1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-15 05:33:04 +01:00
Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonathan Nieder
a48fcd8369 tests: add missing &&
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide
failures from earlier commands in the chain.

Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or
test_might_fail.  The examples in this patch do not require that.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09 11:59:49 -08:00
Jonathan Nieder
8fe5aeddcb t1302 (core.repositoryversion): style tweaks
This test is from 2007, which is late enough for the style to be
recognizably modern but still a while ago.  Freshen it up to
follow new best practices:

 - guard setup commands with test_expect_setup, so errors at
   that stage can be caught;
 - use <<\EOF in preference to <<EOF, to save reviewers the
   trouble of looking for variable interpolations;
 - use test_cmp instead of test "$foo" = "$bar", for better
   output with -v on failure;
 - indent commands in subshells and let them span multiple lines;
 - combine the two "gitdir required mode" tests that do not make
   as much sense alone.

Cc: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-09 16:01:10 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder
18a8269242 tests: subshell indentation stylefix
Format the subshells introduced by the previous patch (Several tests:
cd inside subshell instead of around, 2010-09-06) like so:

	(
		cd subdir &&
		...
	) &&

This is generally easier to read and has the nice side-effect that
this patch will show what commands are used in the subshell, making
it easier to check for lost environment variables and similar
behavior changes.

Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-09 15:56:20 -07:00
Jens Lehmann
fd4ec4f2bb Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of around
Fixed all places where it was a straightforward change from cd'ing into a
directory and back via "cd .." to a cd inside a subshell.

Found these places with "git grep -w "cd \.\.".

Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-06 14:30:53 -07:00
Stephan Beyer
d492b31caf t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".

This is useful to

 - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
   e.g. SIGSEGV, and

 - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13 13:21:26 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
41ac414ea2 Sane use of test_expect_failure
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision.  Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:

    test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        what is to be tested
    '

And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests.  Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test.  The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.

This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:

    test_expect_success 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        ! this command should fail
    '

test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass.  So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:

    test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
        rm -f bar &&
        git foo &&
        test -f bar
    '

This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 20:49:34 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
9459aa77a0 Do check_repository_format() early (re-fix)
This pushes check_repository_format() (actually _gently() version)
to setup_git_directory_gently() in order to prevent from
using unsupported repositories.

New setup_git_directory_gently()'s behaviour is stop searching
for a valid gitdir and return as if there is no gitdir if a
unsupported repository is found. Warning will be thrown in these
cases.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-12-05 15:06:37 -08:00