2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
Commit Formatting
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
|
|
|
Using these options, linkgit:git-rev-list[1] will act similar to the
|
|
|
|
more specialized family of commit log tools: linkgit:git-log[1],
|
|
|
|
linkgit:git-show[1], and linkgit:git-whatchanged[1]
|
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
include::pretty-options.txt[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--relative-date::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synonym for `--date=relative`.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-10-08 19:31:17 +02:00
|
|
|
--date=(relative|local|default|iso|rfc|short|raw)::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only takes effect for dates shown in human-readable format, such
|
2008-05-22 17:24:07 +02:00
|
|
|
as when using "--pretty". `log.date` config variable sets a default
|
|
|
|
value for log command's --date option.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
`--date=relative` shows dates relative to the current time,
|
|
|
|
e.g. "2 hours ago".
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
`--date=local` shows timestamps in user's local timezone.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
`--date=iso` (or `--date=iso8601`) shows timestamps in ISO 8601 format.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
`--date=rfc` (or `--date=rfc2822`) shows timestamps in RFC 2822
|
|
|
|
format, often found in E-mail messages.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
`--date=short` shows only date but not time, in `YYYY-MM-DD` format.
|
|
|
|
+
|
2009-02-20 23:15:22 +01:00
|
|
|
`--date=raw` shows the date in the internal raw git format `%s %z` format.
|
|
|
|
+
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
`--date=default` shows timestamps in the original timezone
|
|
|
|
(either committer's or author's).
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-04 08:56:56 +02:00
|
|
|
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
--header::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print the contents of the commit in raw-format; each record is
|
|
|
|
separated with a NUL character.
|
2008-06-04 08:56:56 +02:00
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--parents::
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-30 17:31:43 +02:00
|
|
|
Print also the parents of the commit (in the form "commit parent...").
|
|
|
|
Also enables parent rewriting, see 'History Simplification' below.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-04 08:01:47 +02:00
|
|
|
--children::
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-30 17:31:43 +02:00
|
|
|
Print also the children of the commit (in the form "commit child...").
|
|
|
|
Also enables parent rewriting, see 'History Simplification' below.
|
2008-04-04 08:01:47 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-06-04 08:56:56 +02:00
|
|
|
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
--timestamp::
|
|
|
|
Print the raw commit timestamp.
|
2008-06-04 08:56:56 +02:00
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--left-right::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark which side of a symmetric diff a commit is reachable from.
|
|
|
|
Commits from the left side are prefixed with `<` and those from
|
|
|
|
the right with `>`. If combined with `--boundary`, those
|
|
|
|
commits are prefixed with `-`.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
For example, if you have this topology:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
y---b---b branch B
|
|
|
|
/ \ /
|
|
|
|
/ .
|
|
|
|
/ / \
|
|
|
|
o---x---a---a branch A
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
2008-08-12 01:55:35 +02:00
|
|
|
you would get an output like this:
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
$ git rev-list --left-right --boundary --pretty=oneline A...B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>bbbbbbb... 3rd on b
|
|
|
|
>bbbbbbb... 2nd on b
|
|
|
|
<aaaaaaa... 3rd on a
|
|
|
|
<aaaaaaa... 2nd on a
|
|
|
|
-yyyyyyy... 1st on b
|
|
|
|
-xxxxxxx... 1st on a
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-04 12:36:54 +02:00
|
|
|
--graph::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Draw a text-based graphical representation of the commit history
|
|
|
|
on the left hand side of the output. This may cause extra lines
|
|
|
|
to be printed in between commits, in order for the graph history
|
|
|
|
to be drawn properly.
|
|
|
|
+
|
2010-11-12 09:48:58 +01:00
|
|
|
This enables parent rewriting, see 'History Simplification' below.
|
|
|
|
+
|
2008-05-04 12:36:54 +02:00
|
|
|
This implies the '--topo-order' option by default, but the
|
|
|
|
'--date-order' option may also be specified.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-10 13:47:23 +02:00
|
|
|
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
|
|
|
--count::
|
|
|
|
Print a number stating how many commits would have been
|
|
|
|
listed, and suppress all other output. When used together
|
|
|
|
with '--left-right', instead print the counts for left and
|
|
|
|
right commits, separated by a tab.
