Change fast_forward_to() to check if locking the ref failed, print a
nice error message and bail out early.
The old code did not check if ref_lock was NULL and relied on the
fact that the write_ref_sha1() would safely detect this condition
and set the return variable ret to indicate an error.
While that is safe, it makes the code harder to read for two reasons:
* Inconsistency. Almost all other places we do check the lock for
NULL explicitly, so the naive reader is confused "why don't we
check here?"
* And relying on write_ref_sha1() to detect and return an error for
when a previous lock_any_ref_for_update() failed feels obfuscated.
This change should not change any functionality or logic aside from
adding an extra error message when this condition is triggered
(write_ref_sha1() returns an error silently for this condition).
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Leaving only the function definitions and declarations so that any
new topic in flight can still make use of the old functions, replace
existing uses of the prefixcmp() and suffixcmp() with new API
functions.
The change can be recreated by mechanically applying this:
$ git grep -l -e prefixcmp -e suffixcmp -- \*.c |
grep -v strbuf\\.c |
xargs perl -pi -e '
s|!prefixcmp\(|starts_with\(|g;
s|prefixcmp\(|!starts_with\(|g;
s|!suffixcmp\(|ends_with\(|g;
s|suffixcmp\(|!ends_with\(|g;
'
on the result of preparatory changes in this series.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Expose lock_ref_sha1_basic's type_p argument to callers of
lock_any_ref_for_update. Update all call sites to ignore it by passing
NULL for now.
Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I attempted to make index_state->cache[] a "const struct cache_entry **"
to find out how existing entries in index are modified and where. The
question I have is what do we do if we really need to keep track of on-disk
changes in the index. The result is
- diff-lib.c: setting CE_UPTODATE
- name-hash.c: setting CE_HASHED
- preload-index.c, read-cache.c, unpack-trees.c and
builtin/update-index: obvious
- entry.c: write_entry() may refresh the checked out entry via
fill_stat_cache_info(). This causes "non-const struct cache_entry
*" in builtin/apply.c, builtin/checkout-index.c and
builtin/checkout.c
- builtin/ls-files.c: --with-tree changes stagemask and may set
CE_UPDATE
Of these, write_entry() and its call sites are probably most
interesting because it modifies on-disk info. But this is stat info
and can be retrieved via refresh, at least for porcelain
commands. Other just uses ce_flags for local purposes.
So, keeping track of "dirty" entries is just a matter of setting a
flag in index modification functions exposed by read-cache.c. Except
unpack-trees, the rest of the code base does not do anything funny
behind read-cache's back.
The actual patch is less valueable than the summary above. But if
anyone wants to re-identify the above sites. Applying this patch, then
this:
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 430d021..1692891 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static inline unsigned int canon_mode(unsigned int mode)
#define cache_entry_size(len) (offsetof(struct cache_entry,name) + (len) + 1)
struct index_state {
- struct cache_entry **cache;
+ const struct cache_entry **cache;
unsigned int version;
unsigned int cache_nr, cache_alloc, cache_changed;
struct string_list *resolve_undo;
will help quickly identify them without bogus warnings.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog message created when "git cherry-pick" fast-forwarded
did not say anything but "cherry-pick", but it now says
"cherry-pick: fast-forward".
* rr/cherry-pick-fast-forward-reflog-message:
sequencer: write useful reflog message for fast-forward
The following command
$ git cherry-pick --ff b8bb3f
writes the following uninformative message to the reflog
cherry-pick
Improve it to
cherry-pick: fast-forward
Avoid hard-coding "cherry-pick" in fast_forward_to(), so the sequencer
is generic enough to support future actions.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix "git cherry-pick $annotated_tag", which was mistakenly rejected.
* mv/sequencer-pick-error-diag:
cherry-pick: picking a tag that resolves to a commit is OK
Earlier, 21246dbb9e (cherry-pick: make sure all input objects are
commits, 2013-04-11) tried to catch an unlikely "git cherry-pick $blob"
as an error, but broke a more important use case to cherry-pick a
tag that points at a commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and tests
kwset: fix spelling in comments
precompose-utf8: fix spelling of "want" in error message
compat/nedmalloc: fix spelling in comments
compat/regex: fix spelling and grammar in comments
obstack: fix spelling of similar
contrib/subtree: fix spelling of accidentally
git-remote-mediawiki: spelling fixes
doc: various spelling fixes
fast-export: fix argument name in error messages
Documentation: distinguish between ref and offset deltas in pack-format
i18n: make the translation of -u advice in one go
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a single argument was a non-commit, the error message used to be:
fatal: BUG: expected exactly one commit from walk
For multiple arguments, when none of the arguments was a commit, the error was:
fatal: empty commit set passed
Finally, when some of the arguments were non-commits, we ignored those
arguments. Fix this bug and make sure all arguments are commits, and
for the first non-commit, error out with:
fatal: <name>: Can't cherry-pick a <type>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Consolidate codepaths that inspect log-message-to-be and decide to
add a new Signed-off-by line in various commands.
