1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-09 02:33:11 +01:00
git/t/t2100-update-cache-badpath.sh

52 lines
1 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano
#
test_description='git update-index nonsense-path test.
This test creates the following structure in the cache:
path0 - a file
path1 - a symlink
path2/file2 - a file in a directory
path3/file3 - a file in a directory
and tries to git update-index --add the following:
path0/file0 - a file in a directory
path1/file1 - a file in a directory
path2 - a file
path3 - a symlink
All of the attempts should fail.
'
. ./test-lib.sh
mkdir path2 path3
date >path0
ln -s xyzzy path1
date >path2/file2
date >path3/file3
test_expect_success \
'git update-index --add to add various paths.' \
'git update-index --add -- path0 path1 path2/file2 path3/file3'
rm -fr path?
mkdir path0 path1
date >path2
ln -s frotz path3
date >path0/file0
date >path1/file1
for p in path0/file0 path1/file1 path2 path3
do
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"git update-index to add conflicting path $p should fail." \
"test_must_fail git update-index --add -- $p"
done
test_done