|
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-08-11 20:46:56 +02:00
|
|
|
ifndef::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
Diff Formatting
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below are listed options that control the formatting of diff output.
|
|
|
|
Some of them are specific to linkgit:git-rev-list[1], however other diff
|
|
|
|
options may be given. See linkgit:git-diff-files[1] for more options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-c::
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-10 02:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
With this option, diff output for a merge commit
|
|
|
|
shows the differences from each of the parents to the merge result
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
simultaneously instead of showing pairwise diff between a parent
|
|
|
|
and the result one at a time. Furthermore, it lists only files
|
|
|
|
which were modified from all parents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--cc::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This flag implies the '-c' options and further compresses the
|
2008-07-24 01:16:05 +02:00
|
|
|
patch output by omitting uninteresting hunks whose contents in
|
|
|
|
the parents have only two variants and the merge result picks
|
|
|
|
one of them without modification.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-10 02:11:49 +01:00
|
|
|
-m::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This flag makes the merge commits show the full diff like
|
|
|
|
regular commits; for each merge parent, a separate log entry
|
|
|
|
and diff is generated. An exception is that only diff against
|
|
|
|
the first parent is shown when '--first-parent' option is given;
|
|
|
|
in that case, the output represents the changes the merge
|
|
|
|
brought _into_ the then-current branch.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-r::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Show recursive diffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-t::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Show the tree objects in the diff output. This implies '-r'.
|
2010-11-09 18:12:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-s::
|
|
|
|
Suppress diff output.
|
2008-08-11 20:46:56 +02:00
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit Limiting
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Besides specifying a range of commits that should be listed using the
|
|
|
|
special notations explained in the description, additional commit
|
|
|
|
limiting may be applied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
-n 'number'::
|
2009-04-07 19:24:33 +02:00
|
|
|
--max-count=<number>::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-08 09:31:24 +01:00
|
|
|
Limit the number of commits to output.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-04-07 19:24:33 +02:00
|
|
|
--skip=<number>::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skip 'number' commits before starting to show the commit output.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-07 19:24:33 +02:00
|
|
|
--since=<date>::
|
|
|
|
--after=<date>::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Show commits more recent than a specific date.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-07 19:24:33 +02:00
|
|
|
--until=<date>::
|
|
|
|
--before=<date>::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Show commits older than a specific date.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-02 15:11:35 +01:00
|
|
|
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
2009-04-07 19:24:33 +02:00
|
|
|
--max-age=<timestamp>::
|
|
|
|
--min-age=<timestamp>::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limit the commits output to specified time range.
|
2008-03-02 15:11:35 +01:00
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-04-07 19:24:33 +02:00
|
|
|
--author=<pattern>::
|
|
|
|
--committer=<pattern>::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limit the commits output to ones with author/committer
|
|
|
|
header lines that match the specified pattern (regular expression).
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-07 19:24:33 +02:00
|
|
|
--grep=<pattern>::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limit the commits output to ones with log message that
|
|
|
|
matches the specified pattern (regular expression).
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-02 19:32:46 +01:00
|
|
|
--all-match::
|
|
|
|
Limit the commits output to ones that match all given --grep,
|
|
|
|
--author and --committer instead of ones that match at least one.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
-i::
|
|
|
|
--regexp-ignore-case::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Match the regexp limiting patterns without regard to letters case.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
-E::
|
|
|
|
--extended-regexp::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the limiting patterns to be extended regular expressions
|
|
|
|
instead of the default basic regular expressions.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
-F::
|
|
|
|
--fixed-strings::
|
2008-02-26 13:22:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the limiting patterns to be fixed strings (don't interpret
|
|
|
|
pattern as a regular expression).
