1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-10-28 12:59:41 +01:00

core-tutorial: Use new syntax for git-merge.

"git-merge <msg> HEAD <other branches>" is still supported but
we shouldn't encourage its use.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Sergei Organov 2007-10-30 22:54:02 +03:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent dee48c3c7e
commit ba17892ddc

View file

@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ script called `git merge`, which wants to know which branches you want
to resolve and what the merge is all about:
------------
$ git merge "Merge work in mybranch" HEAD mybranch
$ git merge -m "Merge work in mybranch" mybranch
------------
where the first argument is going to be used as the commit message if
@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ to the `master` branch. Let's go back to `mybranch`, and run
------------
$ git checkout mybranch
$ git merge "Merge upstream changes." HEAD master
$ git merge -m "Merge upstream changes." master
------------
This outputs something like this (the actual commit object names
@ -1613,8 +1613,8 @@ in both of them. You could merge in 'diff-fix' first and then
'commit-fix' next, like this:
------------
$ git merge 'Merge fix in diff-fix' master diff-fix
$ git merge 'Merge fix in commit-fix' master commit-fix
$ git merge -m 'Merge fix in diff-fix' diff-fix
$ git merge -m 'Merge fix in commit-fix' commit-fix
------------
Which would result in: