mirrors/git
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-05 16:52:59 +01:00
Code Activity
git/t/t1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh

530 lines
17 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

[PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell". This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m merge works correctly. It covers all the tricky cases known back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting files/directories cases since then. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-14 10:46:46 +02:00
#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano
#
test_description='Three way merge with read-tree -m
This test tries three-way merge with read-tree -m
There is one ancestor (called O for Original) and two branches A
and B derived from it. We want to do a 3-way merge between A and
B, using O as the common ancestor.
merge A O B
Decisions are made by comparing contents of O, A and B pathname
by pathname. The result is determined by the following guiding
principle:
- If only A does something to it and B does not touch it, take
whatever A does.
- If only B does something to it and A does not touch it, take
whatever B does.
- If both A and B does something but in the same way, take
whatever they do.
- If A and B does something but different things, we need a
3-way merge:
- We cannot do anything about the following cases:
* O does not have it. A and B both must be adding to the
same path independently.
* A deletes it. B must be modifying.
- Otherwise, A and B are modifying. Run 3-way merge.
First, the case matrix.
- Vertical axis is for A'\''s actions.
- Horizontal axis is for B'\''s actions.
.----------------------------------------------------------------.
| A B | No Action | Delete | Modify | Add |
|------------+------------+------------+------------+------------|
| No Action | | | | |
| | select O | delete | select B | select B |
| | | | | |
|------------+------------+------------+------------+------------|
| Delete | | | ********** | can |
| | delete | delete | merge | not |
| | | | | happen |
|------------+------------+------------+------------+------------|
| Modify | | ********** | ?????????? | can |
| | select A | merge | select A=B | not |
| | | | merge | happen |
|------------+------------+------------+------------+------------|
| Add | | can | can | ?????????? |
| | select A | not | not | select A=B |
| | | happen | happen | merge |
.----------------------------------------------------------------.
In addition:
SS: a special case of MM, where A and B makes the same modification.
LL: a special case of AA, where A and B creates the same file.
TT: a special case of MM, where A and B makes mergeable changes.
DF: a special case, where A makes a directory and B makes a file.
'
. ./test-lib.sh
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-read-tree.sh
tests: use $TEST_DIRECTORY to refer to the t/ directory Many test scripts assumed that they will start in a 'trash' subdirectory that is a single level down from the t/ directory, and referred to their test vector files by asking for files like "../t9999/expect". This will break if we move the 'trash' subdirectory elsewhere. To solve this, we earlier introduced "$TEST_DIRECTORY" so that they can refer to t/ directory reliably. This finally makes all the tests use it to refer to the outside environment. With this patch, and a one-liner not included here (because it would contradict with what Dscho really wants to do): | diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh | index 70ea7e0..60e69e4 100644 | --- a/t/test-lib.sh | +++ b/t/test-lib.sh | @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ fi | . ../GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS | | # Test repository | -test="trash directory" | +test="trash directory/another level/yet another" | rm -fr "$test" || { | trap - exit | echo >&5 "FATAL: Cannot prepare test area" all the tests still pass, but we would want extra sets of eyeballs on this type of change to really make sure. [jc: with help from Stephan Beyer on http-push tests I do not run myself; credits for locating silly quoting errors go to Olivier Marin.] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-08 11:26:28 +02:00
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-read-tree-m-3way.sh
[PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell". This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m merge works correctly. It covers all the tricky cases known back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting files/directories cases since then. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-14 10:46:46 +02:00
################################################################
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
# Trivial "majority when 3 stages exist" merge plus #2ALT, #3ALT
# and #5ALT trivial merges.
[PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell". This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m merge works correctly. It covers all the tricky cases known back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting files/directories cases since then. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-14 10:46:46 +02:00
cat >expected <<\EOF
[PATCH] Make ls-* output consistent with diff-* output format. Use SP as the column separator except the ones before path which uses TAB, to make the output format consistent across ls-* and diff-* commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-26 23:38:19 +02:00
100644 X 2 AA
100644 X 3 AA
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
100644 X 0 AN
[PATCH] Make ls-* output consistent with diff-* output format. Use SP as the column separator except the ones before path which uses TAB, to make the output format consistent across ls-* and diff-* commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-26 23:38:19 +02:00
100644 X 1 DD
100644 X 3 DF
100644 X 2 DF/DF
100644 X 1 DM
100644 X 3 DM
100644 X 1 DN
100644 X 3 DN
[PATCH] read-tree: fix too strong index requirement #5ALT This fixes too strong index requirement 3-way merge enforces in one case: the same file is added in both branches. In this case, the original code insisted that if the index file has that path, it must match our branch and be up-to-date. However in this particular case, it only has to match it, and can be dirty. We just need to make sure that we keep the work-tree copy instead of checking out the merge result. The resolution of such a path, however, cannot be left to outside script, because we will not keep the original stage0 entries for unmerged paths when read-tree finishes, and at that point, the knowledge of "if we resolve it to match the new file added in both branches, the merge succeeds and the work tree would not lose information, but we should _not_ update the work tree from the resulting index file" is lost. For this reason, the now code needs to resolve this case (#5ALT) internally. This affects some existing tests in the test suite, but all in positive ways. In t1000 (3-way test), this #5ALT case now gets one stage0 entry, instead of an identical stage2 and stage3 entry pair, for such a path, and one test that checked for merge failure (because the test assumed the "stricter-than-necessary" behaviour) does not have to fail anymore. In t1005 (emu23 test), two tests that involves a case where the work tree already had a change introduced in the upstream (aka "merged head"), the merge succeeds instead of failing. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 03:37:47 +02:00
100644 X 0 LL
[PATCH] Make ls-* output consistent with diff-* output format. Use SP as the column separator except the ones before path which uses TAB, to make the output format consistent across ls-* and diff-* commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-26 23:38:19 +02:00
100644 X 1 MD
100644 X 2 MD
100644 X 1 MM
100644 X 2 MM
100644 X 3 MM
100644 X 0 MN
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
100644 X 0 NA
[PATCH] Make ls-* output consistent with diff-* output format. Use SP as the column separator except the ones before path which uses TAB, to make the output format consistent across ls-* and diff-* commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-26 23:38:19 +02:00
100644 X 1 ND
100644 X 2 ND
100644 X 0 NM
100644 X 0 NN
100644 X 0 SS
100644 X 1 TT
100644 X 2 TT
100644 X 3 TT
100644 X 2 Z/AA
100644 X 3 Z/AA
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
100644 X 0 Z/AN
[PATCH] Make ls-* output consistent with diff-* output format. Use SP as the column separator except the ones before path which uses TAB, to make the output format consistent across ls-* and diff-* commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-26 23:38:19 +02:00
100644 X 1 Z/DD
100644 X 1 Z/DM
100644 X 3 Z/DM
100644 X 1 Z/DN
100644 X 3 Z/DN
100644 X 1 Z/MD
100644 X 2 Z/MD
100644 X 1 Z/MM
100644 X 2 Z/MM
100644 X 3 Z/MM
100644 X 0 Z/MN
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
100644 X 0 Z/NA
[PATCH] Make ls-* output consistent with diff-* output format. Use SP as the column separator except the ones before path which uses TAB, to make the output format consistent across ls-* and diff-* commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-26 23:38:19 +02:00
100644 X 1 Z/ND
100644 X 2 Z/ND
100644 X 0 Z/NM
100644 X 0 Z/NN
[PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell". This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m merge works correctly. It covers all the tricky cases known back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting files/directories cases since then. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-14 10:46:46 +02:00
EOF
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result () {
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git ls-files --stage | sed -e 's/ '"$_x40"' / X /' >current &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 07:28:56 +02:00
test_cmp expected current
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
}
[PATCH] Tests: read-tree -m test updates. This updates t1000 (basic 3-way merge test) to check the merge results for both successful cases (earlier one checked the result for only one of them). Also fixes typos in t1002 that broke '&&' chain, potentially missing a test failure before the chain got broken. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 11:08:54 +02:00