* bc/append-signed-off-by:
git-commit: populate the edit buffer with 2 blank lines before s-o-b
Unify appending signoff in format-patch, commit and sequencer
format-patch: update append_signoff prototype
t4014: more tests about appending s-o-b lines
sequencer.c: teach append_signoff to avoid adding a duplicate newline
sequencer.c: teach append_signoff how to detect duplicate s-o-b
sequencer.c: always separate "(cherry picked from" from commit body
sequencer.c: require a conforming footer to be preceded by a blank line
sequencer.c: recognize "(cherry picked from ..." as part of s-o-b footer
t/t3511: add some tests of 'cherry-pick -s' functionality
t/test-lib-functions.sh: allow to specify the tag name to test_commit
commit, cherry-pick -s: remove broken support for multiline rfc2822 fields
sequencer.c: rework search for start of footer to improve clarity
'commit -s' populates the edit buffer with a blank line before the
Signed-off-by line, to allow the user to immediately start typing
the log message. But commit 33f2f9ab removed this space, forcing
the user to first push the Signed-off-by line down to open a place
to type the log message.
Fix this regression and let's ensure that the Signed-off-by line is
preceded by two blank lines, instead of just one, to hint that
something should be filled in, and that a blank line should separate
it from the body and the Signed-off-by line.
Add a test for this behavior.
Reported-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach append_signoff to detect whether a blank line exists at the position
that the signed-off-by line will be added, and refrain from adding an
additional one if one already exists. Or, add an additional line if one
is needed to make sure the new footer is separated from the message body
by a blank line.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach append_signoff how to detect a duplicate s-o-b in the commit footer.
This is in preparation to unify the append_signoff implementations in
log-tree.c and sequencer.c.
Fixes test in t3511.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Start treating the "(cherry picked from" line added by cherry-pick -x
the same way that the s-o-b lines are treated. Namely, separate them
from the main commit message body with an empty line.
Introduce tests to test this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, append_signoff() performs a search for the last line of the
commit buffer by searching back from the end until it hits a newline. If
it reaches the beginning of the buffer without finding a newline, that
means either the commit message was empty, or there was only one line in it.
In this case, append_signoff will skip the call to has_conforming_footer
since it already knows that it is necessary to append a newline before
appending the sob.
Let's perform this function inside of has_conforming_footer where it
appropriately belongs and generalize it so that we require that the
footer paragraph be an actual distinct paragraph separated by a blank
line.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 'cherry-pick -s' is used to append a signed-off-by line to a cherry
picked commit, it does not currently detect the "(cherry picked from..."
that may have been appended by a previous 'cherry-pick -x' as part of the
s-o-b footer and it will insert a blank line before appending a new s-o-b.
Let's detect "(cherry picked from...)" as part of the footer so that we
will produce this:
Signed-off-by: A U Thor <author@example.com>
(cherry picked from da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709)
Signed-off-by: C O Mmitter <committer@example.com>
instead of this:
Signed-off-by: A U Thor <author@example.com>
(cherry picked from da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709)
Signed-off-by: C O Mmitter <committer@example.com>
[with improvements from Jonathan Nieder]
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Starting with c1e01b0c (commit: More generous accepting of RFC-2822 footer
lines, 2009-10-28), "git commit -s" carefully parses the last paragraph of
each commit message to check if it consists only of RFC2822-style headers,
in which case the signoff will be added as a new line in the same list:
Reported-by: Reporter <reporter@example.com>
Signed-off-by: Author <author@example.com>
Acked-by: Lieutenant <lt@example.com>
It even included support for accepting indented continuation lines for
multiline fields. Unfortunately the multiline field support is broken
because it checks whether buf[k] (the first character of the *next* line)
instead of buf[i] is a whitespace character. The result is that any footer
with a continuation line is not accepted, since the last continuation line
neither starts with an RFC2822 field name nor is followed by a continuation
line.
