1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-16 14:04:52 +01:00
git/t/t7007-show.sh

124 lines
2.9 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
test_description='git show'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success setup '
echo hello world >foo &&
H=$(git hash-object -w foo) &&
git tag -a foo-tag -m "Tags $H" $H &&
HH=$(expr "$H" : "\(..\)") &&
H38=$(expr "$H" : "..\(.*\)") &&
rm -f .git/objects/$HH/$H38
'
test_expect_success 'showing a tag that point at a missing object' '
test_must_fail git --no-pager show foo-tag
'
Demonstrate git-show is broken with ranges The logic of git-show has remained largely unchanged since around 5d7eeee (git-show: grok blobs, trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14): start a revision walker with no_walk=1, look at its pending objects and handle them one-by-one. For commits, this means stuffing them into a new queue all alone, and running the walker. Then Linus's f222abd (Make 'git show' more useful, 2009-07-13) came along and set no_walk=0 whenever the user specifies a range. Which appears to work fine, until you actually prod it hard enough, as the preceding commit shows: UNINTERESTING commits will be marked as such, but not walked further to propagate the marks. Demonstrate this with the main tests of this patch: 'showing a range walks (Y shape)'. The Y shape of history ensures that propagating the UNINTERESTING marks is necessary to correctly exclude the main1 commit. The only example I could find actually requires that the negative revisions are listed later, and in this scenario a dotted range actually works. However, it is easy to find examples in git.git where a dotted range is wrong, e.g. $ git show v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | grep ^commit | wc -l 1297 $ git rev-list v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | wc -l 702 While there, also test a few other things that are not covered so far: the -N way of triggering a range (added in 5853cae, DWIM 'git show -5' to 'git show --do-walk -5', 2010-06-01), and the interactions of tags, commits and ranges. Pointed out by Dr_Memory on #git. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-19 22:04:57 +02:00
test_expect_success 'set up a bit of history' '
test_commit main1 &&
test_commit main2 &&
test_commit main3 &&
git tag -m "annotated tag" annotated &&
git checkout -b side HEAD^^ &&
test_commit side2 &&
test_commit side3
'
test_expect_success 'showing two commits' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
commit $(git rev-parse main2)
commit $(git rev-parse main3)
EOF
git show main2 main3 >actual &&
grep ^commit actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
test_expect_success 'showing a range walks (linear)' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
commit $(git rev-parse main3)
commit $(git rev-parse main2)
EOF
git show main1..main3 >actual &&
grep ^commit actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
test_expect_success 'showing a range walks (Y shape, ^ first)' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
commit $(git rev-parse main3)
commit $(git rev-parse main2)
EOF
git show ^side3 main3 >actual &&
grep ^commit actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
test_expect_success 'showing a range walks (Y shape, ^ last)' '
Demonstrate git-show is broken with ranges The logic of git-show has remained largely unchanged since around 5d7eeee (git-show: grok blobs, trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14): start a revision walker with no_walk=1, look at its pending objects and handle them one-by-one. For commits, this means stuffing them into a new queue all alone, and running the walker. Then Linus's f222abd (Make 'git show' more useful, 2009-07-13) came along and set no_walk=0 whenever the user specifies a range. Which appears to work fine, until you actually prod it hard enough, as the preceding commit shows: UNINTERESTING commits will be marked as such, but not walked further to propagate the marks. Demonstrate this with the main tests of this patch: 'showing a range walks (Y shape)'. The Y shape of history ensures that propagating the UNINTERESTING marks is necessary to correctly exclude the main1 commit. The only example I could find actually requires that the negative revisions are listed later, and in this scenario a dotted range actually works. However, it is easy to find examples in git.git where a dotted range is wrong, e.g. $ git show v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | grep ^commit | wc -l 1297 $ git rev-list v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | wc -l 702 While there, also test a few other things that are not covered so far: the -N way of triggering a range (added in 5853cae, DWIM 'git show -5' to 'git show --do-walk -5', 2010-06-01), and the interactions of tags, commits and ranges. Pointed out by Dr_Memory on #git. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-19 22:04:57 +02:00
