1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-18 15:04:49 +01:00
git/t/t1300-repo-config.sh

762 lines
15 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2005 Johannes Schindelin
#
test_description='Test git config in different settings'
. ./test-lib.sh
test -f .git/config && rm .git/config
git config core.penguin "little blue"
cat > expect << EOF
[core]
penguin = little blue
EOF
test_expect_success 'initial' 'cmp .git/config expect'
git config Core.Movie BadPhysics
cat > expect << EOF
[core]
penguin = little blue
Movie = BadPhysics
EOF
test_expect_success 'mixed case' 'cmp .git/config expect'
git config Cores.WhatEver Second
cat > expect << EOF
[core]
penguin = little blue
Movie = BadPhysics
[Cores]
WhatEver = Second
EOF
test_expect_success 'similar section' 'cmp .git/config expect'
git config CORE.UPPERCASE true
cat > expect << EOF
[core]
penguin = little blue
Movie = BadPhysics
UPPERCASE = true
[Cores]
WhatEver = Second
EOF
test_expect_success 'similar section' 'cmp .git/config expect'
test_expect_success 'replace with non-match' \
'git config core.penguin kingpin !blue'
test_expect_success 'replace with non-match (actually matching)' \
'git config core.penguin "very blue" !kingpin'
cat > expect << EOF
[core]
penguin = very blue
Movie = BadPhysics
UPPERCASE = true
penguin = kingpin
[Cores]
WhatEver = Second
EOF
test_expect_success 'non-match result' 'cmp .git/config expect'
cat > .git/config <<\EOF
[alpha]
bar = foo
[beta]
baz = multiple \
lines
EOF
test_expect_success 'unset with cont. lines' \
'git config --unset beta.baz'
cat > expect <<\EOF
[alpha]
bar = foo
[beta]
EOF
test_expect_success 'unset with cont. lines is correct' 'cmp .git/config expect'
cat > .git/config << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
haha ="beta" # last silly comment
haha = hello
haha = bello
[nextSection] noNewline = ouch
EOF
cp .git/config .git/config2
test_expect_success 'multiple unset' \
'git config --unset-all beta.haha'
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
[nextSection] noNewline = ouch
EOF
test_expect_success 'multiple unset is correct' 'cmp .git/config expect'
cp .git/config2 .git/config
test_expect_success '--replace-all missing value' '
test_must_fail git config --replace-all beta.haha &&
test_cmp .git/config2 .git/config
'
rm .git/config2
test_expect_success '--replace-all' \
'git config --replace-all beta.haha gamma'
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
haha = gamma
[nextSection] noNewline = ouch
EOF
test_expect_success 'all replaced' 'cmp .git/config expect'
git config beta.haha alpha
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
haha = alpha
[nextSection] noNewline = ouch
EOF
test_expect_success 'really mean test' 'cmp .git/config expect'
git config nextsection.nonewline wow
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
haha = alpha
[nextSection]
nonewline = wow
EOF
test_expect_success 'really really mean test' 'cmp .git/config expect'
test_expect_success 'get value' 'test alpha = $(git config beta.haha)'
git config --unset beta.haha
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
[nextSection]
nonewline = wow
EOF
test_expect_success 'unset' 'cmp .git/config expect'
git config nextsection.NoNewLine "wow2 for me" "for me$"
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
[nextSection]
nonewline = wow
NoNewLine = wow2 for me
EOF
test_expect_success 'multivar' 'cmp .git/config expect'
test_expect_success 'non-match' \
'git config --get nextsection.nonewline !for'
test_expect_success 'non-match value' \
'test wow = $(git config --get nextsection.nonewline !for)'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'ambiguous get' '
test_must_fail git config --get nextsection.nonewline
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
'
test_expect_success 'get multivar' \
'git config --get-all nextsection.nonewline'
git config nextsection.nonewline "wow3" "wow$"
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
[nextSection]
nonewline = wow3
NoNewLine = wow2 for me
EOF
test_expect_success 'multivar replace' 'cmp .git/config expect'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'ambiguous value' '