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
--remove-empty::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stop when a given path disappears from the tree.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-13 17:11:44 +02:00
|
|
|
--merges::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print only merge commits.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
--no-merges::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not print commits with more than one parent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--first-parent::
|
|
|
|
Follow only the first parent commit upon seeing a merge
|
|
|
|
commit. This option can give a better overview when
|
|
|
|
viewing the evolution of a particular topic branch,
|
|
|
|
because merges into a topic branch tend to be only about
|
|
|
|
adjusting to updated upstream from time to time, and
|
|
|
|
this option allows you to ignore the individual commits
|
|
|
|
brought in to your history by such a merge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--not::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverses the meaning of the '{caret}' prefix (or lack thereof)
|
|
|
|
for all following revision specifiers, up to the next '--not'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--all::
|
|
|
|
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
Pretend as if all the refs in `refs/` are listed on the
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
command line as '<commit>'.
|
2008-11-17 22:03:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-08 19:31:15 +02:00
|
|
|
--branches[=<pattern>]::
|
2008-11-17 22:03:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
Pretend as if all the refs in `refs/heads` are listed
|
2010-10-08 19:31:15 +02:00
|
|
|
on the command line as '<commit>'. If '<pattern>' is given, limit
|
2010-01-20 10:48:26 +01:00
|
|
|
branches to ones matching given shell glob. If pattern lacks '?',
|
2010-01-31 14:24:39 +01:00
|
|
|
'*', or '[', '/*' at the end is implied.
|
2008-11-17 22:03:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-08 19:31:15 +02:00
|
|
|
--tags[=<pattern>]::
|
2008-11-17 22:03:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
Pretend as if all the refs in `refs/tags` are listed
|
2010-10-08 19:31:15 +02:00
|
|
|
on the command line as '<commit>'. If '<pattern>' is given, limit
|
2010-01-20 10:48:26 +01:00
|
|
|
tags to ones matching given shell glob. If pattern lacks '?', '*',
|
2010-01-31 14:24:39 +01:00
|
|
|
or '[', '/*' at the end is implied.
|
2008-11-17 22:03:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-08 19:31:15 +02:00
|
|
|
--remotes[=<pattern>]::
|
2008-11-17 22:03:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
Pretend as if all the refs in `refs/remotes` are listed
|
2010-10-08 19:31:15 +02:00
|
|
|
on the command line as '<commit>'. If '<pattern>' is given, limit
|
2010-11-02 16:31:20 +01:00
|
|
|
remote-tracking branches to ones matching given shell glob.
|
2010-01-31 14:24:39 +01:00
|
|
|
If pattern lacks '?', '*', or '[', '/*' at the end is implied.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-08 19:31:15 +02:00
|
|
|
--glob=<glob-pattern>::
|
|
|
|
Pretend as if all the refs matching shell glob '<glob-pattern>'
|
2010-01-20 10:48:25 +01:00
|
|
|
are listed on the command line as '<commit>'. Leading 'refs/',
|
|
|
|
is automatically prepended if missing. If pattern lacks '?', '*',
|
2010-01-31 14:24:39 +01:00
|
|
|
or '[', '/*' at the end is implied.
|
2010-01-20 10:48:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
ifndef::git-rev-list[]
|
|
|
|
--bisect::
|
|
|
|
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
Pretend as if the bad bisection ref `refs/bisect/bad`
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
was listed and as if it was followed by `--not` and the good
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
bisection refs `refs/bisect/good-*` on the command
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
line.
|
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
--stdin::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the '<commit>' listed on the command
|
2009-11-20 11:50:21 +01:00
|
|
|
line, read them from the standard input. If a '--' separator is
|
|
|
|
seen, stop reading commits and start reading paths to limit the
|
|
|
|
result.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 15:59:18 +01:00
|
|
|
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
--quiet::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't print anything to standard output. This form
|
|
|
|
is primarily meant to allow the caller to
|
|
|
|
test the exit status to see if a range of objects is fully
|
|
|
|
connected (or not). It is faster than redirecting stdout
|
|
|
|
to /dev/null as the output does not have to be formatted.