# This is done on an empty work directory, which is the normal
# merge person behaviour.
test_expect_success \
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
'3-way merge with git read-tree -m, empty cache' \
[PATCH] Tests: read-tree -m test updates. This updates t1000 (basic 3-way merge test) to check the merge results for both successful cases (earlier one checked the result for only one of them). Also fixes typos in t1002 that broke '&&' chain, potentially missing a test failure before the chain got broken. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 11:08:54 +02:00
"rm -fr [NDMALTS][NDMALTSF] Z &&
rm .git/index &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
[PATCH] Tests: read-tree -m test updates. This updates t1000 (basic 3-way merge test) to check the merge results for both successful cases (earlier one checked the result for only one of them). Also fixes typos in t1002 that broke '&&' chain, potentially missing a test failure before the chain got broken. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 11:08:54 +02:00
# This starts out with the first head, which is the normal
# patch submitter behaviour.
[PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell". This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m merge works correctly. It covers all the tricky cases known back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting files/directories cases since then. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-14 10:46:46 +02:00
test_expect_success \
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
'3-way merge with git read-tree -m, match H' \
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
"rm -fr [NDMALTS][NDMALTSF] Z &&
rm .git/index &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed $tree_A &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git checkout-index -f -u -a &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
: <<\END_OF_CASE_TABLE
We have so far tested only empty index and clean-and-matching-A index
case which are trivial. Make sure index requirements are also
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
checked.
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
"git read-tree -m O A B"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
O A B result index requirements
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1 missing missing missing - must not exist.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
2 missing missing exists take B* must match B, if exists.
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
------------------------------------------------------------------
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
3 missing exists missing take A* must match A, if exists.
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
------------------------------------------------------------------
4 missing exists A!=B no merge must match A and be
up-to-date, if exists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
5 missing exists A==B take A must match A, if exists.
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
------------------------------------------------------------------
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
6 exists missing missing remove must not exist.
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
------------------------------------------------------------------
7 exists missing O!=B no merge must not exist.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
8 exists missing O==B remove must not exist.
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
------------------------------------------------------------------
9 exists O!=A missing no merge must match A and be
up-to-date, if exists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
t1000: fix case table. Case #10 is not handled with unpack-trees.c:threeway_merge() internally, unless under the agressive rule, and it is not a bug. As the test expects, ND (one side did not do anything, other side deleted) case was meant to be handled by the caller's policy (e.g. git-merge-one-file or git-merge-recursive). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:42:01 +02:00
10 exists O==A missing no merge must match A
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
------------------------------------------------------------------
11 exists O!=A O!=B no merge must match A and be
A!=B up-to-date, if exists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
12 exists O!=A O!=B take A must match A, if exists.
A==B
------------------------------------------------------------------
13 exists O!=A O==B take A must match A, if exists.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
14 exists O==A O!=B take B if exists, must either (1)
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
match A and be up-to-date,
or (2) match B.
------------------------------------------------------------------
15 exists O==A O==B take B must match A if exists.
[PATCH] Add debugging help for case #16 to read-tree.c This will help us detect if real-world example merges have multiple merge-base candidates and one of them matches one head while another matches the other head. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-06 21:53:56 +02:00
------------------------------------------------------------------
16 exists O==A O==B barf must match A if exists.
*multi* in one in another
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Update the case table in t/t1000. It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have used those alternative semantics for quite some time. Update them to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 21:56:18 +02:00
Note: we need to be careful in case 2 and 3. The tree A may contain
DF (file) when tree B require DF to be a directory by having DF/DF
(file).
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
END_OF_CASE_TABLE
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success '1 - must not have an entry not in A.' "
rm -f .git/index XX &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo XX >XX &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add XX &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'2 - must match B in !O && !A && B case.' \
"rm -f .git/index NA &&
cp .orig-B/NA NA &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NA &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B"
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'2 - matching B alone is OK in !O && !A && B case.' \
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
"rm -f .git/index NA &&
cp .orig-B/NA NA &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NA &&
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
echo extra >>NA &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
'3 - must match A in !O && A && !B case.' \
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
"rm -f .git/index AN &&
cp .orig-A/AN AN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add AN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
[PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge. This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added only in one branch and not in the other internally. This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed. Running diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when pure 2-way merge would have refused to run. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:50:51 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'3 - matching A alone is OK in !O && A && !B case.' \
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
"rm -f .git/index AN &&
cp .orig-A/AN AN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add AN &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>AN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'3 (fail) - must match A in !O && A && !B case.' "
rm -f .git/index AN &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/AN AN &&
echo extra >>AN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add AN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'4 - must match and be up-to-date in !O && A && B && A!=B case.' \
"rm -f .git/index AA &&
cp .orig-A/AA AA &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add AA &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'4 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in !O && A && B && A!=B case.' "
rm -f .git/index AA &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/AA AA &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add AA &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>AA &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'4 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in !O && A && B && A!=B case.' "
rm -f .git/index AA &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/AA AA &&
echo extra >>AA &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add AA &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
[PATCH] read-tree: fix too strong index requirement #5ALT This fixes too strong index requirement 3-way merge enforces in one case: the same file is added in both branches. In this case, the original code insisted that if the index file has that path, it must match our branch and be up-to-date. However in this particular case, it only has to match it, and can be dirty. We just need to make sure that we keep the work-tree copy instead of checking out the merge result. The resolution of such a path, however, cannot be left to outside script, because we will not keep the original stage0 entries for unmerged paths when read-tree finishes, and at that point, the knowledge of "if we resolve it to match the new file added in both branches, the merge succeeds and the work tree would not lose information, but we should _not_ update the work tree from the resulting index file" is lost. For this reason, the now code needs to resolve this case (#5ALT) internally. This affects some existing tests in the test suite, but all in positive ways. In t1000 (3-way test), this #5ALT case now gets one stage0 entry, instead of an identical stage2 and stage3 entry pair, for such a path, and one test that checked for merge failure (because the test assumed the "stricter-than-necessary" behaviour) does not have to fail anymore. In t1005 (emu23 test), two tests that involves a case where the work tree already had a change introduced in the upstream (aka "merged head"), the merge succeeds instead of failing. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 03:37:47 +02:00
'5 - must match in !O && A && B && A==B case.' \
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
"rm -f .git/index LL &&
cp .orig-A/LL LL &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add LL &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
[PATCH] read-tree: fix too strong index requirement #5ALT This fixes too strong index requirement 3-way merge enforces in one case: the same file is added in both branches. In this case, the original code insisted that if the index file has that path, it must match our branch and be up-to-date. However in this particular case, it only has to match it, and can be dirty. We just need to make sure that we keep the work-tree copy instead of checking out the merge result. The resolution of such a path, however, cannot be left to outside script, because we will not keep the original stage0 entries for unmerged paths when read-tree finishes, and at that point, the knowledge of "if we resolve it to match the new file added in both branches, the merge succeeds and the work tree would not lose information, but we should _not_ update the work tree from the resulting index file" is lost. For this reason, the now code needs to resolve this case (#5ALT) internally. This affects some existing tests in the test suite, but all in positive ways. In t1000 (3-way test), this #5ALT case now gets one stage0 entry, instead of an identical stage2 and stage3 entry pair, for such a path, and one test that checked for merge failure (because the test assumed the "stricter-than-necessary" behaviour) does not have to fail anymore. In t1005 (emu23 test), two tests that involves a case where the work tree already had a change introduced in the upstream (aka "merged head"), the merge succeeds instead of failing. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 03:37:47 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'5 - must match in !O && A && B && A==B case.' \
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
"rm -f .git/index LL &&
cp .orig-A/LL LL &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add LL &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>LL &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] read-tree: fix too strong index requirement #5ALT This fixes too strong index requirement 3-way merge enforces in one case: the same file is added in both branches. In this case, the original code insisted that if the index file has that path, it must match our branch and be up-to-date. However in this particular case, it only has to match it, and can be dirty. We just need to make sure that we keep the work-tree copy instead of checking out the merge result. The resolution of such a path, however, cannot be left to outside script, because we will not keep the original stage0 entries for unmerged paths when read-tree finishes, and at that point, the knowledge of "if we resolve it to match the new file added in both branches, the merge succeeds and the work tree would not lose information, but we should _not_ update the work tree from the resulting index file" is lost. For this reason, the now code needs to resolve this case (#5ALT) internally. This affects some existing tests in the test suite, but all in positive ways. In t1000 (3-way test), this #5ALT case now gets one stage0 entry, instead of an identical stage2 and stage3 entry pair, for such a path, and one test that checked for merge failure (because the test assumed the "stricter-than-necessary" behaviour) does not have to fail anymore. In t1005 (emu23 test), two tests that involves a case where the work tree already had a change introduced in the upstream (aka "merged head"), the merge succeeds instead of failing. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 03:37:47 +02:00
check_result"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'5 (fail) - must match A in !O && A && B && A==B case.' "
rm -f .git/index LL &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/LL LL &&
echo extra >>LL &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add LL &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'6 - must not exist in O && !A && !B case' "
rm -f .git/index DD &&
tests: add missing && Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-31 02:46:54 +01:00
echo DD >DD &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add DD &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'7 - must not exist in O && !A && B && O!=B case' "
rm -f .git/index DM &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-B/DM DM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add DM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'8 - must not exist in O && !A && B && O==B case' "
rm -f .git/index DN &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-B/DN DN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add DN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'9 - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && !B && O!=A case' \
"rm -f .git/index MD &&
cp .orig-A/MD MD &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MD &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'9 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && !B && O!=A case' "
rm -f .git/index MD &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/MD MD &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MD &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>MD &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'9 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && !B && O!=A case' "
rm -f .git/index MD &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/MD MD &&
echo extra >>MD &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MD &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'10 - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && !B && O==A case' \
"rm -f .git/index ND &&
cp .orig-A/ND ND &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add ND &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'10 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && !B && O==A case' "
rm -f .git/index ND &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/ND ND &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add ND &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>ND &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'10 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && !B && O==A case' "
rm -f .git/index ND &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/ND ND &&
echo extra >>ND &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add ND &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'11 - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && B && O!=A && O!=B && A!=B case' \
"rm -f .git/index MM &&
cp .orig-A/MM MM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'11 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && B && O!=A && O!=B && A!=B case' "
rm -f .git/index MM &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/MM MM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MM &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>MM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'11 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && B && O!=A && O!=B && A!=B case' "
rm -f .git/index MM &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/MM MM &&
echo extra >>MM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'12 - must match A in O && A && B && O!=A && A==B case' \
"rm -f .git/index SS &&
cp .orig-A/SS SS &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add SS &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
test_expect_success \
'12 - must match A in O && A && B && O!=A && A==B case' \
"rm -f .git/index SS &&
cp .orig-A/SS SS &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add SS &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>SS &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'12 (fail) - must match A in O && A && B && O!=A && A==B case' "
rm -f .git/index SS &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/SS SS &&
echo extra >>SS &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add SS &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'13 - must match A in O && A && B && O!=A && O==B case' \
"rm -f .git/index MN &&
cp .orig-A/MN MN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
