From 6d60bbefdc2a42614069024b0a38db8c2de33967 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 21:17:45 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fsck-objects: do not segfault on missing tree in cache-tree

Even if trees are missing in cache-tree, we should continue and
check the rest of the object database.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
---
 fsck-objects.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fsck-objects.c b/fsck-objects.c
index 98421aab30..1922b6d84c 100644
--- a/fsck-objects.c
+++ b/fsck-objects.c
@@ -446,6 +446,11 @@ static int fsck_cache_tree(struct cache_tree *it)
 
 	if (0 <= it->entry_count) {
 		struct object *obj = parse_object(it->sha1);
+		if (!obj) {
+			error("%s: invalid sha1 pointer in cache-tree",
+			      sha1_to_hex(it->sha1));
+			return 1;
+		}
 		mark_reachable(obj, REACHABLE);
 		obj->used = 1;
 		if (obj->type != tree_type)