1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-05 00:37:55 +01:00
git/t/t7501-commit.sh

369 lines
8.3 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2007 Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
#
# FIXME: Test the various index usages, -i and -o, test reflog,
# signoff
test_description='git commit'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_tick
test_expect_success \
"initial status" \
"echo 'bongo bongo' >file &&
git add file && \
git status | grep 'Initial commit'"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"fail initial amend" \
"test_must_fail git commit --amend"
test_expect_success \
"initial commit" \
"git commit -m initial"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"invalid options 1" \
"test_must_fail git commit -m foo -m bar -F file"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"invalid options 2" \
"test_must_fail git commit -C HEAD -m illegal"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"using paths with -a" \
"echo King of the bongo >file &&
test_must_fail git commit -m foo -a file"
test_expect_success PERL \
"using paths with --interactive" \
"echo bong-o-bong >file &&
! (echo 7 | git commit -m foo --interactive file)"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"using invalid commit with -C" \
"test_must_fail git commit -C bogus"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"testing nothing to commit" \
"test_must_fail git commit -m initial"
test_expect_success \
"next commit" \
"echo 'bongo bongo bongo' >file \
git commit -m next -a"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"commit message from non-existing file" \
"echo 'more bongo: bongo bongo bongo bongo' >file && \
test_must_fail git commit -F gah -a"
# Empty except stray tabs and spaces on a few lines.
sed -e 's/@$//' >msg <<EOF
@
@
Signed-off-by: hula
EOF
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"empty commit message" \
"test_must_fail git commit -F msg -a"
test_expect_success \
"commit message from file" \
"echo 'this is the commit message, coming from a file' >msg && \
git commit -F msg -a"
cat >editor <<\EOF
#!/bin/sh
sed -e "s/a file/an amend commit/g" < "$1" > "$1-"
mv "$1-" "$1"
EOF
chmod 755 editor
test_expect_success \
"amend commit" \
"VISUAL=./editor git commit --amend"
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success \
"passing -m and -F" \
"echo 'enough with the bongos' >file && \
test_must_fail git commit -F msg -m amending ."
test_expect_success \
"using message from other commit" \
"git commit -C HEAD^ ."
cat >editor <<\EOF
#!/bin/sh
sed -e "s/amend/older/g" < "$1" > "$1-"
mv "$1-" "$1"
EOF
chmod 755 editor
test_expect_success \
"editing message from other commit" \
"echo 'hula hula' >file && \
VISUAL=./editor git commit -c HEAD^ -a"
test_expect_success \
"message from stdin" \
"echo 'silly new contents' >file && \
echo commit message from stdin | git commit -F - -a"
test_expect_success \
"overriding author from command line" \
"echo 'gak' >file && \
git commit -m 'author' --author 'Rubber Duck <rduck@convoy.org>' -a"
test_expect_success PERL \
"interactive add" \
"echo 7 | git commit --interactive | grep 'What now'"
test_expect_success \
"showing committed revisions" \
"git rev-list HEAD >current"
cat >editor <<\EOF
#!/bin/sh
sed -e "s/good/bad/g" < "$1" > "$1-"
mv "$1-" "$1"
EOF
chmod 755 editor
cat >msg <<EOF
A good commit message.
EOF
test_expect_success \
'editor not invoked if -F is given' '
echo "moo" >file &&
VISUAL=./editor git commit -a -F msg &&
git show -s --pretty=format:"%s" | grep -q good &&
echo "quack" >file &&
echo "Another good message." | VISUAL=./editor git commit -a -F - &&
git show -s --pretty=format:"%s" | grep -q good
'
