1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-09 02:33:11 +01:00
git/t/t9001-send-email.sh

1601 lines
45 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
test_description='git send-email'
. ./test-lib.sh
# May be altered later in the test
PREREQ="PERL"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'prepare reference tree' '
echo "1A quick brown fox jumps over the" >file &&
echo "lazy dog" >>file &&
git add file &&
GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="A" git commit -a -m "Initial."
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Setup helper tool' '
write_script fake.sendmail <<-\EOF &&
shift
output=1
while test -f commandline$output
do
output=$(($output+1))
done
for a
do
echo "!$a!"
done >commandline$output
cat >"msgtxt$output"
EOF
git add fake.sendmail &&
GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="A" git commit -a -m "Second."
'
clean_fake_sendmail () {
rm -f commandline* msgtxt*
}
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Extract patches' '
patches=`git format-patch -s --cc="One <one@example.com>" --cc=two@example.com -n HEAD^1`
'
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
# Test no confirm early to ensure remaining tests will not hang
test_no_confirm () {
rm -f no_confirm_okay
echo n | \
GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 \
git send-email \
--from="Example <from@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$@ \
$patches >stdout &&
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
test_must_fail grep "Send this email" stdout &&
>no_confirm_okay
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
}
# Exit immediately to prevent hang if a no-confirm test fails
check_no_confirm () {
if ! test -f no_confirm_okay
then
say 'confirm test failed; skipping remaining tests to prevent hanging'
PREREQ="$PREREQ,CHECK_NO_CONFIRM"
fi
return 0
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
}
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'No confirm with --suppress-cc' '
test_no_confirm --suppress-cc=sob &&
check_no_confirm
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'No confirm with --confirm=never' '
test_no_confirm --confirm=never &&
check_no_confirm
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
'
# leave sendemail.confirm set to never after this so that none of the
# remaining tests prompt unintentionally.
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'No confirm with sendemail.confirm=never' '
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
git config sendemail.confirm never &&
test_no_confirm --compose --subject=foo &&
check_no_confirm
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Send patches' '
git send-email --suppress-cc=sob --from="Example <nobody@example.com>" --to=nobody@example.com --smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" $patches 2>errors
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
!nobody@example.com!
!author@example.com!
!one@example.com!
!two@example.com!
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Verify commandline' '
test_cmp expected commandline1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Send patches with --envelope-sender' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email --envelope-sender="Patch Contributor <patch@example.com>" --suppress-cc=sob --from="Example <nobody@example.com>" --to=nobody@example.com --smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" $patches 2>errors
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
!patch@example.com!
!-i!
!nobody@example.com!
!author@example.com!
!one@example.com!
!two@example.com!
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Verify commandline' '
test_cmp expected commandline1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Send patches with --envelope-sender=auto' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email --envelope-sender=auto --suppress-cc=sob --from="Example <nobody@example.com>" --to=nobody@example.com --smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" $patches 2>errors
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
!nobody@example.com!
!-i!
!nobody@example.com!
!author@example.com!
!one@example.com!
!two@example.com!
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Verify commandline' '
test_cmp expected commandline1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-show-all-headers <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<cc@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
RCPT TO:<bcc@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: cc@example.com,
A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
In-Reply-To: <unique-message-id@example.com>
References: <unique-message-id@example.com>
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_suppress_self () {
test_commit $3 &&
test_when_finished "git reset --hard HEAD^" &&
write_script cccmd-sed <<-EOF &&
sed -n -e s/^cccmd--//p "\$1"
EOF
git commit --amend --author="$1 <$2>" -F - &&
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git format-patch --stdout -1 >"suppress-self-$3.patch" &&
git send-email --from="$1 <$2>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--cc-cmd=./cccmd-sed \
--suppress-cc=self \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
suppress-self-$3.patch &&
mv msgtxt1 msgtxt1-$3 &&
sed -e '/^$/q' msgtxt1-$3 >"msghdr1-$3" &&
>"expected-no-cc-$3" &&
(grep '^Cc:' msghdr1-$3 >"actual-no-cc-$3";
test_cmp expected-no-cc-$3 actual-no-cc-$3)
}
test_suppress_self_unquoted () {
test_suppress_self "$1" "$2" "unquoted-$3" <<-EOF
test suppress-cc.self unquoted-$3 with name $1 email $2
unquoted-$3
cccmd--$1 <$2>
Cc: $1 <$2>
Signed-off-by: $1 <$2>
EOF
}
test_suppress_self_quoted () {
test_suppress_self "$1" "$2" "quoted-$3" <<-EOF
test suppress-cc.self quoted-$3 with name $1 email $2
quoted-$3
cccmd--"$1" <$2>
Cc: $1 <$2>
Cc: "$1" <$2>
Signed-off-by: $1 <$2>
Signed-off-by: "$1" <$2>
EOF
}
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'self name is suppressed' "
test_suppress_self_unquoted 'A U Thor' 'author@example.com' \
'self_name_suppressed'
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'self name with dot is suppressed' "
test_suppress_self_quoted 'A U. Thor' 'author@example.com' \
'self_name_dot_suppressed'
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'non-ascii self name is suppressed' "
test_suppress_self_quoted 'Füñný Nâmé' 'odd_?=mail@example.com' \
'non_ascii_self_suppressed'
"
