)
|
|
|
|
opts.index_only = 1;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
opts.update = 1;
|
|
|
|
opts.merge = 1;
|
|
|
|
opts.head_idx = 2;
|
|
|
|
opts.fn = threeway_merge;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-10 07:21:29 +02:00
|
|
|
init_tree_desc_from_tree(t+0, common);
|
|
|
|
init_tree_desc_from_tree(t+1, head);
|
|
|
|
init_tree_desc_from_tree(t+2, merge);
|
2006-07-30 20:27:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-08-10 07:21:29 +02:00
|
|
|
rc = unpack_trees(3, t, &opts);
|
2006-07-30 20:27:10 +02:00
|
|
|
cache_tree_free(&active_cache_tree);
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
static int unmerged_index(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
|
|
|
|
if (ce_stage(ce))
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct tree *git_write_tree(void)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-08-09 15:04:16 +02:00
|
|
|
struct tree *result = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-03-31 13:49:38 +02:00
|
|
|
if (unmerged_index()) {
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
output(0, "There are unmerged index entries:");
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
|
|
|
|
if (ce_stage(ce))
|
|
|
|
output(0, "%d %.*s", ce_stage(ce), ce_namelen(ce), ce->name);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2007-03-31 13:49:38 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-08-09 15:04:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!active_cache_tree)
|
|
|
|
active_cache_tree = cache_tree();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!cache_tree_fully_valid(active_cache_tree) &&
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
cache_tree_update(active_cache_tree,
|
|
|
|
active_cache, active_nr, 0, 0) < 0)
|
2006-08-09 15:04:16 +02:00
|
|
|
die("error building trees");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
result = lookup_tree(active_cache_tree->sha1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int save_files_dirs(const unsigned char *sha1,
|
|
|
|
const char *base, int baselen, const char *path,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int mode, int stage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int len = strlen(path);
|
2006-09-01 00:32:39 +02:00
|
|
|
char *newpath = xmalloc(baselen + len + 1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
memcpy(newpath, base, baselen);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(newpath + baselen, path, len);
|
|
|
|
newpath[baselen + len] = '\0';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (S_ISDIR(mode))
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
path_list_insert(newpath, ¤t_directory_set);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
else
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
path_list_insert(newpath, ¤t_file_set);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
free(newpath);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return READ_TREE_RECURSIVE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static int get_files_dirs(struct tree *tree)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int n;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:51 +02:00
|
|
|
if (read_tree_recursive(tree, "", 0, 0, NULL, save_files_dirs) != 0)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
n = current_file_set.nr + current_directory_set.nr;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return n;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2008-01-03 15:18:07 +01:00
|
|
|
* Returns an index_entry instance which doesn't have to correspond to
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
* a real cache entry in Git's index.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct stage_data *insert_stage_data(const char *path,
|
|
|
|
struct tree *o, struct tree *a, struct tree *b,
|
|
|
|
struct path_list *entries)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct path_list_item *item;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct stage_data *e = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct stage_data));
|
|
|
|
get_tree_entry(o->object.sha1, path,
|
|
|
|
e->stages[1].sha, &e->stages[1].mode);
|
|
|
|
get_tree_entry(a->object.sha1, path,
|
|
|
|
e->stages[2].sha, &e->stages[2].mode);
|
|
|
|
get_tree_entry(b->object.sha1, path,
|
|
|
|
e->stages[3].sha, &e->stages[3].mode);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
item = path_list_insert(path, entries);
|
|
|
|
item->util = e;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return e;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
* Create a dictionary mapping file names to stage_data objects. The
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
* dictionary contains one entry for every path with a non-zero stage entry.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct path_list *get_unmerged(void)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct path_list *unmerged = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct path_list));
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unmerged->strdup_paths = 1;
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-20 08:37:18 +02:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct path_list_item *item;
|
|
|
|
struct stage_data *e;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
|
|
|
|
if (!ce_stage(ce))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
item = path_list_lookup(ce->name, unmerged);
|
|
|
|
if (!item) {
|
|
|
|
item = path_list_insert(ce->name, unmerged);
|
|
|
|
item->util = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct stage_data));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
e = item->util;
|
2008-01-15 01:03:17 +01:00
|
|
|
e->stages[ce_stage(ce)].mode = ce->ce_mode;
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(e->stages[ce_stage(ce)].sha, ce->sha1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return unmerged;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct rename
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filepair *pair;
|
|
|
|
struct stage_data *src_entry;
|
|
|
|
struct stage_data *dst_entry;
|
|
|
|
unsigned processed:1;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2007-02-04 05:49:16 +01:00
|
|
|
* Get information of all renames which occurred between 'o_tree' and
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
* 'tree'. We need the three trees in the merge ('o_tree', 'a_tree' and
|
|
|
|
* 'b_tree') to be able to associate the correct cache entries with
|
|
|
|
* the rename information. 'tree' is always equal to either a_tree or b_tree.
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static struct path_list *get_renames(struct tree *tree,
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
struct tree *o_tree,
|
|
|
|
struct tree *a_tree,
|
|
|
|
struct tree *b_tree,
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct path_list *entries)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct path_list *renames;
|
|
|
|
struct diff_options opts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
renames = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct path_list));
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
diff_setup(&opts);
|
2007-11-10 20:05:14 +01:00
|
|
|
DIFF_OPT_SET(&opts, RECURSIVE);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
opts.detect_rename = DIFF_DETECT_RENAME;
|
2007-09-25 08:36:38 +02:00
|
|
|
opts.rename_limit = rename_limit;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
opts.output_format = DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT;
|
|
|
|
if (diff_setup_done(&opts) < 0)
|
|
|
|
die("diff setup failed");
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
diff_tree_sha1(o_tree->object.sha1, tree->object.sha1, "", &opts);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
diffcore_std(&opts);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < diff_queued_diff.nr; ++i) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct path_list_item *item;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct rename *re;
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filepair *pair = diff_queued_diff.queue[i];
|
|
|
|
if (pair->status != 'R') {
|
|
|
|
diff_free_filepair(pair);
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
re = xmalloc(sizeof(*re));
|
|
|
|
re->processed = 0;
|
|
|
|
re->pair = pair;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
item = path_list_lookup(re->pair->one->path, entries);
|
|
|
|
if (!item)
|
|
|
|
re->src_entry = insert_stage_data(re->pair->one->path,
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
o_tree, a_tree, b_tree, entries);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
re->src_entry = item->util;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
item = path_list_lookup(re->pair->two->path, entries);
|
|
|
|
if (!item)
|
|
|
|
re->dst_entry = insert_stage_data(re->pair->two->path,
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
o_tree, a_tree, b_tree, entries);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
re->dst_entry = item->util;
|
|
|
|
item = path_list_insert(pair->one->path, renames);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
item->util = re;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
opts.output_format = DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT;
|
|
|
|
diff_queued_diff.nr = 0;
|
|
|
|
diff_flush(&opts);
|
|
|
|
return renames;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-23 09:46:15 +02:00
|
|
|
static int update_stages(const char *path, struct diff_filespec *o,
