In commit fbd4a70 (list-objects: mark more commits as edges in
mark_edges_uninteresting - 2013-08-16), we marked an increasing number
of edges uninteresting. This change, and the subsequent change to make
this conditional on --objects-edge, are used by --thin to make much
smaller packs for shallow clones.
Unfortunately, they cause a significant performance regression when
pushing non-shallow clones with lots of refs (23.322 seconds vs.
4.785 seconds with 22400 refs). Add an option to git rev-list,
--objects-edge-aggressive, that preserves this more aggressive behavior,
while leaving --objects-edge to provide more performant behavior.
Preserve the current behavior for the moment by using the aggressive
option.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is currently no easy way to ask the revision traversal
machinery to include objects reachable from the index (e.g.,
blobs and trees that have not yet been committed). This
patch adds an option to do so.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We want to add all reflog entries as tips for finding
reachable objects. The revision machinery can already do
this (to support "rev-list --reflog"); we can reuse that
code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When pack-objects is computing the reachability bitmap to
serve a fetch request, it can erroneously die() if some of
the UNINTERESTING objects are not present. Upload-pack
throws away HAVE lines from the client for objects we do not
have, but we may have a tip object without all of its
ancestors (e.g., if the tip is no longer reachable and was
new enough to survive a `git prune`, but some of its
reachable objects did get pruned).
In the non-bitmap case, we do a revision walk with the HAVE
objects marked as UNINTERESTING. The revision walker
explicitly ignores errors in accessing UNINTERESTING commits
to handle this case (and we do not bother looking at
UNINTERESTING trees or blobs at all).
When we have bitmaps, however, the process is quite
different. The bitmap index for a pack-objects run is
calculated in two separate steps:
First, we perform an extensive walk from all the HAVEs to
find the full set of objects reachable from them. This walk
is usually optimized away because we are expected to hit an
object with a bitmap during the traversal, which allows us
to terminate early.
Secondly, we perform an extensive walk from all the WANTs,
which usually also terminates early because we hit a commit
with an existing bitmap.
Once we have the resulting bitmaps from the two walks, we
AND-NOT them together to obtain the resulting set of objects
we need to pack.
When we are walking the HAVE objects, the revision walker
does not know that we are walking it only to mark the
results as uninteresting. We strip out the UNINTERESTING flag,
because those objects _are_ interesting to us during the
first walk. We want to keep going to get a complete set of
reachable objects if we can.
We need some way to tell the revision walker that it's OK to
silently truncate the HAVE walk, just like it does for the
UNINTERESTING case. This patch introduces a new
`ignore_missing_links` flag to the `rev_info` struct, which
we set only for the HAVE walk.
It also adds tests to cover UNINTERESTING objects missing
from several positions: a missing blob, a missing tree, and
a missing parent commit. The missing blob already worked (as
we do not care about its contents at all), but the other two
cases caused us to die().
Note that there are a few cases we do not need to test:
1. We do not need to test a missing tree, with the blob
still present. Without the tree that refers to it, we
would not know that the blob is relevant to our walk.
2. We do not need to test a tip commit that is missing.
Upload-pack omits these for us (and in fact, we
complain even in the non-bitmap case if it fails to do
so).
Reported-by: Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <tanoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Attempts to show where a single-strand-of-pearls break in "git log"
output.
* nd/log-show-linear-break:
log: add --show-linear-break to help see non-linear history
object.h: centralize object flag allocation
Option explanation is in rev-list-options.txt. The interaction with -z
is left undecided.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While the field "flags" is mainly used by the revision walker, it is
also used in many other places. Centralize the whole flag allocation to
one place for a better overview (and easier to move flags if we have
too).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Borrow the bitmap index into packfiles from JGit to speed up
enumeration of objects involved in a commit range without having to
fully traverse the history.
* jk/pack-bitmap: (26 commits)
ewah: unconditionally ntohll ewah data
ewah: support platforms that require aligned reads
read-cache: use get_be32 instead of hand-rolled ntoh_l
block-sha1: factor out get_be and put_be wrappers
do not discard revindex when re-preparing packfiles
pack-bitmap: implement optional name_hash cache
t/perf: add tests for pack bitmaps
t: add basic bitmap functionality tests
count-objects: recognize .bitmap in garbage-checking
repack: consider bitmaps when performing repacks
repack: handle optional files created by pack-objects
repack: turn exts array into array-of-struct
repack: stop using magic number for ARRAY_SIZE(exts)
pack-objects: implement bitmap writing
rev-list: add bitmap mode to speed up object lists
pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects
pack-objects: split add_object_entry
pack-bitmap: add support for bitmap indexes
documentation: add documentation for the bitmap format
ewah: compressed bitmap implementation
...