# This name is long enough to force format-patch to split it into multiple
# encoded-words, assuming it uses UTF-8 with the "Q" encoding.
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'long non-ascii self name is suppressed' "
test_suppress_self_quoted 'Ƒüñníęř €. Nâṁé' 'odd_?=mail@example.com' \
'long_non_ascii_self_suppressed'
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sanitized self name is suppressed' "
test_suppress_self_unquoted '\"A U. Thor\"' 'author@example.com' \
'self_name_sanitized_suppressed'
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Show all headers' '
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--suppress-cc=sob \
--from="Example <from@example.com>" \
--to=to@example.com \
--cc=cc@example.com \
--bcc=bcc@example.com \
--in-reply-to="<unique-message-id@example.com>" \
--smtp-server relay.example.com \
$patches |
sed -e "s/^\(Date:\).*/\1 DATE-STRING/" \
-e "s/^\(Message-Id:\).*/\1 MESSAGE-ID-STRING/" \
-e "s/^\(X-Mailer:\).*/\1 X-MAILER-STRING/" \
>actual-show-all-headers &&
test_cmp expected-show-all-headers actual-show-all-headers
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Prompting works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
send-email: avoid questions when user has an ident Currently we keep getting questions even when the user has properly configured his full name and password: Who should the emails appear to be from? [Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>] And once a question pops up, other questions are turned on. This is annoying. The reason it's safe to avoid this question is because currently the script fails completely when the author (or committer) is not correct, so we won't even be reaching this point in the code. The scenarios, and the current situation: 1) No information at all, no fully qualified domain name fatal: empty ident name (for <felipec@nysa.(none)>) not allowed 2) Only full name fatal: unable to auto-detect email address (got 'felipec@nysa.(none)') 3) Full name + fqdm Who should the emails appear to be from? [Felipe Contreras <felipec@nysa.felipec.org>] 4) Full name + EMAIL Who should the emails appear to be from? [Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>] 5) User configured 6) GIT_COMMITTER 7) GIT_AUTHOR All these are the same as 4) After this patch: 1) 2) won't change: git send-email would still die 4) 5) 6) 7) will change: git send-email won't ask the user This is good, that's what we would expect, because the identity is explicit. 3) will change: git send-email won't ask the user This is bad, because we will try with an address such as 'felipec@nysa.felipec.org', which is most likely not what the user wants, but the user will get warned by default (confirm=auto), and if not, most likely the sending won't work, which the user would readily note and fix. The worst possible scenario is that such mail address does work, and the user sends an email from that address unintentionally, when in fact the user expected to correct that address in the prompt. This is a very, very, very unlikely scenario, with many dependencies: 1) No configured user.name/user.email 2) No specified $EMAIL 3) No configured sendemail.from 4) No specified --from argument 5) A fully qualified domain name 6) A full name in the geckos field 7) A sendmail configuration that allows sending from this domain name 8) confirm=never, or 8.1) confirm configuration not hitting, or 8.2) Getting the error, not being aware of it 9) The user expecting to correct this address in the prompt In a more likely scenario where 7) is not the case (can't send from nysa.felipec.org), the user will simply see the mail was not sent properly, and fix the problem. The much more likely scenario though, is where 5) is not the case (nysa.(none)), and git send-email will fail right away like it does now. So the likelihood of this affecting anybody seriously is very very slim, and the chances of this affecting somebody slightly are still very small. The vast majority, if not all, of git users won't be affected negatively, and a lot will benefit from this. Tests-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-11-24 12:16:19 +01:00
(echo "to@example.com"
echo ""
) | GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 git send-email \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches \
2>errors &&
send-email: avoid questions when user has an ident Currently we keep getting questions even when the user has properly configured his full name and password: Who should the emails appear to be from? [Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>] And once a question pops up, other questions are turned on. This is annoying. The reason it's safe to avoid this question is because currently the script fails completely when the author (or committer) is not correct, so we won't even be reaching this point in the code. The scenarios, and the current situation: 1) No information at all, no fully qualified domain name fatal: empty ident name (for <felipec@nysa.(none)>) not allowed 2) Only full name fatal: unable to auto-detect email address (got 'felipec@nysa.(none)') 3) Full name + fqdm Who should the emails appear to be from? [Felipe Contreras <felipec@nysa.felipec.org>] 4) Full name + EMAIL Who should the emails appear to be from? [Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>] 5) User configured 6) GIT_COMMITTER 7) GIT_AUTHOR All these are the same as 4) After this patch: 1) 2) won't change: git send-email would still die 4) 5) 6) 7) will change: git send-email won't ask the user This is good, that's what we would expect, because the identity is explicit. 3) will change: git send-email won't ask the user This is bad, because we will try with an address such as 'felipec@nysa.felipec.org', which is most likely not what the user wants, but the user will get warned by default (confirm=auto), and if not, most likely the sending won't work, which the user would readily note and fix. The worst possible scenario is that such mail address does work, and the user sends an email from that address unintentionally, when in fact the user expected to correct that address in the prompt. This is a very, very, very unlikely scenario, with many dependencies: 1) No configured user.name/user.email 2) No specified $EMAIL 3) No configured sendemail.from 4) No specified --from argument 5) A fully qualified domain name 6) A full name in the geckos field 7) A sendmail configuration that allows sending from this domain name 8) confirm=never, or 8.1) confirm configuration not hitting, or 8.2) Getting the error, not being aware of it 9) The user expecting to correct this address in the prompt In a more likely scenario where 7) is not the case (can't send from nysa.felipec.org), the user will simply see the mail was not sent properly, and fix the problem. The much more likely scenario though, is where 5) is not the case (nysa.(none)), and git send-email will fail right away like it does now. So the likelihood of this affecting anybody seriously is very very slim, and the chances of this affecting somebody slightly are still very small. The vast majority, if not all, of git users won't be affected negatively, and a lot will benefit from this. Tests-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-11-24 12:16:19 +01:00
grep "^From: A U Thor <author@example.com>\$" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^To: to@example.com\$" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ,AUTOIDENT 'implicit ident is allowed' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
(sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 git send-email \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
--to=to@example.com \
$patches </dev/null 2>errors
)
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ,!AUTOIDENT 'broken implicit ident aborts send-email' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
(sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 && export GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY &&
test_must_fail git send-email \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
--to=to@example.com \
$patches </dev/null 2>errors &&
test_i18ngrep "tell me who you are" errors
)
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'tocmd works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
cp $patches tocmd.patch &&
echo tocmd--tocmd@example.com >>tocmd.patch &&
write_script tocmd-sed <<-\EOF &&
sed -n -e "s/^tocmd--//p" "$1"
EOF
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to-cmd=./tocmd-sed \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
tocmd.patch \
&&
grep "^To: tocmd@example.com" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'cccmd works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
cp $patches cccmd.patch &&
echo "cccmd-- cccmd@example.com" >>cccmd.patch &&
write_script cccmd-sed <<-\EOF &&
sed -n -e "s/^cccmd--//p" "$1"
EOF
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--cc-cmd=./cccmd-sed \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
cccmd.patch \
&&
grep "^ cccmd@example.com" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'reject long lines' '
z8=zzzzzzzz &&
z64=$z8$z8$z8$z8$z8$z8$z8$z8 &&
z512=$z64$z64$z64$z64$z64$z64$z64$z64 &&
clean_fake_sendmail &&
cp $patches longline.patch &&
echo $z512$z512 >>longline.patch &&
test_must_fail git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches longline.patch \
2>errors &&
grep longline.patch errors
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'no patch was sent' '
! test -e commandline1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Author From: in message body' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
sed "1,/^\$/d" <msgtxt1 >msgbody1 &&
grep "From: A <author@example.com>" msgbody1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Author From: not in message body' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--from="A <author@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
sed "1,/^\$/d" <msgtxt1 >msgbody1 &&
! grep "From: A <author@example.com>" msgbody1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'allow long lines with --no-validate' '
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
--no-validate \
$patches longline.patch \
2>errors
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Invalid In-Reply-To' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--in-reply-to=" " \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches \
2>errors &&
! grep "^In-Reply-To: < *>" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Valid In-Reply-To when prompting' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
(echo "From Example <from@example.com>"
echo "To Example <to@example.com>"
echo ""
) | GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 git send-email \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches 2>errors &&
! grep "^In-Reply-To: < *>" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'In-Reply-To without --chain-reply-to' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
echo "<unique-message-id@example.com>" >expect &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--no-chain-reply-to \
--in-reply-to="$(cat expect)" \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches $patches $patches \
2>errors &&
git-send-email.perl: make initial In-Reply-To apply only to first email When an initial --in-reply-to is supplied, make it apply only to the first message; --[no-]chain-reply-to setting are honored by second and subsequent messages; this is also how the git-format-patch option with the same name behaves. Moreover, when $initial_reply_to is asked to the user interactively it is asked as the "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the _first_ email", this makes the user think that the second and subsequent patches are not using it but are considered as replies to the first message or chained according to the --[no-]chain-reply setting. Look at the v2 series in the illustration to see what the new behavior ensures: (before the patch) | (after the patch) [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... | [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests | [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests [PATCH 2/2] Implementation | [PATCH 2/2] Implementation [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll | [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up | [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests | [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation | [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation This is the typical behaviour we want when we send a series with cover letter in reply to some discussion, the new patch series should appear as a separate subtree in the discussion. Also update the documentation on --in-reply-to to describe the new behavior. Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-12 15:55:08 +01:00
# The first message is a reply to --in-reply-to
sed -n -e "s/^In-Reply-To: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
git-send-email.perl: make initial In-Reply-To apply only to first email When an initial --in-reply-to is supplied, make it apply only to the first message; --[no-]chain-reply-to setting are honored by second and subsequent messages; this is also how the git-format-patch option with the same name behaves. Moreover, when $initial_reply_to is asked to the user interactively it is asked as the "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the _first_ email", this makes the user think that the second and subsequent patches are not using it but are considered as replies to the first message or chained according to the --[no-]chain-reply setting. Look at the v2 series in the illustration to see what the new behavior ensures: (before the patch) | (after the patch) [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... | [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests | [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests [PATCH 2/2] Implementation | [PATCH 2/2] Implementation [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll | [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up | [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests | [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation | [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation This is the typical behaviour we want when we send a series with cover letter in reply to some discussion, the new patch series should appear as a separate subtree in the discussion. Also update the documentation on --in-reply-to to describe the new behavior. Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-12 15:55:08 +01:00
# Second and subsequent messages are replies to the first one
sed -n -e "s/^Message-Id: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt1 >expect &&
sed -n -e "s/^In-Reply-To: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
sed -n -e "s/^In-Reply-To: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt3 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'In-Reply-To with --chain-reply-to' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
echo "<unique-message-id@example.com>" >expect &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--chain-reply-to \
--in-reply-to="$(cat expect)" \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches $patches $patches \
2>errors &&
sed -n -e "s/^In-Reply-To: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
sed -n -e "s/^Message-Id: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt1 >expect &&
sed -n -e "s/^In-Reply-To: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt2 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
sed -n -e "s/^Message-Id: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt2 >expect &&
sed -n -e "s/^In-Reply-To: *\(.*\)/\1/p" msgtxt3 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup fake editor' '
write_script fake-editor <<-\EOF
echo fake edit >>"$1"
EOF
'
test_set_editor "$(pwd)/fake-editor"
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--compose works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
git send-email \
--compose --subject foo \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches \
2>errors
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'first message is compose text' '
grep "^fake edit" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'second message is patch' '
grep "Subject:.*Second" msgtxt2
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-sob <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<cc@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: cc@example.com,
A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_suppression () {
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--suppress-cc=$1 ${2+"--suppress-cc=$2"} \
--from="Example <from@example.com>" \
--to=to@example.com \
--smtp-server relay.example.com \
$patches |
sed -e "s/^\(Date:\).*/\1 DATE-STRING/" \
-e "s/^\(Message-Id:\).*/\1 MESSAGE-ID-STRING/" \
-e "s/^\(X-Mailer:\).*/\1 X-MAILER-STRING/" \
>actual-suppress-$1${2+"-$2"} &&
test_cmp expected-suppress-$1${2+"-$2"} actual-suppress-$1${2+"-$2"}
}
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.cc set' '
git config sendemail.cc cc@example.com &&
test_suppression sob
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-sob <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.cc unset' '
git config --unset sendemail.cc &&
test_suppression sob
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-cccmd <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(body) Adding cc: C O Mitter <committer@example.com> from line 'Signed-off-by: C O Mitter <committer@example.com>'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
RCPT TO:<committer@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com,
C O Mitter <committer@example.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.cccmd' '
write_script cccmd <<-\EOF &&
echo cc-cmd@example.com
EOF
git config sendemail.cccmd ./cccmd &&
test_suppression cccmd
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected-suppress-all <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--suppress-cc=all' '
test_suppression all
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-body <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(cc-cmd) Adding cc: cc-cmd@example.com from: './cccmd'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
RCPT TO:<cc-cmd@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com,
cc-cmd@example.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--suppress-cc=body' '
test_suppression body
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-body-cccmd <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--suppress-cc=body --suppress-cc=cccmd' '
test_suppression body cccmd
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-sob <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--suppress-cc=sob' '
test_might_fail git config --unset sendemail.cccmd &&
test_suppression sob
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-bodycc <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(mbox) Adding cc: One <one@example.com> from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(mbox) Adding cc: two@example.com from line 'Cc: One <one@example.com>, two@example.com'
(body) Adding cc: C O Mitter <committer@example.com> from line 'Signed-off-by: C O Mitter <committer@example.com>'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<one@example.com>
RCPT TO:<two@example.com>
RCPT TO:<committer@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: A <author@example.com>,
One <one@example.com>,
two@example.com,
C O Mitter <committer@example.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--suppress-cc=bodycc' '
test_suppression bodycc
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
cat >expected-suppress-cc <<\EOF
0001-Second.patch
(mbox) Adding cc: A <author@example.com> from line 'From: A <author@example.com>'
(body) Adding cc: C O Mitter <committer@example.com> from line 'Signed-off-by: C O Mitter <committer@example.com>'
Dry-OK. Log says:
Server: relay.example.com
MAIL FROM:<from@example.com>
RCPT TO:<to@example.com>
RCPT TO:<author@example.com>
RCPT TO:<committer@example.com>
From: Example <from@example.com>
To: to@example.com
Cc: A <author@example.com>,
C O Mitter <committer@example.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Second.
Date: DATE-STRING
Message-Id: MESSAGE-ID-STRING
X-Mailer: X-MAILER-STRING
Result: OK
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--suppress-cc=cc' '
test_suppression cc
'
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
test_confirm () {
echo y | \
GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 \
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$@ $patches >stdout &&
grep "Send this email" stdout
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
}
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--confirm=always' '
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
test_confirm --confirm=always --suppress-cc=all
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--confirm=auto' '
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
test_confirm --confirm=auto
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--confirm=cc' '
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
test_confirm --confirm=cc
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--confirm=compose' '
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
test_confirm --confirm=compose --compose
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'confirm by default (due to cc)' '
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
CONFIRM=$(git config --get sendemail.confirm) &&
git config --unset sendemail.confirm &&
test_confirm
ret="$?"
git config sendemail.confirm ${CONFIRM:-never}
test $ret = "0"
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'confirm by default (due to --compose)' '
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
CONFIRM=$(git config --get sendemail.confirm) &&
git config --unset sendemail.confirm &&
test_confirm --suppress-cc=all --compose
ret="$?"
git config sendemail.confirm ${CONFIRM:-never}
test $ret = "0"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'confirm detects EOF (inform assumes y)' '
CONFIRM=$(git config --get sendemail.confirm) &&
git config --unset sendemail.confirm &&
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch -2 -o outdir &&
GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 \
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
outdir/*.patch </dev/null
ret="$?"
git config sendemail.confirm ${CONFIRM:-never}
test $ret = "0"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'confirm detects EOF (auto causes failure)' '
CONFIRM=$(git config --get sendemail.confirm) &&
git config sendemail.confirm auto &&
GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 &&
export GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY &&
test_must_fail git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches </dev/null
ret="$?"
git config sendemail.confirm ${CONFIRM:-never}
test $ret = "0"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'confirm does not loop forever' '
CONFIRM=$(git config --get sendemail.confirm) &&
git config sendemail.confirm auto &&
GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 &&
export GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY &&
yes "bogus" | test_must_fail git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches
ret="$?"
