1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-17 22:44:49 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Schindelin
37e5c8f460 Simplify t3411
Use test_commit() and test_merge().  This way, it is harder to forget to
tag, or to call test_tick before committing.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-28 20:17:27 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
29a03348a3 t3404 & t3411: undo copy&paste
Rather than copying and pasting, which is prone to lead to fixes
missing in one version, move the fake-editor generator to t/t3404/.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-28 20:11:21 -08:00
Miklos Vajna
8dca683346 Make t3411 executable
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-14 17:00:00 -08:00
Stephen Haberman
80fe82e4eb rebase-i-p: if todo was reordered use HEAD as the rewritten parent
This seems like the best guess we can make until git sequencer marks are
available. That being said, within the context of re-ordering a commit before
its parent in todo, I think applying it on top of the current commit seems like
a reasonable assumption of what the user intended.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-16 09:23:54 -07:00
Stephen Haberman
42f939e473 rebase-i-p: test to exclude commits from todo based on its parents
The first case was based off a script from Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>.

The second case includes a merge-of-a-merge to ensure both are included in todo.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-16 09:23:53 -07:00