That this has remained broken for so long is good evidence that nobody
actually needed multiline fields. Rip out the broken continuation support.
There should be no functional change.
[Thanks to Jonathan Nieder for the excellent commit message]
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This code sequence is somewhat difficult to read. Let's rewrite it and add
some comments to improve clarity.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
cherry-picking into an unborn branch should work, so make it work,
with or without --ff.
Cherry-picking anything other than a commit that only adds files, will
naturally result in conflicts. Similarly, revert also works, but will
result in conflicts unless the specified revision only deletes files.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Various codepaths checked if two encoding names are the same using
ad-hoc code and some of them ended up asking iconv() to convert
between "utf8" and "UTF-8". The former is not a valid way to spell
the encoding name, but often people use it by mistake, and we
equated them in some but not all codepaths. Introduce a new helper
function to make these codepaths consistent.
* jc/same-encoding:
reencode_string(): introduce and use same_encoding()
Conflicts:
builtin/mailinfo.c
Callers of reencode_string() that re-encodes a string from one
encoding to another all used ad-hoc way to bypass the case where the
input and the output encodings are the same. Some did strcmp(),
some did strcasecmp(), yet some others when converting to UTF-8 used
is_encoding_utf8().
Introduce same_encoding() helper function to make these callers use
the same logic. Notably, is_encoding_utf8() has a work-around for
common misconfiguration to use "utf8" to name UTF-8 encoding, which
does not match "UTF-8" hence strcasecmp() would not consider the
same. Make use of it in this helper function.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These functions are called in sequencer.c, which is part of
libgit.a. This makes libgit.a potentially require builtin/merge.c for
external git commands.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Turn many file-scope private symbols to static to reduce the
global namespace contamination.
* jc/make-static:
sequencer.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
ident.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
trace.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
wt-status.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
read-cache.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
strbuf.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
sha1-array.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
symlinks.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
notes.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
rerere.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
graph.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
diff.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
commit.c: mark a file-scope private symbol as static
builtin/notes.c: mark file-scope private symbols as static
In case 'git cherry-pick -s <commit>' failed, the user had to use 'git
commit -s' (i.e. state the -s option again), which is easy to forget
about. Instead, write the signed-off-by line early, so plain 'git
commit' will have the same result.
Also update 'git commit -s', so that in case there is already a relevant
Signed-off-by line before the Conflicts: line, it won't add one more at
the end of the message. If there is no such line, then add it before the
the Conflicts: line.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git cherry-pick A C B" used to replay changes in A and then B and
then C if these three commits had committer timestamps in that
order, which is not what the user who said "A C B" naturally expects.
* mz/cherry-pick-cmdline-order:
cherry-pick/revert: respect order of revisions to pick
demonstrate broken 'git cherry-pick three one two'
teach log --no-walk=unsorted, which avoids sorting
When giving multiple individual revisions to cherry-pick or revert, as
in 'git cherry-pick A B' or 'git revert B A', one would expect them to
be picked/reverted in the order given on the command line. They are
instead ordered by their commit timestamp -- in chronological order
for "cherry-pick" and in reverse chronological order for
"revert". This matches the order in which one would usually give them
on the command line, making this bug somewhat hard to notice. Still,
it has been reported at least once before [1].
It seems like the chronological sorting happened by accident because
the revision walker has traditionally always sorted commits in reverse
chronological order when rev_info.no_walk was enabled. In the case of
'git revert B A' where B is newer than A, this sorting is a no-op. For
'git cherry-pick A B', the sorting would reverse the arguments, but
because the sequencer also flips the rev_info.reverse flag when
picking (as opposed to reverting), the end result is a chronological
order. The rev_info.reverse flag was probably flipped so that the
revision walker emits B before C in 'git cherry-pick A..C'; that it
happened to effectively undo the unexpected sorting done when not
walking, was probably a coincidence that allowed this bug to happen at
all.
Fix the bug by telling the revision walker not to sort the commits
when not walking. The only case we want to reverse the order is now
when cherry-picking and walking revisions (rev_info.no_walk = 0).
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/164794
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Scripts such as "git rebase -i" cannot currently cherry-pick commits
which have an empty commit message, as git cherry-pick calls git
commit without the --allow-empty-message option.
Add an --allow-empty-message option to git cherry-pick which is passed
through to git commit, so this behaviour can be overridden.
Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The earlier "--keep-redundant-commit" series broke "cherry-pick"
that is given a commit whose change is already in the current
history. Such a cherry-pick would result in an empty change, and
should stop with an error, telling the user that conflict resolution
may have made the result empty (which is exactly what is happening),
but we silently dropped the change on the floor without any message
nor non-zero exit code.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the case the pointer could be NULL, the function that gave the caller
the NULL pointer would already have issued an error message, so simply
returning early with an error status without issuing a new message is
sufficient. The same for parse_commit() that will show necessary error
message when the argument is not NULL, and will return error silently
when the argument is NULL.
Noticed-by: Michael Mueller
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase" learned to optionally keep commits that do not introduce
any change in the original history.
By Neil Horman
* nh/empty-rebase:
git-rebase: add keep_empty flag
git-cherry-pick: Add test to validate new options
git-cherry-pick: Add keep-redundant-commits option
git-cherry-pick: add allow-empty option
There is no need for "commit_list_reverse()" function that only invites
inefficient code.
By René Scharfe
* rs/commit-list-append:
commit: remove commit_list_reverse()
revision: append to list instead of insert and reverse
sequencer: export commit_list_append()
In the older days, the header "Conflicts:" in "cherry-pick" and
"merge" was separated by a blank line from the list of paths that
follow for readability, but when "merge" was rewritten in C, we lost
it by mistake. Remove the newline from "cherry-pick" to make them
match again.
By Ralf Thielow
* rt/cherry-revert-conflict-summary:
sequencer: remove additional blank line
This function can be used in other parts of git. Give it a new home
in commit.c.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-cherry-pick --allow-empty command by default only preserves empty
commits that were originally empty, i.e only those commits for which
<commit>^{tree} and <commit>^^{tree} are equal. By default commits which are
non-empty, but were made empty by the inclusion of a prior commit on the current
history are filtered out. This option allows us to override that behavior and
include redundant commits as empty commits in the change history.
Note that this patch changes the default behavior of git cherry-pick slightly.
Prior to this patch all commits in a cherry-pick sequence were applied and git
commit was run. The implication here was that, if a commit was redundant, and
the commit did not trigger the fast forward logic, the git commit operation, and
therefore the git cherry-pick operation would fail, displaying the cherry pick
advice (i.e. run git commit --allow-empty). With this patch however, such
redundant commits are automatically skipped without stopping, unless
--keep-redundant-commits is specified, in which case, they are automatically
applied as empty commits.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove an additional blank line between the
headline and the list of conflicted files after
doing a recursive merge.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git cherry-pick fails when picking a non-ff commit that is empty. The advice
given with the failure is that a git-commit --allow-empty should be issued to
explicitly add the empty commit during the cherry pick. This option allows a
user to specify before hand that they want to keep the empty commit. This
eliminates the need to issue both a cherry pick and a commit operation.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This macro already evaluates to the correct type, as it
casts the string literal to "unsigned char *" itself
(and callers who want the literal can use the _LITERAL
form).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When cherry-pick fails it offers a helpful hint about how to
proceed. The hint tells the user how to do the cleanup
needed by the conflicted cherry-pick and finish the job after
conflict resolution. In case of cherry-pick --no-commit, the
hint goes too far. It tells the user to finish up with
'git commit'. That is not what this git-cherry-pick was
trying to do in the first place.
Restrict the hint in case of --no-commit to avoid giving this
extra advice.
Also, add a test verifying the reduced hint for the --no-commit
version of cherry-pick.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Expose the cherry-picking machinery through a public
sequencer_pick_revisions() (renamed from pick_revisions() in
builtin/revert.c), so that cherry-picking and reverting are special
cases of a general sequencer operation. The cherry-pick builtin is
now a thin wrapper that does command-line argument parsing before
calling into sequencer_pick_revisions(). In the future, we can write
a new "foo" builtin that calls into the sequencer like:
memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts));
opts.action = REPLAY_FOO;
opts.revisions = xmalloc(sizeof(*opts.revs));
parse_args_populate_opts(argc, argv, &opts);
init_revisions(opts.revs);
sequencer_pick_revisions(&opts);
This patch does not intend to make any functional changes. Check
with:
$ git blame -s -C HEAD^..HEAD -- sequencer.c | grep -C3 '^[^^]'
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that "git reset" no longer implicitly removes .git/sequencer that
the operator may or may not have wanted to keep, the logic to write a
backup copy of .git/sequencer and remove it when stale is not needed
any more. Simplify the sequencer API and repository layout by
dropping it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