git config sendemail.confirm ${CONFIRM:-never}
test $ret = "0"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'utf8 Cc is rfc2047 encoded' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch -1 -o outdir --cc="àéìöú <utf8@example.com>" &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
outdir/*.patch &&
grep "^ " msgtxt1 |
grep "=?UTF-8?q?=C3=A0=C3=A9=C3=AC=C3=B6=C3=BA?= <utf8@example.com>"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--compose adds MIME for utf8 body' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
write_script fake-editor-utf8 <<-\EOF &&
echo "utf8 body: àéìöú" >>"$1"
EOF
GIT_EDITOR="\"$(pwd)/fake-editor-utf8\"" \
git send-email \
--compose --subject foo \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
grep "^utf8 body" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--compose respects user mime type' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
write_script fake-editor-utf8-mime <<-\EOF &&
cat >"$1" <<-\EOM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: foo
utf8 body: àéìöú
EOM
EOF
GIT_EDITOR="\"$(pwd)/fake-editor-utf8-mime\"" \
git send-email \
--compose --subject foo \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
grep "^utf8 body" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1" msgtxt1 &&
! grep "^Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--compose adds MIME for utf8 subject' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
GIT_EDITOR="\"$(pwd)/fake-editor\"" \
git send-email \
--compose --subject utf8-sübjëct \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
grep "^fake edit" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^Subject: =?UTF-8?q?utf8-s=C3=BCbj=C3=ABct?=" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'utf8 author is correctly passed on' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
test_commit weird_author &&
test_when_finished "git reset --hard HEAD^" &&
git commit --amend --author "Füñný Nâmé <odd_?=mail@example.com>" &&
git format-patch --stdout -1 >funny_name.patch &&
git send-email --from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
funny_name.patch &&
grep "^From: Füñný Nâmé <odd_?=mail@example.com>" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'utf8 sender is not duplicated' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
test_commit weird_sender &&
test_when_finished "git reset --hard HEAD^" &&
git commit --amend --author "Füñný Nâmé <odd_?=mail@example.com>" &&
git format-patch --stdout -1 >funny_name.patch &&
git send-email --from="Füñný Nâmé <odd_?=mail@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
funny_name.patch &&
grep "^From: " msgtxt1 >msgfrom &&
test_line_count = 1 msgfrom
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.composeencoding works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git config sendemail.composeencoding iso-8859-1 &&
write_script fake-editor-utf8 <<-\EOF &&
echo "utf8 body: àéìöú" >>"$1"
EOF
GIT_EDITOR="\"$(pwd)/fake-editor-utf8\"" \
git send-email \
--compose --subject foo \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
grep "^utf8 body" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--compose-encoding works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
write_script fake-editor-utf8 <<-\EOF &&
echo "utf8 body: àéìöú" >>"$1"
EOF
GIT_EDITOR="\"$(pwd)/fake-editor-utf8\"" \
git send-email \
--compose-encoding iso-8859-1 \
--compose --subject foo \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
grep "^utf8 body" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--compose-encoding overrides sendemail.composeencoding' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git config sendemail.composeencoding iso-8859-1 &&
write_script fake-editor-utf8 <<-\EOF &&
echo "utf8 body: àéìöú" >>"$1"
EOF
GIT_EDITOR="\"$(pwd)/fake-editor-utf8\"" \
git send-email \
--compose-encoding iso-8859-2 \
--compose --subject foo \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
grep "^utf8 body" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--compose-encoding adds correct MIME for subject' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
GIT_EDITOR="\"$(pwd)/fake-editor\"" \
git send-email \
--compose-encoding iso-8859-2 \
--compose --subject utf8-sübjëct \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$patches &&
grep "^fake edit" msgtxt1 &&
grep "^Subject: =?iso-8859-2?q?utf8-s=C3=BCbj=C3=ABct?=" msgtxt1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'detects ambiguous reference/file conflict' '
echo master >master &&
git add master &&
git commit -m"add master" &&
test_must_fail git send-email --dry-run master 2>errors &&
grep disambiguate errors
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'feed two files' '
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch -2 -o outdir &&
send-email: add --confirm option and configuration setting send-email violates the principle of least surprise by automatically cc'ing additional recipients without confirming this with the user. This patch teaches send-email a --confirm option. It takes the following values: --confirm=always always confirm before sending --confirm=never never confirm before sending --confirm=cc confirm before sending when send-email has automatically added addresses from the patch to the Cc list --confirm=compose confirm before sending the first message when using --compose. (Needed to maintain backwards compatibility with existing behavior.) --confirm=auto 'cc' + 'compose' If sendemail.confirm is unconfigured, the option defaults to 'compose' if any suppress-Cc related options have been used, otherwise it defaults to 'auto'. Unfortunately, it is impossible to introduce this patch such that it helps new users without potentially annoying some existing users. We attempt to mitigate the latter by: * Allowing the user to set 'git config sendemail.confirm never' * Allowing the user to say 'all' after the first prompt to not be prompted on remaining emails during the same invocation. * Telling the user about the 'sendemail.confirm' setting if it is unconfigured whenever we prompt due to Cc before sending. * Only prompting if no --suppress related options have been passed, as using such an option is likely to indicate an experienced send-email user. There is a slight fib in message informing the user of the sendemail.confirm setting and this is intentional. Setting 'auto' differs from leaving sendemail.confirm unset in two ways: 1) 'auto' obviously squelches the informational message; 2) 'auto' prompts when the Cc list has been expanded even in the presence of a --suppress related option, where leaving sendemail.confirm unset does not. This is intentional to keep the message simple, and to avoid adding another sendemail.confirm value ('auto-except-suppress'?). Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03 05:52:18 +01:00
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
outdir/000?-*.patch 2>errors >out &&
grep "^Subject: " out >subjects &&
test "z$(sed -n -e 1p subjects)" = "zSubject: [PATCH 1/2] Second." &&
test "z$(sed -n -e 2p subjects)" = "zSubject: [PATCH 2/2] add master"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'in-reply-to but no threading' '
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--in-reply-to="<in-reply-id@example.com>" \
--no-thread \
$patches |
grep "In-Reply-To: <in-reply-id@example.com>"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'no in-reply-to and no threading' '
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--no-thread \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
! grep "In-Reply-To: " stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'threading but no chain-reply-to' '
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--thread \
--no-chain-reply-to \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