test_must_fail git config nextsection.nonewline
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'ambiguous unset' '
test_must_fail git config --unset nextsection.nonewline
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'invalid unset' '
test_must_fail git config --unset somesection.nonewline
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
'
git config --unset nextsection.nonewline "wow3$"
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
[nextSection]
NoNewLine = wow2 for me
EOF
test_expect_success 'multivar unset' 'cmp .git/config expect'
test_expect_success 'invalid key' 'test_must_fail git config inval.2key blabla'
test_expect_success 'correct key' 'git config 123456.a123 987'
test_expect_success 'hierarchical section' \
'git config Version.1.2.3eX.Alpha beta'
cat > expect << EOF
[beta] ; silly comment # another comment
noIndent= sillyValue ; 'nother silly comment
# empty line
; comment
[nextSection]
NoNewLine = wow2 for me
[123456]
a123 = 987
git config syntax updates This updates the hierarchical section name syntax to [section<space>+"<randomstring>"] where the only rule for "randomstring" is that it can't contain a newline, and if you really want to insert a double-quote, you do it with \". It turns that into the section name "secion.randomstring". The "section" part is still case insensitive, but the "randomstring" part is case sensitive. So you could use this for things like [email "torvalds@osdl.org"] name = Linus Torvalds if you wanted to do the "email->name" conversion as part of the config file format (I'm not claiming that is sensible, I'm just giving it as an insane example). That would show up as the association email.torvalds@osdl.org.name -> Linus Torvalds which is easy to parse (the "." in the email _looks_ ambiguous, but it isn't: you know that there will always be a single key-name, so you find the key name with "strrchr(name, '.')" and things are entirely unambiguous). Repo-config is updated to be able to parse the new format, and also write things out in the new format. [jc: rolled two patches from Linus and one fix-up from Sean into one, with additional adjustments for t/t1300 test to check the case insensitiveness of section base and variable and case sensitiveness of the extended section part. Then stripped some part off to make the result applicable to the stale 1.3.X series that does not have recent enhancements. ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Sean Estabrooks <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-09 21:24:02 +02:00
[Version "1.2.3eX"]
Alpha = beta
EOF
test_expect_success 'hierarchical section value' 'cmp .git/config expect'
cat > expect << EOF
beta.noindent=sillyValue
nextsection.nonewline=wow2 for me
123456.a123=987
version.1.2.3eX.alpha=beta
EOF
test_expect_success 'working --list' \
'git config --list > output && cmp output expect'
cat > expect << EOF
beta.noindent sillyValue
nextsection.nonewline wow2 for me
EOF
test_expect_success '--get-regexp' \
'git config --get-regexp in > output && cmp output expect'
git config --add nextsection.nonewline "wow4 for you"
cat > expect << EOF
wow2 for me
wow4 for you
EOF
test_expect_success '--add' \
'git config --get-all nextsection.nonewline > output && cmp output expect'
cat > .git/config << EOF
[novalue]
variable
[emptyvalue]
variable =
EOF
test_expect_success 'get variable with no value' \
'git config --get novalue.variable ^$'
test_expect_success 'get variable with empty value' \
'git config --get emptyvalue.variable ^$'
echo novalue.variable > expect
test_expect_success 'get-regexp variable with no value' \
'git config --get-regexp novalue > output &&
cmp output expect'
echo 'emptyvalue.variable ' > expect
test_expect_success 'get-regexp variable with empty value' \
'git config --get-regexp emptyvalue > output &&
cmp output expect'
echo true > expect
test_expect_success 'get bool variable with no value' \
'git config --bool novalue.variable > output &&
cmp output expect'
echo false > expect
test_expect_success 'get bool variable with empty value' \
'git config --bool emptyvalue.variable > output &&
cmp output expect'
test_expect_success 'no arguments, but no crash' '
test_must_fail git config >output 2>&1 &&
grep usage output
'
cat > .git/config << EOF
[a.b]
c = d
EOF
git config a.x y
cat > expect << EOF
[a.b]
c = d
[a]
x = y
EOF
test_expect_success 'new section is partial match of another' 'cmp .git/config expect'
git config b.x y
git config a.b c
cat > expect << EOF
[a.b]
c = d
[a]
x = y
b = c
[b]
x = y
EOF
test_expect_success 'new variable inserts into proper section' 'cmp .git/config expect'
test_expect_success 'alternative GIT_CONFIG (non-existing file should fail)' \
'test_must_fail git config --file non-existing-config -l'
cat > other-config << EOF
[ein]
bahn = strasse
EOF
cat > expect << EOF
ein.bahn=strasse
EOF
GIT_CONFIG=other-config git config -l > output
test_expect_success 'alternative GIT_CONFIG' 'cmp output expect'
test_expect_success 'alternative GIT_CONFIG (--file)' \
'git config --file other-config -l > output && cmp output expect'
GIT_CONFIG=other-config git config anwohner.park ausweis
cat > expect << EOF
[ein]
bahn = strasse
[anwohner]
park = ausweis
EOF
test_expect_success '--set in alternative GIT_CONFIG' 'cmp other-config expect'
cat > .git/config << EOF
# Hallo
#Bello
[branch "eins"]
x = 1
[branch.eins]
y = 1
[branch "1 234 blabl/a"]
weird
EOF
test_expect_success "rename section" \
"git config --rename-section branch.eins branch.zwei"
cat > expect << EOF
# Hallo
#Bello
[branch "zwei"]
x = 1
[branch "zwei"]
y = 1
[branch "1 234 blabl/a"]
weird
EOF
test_expect_success "rename succeeded" "test_cmp expect .git/config"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success "rename non-existing section" '
test_must_fail git config --rename-section \
branch."world domination" branch.drei
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
'
test_expect_success "rename succeeded" "test_cmp expect .git/config"
test_expect_success "rename another section" \
'git config --rename-section branch."1 234 blabl/a" branch.drei'
cat > expect << EOF
# Hallo
#Bello
[branch "zwei"]
x = 1
[branch "zwei"]
y = 1
[branch "drei"]
weird
EOF
test_expect_success "rename succeeded" "test_cmp expect .git/config"
cat >> .git/config << EOF
[branch "zwei"] a = 1 [branch "vier"]
EOF
test_expect_success "remove section" "git config --remove-section branch.zwei"
cat > expect << EOF
# Hallo
#Bello
[branch "drei"]
weird
EOF
test_expect_success "section was removed properly" \
"test_cmp expect .git/config"
rm .git/config
cat > expect << EOF
[gitcvs]
enabled = true
dbname = %Ggitcvs2.%a.%m.sqlite
[gitcvs "ext"]
dbname = %Ggitcvs1.%a.%m.sqlite
EOF
test_expect_success 'section ending' '
git config gitcvs.enabled true &&
git config gitcvs.ext.dbname %Ggitcvs1.%a.%m.sqlite &&
git config gitcvs.dbname %Ggitcvs2.%a.%m.sqlite &&
cmp .git/config expect
'
test_expect_success numbers '
git config kilo.gram 1k &&
git config mega.ton 1m &&
k=$(git config --int --get kilo.gram) &&
test z1024 = "z$k" &&
m=$(git config --int --get mega.ton) &&
test z1048576 = "z$m"
'
cat > expect <<EOF
fatal: bad config value for 'aninvalid.unit' in .git/config
EOF
test_expect_success 'invalid unit' '
git config aninvalid.unit "1auto" &&
s=$(git config aninvalid.unit) &&
test "z1auto" = "z$s" &&
if git config --int --get aninvalid.unit 2>actual
then
echo config should have failed
false
fi &&
cmp actual expect
'
cat > expect << EOF
true
false
true
false
true
false
true
false
EOF
test_expect_success bool '
git config bool.true1 01 &&
git config bool.true2 -1 &&
git config bool.true3 YeS &&
git config bool.true4 true &&
git config bool.false1 000 &&
git config bool.false2 "" &&
git config bool.false3 nO &&
git config bool.false4 FALSE &&
rm -f result &&
for i in 1 2 3 4
do
git config --bool --get bool.true$i >>result
git config --bool --get bool.false$i >>result
done &&
cmp expect result'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'invalid bool (--get)' '
git config bool.nobool foobar &&
test_must_fail git config --bool --get bool.nobool'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'invalid bool (set)' '