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
commit $(git rev-parse main3)
commit $(git rev-parse main2)
EOF
git show main3 ^side3 >actual &&
grep ^commit actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
test_expect_success 'showing with -N walks' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
commit $(git rev-parse main3)
commit $(git rev-parse main2)
EOF
git show -2 main3 >actual &&
grep ^commit actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
test_expect_success 'showing annotated tag' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
tag annotated
commit $(git rev-parse annotated^{commit})
EOF
git show annotated >actual &&
grep -E "^(commit|tag)" actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
test_expect_success 'showing annotated tag plus commit' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
tag annotated
commit $(git rev-parse annotated^{commit})
commit $(git rev-parse side3)
EOF
git show annotated side3 >actual &&
grep -E "^(commit|tag)" actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
test_expect_success 'showing range' '
Demonstrate git-show is broken with ranges The logic of git-show has remained largely unchanged since around 5d7eeee (git-show: grok blobs, trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14): start a revision walker with no_walk=1, look at its pending objects and handle them one-by-one. For commits, this means stuffing them into a new queue all alone, and running the walker. Then Linus's f222abd (Make 'git show' more useful, 2009-07-13) came along and set no_walk=0 whenever the user specifies a range. Which appears to work fine, until you actually prod it hard enough, as the preceding commit shows: UNINTERESTING commits will be marked as such, but not walked further to propagate the marks. Demonstrate this with the main tests of this patch: 'showing a range walks (Y shape)'. The Y shape of history ensures that propagating the UNINTERESTING marks is necessary to correctly exclude the main1 commit. The only example I could find actually requires that the negative revisions are listed later, and in this scenario a dotted range actually works. However, it is easy to find examples in git.git where a dotted range is wrong, e.g. $ git show v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | grep ^commit | wc -l 1297 $ git rev-list v1.7.0..v1.7.1 | wc -l 702 While there, also test a few other things that are not covered so far: the -N way of triggering a range (added in 5853cae, DWIM 'git show -5' to 'git show --do-walk -5', 2010-06-01), and the interactions of tags, commits and ranges. Pointed out by Dr_Memory on #git. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-19 22:04:57 +02:00
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
commit $(git rev-parse main3)
commit $(git rev-parse main2)
EOF
git show ^side3 annotated >actual &&
grep -E "^(commit|tag)" actual >actual.filtered &&
test_cmp expect actual.filtered
'
log: fix --quiet synonym for -s Originally the "--quiet" option was parsed by the diff-option parser into the internal QUICK option. This had the effect of silencing diff output from the log (which was not intended, but happened to work and people started to use it). But it also had other odd side effects at the diff level (for example, it would suppress the second commit in "git show A B"). To fix this, commit 1c40c36 converted log to parse-options and handled the "quiet" option separately, not passing it on to the diff code. However, it simply ignored the option, which was a regression for people using it as a synonym for "-s". Commit 01771a8 then fixed that by interpreting the option to add DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT to the list of output formats. However, that commit did not fix it in all cases. It sets the flag after setup_revisions is called. Naively, this makes sense because you would expect the setup_revisions parser to overwrite our output format flag if "-p" or another output format flag is seen. However, that is not how the NO_OUTPUT flag works. We actually store it in the bit-field as just another format. At the end of setup_revisions, we call diff_setup_done, which post-processes the bitfield and clears any other formats if we have set NO_OUTPUT. By setting the flag after setup_revisions is done, diff_setup_done does not have a chance to make this tweak, and we end up with other format options still set. As a result, the flag would have no effect in "git log -p --quiet" or "git show --quiet". Fix it by setting the format flag before the call to setup_revisions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-28 23:29:34 +02:00
test_expect_success '-s suppresses diff' '
echo main3 >expect &&
git show -s --format=%s main3 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '--quiet suppresses diff' '
echo main3 >expect &&
git show --quiet --format=%s main3 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_done