grep "In-Reply-To: " stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.to works' '
git config --replace-all sendemail.to "Somebody <somebody@ex.com>" &&
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
grep "To: Somebody <somebody@ex.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--no-to overrides sendemail.to' '
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--no-to \
--to=nobody@example.com \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
grep "To: nobody@example.com" stdout &&
! grep "To: Somebody <somebody@ex.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.cc works' '
git config --replace-all sendemail.cc "Somebody <somebody@ex.com>" &&
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
grep "Cc: Somebody <somebody@ex.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--no-cc overrides sendemail.cc' '
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--no-cc \
--cc=bodies@example.com \
--to=nobody@example.com \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
grep "Cc: bodies@example.com" stdout &&
! grep "Cc: Somebody <somebody@ex.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.bcc works' '
git config --replace-all sendemail.bcc "Other <other@ex.com>" &&
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server relay.example.com \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
grep "RCPT TO:<other@ex.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--no-bcc overrides sendemail.bcc' '
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--no-bcc \
--bcc=bodies@example.com \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server relay.example.com \
$patches $patches >stdout &&
grep "RCPT TO:<bodies@example.com>" stdout &&
! grep "RCPT TO:<other@ex.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'patches To headers are used by default' '
patch=`git format-patch -1 --to="bodies@example.com"` &&
test_when_finished "rm $patch" &&
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--smtp-server relay.example.com \
$patch >stdout &&
grep "RCPT TO:<bodies@example.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'patches To headers are appended to' '
patch=`git format-patch -1 --to="bodies@example.com"` &&
test_when_finished "rm $patch" &&
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server relay.example.com \
$patch >stdout &&
grep "RCPT TO:<bodies@example.com>" stdout &&
grep "RCPT TO:<nobody@example.com>" stdout
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'To headers from files reset each patch' '
patch1=`git format-patch -1 --to="bodies@example.com"` &&
patch2=`git format-patch -1 --to="other@example.com" HEAD~` &&
test_when_finished "rm $patch1 && rm $patch2" &&
git send-email \
--dry-run \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to="nobody@example.com" \
--smtp-server relay.example.com \
$patch1 $patch2 >stdout &&
test $(grep -c "RCPT TO:<bodies@example.com>" stdout) = 1 &&
test $(grep -c "RCPT TO:<nobody@example.com>" stdout) = 2 &&
test $(grep -c "RCPT TO:<other@example.com>" stdout) = 1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >email-using-8bit <<\EOF
From fe6ecc66ece37198fe5db91fa2fc41d9f4fe5cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <bogus-message-id@example.com>
From: author@example.com
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:53:58 +0200
Subject: subject goes here
Dieser deutsche Text enthält einen Umlaut!
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
echo "Subject: subject goes here" >expected
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'ASCII subject is not RFC2047 quoted' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
echo bogus |
git send-email --from=author@example.com --to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
--8bit-encoding=UTF-8 \
email-using-8bit >stdout &&
grep "Subject" msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >content-type-decl <<-\EOF
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'asks about and fixes 8bit encodings' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
echo |
git send-email --from=author@example.com --to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-8bit >stdout &&
grep "do not declare a Content-Transfer-Encoding" stdout &&
grep email-using-8bit stdout &&
grep "Which 8bit encoding" stdout &&
egrep "Content|MIME" msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp actual content-type-decl
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.8bitEncoding works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git config sendemail.assume8bitEncoding UTF-8 &&
echo bogus |
git send-email --from=author@example.com --to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-8bit >stdout &&
egrep "Content|MIME" msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp actual content-type-decl
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--8bit-encoding overrides sendemail.8bitEncoding' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git config sendemail.assume8bitEncoding "bogus too" &&
echo bogus |
git send-email --from=author@example.com --to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
--8bit-encoding=UTF-8 \
email-using-8bit >stdout &&
egrep "Content|MIME" msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp actual content-type-decl
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >email-using-8bit <<-\EOF
From fe6ecc66ece37198fe5db91fa2fc41d9f4fe5cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <bogus-message-id@example.com>
From: author@example.com
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:53:58 +0200
Subject: Dieser Betreff enthält auch einen Umlaut!
Nothing to see here.
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
Subject: =?UTF-8?q?Dieser=20Betreff=20enth=C3=A4lt=20auch=20einen=20Umlaut!?=
EOF
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--8bit-encoding also treats subject' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
echo bogus |
git send-email --from=author@example.com --to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
--8bit-encoding=UTF-8 \
email-using-8bit >stdout &&
grep "Subject" msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >email-using-8bit <<-\EOF
From fe6ecc66ece37198fe5db91fa2fc41d9f4fe5cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <bogus-message-id@example.com>
From: A U Thor <author@example.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:53:58 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Nothing to see here.
Dieser Betreff enthält auch einen Umlaut!
EOF
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.transferencoding=7bit fails on 8bit data' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git config sendemail.transferEncoding 7bit &&
test_must_fail git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=7bit \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-8bit \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
grep "cannot send message as 7bit" errors &&
test -z "$(ls msgtxt*)"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--transfer-encoding overrides sendemail.transferEncoding' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git config sendemail.transferEncoding 8bit
test_must_fail git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=7bit \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-8bit \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
grep "cannot send message as 7bit" errors &&
test -z "$(ls msgtxt*)"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.transferencoding=8bit' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=8bit \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-8bit \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
sed '1,/^$/d' msgtxt1 >actual &&
sed '1,/^$/d' email-using-8bit >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
Dieser Betreff enth=C3=A4lt auch einen Umlaut!