test_must_fail git config --bool bool.nobool foobar'
rm .git/config
cat > expect <<\EOF
[bool]
true1 = true
true2 = true
true3 = true
true4 = true
false1 = false
false2 = false
false3 = false
false4 = false
EOF
test_expect_success 'set --bool' '
git config --bool bool.true1 01 &&
git config --bool bool.true2 -1 &&
git config --bool bool.true3 YeS &&
git config --bool bool.true4 true &&
git config --bool bool.false1 000 &&
git config --bool bool.false2 "" &&
git config --bool bool.false3 nO &&
git config --bool bool.false4 FALSE &&
cmp expect .git/config'
rm .git/config
cat > expect <<\EOF
[int]
val1 = 1
val2 = -1
val3 = 5242880
EOF
test_expect_success 'set --int' '
git config --int int.val1 01 &&
git config --int int.val2 -1 &&
git config --int int.val3 5m &&
cmp expect .git/config'
rm .git/config
cat >expect <<\EOF
[bool]
true1 = true
true2 = true
false1 = false
false2 = false
[int]
int1 = 0
int2 = 1
int3 = -1
EOF
test_expect_success 'get --bool-or-int' '
(
echo "[bool]"
echo true1
echo true2 = true
echo false = false
echo "[int]"
echo int1 = 0
echo int2 = 1
echo int3 = -1
) >>.git/config &&
test $(git config --bool-or-int bool.true1) = true &&
test $(git config --bool-or-int bool.true2) = true &&
test $(git config --bool-or-int bool.false) = false &&
test $(git config --bool-or-int int.int1) = 0 &&
test $(git config --bool-or-int int.int2) = 1 &&
test $(git config --bool-or-int int.int3) = -1
'
rm .git/config
cat >expect <<\EOF
[bool]
true1 = true
false1 = false
true2 = true
false2 = false
[int]
int1 = 0
int2 = 1
int3 = -1
EOF
test_expect_success 'set --bool-or-int' '
git config --bool-or-int bool.true1 true &&
git config --bool-or-int bool.false1 false &&
git config --bool-or-int bool.true2 yes &&
git config --bool-or-int bool.false2 no &&
git config --bool-or-int int.int1 0 &&
git config --bool-or-int int.int2 1 &&
git config --bool-or-int int.int3 -1 &&
test_cmp expect .git/config
'
rm .git/config
git config quote.leading " test"
git config quote.ending "test "
git config quote.semicolon "test;test"
git config quote.hash "test#test"
cat > expect << EOF
[quote]
leading = " test"
ending = "test "
semicolon = "test;test"
hash = "test#test"
EOF
test_expect_success 'quoting' 'cmp .git/config expect'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'key with newline' '
test_must_fail git config "key.with
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
newline" 123'
test_expect_success 'value with newline' 'git config key.sub value.with\\\
newline'
cat > .git/config <<\EOF
[section]
; comment \
continued = cont\
inued
noncont = not continued ; \
quotecont = "cont;\
inued"
EOF
cat > expect <<\EOF
section.continued=continued
section.noncont=not continued
section.quotecont=cont;inued
EOF
git config --list > result
test_expect_success 'value continued on next line' 'cmp result expect'
cat > .git/config <<\EOF
[section "sub=section"]
val1 = foo=bar
val2 = foo\nbar
val3 = \n\n
val4 =
val5
EOF
cat > expect <<\EOF
section.sub=section.val1
foo=barQsection.sub=section.val2
foo
barQsection.sub=section.val3
Qsection.sub=section.val4
Qsection.sub=section.val5Q
EOF
git config --null --list | perl -pe 'y/\000/Q/' > result
echo >>result
test_expect_success '--null --list' 'cmp result expect'
git config --null --get-regexp 'val[0-9]' | perl -pe 'y/\000/Q/' > result
echo >>result
test_expect_success '--null --get-regexp' 'cmp result expect'
test_expect_success SYMLINKS 'symlinked configuration' '
ln -s notyet myconfig &&
GIT_CONFIG=myconfig git config test.frotz nitfol &&
test -h myconfig &&
test -f notyet &&
test "z$(GIT_CONFIG=notyet git config test.frotz)" = znitfol &&
GIT_CONFIG=myconfig git config test.xyzzy rezrov &&
test -h myconfig &&
test -f notyet &&
test "z$(GIT_CONFIG=notyet git config test.frotz)" = znitfol &&
test "z$(GIT_CONFIG=notyet git config test.xyzzy)" = zrezrov
'
test_expect_success 'check split_cmdline return' "
git config alias.split-cmdline-fix 'echo \"' &&
test_must_fail git split-cmdline-fix &&
echo foo > foo &&
git add foo &&
git commit -m 'initial commit' &&
git config branch.master.mergeoptions 'echo \"' &&
test_must_fail git merge master
"
test_done