|
2008-06-04 08:56:56 +02:00
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--cherry-pick::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omit any commit that introduces the same change as
|
|
|
|
another commit on the "other side" when the set of
|
|
|
|
commits are limited with symmetric difference.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
For example, if you have two branches, `A` and `B`, a usual way
|
|
|
|
to list all commits on only one side of them is with
|
|
|
|
`--left-right`, like the example above in the description of
|
|
|
|
that option. It however shows the commits that were cherry-picked
|
|
|
|
from the other branch (for example, "3rd on b" may be cherry-picked
|
|
|
|
from branch A). With this option, such pairs of commits are
|
|
|
|
excluded from the output.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
-g::
|
|
|
|
--walk-reflogs::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of walking the commit ancestry chain, walk
|
|
|
|
reflog entries from the most recent one to older ones.
|
|
|
|
When this option is used you cannot specify commits to
|
|
|
|
exclude (that is, '{caret}commit', 'commit1..commit2',
|
2010-08-20 12:39:48 +02:00
|
|
|
nor 'commit1\...commit2' notations cannot be used).
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
With '\--pretty' format other than oneline (for obvious reasons),
|
|
|
|
this causes the output to have two extra lines of information
|
|
|
|
taken from the reflog. By default, 'commit@\{Nth}' notation is
|
|
|
|
used in the output. When the starting commit is specified as
|
2008-08-10 15:04:34 +02:00
|
|
|
'commit@\{now}', output also uses 'commit@\{timestamp}' notation
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
instead. Under '\--pretty=oneline', the commit message is
|
|
|
|
prefixed with this information on the same line.
|
2008-08-11 23:24:51 +02:00
|
|
|
This option cannot be combined with '\--reverse'.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
See also linkgit:git-reflog[1].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--merge::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a failed merge, show refs that touch files having a
|
|
|
|
conflict and don't exist on all heads to merge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--boundary::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output uninteresting commits at the boundary, which are usually
|
|
|
|
not shown.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-08-12 01:55:36 +02:00
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History Simplification
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-12 11:51:28 +01:00
|
|
|
Sometimes you are only interested in parts of the history, for example the
|
|
|
|
commits modifying a particular <path>. But there are two parts of
|
|
|
|
'History Simplification', one part is selecting the commits and the other
|
|
|
|
is how to do it, as there are various strategies to simplify the history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following options select the commits to be shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<paths>::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commits modifying the given <paths> are selected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--simplify-by-decoration::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commits that are referred by some branch or tag are selected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that extra commits can be shown to give a meaningful history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following options affect the way the simplification is performed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default mode::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simplifies the history to the simplest history explaining the
|
|
|
|
final state of the tree. Simplest because it prunes some side
|
|
|
|
branches if the end result is the same (i.e. merging branches
|
|
|
|
with the same content)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--full-history::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the default mode but does not prune some history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--dense::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only the selected commits are shown, plus some to have a
|
|
|
|
meaningful history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--sparse::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All commits in the simplified history are shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--simplify-merges::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional option to '--full-history' to remove some needless
|
|
|
|
merges from the resulting history, as there are no selected
|
|
|
|
commits contributing to this merge.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-04 01:17:35 +02:00
|
|
|
--ancestry-path::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When given a range of commits to display (e.g. 'commit1..commit2'
|
|
|
|
or 'commit2 {caret}commit1'), only display commits that exist
|
|
|
|
directly on the ancestry chain between the 'commit1' and
|
|
|
|
'commit2', i.e. commits that are both descendants of 'commit1',
|
|
|
|
and ancestors of 'commit2'.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-12 11:51:28 +01:00
|
|
|
A more detailed explanation follows.
