When branch detection is enabled each branch is named in git after their
relative depot path in Perforce. To do this the depot paths are compared against
each other to find their common base path. The current algorithm makes this
comparison on a character by character basis.
Assuming we have the following branches:
//depot/branches/featureA
//depot/branches/featureB
Then the base depot path would be //depot/branches/feature, which is an invalid
depot path.
The current patch fixes this by splitting the path into a list and comparing the
list entries, making it choose correctly //depot/branches as the base path.
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Copy and rename detection arguments (-C and -M) allow setting a threshold value
for the similarity ratio. If the similarity is below this threshold the rename
or copy is ignored and the file is added as new.
This patch allows setting git-p4.detectRenames and git-p4.detectCopies options
to an integer value to set the respective threshold.
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When importing a repo, the time on the initial commit had been
just "now". But this causes problems when trying to share among
git-p4 repos that were created identically, although at different
times. Instead, use the time in the top-most p4 change as the
time for the git import commit.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add this missing line in one of the tests. Otherwise, on fast
machines, the following git-p4 commit will complain that nobody
edited the submission message.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cleanup nicely when tests fail. This avoids many duplicated
lines in the tests, and adds cleanup in a couple of tests that
did not have it. When one fails, now all the rest will not
fail too.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Break down no-lstat() condition checks in verify_uptodate()
t7400: fix bogus test failure with symlinked trash
Documentation: clarify the invalidated tree entry format
Make it easier to grok under what conditions we can skip lstat().
While at there, shorten ie_match_stat() line for the sake of my eyes.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One of the tests in t7400 fails if the trash directory has a
symlink anywhere in its path. E.g.:
$ mkdir /tmp/git-test
$ mkdir /tmp/git-test/real
$ ln -s real /tmp/git-test/link
$ ./t7400-submodule-basic --root=/tmp/git-test/real
...
# passed all 44 test(s)
$ ./t7400-submodule-basic --root=/tmp/git-test/link
...
not ok - 41 use superproject as upstream when path is relative and no url is set there
The failing test does:
git submodule add ../repo relative &&
...
git submodule sync relative &&
test "$(git config submodule.relative.url)" = "$submodurl/repo"
where $submodurl comes from the $TRASH_DIRECTORY the user
gave us. However, git will resolve symlinks when converting
the relative path into an absolute one, leading them to be
textually different (even though they point to the same
directory).
Fix this by asking pwd to canonicalize the name of the trash
directory for us.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the entry_count is -1, the tree is invalidated and therefore has
not associated hash (or object name). Explicitly state that the next
entry starts after the newline.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On modern multi-core processors "make test" is often run in multiple jobs.
If one of them fails the test run does stop, but the concurrently running
tests finish their run. It is rather easy to find out which test failed by
doing a "ls -d t/trash*". But that only works when you don't use the "-i"
option to "make test" because you want to get an overview of all failing
tests. In that case all thrash directories are deleted end and the
information which tests failed is lost.
If one or more tests failed, print a list of them before the test summary:
failed test(s): t1000 t6500
fixed 0
success 7638
failed 3
broken 49
total 7723
This makes it possible to just run the test suite with -i and collect all
failed test scripts at the end for further examination.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/tag-contains-ab:
Revert clock-skew based attempt to optimize tag --contains traversal
git skew: a tool to find how big a clock skew exists in the history
default core.clockskew variable to one day
limit "contains" traversals based on commit timestamp
tag: speed up --contains calculation
* jn/gitweb-search:
gitweb: Make git_search_* subroutines render whole pages
gitweb: Clean up code in git_search_* subroutines
gitweb: Split body of git_search into subroutines
gitweb: Check permissions first in git_search
* jl/submodule-add-relurl-wo-upstream:
submodule add: clean up duplicated code
submodule add: allow relative repository path even when no url is set
submodule add: test failure when url is not configured in superproject
Conflicts:
git-submodule.sh
* maint:
doc/fast-import: clarify notemodify command
Documentation: minor grammatical fix in rev-list-options.txt
Documentation: git-filter-branch honors replacement refs
remote-curl: Add a format check to parsing of info/refs
git-config: Remove extra whitespaces
The "notemodify" fast-import command was introduced in commit a8dd2e7
(fast-import: Add support for importing commit notes, 2009-10-09)
The commit log has slightly different description than the added
documentation. The latter is somewhat confusing. "notemodify" is a
subcommand of "commit" command used to add a note for some commit.