EOF
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '8-bit and sendemail.transferencoding=quoted-printable' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=quoted-printable \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-8bit \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
sed '1,/^$/d' msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
RGllc2VyIEJldHJlZmYgZW50aMOkbHQgYXVjaCBlaW5lbiBVbWxhdXQhCg==
EOF
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '8-bit and sendemail.transferencoding=base64' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=base64 \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-8bit \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
sed '1,/^$/d' msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >email-using-qp <<-\EOF
From fe6ecc66ece37198fe5db91fa2fc41d9f4fe5cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <bogus-message-id@example.com>
From: A U Thor <author@example.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:53:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Nothing to see here.
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
Dieser Betreff enth=C3=A4lt auch einen Umlaut!
EOF
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'convert from quoted-printable to base64' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=base64 \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-qp \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
sed '1,/^$/d' msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' "
tr -d '\\015' | tr '%' '\\015' >email-using-crlf <<EOF
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
From fe6ecc66ece37198fe5db91fa2fc41d9f4fe5cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <bogus-message-id@example.com>
From: A U Thor <author@example.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:53:58 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Nothing to see here.
Look, I have a CRLF and an = sign!%
EOF
"
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
Look, I have a CRLF and an =3D sign!=0D
EOF
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'CRLF and sendemail.transferencoding=quoted-printable' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=quoted-printable \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-crlf \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
sed '1,/^$/d' msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'setup expect' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF
TG9vaywgSSBoYXZlIGEgQ1JMRiBhbmQgYW4gPSBzaWduIQ0K
EOF
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'CRLF and sendemail.transferencoding=base64' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
git send-email \
--transfer-encoding=base64 \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
email-using-crlf \
2>errors >out &&
git-send-email: add --transfer-encoding option The thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/257392 details problems when applying patches with "git am" in a repository with CRLF line endings. In the example in the thread, the repository originated from "git-svn" so it is not possible to use core.eol and friends on it. Right now, the best option is to use "git am --keep-cr". However, when a patch create new files, the patch application process will reject the new file because it finds a "/dev/null\r" string instead of "/dev/null". The problem is that SMTP transport is CRLF-unsafe. Sending a patch by email is the same as passing it through "dos2unix | unix2dos". The newly introduced CRLFs are normally transparent because git-am strips them. The keepcr=true setting preserves them, but it is mostly working by chance and it would be very problematic to have a "git am" workflow in a repository with mixed LF and CRLF line endings. The MIME solution to this is the quoted-printable transfer enconding. This is not something that we want to enable by default, since it makes received emails horrible to look at. However, it is a very good match for projects that store CRLF line endings in the repository. The only disadvantage of quoted-printable is that quoted-printable patches fail to apply if the maintainer uses "git am --keep-cr". This is because the decoded patch will have two carriage returns at the end of the line. Therefore, add support for base64 transfer encoding too, which makes received emails downright impossible to look at outside a MUA, but really just works. The patch covers all bases, including users that still live in the late 80s, by also providing a 7bit content transfer encoding that refuses to send emails with non-ASCII character in them. And finally, "8bit" will add a Content-Transfer-Encoding header but otherwise do nothing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-25 15:00:27 +01:00
sed '1,/^$/d' msgtxt1 >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
# Note that the patches in this test are deliberately out of order; we
# want to make sure it works even if the cover-letter is not in the
# first mail.
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
test_must_fail git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
outdir/0002-*.patch \
outdir/0000-*.patch \
outdir/0001-*.patch \
2>errors >out &&
grep "SUBJECT HERE" errors &&
test -z "$(ls msgtxt*)"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--force sends cover letter template anyway' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
git send-email \
--force \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=nobody@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
outdir/0002-*.patch \
outdir/0000-*.patch \
outdir/0001-*.patch \
2>errors >out &&
! grep "SUBJECT HERE" errors &&
test -n "$(ls msgtxt*)"
'
test_cover_addresses () {
header="$1"
shift
clean_fake_sendmail &&
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
cover=`echo outdir/0000-*.patch` &&
mv $cover cover-to-edit.patch &&
perl -pe "s/^From:/$header: extra\@address.com\nFrom:/" cover-to-edit.patch >"$cover" &&
git send-email \
--force \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--no-to --no-cc \
"$@" \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
outdir/0000-*.patch \
outdir/0001-*.patch \
outdir/0002-*.patch \
2>errors >out &&
grep "^$header: extra@address.com" msgtxt1 >to1 &&
grep "^$header: extra@address.com" msgtxt2 >to2 &&
grep "^$header: extra@address.com" msgtxt3 >to3 &&
test_line_count = 1 to1 &&
test_line_count = 1 to2 &&
test_line_count = 1 to3
}
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'to-cover adds To to all mail' '
test_cover_addresses "To" --to-cover
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'cc-cover adds Cc to all mail' '
test_cover_addresses "Cc" --cc-cover
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'tocover adds To to all mail' '
test_config sendemail.tocover true &&
test_cover_addresses "To"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'cccover adds Cc to all mail' '
test_config sendemail.cccover true &&
test_cover_addresses "Cc"
'