|
2008-08-12 01:55:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose you specified `foo` as the <paths>. We shall call commits
|
|
|
|
that modify `foo` !TREESAME, and the rest TREESAME. (In a diff
|
|
|
|
filtered for `foo`, they look different and equal, respectively.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the following, we will always refer to the same example history to
|
|
|
|
illustrate the differences between simplification settings. We assume
|
|
|
|
that you are filtering for a file `foo` in this commit graph:
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.-A---M---N---O---P
|
|
|
|
/ / / / /
|
|
|
|
I B C D E
|
|
|
|
\ / / / /
|
|
|
|
`-------------'
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The horizontal line of history A--P is taken to be the first parent of
|
|
|
|
each merge. The commits are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `I` is the initial commit, in which `foo` exists with contents
|
|
|
|
"asdf", and a file `quux` exists with contents "quux". Initial
|
|
|
|
commits are compared to an empty tree, so `I` is !TREESAME.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* In `A`, `foo` contains just "foo".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `B` contains the same change as `A`. Its merge `M` is trivial and
|
|
|
|
hence TREESAME to all parents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `C` does not change `foo`, but its merge `N` changes it to "foobar",
|
|
|
|
so it is not TREESAME to any parent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `D` sets `foo` to "baz". Its merge `O` combines the strings from
|
|
|
|
`N` and `D` to "foobarbaz"; i.e., it is not TREESAME to any parent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `E` changes `quux` to "xyzzy", and its merge `P` combines the
|
|
|
|
strings to "quux xyzzy". Despite appearing interesting, `P` is
|
|
|
|
TREESAME to all parents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'rev-list' walks backwards through history, including or excluding
|
|
|
|
commits based on whether '\--full-history' and/or parent rewriting
|
|
|
|
(via '\--parents' or '\--children') are used. The following settings
|
|
|
|
are available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default mode::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commits are included if they are not TREESAME to any parent
|
|
|
|
(though this can be changed, see '\--sparse' below). If the
|
|
|
|
commit was a merge, and it was TREESAME to one parent, follow
|
|
|
|
only that parent. (Even if there are several TREESAME
|
|
|
|
parents, follow only one of them.) Otherwise, follow all
|
|
|
|
parents.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
This results in:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.-A---N---O
|
2010-06-04 01:17:33 +02:00
|
|
|
/ / /
|
2008-08-12 01:55:36 +02:00
|
|
|
I---------D
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Note how the rule to only follow the TREESAME parent, if one is
|
|
|
|
available, removed `B` from consideration entirely. `C` was
|
|
|
|
considered via `N`, but is TREESAME. Root commits are compared to an
|
|
|
|
empty tree, so `I` is !TREESAME.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Parent/child relations are only visible with --parents, but that does
|
|
|
|
not affect the commits selected in default mode, so we have shown the
|
|
|
|
parent lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--full-history without parent rewriting::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This mode differs from the default in one point: always follow
|
|
|
|
all parents of a merge, even if it is TREESAME to one of them.
|
|
|
|
Even if more than one side of the merge has commits that are
|
|
|
|
included, this does not imply that the merge itself is! In
|
|
|
|
the example, we get
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
I A B N D O
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
`P` and `M` were excluded because they are TREESAME to a parent. `E`,
|
|
|
|
`C` and `B` were all walked, but only `B` was !TREESAME, so the others
|
|
|
|
do not appear.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Note that without parent rewriting, it is not really possible to talk
|
|
|
|
about the parent/child relationships between the commits, so we show
|
|
|
|
them disconnected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--full-history with parent rewriting::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary commits are only included if they are !TREESAME
|
|
|
|
(though this can be changed, see '\--sparse' below).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Merges are always included. However, their parent list is rewritten:
|
|
|
|
Along each parent, prune away commits that are not included
|
|
|
|
themselves. This results in
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.-A---M---N---O---P
|
|
|
|
/ / / / /
|
|
|
|
I B / D /
|
|
|
|
\ / / / /
|
|
|
|
`-------------'
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Compare to '\--full-history' without rewriting above. Note that `E`
|
|
|
|
was pruned away because it is TREESAME, but the parent list of P was
|
|
|
|
rewritten to contain `E`'s parent `I`. The same happened for `C` and
|
|
|
|
`N`. Note also that `P` was included despite being TREESAME.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the above settings, you can change whether TREESAME
|
|
|
|
affects inclusion:
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
--dense::
|
2008-08-12 01:55:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commits that are walked are included if they are not TREESAME
|
|
|
|
to any parent.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-08 03:36:09 +02:00
|
|
|
--sparse::
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-08-12 01:55:36 +02:00
|
|
|
All commits that are walked are included.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Note that without '\--full-history', this still simplifies merges: if
|
|
|
|
one of the parents is TREESAME, we follow only that one, so the other
|
|
|
|
sides of the merge are never walked.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-08-12 01:55:37 +02:00
|
|
|
--simplify-merges::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, build a history graph in the same way that
|
|
|
|
'\--full-history' with parent rewriting does (see above).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Then simplify each commit `C` to its replacement `C'` in the final
|
|
|
|
history according to the following rules:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
* Set `C'` to `C`.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
* Replace each parent `P` of `C'` with its simplification `P'`. In
|
|
|
|
the process, drop parents that are ancestors of other parents, and
|
|
|
|
remove duplicates.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
* If after this parent rewriting, `C'` is a root or merge commit (has
|
|
|
|
zero or >1 parents), a boundary commit, or !TREESAME, it remains.