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec *a, struct diff_filespec *b,
|
|
|
|
int clear)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int options = ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD | ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_REPLACE;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (clear)
|
|
|
|
if (remove_file_from_cache(path))
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return -1;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (o)
|
|
|
|
if (add_cacheinfo(o->mode, o->sha1, path, 1, 0, options))
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return -1;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (a)
|
|
|
|
if (add_cacheinfo(a->mode, a->sha1, path, 2, 0, options))
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return -1;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (b)
|
|
|
|
if (add_cacheinfo(b->mode, b->sha1, path, 3, 0, options))
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int remove_path(const char *name)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2007-09-16 00:32:36 +02:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
char *slash, *dirs;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret = unlink(name);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2007-09-16 00:32:36 +02:00
|
|
|
dirs = xstrdup(name);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
while ((slash = strrchr(name, '/'))) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*slash = '\0';
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (rmdir(name) != 0)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
free(dirs);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
static int remove_file(int clean, const char *path, int no_wd)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
int update_cache = index_only || clean;
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
int update_working_directory = !index_only && !no_wd;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (update_cache) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
if (remove_file_from_cache(path))
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
if (update_working_directory) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
unlink(path);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (errno != ENOENT || errno != EISDIR)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
remove_path(path);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static char *unique_path(const char *path, const char *branch)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char *newpath = xmalloc(strlen(path) + 1 + strlen(branch) + 8 + 1);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int suffix = 0;
|
|
|
|
struct stat st;
|
2006-07-30 18:35:21 +02:00
|
|
|
char *p = newpath + strlen(path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
strcpy(newpath, path);
|
2006-07-30 18:35:21 +02:00
|
|
|
*(p++) = '~';
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
strcpy(p, branch);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
for (; *p; ++p)
|
|
|
|
if ('/' == *p)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*p = '_';
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
while (path_list_has_path(¤t_file_set, newpath) ||
|
|
|
|
path_list_has_path(¤t_directory_set, newpath) ||
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
lstat(newpath, &st) == 0)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
sprintf(p, "_%d", suffix++);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
path_list_insert(newpath, ¤t_file_set);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return newpath;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static int mkdir_p(const char *path, unsigned long mode)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-09-02 06:16:31 +02:00
|
|
|
/* path points to cache entries, so xstrdup before messing with it */
|
|
|
|
char *buf = xstrdup(path);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int result = safe_create_leading_directories(buf);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
free(buf);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return result;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void flush_buffer(int fd, const char *buf, unsigned long size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
while (size > 0) {
|
2007-01-08 16:58:23 +01:00
|
|
|
long ret = write_in_full(fd, buf, size);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ret < 0) {
|
|
|
|
/* Ignore epipe */
|
|
|
|
if (errno == EPIPE)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
die("merge-recursive: %s", strerror(errno));
|
|
|
|
} else if (!ret) {
|
|
|
|
die("merge-recursive: disk full?");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
size -= ret;
|
|
|
|
buf += ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-20 07:48:21 +02:00
|
|
|
static int make_room_for_path(const char *path)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int status;
|
|
|
|
const char *msg = "failed to create path '%s'%s";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
status = mkdir_p(path, 0777);
|
|
|
|
if (status) {
|
|
|
|
if (status == -3) {
|
|
|
|
/* something else exists */
|
|
|
|
error(msg, path, ": perhaps a D/F conflict?");
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
die(msg, path, "");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Successful unlink is good.. */
|
|
|
|
if (!unlink(path))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
/* .. and so is no existing file */
|
|
|
|
if (errno == ENOENT)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
/* .. but not some other error (who really cares what?) */
|
|
|
|
return error(msg, path, ": perhaps a D/F conflict?");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-23 09:46:15 +02:00
|
|
|
static void update_file_flags(const unsigned char *sha,
|
|
|
|
unsigned mode,
|
|
|
|
const char *path,
|
|
|
|
int update_cache,
|
|
|
|
int update_wd)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (index_only)
|
|
|
|
update_wd = 0;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (update_wd) {
|
2007-02-26 20:55:59 +01:00
|
|
|
enum object_type type;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
void *buf;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long size;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-12-18 20:50:28 +01:00
|
|
|
if (S_ISGITLINK(mode))
|
|
|
|
die("cannot read object %s '%s': It is a submodule!",
|
|
|
|
sha1_to_hex(sha), path);
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-26 20:55:59 +01:00
|
|
|
buf = read_sha1_file(sha, &type, &size);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!buf)
|
|
|
|
die("cannot read object %s '%s'", sha1_to_hex(sha), path);
|
2007-02-26 20:55:59 +01:00
|
|
|
if (type != OBJ_BLOB)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
die("blob expected for %s '%s'", sha1_to_hex(sha), path);
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-20 07:48:21 +02:00
|
|
|
if (make_room_for_path(path) < 0) {
|
|
|
|
update_wd = 0;
|
|
|
|
goto update_index;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-03-03 20:32:46 +01:00
|
|
|
if (S_ISREG(mode) || (!has_symlinks && S_ISLNK(mode))) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int fd;
|
|
|
|
if (mode & 0100)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
mode = 0777;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
mode = 0666;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
fd = open(path, O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT, mode);
|
|
|
|
if (fd < 0)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
die("failed to open %s: %s", path, strerror(errno));
|
|
|
|
flush_buffer(fd, buf, size);
|
|
|
|
close(fd);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} else if (S_ISLNK(mode)) {
|
2007-09-16 00:32:36 +02:00
|
|
|
char *lnk = xmemdupz(buf, size);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
mkdir_p(path, 0777);
|
2007-02-26 03:42:07 +01:00
|
|
|
unlink(path);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
symlink(lnk, path);
|
2007-03-03 20:32:46 +01:00
|
|
|
free(lnk);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else
|
|
|
|
die("do not know what to do with %06o %s '%s'",
|
|
|
|
mode, sha1_to_hex(sha), path);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-04-07 15:41:13 +02:00
|
|
|
update_index:
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (update_cache)
|
|
|
|
add_cacheinfo(mode, sha, path, 0, update_wd, ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-23 09:46:15 +02:00
|
|
|
static void update_file(int clean,
|
|
|
|
const unsigned char *sha,
|
|
|
|
unsigned mode,
|
|
|
|
const char *path)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
update_file_flags(sha, mode, path, index_only || clean, !index_only);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Low level file merging, update and removal */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct merge_file_info
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned char sha[20];
|
|
|
|
unsigned mode;
|
|
|
|
unsigned clean:1,
|
|
|
|
merge:1;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-29 21:07:37 +01:00
|
|
|
static void fill_mm(const unsigned char *sha1, mmfile_t *mm)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long size;
|
2007-02-26 20:55:59 +01:00
|
|
|
enum object_type type;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-13 04:05:39 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!hashcmp(sha1, null_sha1)) {
|
|
|
|
mm->ptr = xstrdup("");
|
|
|
|
mm->size = 0;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-26 20:55:59 +01:00
|
|
|
mm->ptr = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &size);
|
|
|
|
if (!mm->ptr || type != OBJ_BLOB)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
die("unable to read blob object %s", sha1_to_hex(sha1));
|
2006-11-29 21:07:37 +01:00
|
|
|
mm->size = size;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Customizable low-level merge drivers support.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct ll_merge_driver;
|
|
|
|
typedef int (*ll_merge_fn)(const struct ll_merge_driver *,
|
|
|
|
const char *path,
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
mmfile_t *orig,
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src1, const char *name1,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src2, const char *name2,
|
|
|
|
mmbuffer_t *result);
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
struct ll_merge_driver {
|
|
|
|
const char *name;
|
|
|
|
const char *description;
|
|
|
|
ll_merge_fn fn;
|
2007-04-18 21:18:25 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *recursive;
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
struct ll_merge_driver *next;
|
|
|
|
char *cmdline;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Built-in low-levels
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-08-15 00:33:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static int ll_binary_merge(const struct ll_merge_driver *drv_unused,
|
|
|
|
const char *path_unused,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *orig,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src1, const char *name1,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src2, const char *name2,
|
|
|
|
mmbuffer_t *result)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The tentative merge result is "ours" for the final round,
|
|
|
|
* or common ancestor for an internal merge. Still return
|
|
|
|
* "conflicted merge" status.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *stolen = index_only ? orig : src1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
result->ptr = stolen->ptr;
|
|
|
|
result->size = stolen->size;
|
|
|
|
stolen->ptr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
static int ll_xdl_merge(const struct ll_merge_driver *drv_unused,
|
|
|
|
const char *path_unused,
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
mmfile_t *orig,
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src1, const char *name1,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src2, const char *name2,
|
|
|
|
mmbuffer_t *result)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
xpparam_t xpp;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-05 04:36:49 +02:00
|
|
|
if (buffer_is_binary(orig->ptr, orig->size) ||
|
2007-08-15 00:33:07 +02:00
|
|
|
buffer_is_binary(src1->ptr, src1->size) ||
|
|
|
|
buffer_is_binary(src2->ptr, src2->size)) {
|
|
|
|
warning("Cannot merge binary files: %s vs. %s\n",
|
2007-06-05 04:36:49 +02:00
|
|
|
name1, name2);
|
2007-08-15 00:33:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return ll_binary_merge(drv_unused, path_unused,
|
|
|
|
orig, src1, name1,
|
|
|
|
src2, name2,
|
|
|
|
result);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-06-05 04:36:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
memset(&xpp, 0, sizeof(xpp));
|
|
|
|
return xdl_merge(orig,
|
|
|
|
src1, name1,
|
|
|
|
src2, name2,
|
|
|
|
&xpp, XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS,
|
|
|
|
result);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
static int ll_union_merge(const struct ll_merge_driver *drv_unused,
|
|
|
|
const char *path_unused,
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
mmfile_t *orig,
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src1, const char *name1,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src2, const char *name2,
|
|
|
|
mmbuffer_t *result)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char *src, *dst;
|
|
|
|
long size;
|
|
|
|
const int marker_size = 7;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
int status = ll_xdl_merge(drv_unused, path_unused,
|
|
|
|
orig, src1, NULL, src2, NULL, result);
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
if (status <= 0)
|
|
|
|
return status;
|
|
|
|
size = result->size;
|
|
|
|
src = dst = result->ptr;
|
|
|
|
while (size) {
|
|
|
|
char ch;
|
|
|
|
if ((marker_size < size) &&
|
|
|
|
(*src == '<' || *src == '=' || *src == '>')) {
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
ch = *src;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < marker_size; i++)
|
|
|
|
if (src[i] != ch)
|
|
|
|
goto not_a_marker;
|
|
|
|
if (src[marker_size] != '\n')
|
|
|
|
goto not_a_marker;
|
|
|
|
src += marker_size + 1;
|
|
|
|
size -= marker_size + 1;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
not_a_marker:
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
ch = *src++;
|
|
|
|
*dst++ = ch;
|
|
|
|
size--;
|
|
|
|
} while (ch != '\n' && size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result->size = dst - result->ptr;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
#define LL_BINARY_MERGE 0
|
|
|
|
#define LL_TEXT_MERGE 1
|
|
|
|
#define LL_UNION_MERGE 2
|
|
|
|
static struct ll_merge_driver ll_merge_drv[] = {
|
|
|
|
{ "binary", "built-in binary merge", ll_binary_merge },
|
|
|
|
{ "text", "built-in 3-way text merge", ll_xdl_merge },
|
|
|
|
{ "union", "built-in union merge", ll_union_merge },
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
static void create_temp(mmfile_t *src, char *path)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int fd;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strcpy(path, ".merge_file_XXXXXX");
|
2007-08-14 21:45:58 +02:00
|
|
|
fd = xmkstemp(path);
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
if (write_in_full(fd, src->ptr, src->size) != src->size)
|
|
|
|
die("unable to write temp-file");
|
|
|
|
close(fd);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* User defined low-level merge driver support.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int ll_ext_merge(const struct ll_merge_driver *fn,
|
|
|
|
const char *path,
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
mmfile_t *orig,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src1, const char *name1,
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t *src2, const char *name2,
|
|
|
|
mmbuffer_t *result)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char temp[3][50];
|
|
|
|
char cmdbuf[2048];
|
|
|
|
struct interp table[] = {
|
|
|
|
{ "%O" },
|
|
|
|
{ "%A" },
|
|
|
|
{ "%B" },
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct child_process child;
|
|
|
|
const char *args[20];
|
|
|
|
int status, fd, i;
|
|
|
|
struct stat st;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 04:05:57 +02:00
|
|
|
if (fn->cmdline == NULL)
|
|
|
|
die("custom merge driver %s lacks command line.", fn->name);
|
|
|
|
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
result->ptr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
result->size = 0;
|
|
|
|
create_temp(orig, temp[0]);
|
|
|
|
create_temp(src1, temp[1]);
|
|
|
|
create_temp(src2, temp[2]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interp_set_entry(table, 0, temp[0]);
|
|
|
|
interp_set_entry(table, 1, temp[1]);
|
|
|
|
interp_set_entry(table, 2, temp[2]);
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
output(1, "merging %s using %s", path,
|
|
|
|
fn->description ? fn->description : fn->name);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interpolate(cmdbuf, sizeof(cmdbuf), fn->cmdline, table, 3);
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&child, 0, sizeof(child));
|
|
|
|
child.argv = args;
|
|
|
|
args[0] = "sh";
|
|
|
|
args[1] = "-c";
|
|
|
|
args[2] = cmdbuf;
|
|
|
|
args[3] = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
status = run_command(&child);
|
|
|
|
if (status < -ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK)
|
|
|
|
; /* failure in run-command */
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
status = -status;
|
|
|
|
fd = open(temp[1], O_RDONLY);
|
|
|
|
if (fd < 0)
|
|
|
|
goto bad;
|
|
|
|
if (fstat(fd, &st))
|
|
|
|
goto close_bad;
|
|
|
|
result->size = st.st_size;
|
|
|
|
result->ptr = xmalloc(result->size + 1);
|
|
|
|
if (read_in_full(fd, result->ptr, result->size) != result->size) {
|
|
|
|
free(result->ptr);
|
|
|
|
result->ptr = NULL;
|
|
|
|
result->size = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
close_bad:
|
|
|
|
close(fd);
|
|
|
|
bad:
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
|
|
|
|
unlink(temp[i]);
|
|
|
|
return status;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* merge.default and merge.driver configuration items
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct ll_merge_driver *ll_user_merge, **ll_user_merge_tail;
|
2007-04-18 10:47:21 +02:00
|
|
|
static const char *default_ll_merge;
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int read_merge_config(const char *var, const char *value)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
struct ll_merge_driver *fn;
|
|
|
|
const char *ep, *name;
|
|
|
|
int namelen;
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 10:47:21 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(var, "merge.default")) {
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
if (value)
|
|
|
|
default_ll_merge = strdup(value);
|
2007-04-18 10:47:21 +02:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We are not interested in anything but "merge.<name>.variable";
|
|
|
|
* especially, we do not want to look at variables such as
|
|
|
|
* "merge.summary", "merge.tool", and "merge.verbosity".