send-email: Fix %config_path_settings handling cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30) broke the expansion of aliases. This was caused by treating %config_path_settings, newly introduced in said patch, like %config_bool_settings instead of like %config_settings. Copy from %config_settings, making it more readable. While at it add basic test for expansion of aliases, and for path expansion, which would catch this error. Nb. there were a few issues that were responsible for this error: 1. %config_bool_settings and %config_settings despite similar name have different semantic. %config_bool_settings values are arrays where the first element is (reference to) the variable to set, and second element is default value... which admittedly is a bit cryptic. More readable if more verbose option would be to use hash reference, e.g.: my %config_bool_settings = ( "thread" => { variable => \$thread, default => 1}, [...] %config_settings values are either either reference to scalar variable or reference to array. In second case it means that option (or config option) is multi-valued. BTW. this is similar to what Getopt::Long does. 2. In cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30) the setting "aliasesfile" was moved from %config_settings to newly introduced %config_path_settings. But the loop that parses settings from %config_path_settings was copy'n'pasted *wrongly* from %config_bool_settings instead of from %config_settings. It looks like cec5dae author cargo-culted this change... 3. 994d6c6 (send-email: address expansion for common mailers, 2006-05-14) didn't add test for alias expansion to t9001-send-email.sh Signed-off-by: Cord Seele <cowose@gmail.com> Tested-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-14 22:53:31 +02:00
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.aliasfiletype=mailrc' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
echo "alias sbd somebody@example.org" >.mailrc &&
git config --replace-all sendemail.aliasesfile "$(pwd)/.mailrc" &&
git config sendemail.aliasfiletype mailrc &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=sbd \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
outdir/0001-*.patch \
2>errors >out &&
send-email: Fix %config_path_settings handling cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30) broke the expansion of aliases. This was caused by treating %config_path_settings, newly introduced in said patch, like %config_bool_settings instead of like %config_settings. Copy from %config_settings, making it more readable. While at it add basic test for expansion of aliases, and for path expansion, which would catch this error. Nb. there were a few issues that were responsible for this error: 1. %config_bool_settings and %config_settings despite similar name have different semantic. %config_bool_settings values are arrays where the first element is (reference to) the variable to set, and second element is default value... which admittedly is a bit cryptic. More readable if more verbose option would be to use hash reference, e.g.: my %config_bool_settings = ( "thread" => { variable => \$thread, default => 1}, [...] %config_settings values are either either reference to scalar variable or reference to array. In second case it means that option (or config option) is multi-valued. BTW. this is similar to what Getopt::Long does. 2. In cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30) the setting "aliasesfile" was moved from %config_settings to newly introduced %config_path_settings. But the loop that parses settings from %config_path_settings was copy'n'pasted *wrongly* from %config_bool_settings instead of from %config_settings. It looks like cec5dae author cargo-culted this change... 3. 994d6c6 (send-email: address expansion for common mailers, 2006-05-14) didn't add test for alias expansion to t9001-send-email.sh Signed-off-by: Cord Seele <cowose@gmail.com> Tested-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-14 22:53:31 +02:00
grep "^!somebody@example\.org!$" commandline1
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'sendemail.aliasfile=~/.mailrc' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
echo "alias sbd someone@example.org" >~/.mailrc &&
git config --replace-all sendemail.aliasesfile "~/.mailrc" &&
git config sendemail.aliasfiletype mailrc &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=sbd \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
outdir/0001-*.patch \
2>errors >out &&
send-email: Fix %config_path_settings handling cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30) broke the expansion of aliases. This was caused by treating %config_path_settings, newly introduced in said patch, like %config_bool_settings instead of like %config_settings. Copy from %config_settings, making it more readable. While at it add basic test for expansion of aliases, and for path expansion, which would catch this error. Nb. there were a few issues that were responsible for this error: 1. %config_bool_settings and %config_settings despite similar name have different semantic. %config_bool_settings values are arrays where the first element is (reference to) the variable to set, and second element is default value... which admittedly is a bit cryptic. More readable if more verbose option would be to use hash reference, e.g.: my %config_bool_settings = ( "thread" => { variable => \$thread, default => 1}, [...] %config_settings values are either either reference to scalar variable or reference to array. In second case it means that option (or config option) is multi-valued. BTW. this is similar to what Getopt::Long does. 2. In cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30) the setting "aliasesfile" was moved from %config_settings to newly introduced %config_path_settings. But the loop that parses settings from %config_path_settings was copy'n'pasted *wrongly* from %config_bool_settings instead of from %config_settings. It looks like cec5dae author cargo-culted this change... 3. 994d6c6 (send-email: address expansion for common mailers, 2006-05-14) didn't add test for alias expansion to t9001-send-email.sh Signed-off-by: Cord Seele <cowose@gmail.com> Tested-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-14 22:53:31 +02:00
grep "^!someone@example\.org!$" commandline1
'
do_xmailer_test () {
expected=$1 params=$2 &&
git format-patch -1 &&
git send-email \
--from="Example <nobody@example.com>" \
--to=someone@example.com \
--smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
$params \
0001-*.patch \
2>errors >out &&
{ grep '^X-Mailer:' out || :; } >mailer &&
test_line_count = $expected mailer
}
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--[no-]xmailer without any configuration' '
do_xmailer_test 1 "--xmailer" &&
do_xmailer_test 0 "--no-xmailer"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--[no-]xmailer with sendemail.xmailer=true' '
test_config sendemail.xmailer true &&
do_xmailer_test 1 "" &&
do_xmailer_test 0 "--no-xmailer" &&
do_xmailer_test 1 "--xmailer"
'
test_expect_success $PREREQ '--[no-]xmailer with sendemail.xmailer=false' '
test_config sendemail.xmailer false &&
do_xmailer_test 0 "" &&
do_xmailer_test 0 "--no-xmailer" &&
do_xmailer_test 1 "--xmailer"
'
test_done