People often wished a way to tell "git log --branches" (and "git
log --remotes --not --branches") to exclude some local branches
from the expansion of "--branches" (similarly for "--tags", "--all"
and "--glob=<pattern>"). Now they have one.
* jc/ref-excludes:
rev-parse: introduce --exclude=<glob> to tame wildcards
rev-list --exclude: export add/clear-ref-exclusion and ref-excluded API
rev-list --exclude: tests
document --exclude option
revision: introduce --exclude=<glob> to tame wildcards
Otherwise we might not have 'struct diff_options'.
[jc: needs a matching follow-up patch to remove inclusion of diff.h
from *.c files that do not themselves use anything from diff.h]
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit enables users of `struct rev_info` to peform custom limiting
during a revision walk (i.e. `get_revision`).
If the field `include_check` has been set to a callback, this callback
will be issued once for each commit before it is added to the "pending"
list of the revwalk. If the include check returns 0, the commit will be
marked as added but won't be pushed to the pending list, effectively
limiting the walk.
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <tanoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
People often find "git log --branches" etc. that includes _all_
branches is cumbersome to use when they want to grab most but except
some. The same applies to --tags, --all and --glob.
Teach the revision machinery to remember patterns, and then upon the
next such a globbing option, exclude those that match the pattern.
With this, I can view only my integration branches (e.g. maint,
master, etc.) without topic branches, which are named after two
letters from primary authors' names, slash and topic name.
git rev-list --no-walk --exclude=??/* --branches |
git name-rev --refs refs/heads/* --stdin
This one shows things reachable from local and remote branches that
have not been merged to the integration branches.
git log --remotes --branches --not --exclude=??/* --branches
It may be a bit rough around the edges, in that the pattern to give
the exclude option depends on what globbing option follows. In
these examples, the pattern "??/*" is used, not "refs/heads/??/*",
because the globbing option that follows the -"-exclude=<pattern>"
is "--branches". As each use of globbing option resets previously
set "--exclude", this may not be such a bad thing, though.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using pathspec filtering in combination with diff-based log
output, parent simplification happens before the diff is computed.
The diff is therefore against the *simplified* parents.
This works okay, arguably by accident, in the normal case:
simplification reduces to one parent as long as the commit is TREESAME
to it. So the simplified parent of any given commit must have the
same tree contents on the filtered paths as its true (unfiltered)
parent.
However, --full-diff breaks this guarantee, and indeed gives pretty
spectacular results when comparing the output of
git log --graph --stat ...
git log --graph --full-diff --stat ...
(--graph internally kicks in parent simplification, much like
--parents).
To fix it, store a copy of the parent list before simplification (in a
slab) whenever --full-diff is in effect. Then use the stored parents
instead of the simplified ones in the commit display code paths. The
latter do not actually check for --full-diff to avoid duplicated code;
they just grab the original parents if save_parents() has not been
called for this revision walk.
For ordinary commits it should be obvious that this is the right thing
to do.
Merge commits are a bit subtle. Observe that with default
simplification, merge simplification is an all-or-nothing decision:
either the merge is TREESAME to one parent and disappears, or it is
different from all parents and the parent list remains intact.
Redundant parents are not pruned, so the existing code also shows them
as a merge.
So if we do show a merge commit, the parent list just consists of the
rewrite result on each parent. Running, e.g., --cc on this in
--full-diff mode is not very useful: if any commits were skipped, some
hunks will disagree with all sides of the merge (with one side,
because commits were skipped; with the others, because they didn't
have those changes in the first place). This triggers --cc showing
these hunks spuriously.
Therefore I believe that even for merge commits it is better to show
the diffs wrt. the original parents.
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Format-patch generates emails with the "From" address set to the
author of each patch. If you are going to send the emails, however,
you would want to replace the author identity with yours (if they
are not the same), and bump the author identity to an in-body
header.