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-04-19 04:05:57 +02:00
|
|
|
if (prefixcmp(var, "merge.") || (ep = strrchr(var, '.')) == var + 5)
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
* Find existing one as we might be processing merge.<name>.var2
|
|
|
|
* after seeing merge.<name>.var1.
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
name = var + 6;
|
|
|
|
namelen = ep - name;
|
|
|
|
for (fn = ll_user_merge; fn; fn = fn->next)
|
|
|
|
if (!strncmp(fn->name, name, namelen) && !fn->name[namelen])
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (!fn) {
|
|
|
|
fn = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ll_merge_driver));
|
2007-09-16 00:32:36 +02:00
|
|
|
fn->name = xmemdupz(name, namelen);
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
fn->fn = ll_ext_merge;
|
|
|
|
*ll_user_merge_tail = fn;
|
2007-04-21 09:05:31 +02:00
|
|
|
ll_user_merge_tail = &(fn->next);
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ep++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp("name", ep)) {
|
|
|
|
if (!value)
|
|
|
|
return error("%s: lacks value", var);
|
|
|
|
fn->description = strdup(value);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp("driver", ep)) {
|
|
|
|
if (!value)
|
|
|
|
return error("%s: lacks value", var);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* merge.<name>.driver specifies the command line:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* command-line
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The command-line will be interpolated with the following
|
|
|
|
* tokens and is given to the shell:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* %O - temporary file name for the merge base.
|
|
|
|
* %A - temporary file name for our version.
|
|
|
|
* %B - temporary file name for the other branches' version.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The external merge driver should write the results in the
|
|
|
|
* file named by %A, and signal that it has done with zero exit
|
|
|
|
* status.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
fn->cmdline = strdup(value);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 21:18:25 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!strcmp("recursive", ep)) {
|
|
|
|
if (!value)
|
|
|
|
return error("%s: lacks value", var);
|
|
|
|
fn->recursive = strdup(value);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void initialize_ll_merge(void)
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ll_user_merge_tail)
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
ll_user_merge_tail = &ll_user_merge;
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
git_config(read_merge_config);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 01:16:37 +02:00
|
|
|
static const struct ll_merge_driver *find_ll_merge_driver(const char *merge_attr)
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
struct ll_merge_driver *fn;
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *name;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
initialize_ll_merge();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ATTR_TRUE(merge_attr))
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
return &ll_merge_drv[LL_TEXT_MERGE];
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
else if (ATTR_FALSE(merge_attr))
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
return &ll_merge_drv[LL_BINARY_MERGE];
|
2007-04-18 10:47:21 +02:00
|
|
|
else if (ATTR_UNSET(merge_attr)) {
|
|
|
|
if (!default_ll_merge)
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
return &ll_merge_drv[LL_TEXT_MERGE];
|
2007-04-18 10:47:21 +02:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
name = default_ll_merge;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Custom low-level merge driver support.
This allows users to specify custom low-level merge driver per
path, using the attributes mechanism. Just like you can specify
one of built-in "text", "binary", "union" low-level merge
drivers by saying:
* merge=text
.gitignore merge=union
*.jpg merge=binary
pick a name of your favorite merge driver, and assign it as the
value of the 'merge' attribute.
A custom low-level merge driver is defined via the config
mechanism. This patch introduces 'merge.driver', a multi-valued
configuration. Its value is the name (i.e. the one you use as
the value of 'merge' attribute) followed by a command line
specification. The command line can contain %O, %A, and %B to
be interpolated with the names of temporary files that hold the
common ancestor version, the version from your branch, and the
version from the other branch, and the resulting command is
spawned.
The low-level merge driver is expected to update the temporary
file for your branch (i.e. %A) with the result and exit with
status 0 for a clean merge, and non-zero status for a conflicted
merge.
A new test in t6026 demonstrates a sample usage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-18 07:51:45 +02:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
name = merge_attr;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
for (fn = ll_user_merge; fn; fn = fn->next)
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(fn->name, name))
|
|
|
|
return fn;
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ll_merge_drv); i++)
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(ll_merge_drv[i].name, name))
|
|
|
|
return &ll_merge_drv[i];
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* default to the 3-way */
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
return &ll_merge_drv[LL_TEXT_MERGE];
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 01:16:37 +02:00
|
|
|
static const char *git_path_check_merge(const char *path)
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
static struct git_attr_check attr_merge_check;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!attr_merge_check.attr)
|
|
|
|
attr_merge_check.attr = git_attr("merge", 5);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (git_checkattr(path, 1, &attr_merge_check))
|
2007-04-19 01:16:37 +02:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
return attr_merge_check.value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-17 06:58:01 +02:00
|
|
|
static int ll_merge(mmbuffer_t *result_buf,
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec *o,
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec *a,
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec *b,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch1,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch2)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
mmfile_t orig, src1, src2;
|
|
|
|
char *name1, *name2;
|
|
|
|
int merge_status;
|
2007-04-19 01:16:37 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *ll_driver_name;
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
const struct ll_merge_driver *driver;
|
2007-04-17 06:58:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
name1 = xstrdup(mkpath("%s:%s", branch1, a->path));
|
|
|
|
name2 = xstrdup(mkpath("%s:%s", branch2, b->path));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fill_mm(o->sha1, &orig);
|
|
|
|
fill_mm(a->sha1, &src1);
|
|
|
|
fill_mm(b->sha1, &src2);
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 01:16:37 +02:00
|
|
|
ll_driver_name = git_path_check_merge(a->path);
|
|
|
|
driver = find_ll_merge_driver(ll_driver_name);
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 04:22:57 +02:00
|
|
|
if (index_only && driver->recursive)
|
|
|
|
driver = find_ll_merge_driver(driver->recursive);
|
2007-04-18 20:27:32 +02:00
|
|
|
merge_status = driver->fn(driver, a->path,
|
|
|
|
&orig, &src1, name1, &src2, name2,
|
|
|
|
result_buf);
|
Allow specifying specialized merge-backend per path.
This allows 'merge' attribute to control how the file-level
three-way merge is done per path.
- If you set 'merge' to true, leave it unspecified, or set it
to "text", we use the built-in 3-way xdl-merge.
- If you set 'merge' to false, or set it to "binary, the
"binary" merge is done. The merge result is the blob from
'our' tree, but this still leaves the path conflicted, so
that the mess can be sorted out by the user. This is
obviously meant to be useful for binary files.
- 'merge=union' (this is the first example of a string valued
attribute, introduced in the previous one) uses the "union"
merge. The "union" merge takes lines in conflicted hunks
from both sides, which is useful for line-oriented files such
as .gitignore.
Instead fo setting merge to 'true' or 'false' by using 'merge'
or '-merge', setting it explicitly to "text" or "binary" will
become useful once we start allowing custom per-path backends to
be added, and allow them to be activated for the default
(i.e. 'merge' attribute specified to 'true' or 'false') case,
using some other mechanisms. Setting merge attribute to "text"
or "binary" will be a way to explicitly request to override such
a custom default for selected paths.
Currently there is no way to specify random programs but it
should be trivial for motivated contributors to add later.