test_expect_success \
'13 - must match A in O && A && B && O!=A && O==B case' \
"rm -f .git/index MN &&
cp .orig-A/MN MN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add MN &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>MN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
test_expect_success \
'14 - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && B && O==A && O!=B case' \
"rm -f .git/index NM &&
cp .orig-A/NM NM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
[PATCH] read-tree: loosen too strict index requirements This patch teaches read-tree 3-way merge that, when only "the other tree" changed a path, and if the index file already has the same change, we are not in a situation that would clobber the index and the work tree, and lets the merge succeed; this is case #14ALT in t1000 test. It does not change the result of the merge, but prevents it from failing when it does not have to. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:53:57 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'14 - may match B in O && A && B && O==A && O!=B case' \
"rm -f .git/index NM &&
cp .orig-B/NM NM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NM &&
[PATCH] read-tree: loosen too strict index requirements This patch teaches read-tree 3-way merge that, when only "the other tree" changed a path, and if the index file already has the same change, we are not in a situation that would clobber the index and the work tree, and lets the merge succeed; this is case #14ALT in t1000 test. It does not change the result of the merge, but prevents it from failing when it does not have to. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:53:57 +02:00
echo extra >>NM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] read-tree: loosen too strict index requirements This patch teaches read-tree 3-way merge that, when only "the other tree" changed a path, and if the index file already has the same change, we are not in a situation that would clobber the index and the work tree, and lets the merge succeed; this is case #14ALT in t1000 test. It does not change the result of the merge, but prevents it from failing when it does not have to. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-11 11:53:57 +02:00
check_result"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'14 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && B && O==A && O!=B case' "
rm -f .git/index NM &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/NM NM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NM &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>NM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'14 (fail) - must match and be up-to-date in O && A && B && O==A && O!=B case' "
rm -f .git/index NM &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/NM NM &&
echo extra >>NM &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NM &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
test_expect_success \
'15 - must match A in O && A && B && O==A && O==B case' \
"rm -f .git/index NN &&
cp .orig-A/NN NN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
test_expect_success \
'15 - must match A in O && A && B && O==A && O==B case' \
"rm -f .git/index NN &&
cp .orig-A/NN NN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NN &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
echo extra >>NN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
check_result"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
'15 (fail) - must match A in O && A && B && O==A && O==B case' "
rm -f .git/index NN &&
[PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests. This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way merge is run with an already populated index file. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 23:55:35 +02:00
cp .orig-A/NN NN &&
echo extra >>NN &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add NN &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_fail -m $tree_O $tree_A $tree_B
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
"
[PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell". This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m merge works correctly. It covers all the tricky cases known back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting files/directories cases since then. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-14 10:46:46 +02:00
[PATCH] Add debugging help for case #16 to read-tree.c This will help us detect if real-world example merges have multiple merge-base candidates and one of them matches one head while another matches the other head. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-06 21:53:56 +02:00
# #16
test_expect_success \
'16 - A matches in one and B matches in another.' \
'rm -f .git/index F16 &&
echo F16 >F16 &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index --add F16 &&
tree0=`git write-tree` &&
[PATCH] Add debugging help for case #16 to read-tree.c This will help us detect if real-world example merges have multiple merge-base candidates and one of them matches one head while another matches the other head. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-06 21:53:56 +02:00
echo E16 >F16 &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git update-index F16 &&
tree1=`git write-tree` &&
Teach read-tree the -n|--dry-run option The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either the index or the working tree. The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new t/lib-read-tree.sh file. The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not detected with -n. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-25 22:10:41 +02:00
read_tree_must_succeed -m $tree0 $tree1 $tree1 $tree0 &&
Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03 07:52:14 +02:00
git ls-files --stage'
[PATCH] Add debugging help for case #16 to read-tree.c This will help us detect if real-world example merges have multiple merge-base candidates and one of them matches one head while another matches the other head. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-06 21:53:56 +02:00
[PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell". This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m merge works correctly. It covers all the tricky cases known back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting files/directories cases since then. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-14 10:46:46 +02:00
test_done
Copy permalink