Does this note annotate the commit produced by the "commit" command
or a commit given by it's committish parameter? Which notes tree
does it write notes to?
The exact meaning could be deduced with old description and some
notes machinery knowledge. But let's make it more obvious. This
command is used in a context like "commit refs/notes/test" to
add or rewrite an annotation for a committish parameter. So the
advised way to add notes in a fast-import stream is:
1) import some commits (optional)
2) prepare a "commit" to the notes tree:
2.1) choose notes ref, committer, log message, etc.
2.2) create annotations with "notemodify", where each can refer to
a commit being annotated via a branch name, import mark reference,
sha1 and other expressions specified in the Documentation.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ivankov <divanorama@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make it clear that git-filter-branch will honor and make permanent
replacement refs as well as grafts.
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When parsing info/refs, no checks were applied that the file was in
the requried format. Since the file is read from a remote webserver,
this isn't guarenteed to be true. Add a check that the file at least
only contains lines that consist of 40 characters followed by a tab
and then the ref name.
Signed-off-by: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove extra whitespaces introduced by commits
01ebb9dc and fc1905bb
Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/index-pack:
verify-pack: use index-pack --verify
index-pack: show histogram when emulating "verify-pack -v"
index-pack: start learning to emulate "verify-pack -v"
index-pack: a miniscule refactor
index-pack --verify: read anomalous offsets from v2 idx file
write_idx_file: need_large_offset() helper function
index-pack: --verify
write_idx_file: introduce a struct to hold idx customization options
index-pack: group the delta-base array entries also by type
Conflicts:
builtin/verify-pack.c
cache.h
sha1_file.c
* jn/mime-type-with-params:
gitweb: Serve */*+xml 'blob_plain' as text/plain with $prevent_xss
gitweb: Serve text/* 'blob_plain' as text/plain with $prevent_xss
* jk/clone-cmdline-config:
clone: accept config options on the command line
config: make git_config_parse_parameter a public function
remote: use new OPT_STRING_LIST
parse-options: add OPT_STRING_LIST helper
* jk/maint-config-param:
config: use strbuf_split_str instead of a temporary strbuf
strbuf: allow strbuf_split to work on non-strbufs
config: avoid segfault when parsing command-line config
config: die on error in command-line config
fix "git -c" parsing of values with equals signs
strbuf_split: add a max parameter
* jc/zlib-wrap:
zlib: allow feeding more than 4GB in one go
zlib: zlib can only process 4GB at a time
zlib: wrap deflateBound() too
zlib: wrap deflate side of the API
zlib: wrap inflateInit2 used to accept only for gzip format
zlib: wrap remaining calls to direct inflate/inflateEnd
zlib wrapper: refactor error message formatter
Conflicts:
sha1_file.c
* ak/gcc46-profile-feedback:
Add explanation of the profile feedback build to the README
Add profile feedback build to git
Add option to disable NORETURN
IPv6 hosts are often unreachable on the primarily IPv4 Internet and
therefore we shouldn't print an error if there are still other hosts we
can try to connect() to. This helps "git fetch --quiet" stay quiet.
Signed-off-by: Dave Zarzycki <zarzycki@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The description for 'git rebase --abort' currently says:
Restore the original branch and abort the rebase operation.
The "restore" can be misinterpreted to imply that the original branch
was somehow in a broken state during the rebase operation. It is also
not completely clear what "the original branch" is --- is it the
branch that was checked out before the rebase operation was called or
is the the branch that is being rebased (it is the latter)? Although
both issues are made clear in the DESCRIPTION section, let us also
make the entry in the OPTIONS secion more clear.
Also remove the term "rebasing process" from the usage text, since the
user already knows that the text is about "git rebase".
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