There is one caveat, though. ll_merge() is called for both
internal ancestor merge and the outer "final" merge. I think an
interactive custom per-path merge backend should refrain from
going interactive when performing an internal merge (you can
tell it by checking call_depth) and instead just call either
ll_xdl_merge() if the content is text, or call ll_binary_merge()
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-17 07:59:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-17 06:58:01 +02:00
|
|
|
free(name1);
|
|
|
|
free(name2);
|
|
|
|
free(orig.ptr);
|
|
|
|
free(src1.ptr);
|
|
|
|
free(src2.ptr);
|
|
|
|
return merge_status;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct merge_file_info merge_file(struct diff_filespec *o,
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec *a, struct diff_filespec *b,
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *branch1, const char *branch2)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct merge_file_info result;
|
|
|
|
result.merge = 0;
|
|
|
|
result.clean = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if ((S_IFMT & a->mode) != (S_IFMT & b->mode)) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
result.clean = 0;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (S_ISREG(a->mode)) {
|
|
|
|
result.mode = a->mode;
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(result.sha, a->sha1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
result.mode = b->mode;
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(result.sha, b->sha1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!sha_eq(a->sha1, o->sha1) && !sha_eq(b->sha1, o->sha1))
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
result.merge = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
result.mode = a->mode == o->mode ? b->mode: a->mode;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (sha_eq(a->sha1, o->sha1))
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(result.sha, b->sha1);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
else if (sha_eq(b->sha1, o->sha1))
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(result.sha, a->sha1);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
else if (S_ISREG(a->mode)) {
|
2006-11-29 21:07:37 +01:00
|
|
|
mmbuffer_t result_buf;
|
|
|
|
int merge_status;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-17 06:58:01 +02:00
|
|
|
merge_status = ll_merge(&result_buf, o, a, b,
|
|
|
|
branch1, branch2);
|
2006-11-29 21:07:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ((merge_status < 0) || !result_buf.ptr)
|
|
|
|
die("Failed to execute internal merge");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (write_sha1_file(result_buf.ptr, result_buf.size,
|
|
|
|
blob_type, result.sha))
|
|
|
|
die("Unable to add %s to database",
|
|
|
|
a->path);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free(result_buf.ptr);
|
|
|
|
result.clean = (merge_status == 0);
|
2007-12-10 20:22:05 +01:00
|
|
|
} else if (S_ISGITLINK(a->mode)) {
|
|
|
|
result.clean = 0;
|
|
|
|
hashcpy(result.sha, a->sha1);
|
|
|
|
} else if (S_ISLNK(a->mode)) {
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(result.sha, a->sha1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!sha_eq(a->sha1, b->sha1))
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
result.clean = 0;
|
2007-12-10 20:22:05 +01:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
die("unsupported object type in the tree");
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void conflict_rename_rename(struct rename *ren1,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch1,
|
|
|
|
struct rename *ren2,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch2)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char *del[2];
|
|
|
|
int delp = 0;
|
|
|
|
const char *ren1_dst = ren1->pair->two->path;
|
|
|
|
const char *ren2_dst = ren2->pair->two->path;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *dst_name1 = ren1_dst;
|
|
|
|
const char *dst_name2 = ren2_dst;
|
|
|
|
if (path_list_has_path(¤t_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
|
|
|
|
dst_name1 = del[delp++] = unique_path(ren1_dst, branch1);
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "%s is a directory in %s added as %s instead",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1_dst, branch2, dst_name1);
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
remove_file(0, ren1_dst, 0);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (path_list_has_path(¤t_directory_set, ren2_dst)) {
|
|
|
|
dst_name2 = del[delp++] = unique_path(ren2_dst, branch2);
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "%s is a directory in %s added as %s instead",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren2_dst, branch1, dst_name2);
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
remove_file(0, ren2_dst, 0);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-03-31 13:49:38 +02:00
|
|
|
if (index_only) {
|
|
|
|
remove_file_from_cache(dst_name1);
|
|
|
|
remove_file_from_cache(dst_name2);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Uncomment to leave the conflicting names in the resulting tree
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* update_file(0, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, dst_name1);
|
|
|
|
* update_file(0, ren2->pair->two->sha1, ren2->pair->two->mode, dst_name2);
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
update_stages(dst_name1, NULL, ren1->pair->two, NULL, 1);
|
|
|
|
update_stages(dst_name2, NULL, NULL, ren2->pair->two, 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
while (delp--)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
free(del[delp]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void conflict_rename_dir(struct rename *ren1,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch1)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
char *new_path = unique_path(ren1->pair->two->path, branch1);
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "Renamed %s to %s instead", ren1->pair->one->path, new_path);
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
remove_file(0, ren1->pair->two->path, 0);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, new_path);
|
|
|
|
free(new_path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void conflict_rename_rename_2(struct rename *ren1,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch1,
|
|
|
|
struct rename *ren2,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch2)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
char *new_path1 = unique_path(ren1->pair->two->path, branch1);
|
|
|
|
char *new_path2 = unique_path(ren2->pair->two->path, branch2);
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "Renamed %s to %s and %s to %s instead",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1->pair->one->path, new_path1,
|
|
|
|
ren2->pair->one->path, new_path2);
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
remove_file(0, ren1->pair->two->path, 0);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, new_path1);
|
|
|
|
update_file(0, ren2->pair->two->sha1, ren2->pair->two->mode, new_path2);
|
|
|
|
free(new_path2);
|
|
|
|
free(new_path1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
static int process_renames(struct path_list *a_renames,
|
|
|
|
struct path_list *b_renames,
|
|
|
|
const char *a_branch,
|
|
|
|
const char *b_branch)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
int clean_merge = 1, i, j;
|
|
|
|
struct path_list a_by_dst = {NULL, 0, 0, 0}, b_by_dst = {NULL, 0, 0, 0};
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
const struct rename *sre;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < a_renames->nr; i++) {
|
|
|
|
sre = a_renames->items[i].util;
|
|
|
|
path_list_insert(sre->pair->two->path, &a_by_dst)->util
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
= sre->dst_entry;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < b_renames->nr; i++) {
|
|
|
|
sre = b_renames->items[i].util;
|
|
|
|
path_list_insert(sre->pair->two->path, &b_by_dst)->util
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
= sre->dst_entry;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < a_renames->nr || j < b_renames->nr;) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int compare;
|
|
|
|
char *src;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct path_list *renames1, *renames2, *renames2Dst;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct rename *ren1 = NULL, *ren2 = NULL;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *branch1, *branch2;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *ren1_src, *ren1_dst;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (i >= a_renames->nr) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
compare = 1;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren2 = b_renames->items[j++].util;
|
|
|
|
} else if (j >= b_renames->nr) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
compare = -1;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1 = a_renames->items[i++].util;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
compare = strcmp(a_renames->items[i].path,
|
|
|
|
b_renames->items[j].path);
|
2006-08-04 18:21:41 +02:00
|
|
|
if (compare <= 0)
|
|
|
|
ren1 = a_renames->items[i++].util;
|
|
|
|
if (compare >= 0)
|
|
|
|
ren2 = b_renames->items[j++].util;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/* TODO: refactor, so that 1/2 are not needed */
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ren1) {
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
renames1 = a_renames;
|
|
|
|
renames2 = b_renames;
|
|
|
|
renames2Dst = &b_by_dst;
|
|
|
|
branch1 = a_branch;
|
|
|
|
branch2 = b_branch;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct rename *tmp;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
renames1 = b_renames;
|
|
|
|
renames2 = a_renames;
|
|
|
|
renames2Dst = &a_by_dst;
|
|
|
|
branch1 = b_branch;
|
|
|
|
branch2 = a_branch;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
tmp = ren2;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
ren2 = ren1;
|
|
|
|
ren1 = tmp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
src = ren1->pair->one->path;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ren1->dst_entry->processed = 1;
|
|
|
|
ren1->src_entry->processed = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ren1->processed)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
ren1->processed = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1_src = ren1->pair->one->path;
|
|
|
|
ren1_dst = ren1->pair->two->path;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ren2) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *ren2_src = ren2->pair->one->path;
|
|
|
|
const char *ren2_dst = ren2->pair->two->path;
|
|
|
|
/* Renamed in 1 and renamed in 2 */
|
|
|
|
if (strcmp(ren1_src, ren2_src) != 0)
|
|
|
|
die("ren1.src != ren2.src");
|
|
|
|
ren2->dst_entry->processed = 1;
|
|
|
|
ren2->processed = 1;
|
|
|
|
if (strcmp(ren1_dst, ren2_dst) != 0) {
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): "
|
2007-03-31 13:49:38 +02:00
|
|
|
"Rename \"%s\"->\"%s\" in branch \"%s\" "
|
|
|
|
"rename \"%s\"->\"%s\" in \"%s\"%s",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
src, ren1_dst, branch1,
|
2007-03-31 13:49:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src, ren2_dst, branch2,
|
|
|
|
index_only ? " (left unresolved)": "");
|
|
|
|
if (index_only) {
|
|
|
|
remove_file_from_cache(src);
|
|
|
|
update_file(0, ren1->pair->one->sha1,
|
|
|
|
ren1->pair->one->mode, src);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
conflict_rename_rename(ren1, branch1, ren2, branch2);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
struct merge_file_info mfi;
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
remove_file(1, ren1_src, 1);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
mfi = merge_file(ren1->pair->one,
|
|
|
|
ren1->pair->two,
|
|
|
|
ren2->pair->two,
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
branch1,
|
|
|
|
branch2);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (mfi.merge || !mfi.clean)
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "Renamed %s->%s", src, ren1_dst);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (mfi.merge)
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(2, "Auto-merged %s", ren1_dst);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!mfi.clean) {
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (content): merge conflict in %s",
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1_dst);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!index_only)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
update_stages(ren1_dst,
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1->pair->one,
|
|
|
|
ren1->pair->two,
|
|
|
|
ren2->pair->two,
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
1 /* clear */);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
update_file(mfi.clean, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, ren1_dst);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* Renamed in 1, maybe changed in 2 */
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct path_list_item *item;
|
|
|
|
/* we only use sha1 and mode of these */
|
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec src_other, dst_other;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
int try_merge, stage = a_renames == renames1 ? 3: 2;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-04 06:45:54 +01:00
|
|
|
remove_file(1, ren1_src, index_only || stage == 3);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-23 23:31:20 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(src_other.sha1, ren1->src_entry->stages[stage].sha);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
src_other.mode = ren1->src_entry->stages[stage].mode;
|
2006-08-23 23:31:20 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(dst_other.sha1, ren1->dst_entry->stages[stage].sha);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
dst_other.mode = ren1->dst_entry->stages[stage].mode;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
try_merge = 0;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (path_list_has_path(¤t_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
|
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/directory): Renamed %s->%s in %s "
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
" directory %s added in %s",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
|
|
|
|
ren1_dst, branch2);
|
|
|
|
conflict_rename_dir(ren1, branch1);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} else if (sha_eq(src_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/delete): Renamed %s->%s in %s "
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
"and deleted in %s",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
|
|
|
|
branch2);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, ren1_dst);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} else if (!sha_eq(dst_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *new_path;
|
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
|
|
|
try_merge = 1;
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/add): Renamed %s->%s in %s. "
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
"%s added in %s",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
|
|
|
|
ren1_dst, branch2);
|
|
|
|
new_path = unique_path(ren1_dst, branch2);
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "Added as %s instead", new_path);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, dst_other.sha1, dst_other.mode, new_path);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} else if ((item = path_list_lookup(ren1_dst, renames2Dst))) {
|
|
|
|
ren2 = item->util;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
ren2->processed = 1;
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): Renamed %s->%s in %s. "
|
|
|
|
"Renamed %s->%s in %s",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
|
|
|
|
ren2->pair->one->path, ren2->pair->two->path, branch2);
|
|
|
|
conflict_rename_rename_2(ren1, branch1, ren2, branch2);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
try_merge = 1;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (try_merge) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec *o, *a, *b;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct merge_file_info mfi;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
src_other.path = (char *)ren1_src;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o = ren1->pair->one;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (a_renames == renames1) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
a = ren1->pair->two;
|
|
|
|
b = &src_other;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
b = ren1->pair->two;
|
|
|
|
a = &src_other;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mfi = merge_file(o, a, b,
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
a_branch, b_branch);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-04-26 21:13:49 +02:00
|
|
|
if (mfi.clean &&
|
2007-04-25 22:06:59 +02:00
|
|
|
sha_eq(mfi.sha, ren1->pair->two->sha1) &&
|
|
|
|
mfi.mode == ren1->pair->two->mode)
|
2007-04-25 22:07:45 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This messaged is part of
|
|
|
|
* t6022 test. If you change
|
|
|
|
* it update the test too.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-04-25 22:06:59 +02:00
|
|
|
output(3, "Skipped %s (merged same as existing)", ren1_dst);
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
if (mfi.merge || !mfi.clean)
|
|
|
|
output(1, "Renamed %s => %s", ren1_src, ren1_dst);
|
|
|
|
if (mfi.merge)
|
|
|
|
output(2, "Auto-merged %s", ren1_dst);
|
|
|
|
if (!mfi.clean) {
|
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/modify): Merge conflict in %s",
|
|
|
|
ren1_dst);
|
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!index_only)
|
|
|
|
update_stages(ren1_dst,
|
|
|
|
o, a, b, 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
update_file(mfi.clean, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, ren1_dst);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
path_list_clear(&a_by_dst, 0);
|
|
|
|
path_list_clear(&b_by_dst, 0);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
return clean_merge;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-07 14:52:57 +02:00
|
|
|
static unsigned char *stage_sha(const unsigned char *sha, unsigned mode)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-04-07 14:52:57 +02:00
|
|
|
return (is_null_sha1(sha) || mode == 0) ? NULL: (unsigned char *)sha;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Per entry merge function */
|
|
|
|
static int process_entry(const char *path, struct stage_data *entry,
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *branch1,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch2)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
printf("processing entry, clean cache: %s\n", index_only ? "yes": "no");
|
|
|
|
print_index_entry("\tpath: ", entry);
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
int clean_merge = 1;
|
|
|
|
unsigned o_mode = entry->stages[1].mode;
|
|
|
|
unsigned a_mode = entry->stages[2].mode;
|
|
|
|
unsigned b_mode = entry->stages[3].mode;
|
2007-04-07 14:52:57 +02:00
|
|
|
unsigned char *o_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[1].sha, o_mode);
|
|
|
|
unsigned char *a_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[2].sha, a_mode);
|
|
|
|
unsigned char *b_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[3].sha, b_mode);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (o_sha && (!a_sha || !b_sha)) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Case A: Deleted in one */