# We could just check the head sha1, but checking each commit makes it
# easier to isolate bugs.
cat >expected <<\EOF
72c0dc9855b0c9dadcbfd5a31cab072e0cb774ca
9b88fc14ce6b32e3d9ee021531a54f18a5cf38a2
3536bbb352c3a1ef9a420f5b4242d48578b92aa7
d381ac431806e53f3dd7ac2f1ae0534f36d738b9
4fd44095ad6334f3ef72e4c5ec8ddf108174b54a
402702b49136e7587daa9280e91e4bb7cb2179f7
EOF
test_expect_success \
'validate git rev-list output.' \
'test_cmp expected current'
test_expect_success 'partial commit that involves removal (1)' '
git rm --cached file &&
mv file elif &&
git add elif &&
git commit -m "Partial: add elif" elif &&
git diff-tree --name-status HEAD^ HEAD >current &&
echo "A elif" >expected &&
test_cmp expected current
'
test_expect_success 'partial commit that involves removal (2)' '
git commit -m "Partial: remove file" file &&
git diff-tree --name-status HEAD^ HEAD >current &&
echo "D file" >expected &&
test_cmp expected current
'
test_expect_success 'partial commit that involves removal (3)' '
git rm --cached elif &&
echo elif >elif &&
git commit -m "Partial: modify elif" elif &&
git diff-tree --name-status HEAD^ HEAD >current &&
echo "M elif" >expected &&
test_cmp expected current
'
author="The Real Author <someguy@his.email.org>"
test_expect_success 'amend commit to fix author' '
oldtick=$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE &&
test_tick &&
git reset --hard &&
git cat-file -p HEAD |
sed -e "s/author.*/author $author $oldtick/" \
-e "s/^\(committer.*> \).*$/\1$GIT_COMMITTER_DATE/" > \
expected &&
git commit --amend --author="$author" &&
git cat-file -p HEAD > current &&
test_cmp expected current
'
test_expect_success 'sign off (1)' '
echo 1 >positive &&
git add positive &&
git commit -s -m "thank you" &&
git cat-file commit HEAD | sed -e "1,/^\$/d" >actual &&
(
echo thank you
echo
git var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT |
sed -e "s/>.*/>/" -e "s/^/Signed-off-by: /"
) >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success 'sign off (2)' '
echo 2 >positive &&
git add positive &&
existing="Signed-off-by: Watch This <watchthis@example.com>" &&
git commit -s -m "thank you
$existing" &&
git cat-file commit HEAD | sed -e "1,/^\$/d" >actual &&
(
echo thank you
echo
echo $existing
git var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT |
sed -e "s/>.*/>/" -e "s/^/Signed-off-by: /"
) >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success 'multiple -m' '
>negative &&
git add negative &&
git commit -m "one" -m "two" -m "three" &&
git cat-file commit HEAD | sed -e "1,/^\$/d" >actual &&
(
echo one
echo
echo two
echo
echo three
) >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
author="The Real Author <someguy@his.email.org>"
test_expect_success 'amend commit to fix author' '
oldtick=$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE &&
test_tick &&
git reset --hard &&
git cat-file -p HEAD |
sed -e "s/author.*/author $author $oldtick/" \
-e "s/^\(committer.*> \).*$/\1$GIT_COMMITTER_DATE/" > \
expected &&
git commit --amend --author="$author" &&
git cat-file -p HEAD > current &&
test_cmp expected current
'
test_expect_success 'git commit <file> with dirty index' '
echo tacocat > elif &&
echo tehlulz > chz &&
git add chz &&
git commit elif -m "tacocat is a palindrome" &&
git show --stat | grep elif &&
git diff --cached | grep chz
'
test_expect_success 'same tree (single parent)' '
git reset --hard
if git commit -m empty
then
echo oops -- should have complained
false
else
: happy
fi
'
test_expect_success 'same tree (single parent) --allow-empty' '
git commit --allow-empty -m "forced empty" &&
git cat-file commit HEAD | grep forced
'
test_expect_success 'same tree (merge and amend merge)' '
git checkout -b side HEAD^ &&
echo zero >zero &&
git add zero &&
git commit -m "add zero" &&
git checkout master &&
git merge -s ours side -m "empty ok" &&
git diff HEAD^ HEAD >actual &&
: >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual &&
git commit --amend -m "empty really ok" &&
git diff HEAD^ HEAD >actual &&
: >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success 'amend using the message from another commit' '
git reset --hard &&
test_tick &&
git commit --allow-empty -m "old commit" &&
old=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
test_tick &&
git commit --allow-empty -m "new commit" &&
new=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
test_tick &&
git commit --allow-empty --amend -C "$old" &&
git show --pretty="format:%ad %s" "$old" >expected &&
git show --pretty="format:%ad %s" HEAD >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_expect_success 'amend using the message from a commit named with tag' '
git reset --hard &&
test_tick &&
git commit --allow-empty -m "old commit" &&
old=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
git tag -a -m "tag on old" tagged-old HEAD &&
test_tick &&
git commit --allow-empty -m "new commit" &&
new=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
test_tick &&
git commit --allow-empty --amend -C tagged-old &&
git show --pretty="format:%ad %s" "$old" >expected &&
git show --pretty="format:%ad %s" HEAD >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
test_done