|
|
|
|
Otherwise, it is replaced with its only parent.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
The effect of this is best shown by way of comparing to
|
|
|
|
'\--full-history' with parent rewriting. The example turns into:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.-A---M---N---O
|
|
|
|
/ / /
|
|
|
|
I B D
|
|
|
|
\ / /
|
|
|
|
`---------'
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
Note the major differences in `N` and `P` over '\--full-history':
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
* `N`'s parent list had `I` removed, because it is an ancestor of the
|
|
|
|
other parent `M`. Still, `N` remained because it is !TREESAME.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
* `P`'s parent list similarly had `I` removed. `P` was then
|
|
|
|
removed completely, because it had one parent and is TREESAME.
|
|
|
|
--
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-04 01:17:35 +02:00
|
|
|
Finally, there is a fifth simplification mode available:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--ancestry-path::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limit the displayed commits to those directly on the ancestry
|
|
|
|
chain between the "from" and "to" commits in the given commit
|
|
|
|
range. I.e. only display commits that are ancestor of the "to"
|
|
|
|
commit, and descendants of the "from" commit.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
As an example use case, consider the following commit history:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
D---E-------F
|
|
|
|
/ \ \
|
|
|
|
B---C---G---H---I---J
|
|
|
|
/ \
|
|
|
|
A-------K---------------L--M
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
A regular 'D..M' computes the set of commits that are ancestors of `M`,
|
|
|
|
but excludes the ones that are ancestors of `D`. This is useful to see
|
|
|
|
what happened to the history leading to `M` since `D`, in the sense
|
|
|
|
that "what does `M` have that did not exist in `D`". The result in this
|
|
|
|
example would be all the commits, except `A` and `B` (and `D` itself,
|
|
|
|
of course).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
When we want to find out what commits in `M` are contaminated with the
|
|
|
|
bug introduced by `D` and need fixing, however, we might want to view
|
|
|
|
only the subset of 'D..M' that are actually descendants of `D`, i.e.
|
|
|
|
excluding `C` and `K`. This is exactly what the '\--ancestry-path'
|
|
|
|
option does. Applied to the 'D..M' range, it results in:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
E-------F
|
|
|
|
\ \
|
|
|
|
G---H---I---J
|
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
L--M
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-10 10:58:17 +01:00
|
|
|
The '\--simplify-by-decoration' option allows you to view only the
|
|
|
|
big picture of the topology of the history, by omitting commits
|
|
|
|
that are not referenced by tags. Commits are marked as !TREESAME
|
|
|
|
(in other words, kept after history simplification rules described
|
|
|
|
above) if (1) they are referenced by tags, or (2) they change the
|
|
|
|
contents of the paths given on the command line. All other
|
|
|
|
commits are marked as TREESAME (subject to be simplified away).