Normally this is handled by git-send-email, which does the
transformation before sending out the emails. However, some
workflows may not use send-email (e.g., imap-send, or a custom
script which feeds the mbox to a non-git MUA). They could each
implement this feature themselves, but getting it right is
non-trivial (one must canonicalize the identities by reversing any
RFC2047 encoding or RFC822 quoting of the headers, which has caused
many bugs in send-email over the years).
This patch takes a different approach: it teaches format-patch a
"--from" option which handles the ident check and in-body header
while it is writing out the email. It's much simpler to do at this
level (because we haven't done any quoting yet), and any workflow
based on format-patch can easily turn it on.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git log" learned the "--author-date-order" option, with which the
output is topologically sorted and commits in parallel histories
are shown intermixed together based on the author timestamp.
* jc/topo-author-date-sort:
t6003: add --author-date-order test
topology tests: teach a helper to set author dates as well
t6003: add --date-order test
topology tests: teach a helper to take abbreviated timestamps
t/lib-t6000: style fixes
log: --author-date-order
sort-in-topological-order: use prio-queue
prio-queue: priority queue of pointers to structs
toposort: rename "lifo" field
Define memory ownership and lifetime rules for what for-each-ref
feeds to its callbacks (in short, "you do not own it, so make a
copy if you want to keep it").
* mh/reflife: (25 commits)
refs: document the lifetime of the args passed to each_ref_fn
register_ref(): make a copy of the bad reference SHA-1
exclude_existing(): set existing_refs.strdup_strings
string_list_add_refs_by_glob(): add a comment about memory management
string_list_add_one_ref(): rename first parameter to "refname"
show_head_ref(): rename first parameter to "refname"
show_head_ref(): do not shadow name of argument
add_existing(): do not retain a reference to sha1
do_fetch(): clean up existing_refs before exiting
do_fetch(): reduce scope of peer_item
object_array_entry: fix memory handling of the name field
find_first_merges(): remove unnecessary code
find_first_merges(): initialize merges variable using initializer
fsck: don't put a void*-shaped peg in a char*-shaped hole
object_array_remove_duplicates(): rewrite to reduce copying
revision: use object_array_filter() in implementation of gc_boundary()
object_array: add function object_array_filter()
revision: split some overly-long lines
cmd_diff(): make it obvious which cases are exclusive of each other
cmd_diff(): rename local variable "list" -> "entry"
...
Major update to the revision traversal logic to improve culling of
irrelevant parents while traversing a mergy history.
* kb/full-history-compute-treesame-carefully-2:
revision.c: make default history consider bottom commits
revision.c: don't show all merges for --parents
revision.c: discount side branches when computing TREESAME
revision.c: add BOTTOM flag for commits
simplify-merges: drop merge from irrelevant side branch
simplify-merges: never remove all TREESAME parents
t6012: update test for tweaked full-history traversal
revision.c: Make --full-history consider more merges
Documentation: avoid "uninteresting"
rev-list-options.txt: correct TREESAME for P
t6111: add parents to tests
t6111: allow checking the parents as well
t6111: new TREESAME test set
t6019: test file dropped in -s ours merge
decorate.c: compact table when growing
The primary invariant of sort_in_topological_order() is that a
parent commit is not emitted until all children of it are. When
traversing a forked history like this with "git log C E":
A----B----C
\
D----E
we ensure that A is emitted after all of B, C, D, and E are done, B
has to wait until C is done, and D has to wait until E is done.
In some applications, however, we would further want to control how
these child commits B, C, D and E on two parallel ancestry chains
are shown.
Most of the time, we would want to see C and B emitted together, and
then E and D, and finally A (i.e. the --topo-order output). The
"lifo" parameter of the sort_in_topological_order() function is used
to control this behaviour. We start the traversal by knowing two
commits, C and E. While keeping in mind that we also need to
inspect E later, we pick C first to inspect, and we notice and
record that B needs to be inspected. By structuring the "work to be
done" set as a LIFO stack, we ensure that B is inspected next,
before other in-flight commits we had known that we will need to
inspect, e.g. E.
When showing in --date-order, we would want to see commits ordered
by timestamps, i.e. show C, E, B and D in this order before showing
A, possibly mixing commits from two parallel histories together.
When "lifo" parameter is set to false, the function keeps the "work
to be done" set sorted in the date order to realize this semantics.