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if ((!a_sha && !b_sha) ||
|
|
|
|
(sha_eq(a_sha, o_sha) && !b_sha) ||
|
|
|
|
(!a_sha && sha_eq(b_sha, o_sha))) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Deleted in both or deleted in one and
|
|
|
|
* unchanged in the other */
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (a_sha)
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(2, "Removed %s", path);
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
/* do not touch working file if it did not exist */
|
|
|
|
remove_file(1, path, !a_sha);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* Deleted in one and changed in the other */
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (!a_sha) {
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
"and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree.",
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
path, branch1,
|
|
|
|
branch2, branch2, path);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, b_sha, b_mode, path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
"and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree.",
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
path, branch2,
|
|
|
|
branch1, branch1, path);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, a_sha, a_mode, path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
} else if ((!o_sha && a_sha && !b_sha) ||
|
|
|
|
(!o_sha && !a_sha && b_sha)) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Case B: Added in one. */
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *add_branch;
|
|
|
|
const char *other_branch;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
unsigned mode;
|
|
|
|
const unsigned char *sha;
|
|
|
|
const char *conf;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (a_sha) {
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
add_branch = branch1;
|
|
|
|
other_branch = branch2;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
mode = a_mode;
|
|
|
|
sha = a_sha;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
conf = "file/directory";
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
add_branch = branch2;
|
|
|
|
other_branch = branch1;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
mode = b_mode;
|
|
|
|
sha = b_sha;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
conf = "directory/file";
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (path_list_has_path(¤t_directory_set, path)) {
|
|
|
|
const char *new_path = unique_path(path, add_branch);
|
|
|
|
clean_merge = 0;
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (%s): There is a directory with name %s in %s. "
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
"Added %s as %s",
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
conf, path, other_branch, path, new_path);
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
remove_file(0, path, 0);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, sha, mode, new_path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(2, "Added %s", path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(1, sha, mode, path);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-12-13 04:05:39 +01:00
|
|
|
} else if (a_sha && b_sha) {
|
|
|
|
/* Case C: Added in both (check for same permissions) and */
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/* case D: Modified in both, but differently. */
|
2006-12-13 04:05:39 +01:00
|
|
|
const char *reason = "content";
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
struct merge_file_info mfi;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct diff_filespec o, a, b;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-13 04:05:39 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!o_sha) {
|
|
|
|
reason = "add/add";
|
|
|
|
o_sha = (unsigned char *)null_sha1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-01-14 09:11:28 +01:00
|
|
|
output(2, "Auto-merged %s", path);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
o.path = a.path = b.path = (char *)path;
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(o.sha1, o_sha);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
o.mode = o_mode;
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(a.sha1, a_sha);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
a.mode = a_mode;
|
2006-08-23 08:49:00 +02:00
|
|
|
hashcpy(b.sha1, b_sha);
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
b.mode = b_mode;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mfi = merge_file(&o, &a, &b,
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
branch1, branch2);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-12-18 20:50:28 +01:00
|
|
|
clean_merge = mfi.clean;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (mfi.clean)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(1, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
|
2007-12-18 20:50:28 +01:00
|
|
|
else if (S_ISGITLINK(mfi.mode))
|
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (submodule): Merge conflict in %s "
|
|
|
|
"- needs %s", path, sha1_to_hex(b.sha1));
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
else {
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
output(1, "CONFLICT (%s): Merge conflict in %s",
|
2006-12-13 04:05:39 +01:00
|
|
|
reason, path);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (index_only)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
update_file(0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
update_file_flags(mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path,
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
0 /* update_cache */, 1 /* update_working_directory */);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-04-07 14:52:57 +02:00
|
|
|
} else if (!o_sha && !a_sha && !b_sha) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* this entry was deleted altogether. a_mode == 0 means
|
|
|
|
* we had that path and want to actively remove it.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
remove_file(1, path, !a_mode);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
} else
|
|
|
|
die("Fatal merge failure, shouldn't happen.");
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
return clean_merge;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
static int merge_trees(struct tree *head,
|
|
|
|
struct tree *merge,
|
|
|
|
struct tree *common,
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *branch1,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch2,
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct tree **result)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int code, clean;
|
2007-02-16 01:32:45 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (subtree_merge) {
|
|
|
|
merge = shift_tree_object(head, merge);
|
|
|
|
common = shift_tree_object(head, common);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (sha_eq(common->object.sha1, merge->object.sha1)) {
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
output(0, "Already uptodate!");
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
*result = head;
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-30 20:27:10 +02:00
|
|
|
code = git_merge_trees(index_only, common, head, merge);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
if (code != 0)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
die("merging of trees %s and %s failed",
|
|
|
|
sha1_to_hex(head->object.sha1),
|
|
|
|
sha1_to_hex(merge->object.sha1));
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
if (unmerged_index()) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
struct path_list *entries, *re_head, *re_merge;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
path_list_clear(¤t_file_set, 1);
|
|
|
|
path_list_clear(¤t_directory_set, 1);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
get_files_dirs(head);
|
|
|
|
get_files_dirs(merge);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
entries = get_unmerged();
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
re_head = get_renames(head, common, head, merge, entries);
|
|
|
|
re_merge = get_renames(merge, common, head, merge, entries);
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
clean = process_renames(re_head, re_merge,
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
branch1, branch2);
|
2007-04-20 08:37:18 +02:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < entries->nr; i++) {
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
const char *path = entries->items[i].path;
|
|
|
|
struct stage_data *e = entries->items[i].util;
|
2007-01-14 06:28:58 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!e->processed
|
|
|
|
&& !process_entry(path, e, branch1, branch2))
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
clean = 0;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
path_list_clear(re_merge, 0);
|
|
|
|
path_list_clear(re_head, 0);
|
|
|
|
path_list_clear(entries, 1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-01-12 21:05:58 +01:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
clean = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
if (index_only)
|
|
|
|
*result = git_write_tree();
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return clean;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-09 22:30:58 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct commit_list *reverse_commit_list(struct commit_list *list)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct commit_list *next = NULL, *current, *backup;
|
|
|
|
for (current = list; current; current = backup) {
|
|
|
|
backup = current->next;
|
|
|
|
current->next = next;
|
|
|
|
next = current;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return next;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Merge the commits h1 and h2, return the resulting virtual
|
2007-02-04 05:49:16 +01:00
|
|
|
* commit object and a flag indicating the cleanness of the merge.