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
ifdef::git-rev-list[]
|
2008-08-12 01:55:36 +02:00
|
|
|
Bisection Helpers
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
--bisect::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limit output to the one commit object which is roughly halfway between
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
included and excluded commits. Note that the bad bisection ref
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
`refs/bisect/bad` is added to the included commits (if it
|
|
|
|
exists) and the good bisection refs `refs/bisect/good-*` are
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
added to the excluded commits (if they exist). Thus, supposing there
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
are no refs in `refs/bisect/`, if
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2008-11-09 14:46:35 +01:00
|
|
|
$ git rev-list --bisect foo ^bar ^baz
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outputs 'midpoint', the output of the two commands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2008-11-09 14:46:35 +01:00
|
|
|
$ git rev-list foo ^midpoint
|
|
|
|
$ git rev-list midpoint ^bar ^baz
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
would be of roughly the same length. Finding the change which
|
|
|
|
introduces a regression is thus reduced to a binary search: repeatedly
|
|
|
|
generate and test new 'midpoint's until the commit chain is of length
|
|
|
|
one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--bisect-vars::
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
This calculates the same as `--bisect`, except that refs in
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
`refs/bisect/` are not used, and except that this outputs
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
text ready to be eval'ed by the shell. These lines will assign the
|
|
|
|
name of the midpoint revision to the variable `bisect_rev`, and the
|
|
|
|
expected number of commits to be tested after `bisect_rev` is tested
|
|
|
|
to `bisect_nr`, the expected number of commits to be tested if
|
|
|
|
`bisect_rev` turns out to be good to `bisect_good`, the expected
|
|
|
|
number of commits to be tested if `bisect_rev` turns out to be bad to
|
|
|
|
`bisect_bad`, and the number of commits we are bisecting right now to
|
|
|
|
`bisect_all`.
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--bisect-all::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This outputs all the commit objects between the included and excluded
|
|
|
|
commits, ordered by their distance to the included and excluded
|
docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhere
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-18 02:16:20 +01:00
|
|
|
commits. Refs in `refs/bisect/` are not used. The farthest
|
2009-11-24 07:54:44 +01:00
|
|
|
from them is displayed first. (This is the only one displayed by
|
|
|
|
`--bisect`.)
|
2009-03-07 13:37:24 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
This is useful because it makes it easy to choose a good commit to
|
|
|
|
test when you want to avoid to test some of them for some reason (they
|
|
|
|
may not compile for example).
|
2009-03-07 13:37:24 +01:00
|
|
|
+
|
2008-01-18 23:58:57 +01:00
|
|
|
This option can be used along with `--bisect-vars`, in this case,
|
|
|
|
after all the sorted commit objects, there will be the same text as if
|
|
|
|
`--bisect-vars` had been used alone.
|
|
|
|
endif::git-rev-list[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit Ordering
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, the commits are shown in reverse chronological order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--topo-order::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This option makes them appear in topological order (i.e.
|
|
|
|
descendant commits are shown before their parents).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--date-order::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This option is similar to '--topo-order' in the sense that no
|
|
|
|
parent comes before all of its children, but otherwise things
|
|
|
|
are still ordered in the commit timestamp order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--reverse::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output the commits in reverse order.
|
|
|
|
Cannot be combined with '\--walk-reflogs'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Object Traversal
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These options are mostly targeted for packing of git repositories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--objects::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print the object IDs of any object referenced by the listed
|
|
|
|
commits. '--objects foo ^bar' thus means "send me
|
|
|
|
all object IDs which I need to download if I have the commit
|
|
|
|
object 'bar', but not 'foo'".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--objects-edge::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar to '--objects', but also print the IDs of excluded
|
|
|
|
commits prefixed with a "-" character. This is used by
|
|
|
|
linkgit:git-pack-objects[1] to build "thin" pack, which records
|
|
|
|
objects in deltified form based on objects contained in these
|
|
|
|
excluded commits to reduce network traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--unpacked::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only useful with '--objects'; print the object IDs that are not
|
|
|
|
in packs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--no-walk::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only show the given revs, but do not traverse their ancestors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--do-walk::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overrides a previous --no-walk.
|