After inspecting C, we add B to the "work to be done" set, but the
next commit we inspect from the set is E which is newer than B.
The name "lifo", however, is too strongly tied to the way how the
function implements its behaviour, and does not describe what the
behaviour _means_.
Replace this field with an enum rev_sort_order, with two possible
values: REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER and REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE, and
update the existing code. The mechanical replacement rule is:
"lifo == 0" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE"
"lifo == 1" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER"
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/line-log:
git-log(1): remove --full-line-diff description
line-log: fix documentation formatting
log -L: improve comments in process_all_files()
log -L: store the path instead of a diff_filespec
log -L: test merge of parallel modify/rename
t4211: pass -M to 'git log -M -L...' test
log -L: fix overlapping input ranges
log -L: check range set invariants when we look it up
Speed up log -L... -M
log -L: :pattern:file syntax to find by funcname
Implement line-history search (git log -L)
Export rewrite_parents() for 'log -L'
Refactor parse_loc
When performing edge-based operations on the revision graph, it can be
useful to be able to identify the INTERESTING graph's connection(s) to
the bottom commit(s) specified by the user.
Conceptually when the user specifies "A..B" (== B ^A), they are asking
for the history from A to B. The first connection from A onto the
INTERESTING graph is part of that history, and should be considered. If
we consider only INTERESTING nodes and their connections, then we're
really only considering the history from A's immediate descendants to B.
This patch does not change behaviour, but adds a new BOTTOM flag to
indicate the bottom commits specified by the user, ready to be used by
following patches.
We immediately use the BOTTOM flag to return collect_bottom_commits() to
its original approach of examining the pending commit list rather than
the command line. This will ensure alignment of the definition of
"bottom" with future patches.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
History simplification previously always treated merges as TREESAME
if they were TREESAME to any parent.
While this was consistent with the default behaviour, this could be
extremely unhelpful when searching detailed history, and could not be
overridden. For example, if a merge had ignored a change, as if by "-s
ours", then:
git log -m -p --full-history -Schange file
would successfully locate "change"'s addition but would not locate the
merge that resolved against it.
Futher, simplify_merges could drop the actual parent that a commit
was TREESAME to, leaving it as a normal commit marked TREESAME that
isn't actually TREESAME to its remaining parent.
Now redefine a commit's TREESAME flag to be true only if a commit is
TREESAME to _all_ of its parents. This doesn't affect either the default
simplify_history behaviour (because partially TREESAME merges are turned
into normal commits), or full-history with parent rewriting (because all
merges are output). But it does affect other modes. The clearest
difference is that --full-history will show more merges - sufficient to
ensure that -m -p --full-history log searches can really explain every
change to the file, including those changes' ultimate fate in merges.
Also modify simplify_merges to recalculate TREESAME after removing
a parent. This is achieved by storing per-parent TREESAME flags on the
initial scan, so the combined flag can be easily recomputed.
This fixes some t6111 failures, but creates a couple of new ones -
we are now showing some merges that don't need to be shown.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation assures users that "A...B" is defined as "A B --not
$(git merge-base --all A B)". This wasn't in fact quite true, because
the calculated merge bases were not sent to add_rev_cmdline().
The main effect of this was that although
git rev-list --ancestry-path A B --not $(git merge-base --all A B)
worked, the simpler form
git rev-list --ancestry-path A...B
failed with a "no bottom commits" error.
Other potential users of bottom commits could also be affected by this
problem, if they examine revs->cmdline_info; I came across the issue in
my proposed history traversal refinements series.
So ensure that the calculated merge bases are sent to add_rev_cmdline(),
flagged with new 'whence' enum value REV_CMD_MERGE_BASE.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Consolidate codepaths that inspect log-message-to-be and decide to
add a new Signed-off-by line in various commands.