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
static int merge(struct commit *h1,
|
|
|
|
struct commit *h2,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch1,
|
|
|
|
const char *branch2,
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
struct commit_list *ca,
|
2006-10-27 23:08:14 +02:00
|
|
|
struct commit **result)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
struct commit_list *iter;
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
struct commit *merged_common_ancestors;
|
2007-10-29 20:00:55 +01:00
|
|
|
struct tree *mrtree = mrtree;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int clean;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
if (show(4)) {
|
|
|
|
output(4, "Merging:");
|
|
|
|
output_commit_title(h1);
|
|
|
|
output_commit_title(h2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!ca) {
|
|
|
|
ca = get_merge_bases(h1, h2, 1);
|
|
|
|
ca = reverse_commit_list(ca);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
if (show(5)) {
|
|
|
|
output(5, "found %u common ancestor(s):", commit_list_count(ca));
|
|
|
|
for (iter = ca; iter; iter = iter->next)
|
|
|
|
output_commit_title(iter->item);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
merged_common_ancestors = pop_commit(&ca);
|
2006-08-09 18:43:03 +02:00
|
|
|
if (merged_common_ancestors == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
/* if there is no common ancestor, make an empty tree */
|
|
|
|
struct tree *tree = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct tree));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tree->object.parsed = 1;
|
|
|
|
tree->object.type = OBJ_TREE;
|
2007-02-26 20:55:59 +01:00
|
|
|
pretend_sha1_file(NULL, 0, OBJ_TREE, tree->object.sha1);
|
2006-08-09 18:43:03 +02:00
|
|
|
merged_common_ancestors = make_virtual_commit(tree, "ancestor");
|
|
|
|
}
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (iter = ca; iter; iter = iter->next) {
|
2007-01-14 06:28:33 +01:00
|
|
|
call_depth++;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* When the merge fails, the result contains files
|
|
|
|
* with conflict markers. The cleanness flag is
|
2007-02-04 05:49:16 +01:00
|
|
|
* ignored, it was never actually used, as result of
|
|
|
|
* merge_trees has always overwritten it: the committed
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
* "conflicts" were already resolved.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
discard_cache();
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
merge(merged_common_ancestors, iter->item,
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
"Temporary merge branch 1",
|
|
|
|
"Temporary merge branch 2",
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
&merged_common_ancestors);
|
2007-01-14 06:28:33 +01:00
|
|
|
call_depth--;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!merged_common_ancestors)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
die("merge returned no commit");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
discard_cache();
|
2007-01-14 06:28:33 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!call_depth) {
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
read_cache();
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
index_only = 0;
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
} else
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
index_only = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 19:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
clean = merge_trees(h1->tree, h2->tree, merged_common_ancestors->tree,
|
2006-07-27 19:13:47 +02:00
|
|
|
branch1, branch2, &mrtree);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
if (index_only) {
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
*result = make_virtual_commit(mrtree, "merged tree");
|
|
|
|
commit_list_insert(h1, &(*result)->parents);
|
|
|
|
commit_list_insert(h2, &(*result)->parents->next);
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-01-14 06:28:53 +01:00
|
|
|
flush_output();
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return clean;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-28 08:35:20 +01:00
|
|
|
static const char *better_branch_name(const char *branch)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
static char githead_env[8 + 40 + 1];
|
|
|
|
char *name;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (strlen(branch) != 40)
|
|
|
|
return branch;
|
|
|
|
sprintf(githead_env, "GITHEAD_%s", branch);
|
|
|
|
name = getenv(githead_env);
|
|
|
|
return name ? name : branch;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
static struct commit *get_ref(const char *ref)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned char sha1[20];
|
|
|
|
struct object *object;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (get_sha1(ref, sha1))
|
|
|
|
die("Could not resolve ref '%s'", ref);
|
|
|
|
object = deref_tag(parse_object(sha1), ref, strlen(ref));
|
2006-12-28 08:35:24 +01:00
|
|
|
if (object->type == OBJ_TREE)
|
|
|
|
return make_virtual_commit((struct tree*)object,
|
|
|
|
better_branch_name(ref));
|
2006-07-14 08:38:11 +02:00
|
|
|
if (object->type != OBJ_COMMIT)
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (parse_commit((struct commit *)object))
|
|
|
|
die("Could not parse commit '%s'", sha1_to_hex(object->sha1));
|
|
|
|
return (struct commit *)object;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
static int merge_config(const char *var, const char *value)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (!strcasecmp(var, "merge.verbosity")) {
|
|
|
|
verbosity = git_config_int(var, value);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-09-25 08:36:38 +02:00
|
|
|
if (!strcasecmp(var, "diff.renamelimit")) {
|
|
|
|
rename_limit = git_config_int(var, value);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
return git_default_config(var, value);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
|
|
|
{
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
static const char *bases[20];
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
static unsigned bases_count = 0;
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int i, clean;
|
|
|
|
const char *branch1, *branch2;
|
|
|
|
struct commit *result, *h1, *h2;
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
struct commit_list *ca = NULL;
|
|
|
|
struct lock_file *lock = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct lock_file));
|
|
|
|
int index_fd;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-16 01:32:45 +01:00
|
|
|
if (argv[0]) {
|
|
|
|
int namelen = strlen(argv[0]);
|
|
|
|
if (8 < namelen &&
|
|
|
|
!strcmp(argv[0] + namelen - 8, "-subtree"))
|
|
|
|
subtree_merge = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
git_config(merge_config);
|
|
|
|
if (getenv("GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY"))
|
|
|
|
verbosity = strtol(getenv("GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY"), NULL, 10);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (argc < 4)
|
|
|
|
die("Usage: %s <base>... -- <head> <remote> ...\n", argv[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(argv[i], "--"))
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (bases_count < sizeof(bases)/sizeof(*bases))
|
|
|
|
bases[bases_count++] = argv[i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (argc - i != 3) /* "--" "<head>" "<remote>" */
|
|
|
|
die("Not handling anything other than two heads merge.");
|
2007-04-20 08:37:18 +02:00
|
|
|
if (verbosity >= 5)
|
2007-01-14 06:28:58 +01:00
|
|
|
buffer_output = 0;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
branch1 = argv[++i];
|
|
|
|
branch2 = argv[++i];
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
h1 = get_ref(branch1);
|
|
|
|
h2 = get_ref(branch2);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-23 09:44:47 +01:00
|
|
|
branch1 = better_branch_name(branch1);
|
|
|
|
branch2 = better_branch_name(branch2);
|
2007-01-14 06:28:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-14 06:28:48 +01:00
|
|
|
if (show(3))
|
|
|
|
printf("Merging %s with %s\n", branch1, branch2);
|
2006-12-23 09:44:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
_GIT_INDEX_OUTPUT: allow plumbing to output to an alternative index file.
When defined, this allows plumbing commands that update the
index (add, apply, checkout-index, merge-recursive, mv,
read-tree, rm, update-index, and write-tree) to write their
resulting index to an alternative index file while holding a
lock to the original index file. With this, git-commit that
jumps the index does not have to make an extra copy of the index
file, and more importantly, it can do the update while holding
the lock on the index.
However, I think the interface to let an environment variable
specify the output is a mistake, as shown in the documentation.
If a curious user has the environment variable set to something
other than the file GIT_INDEX_FILE points at, almost everything
will break. This should instead be a command line parameter to
tell these plumbing commands to write the result in the named
file, to prevent stupid mistakes.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-01 08:09:02 +02:00
|
|
|
index_fd = hold_locked_index(lock, 1);
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < bases_count; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct commit *ancestor = get_ref(bases[i]);
|
|
|
|
ca = commit_list_insert(ancestor, &ca);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-01-14 06:28:33 +01:00
|
|
|
clean = merge(h1, h2, branch1, branch2, ca, &result);
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (active_cache_changed &&
|
|
|
|
(write_cache(index_fd, active_cache, active_nr) ||
|
2008-01-16 20:12:46 +01:00
|
|
|
commit_locked_index(lock)))
|
2007-01-10 20:20:58 +01:00
|
|
|
die ("unable to write %s", get_index_file());
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-27 13:17:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return clean ? 0: 1;
|
Status update on merge-recursive in C
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 18:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|