* bc/append-signed-off-by:
git-commit: populate the edit buffer with 2 blank lines before s-o-b
Unify appending signoff in format-patch, commit and sequencer
format-patch: update append_signoff prototype
t4014: more tests about appending s-o-b lines
sequencer.c: teach append_signoff to avoid adding a duplicate newline
sequencer.c: teach append_signoff how to detect duplicate s-o-b
sequencer.c: always separate "(cherry picked from" from commit body
sequencer.c: require a conforming footer to be preceded by a blank line
sequencer.c: recognize "(cherry picked from ..." as part of s-o-b footer
t/t3511: add some tests of 'cherry-pick -s' functionality
t/test-lib-functions.sh: allow to specify the tag name to test_commit
commit, cherry-pick -s: remove broken support for multiline rfc2822 fields
sequencer.c: rework search for start of footer to improve clarity
This is a rewrite of much of Bo's work, mainly in an effort to split
it into smaller, easier to understand routines.
The algorithm is built around the struct range_set, which encodes a
series of line ranges as intervals [a,b). This is used in two
contexts:
* A set of lines we are tracking (which will change as we dig through
history).
* To encode diffs, as pairs of ranges.
The main routine is range_set_map_across_diff(). It processes the
diff between a commit C and some parent P. It determines which diff
hunks are relevant to the ranges tracked in C, and computes the new
ranges for P.
The algorithm is then simply to process history in topological order
from newest to oldest, computing ranges and (partial) diffs. At
branch points, we need to merge the ranges we are watching. We will
find that many commits do not affect the chosen ranges, and mark them
TREESAME (in addition to those already filtered by pathspec limiting).
Another pass of history simplification then gets rid of such commits.
This is wired as an extra filtering pass in the log machinery. This
currently only reduces code duplication, but should allow for other
simplifications and options to be used.
Finally, we hook a diff printer into the output chain. Ideally we
would wire directly into the diff logic, to optionally use features
like word diff. However, that will require some major reworking of
the diff chain, so we completely replace the output with our own diff
for now.
As this was a GSoC project, and has quite some history by now, many
people have helped. In no particular order, thanks go to
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Will Palmer <wmpalmer@gmail.com>
Apologies to everyone I forgot.
Signed-off-by: Bo Yang <struggleyb.nku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The function rewrite_one is used to rewrite a single
parent of the current commit, and is used by rewrite_parents
to rewrite all the parents.
Decouple the dependence between them by making rewrite_one
a callback function that is passed to rewrite_parents. Then
export rewrite_parents for reuse by the line history browser.
We will use this function in line-log.c.
Signed-off-by: Bo Yang <struggleyb.nku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is a preparation step for merging with append_signoff from
sequencer.c
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach commands in the "log" family to optionally pay attention to
the mailmap.
* ap/log-mailmap:
log --use-mailmap: optimize for cases without --author/--committer search
log: add log.mailmap configuration option
log: grep author/committer using mailmap
test: add test for --use-mailmap option
log: add --use-mailmap option
pretty: use mailmap to display username and email
mailmap: add mailmap structure to rev_info and pp
mailmap: simplify map_user() interface
mailmap: remove email copy and length limitation
Use split_ident_line to parse author and committer
string-list: allow case-insensitive string list
Teach "format-patch" to prefix v4- to its output files for the
fourth iteration of a patch series, to make it easier for the
submitter to keep separate copies for iterations.
* jc/format-patch-reroll:
format-patch: give --reroll-count a short synonym -v
format-patch: document and test --reroll-count
format-patch: add --reroll-count=$N option
get_patch_filename(): split into two functions
get_patch_filename(): drop "just-numbers" hack
get_patch_filename(): simplify function signature
builtin/log.c: stop using global patch_suffix
builtin/log.c: drop redundant "numbered_files" parameter from make_cover_letter()
builtin/log.c: drop unused "numbered" parameter from make_cover_letter()
Pass a mailmap from rev_info to pretty_print_context to so that the
pretty printer can use rewritten name and email address when showing
commits.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --reroll-count=$N option, when given a positive integer:
- Adds " v$N" to the subject prefix specified. As the default
subject prefix string is "PATCH", --reroll-count=2 makes it
"PATCH v2".
- Prefixes "v$N-" to the names used for output files. The cover
letter, whose name is usually 0000-cover-letter.patch, becomes
v2-0000-cover-letter.patch when given --reroll-count=2.
This allows users to use the same --output-directory for multiple
iterations of the same series, without letting the output for a
newer round overwrite output files from the earlier rounds. The
user can incorporate materials from earlier rounds to update the
newly minted iteration, and use "send-email v2-*.patch" to send out
the patches belonging to the second iteration easily.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When inserting the note after the commit log message to format-patch
output, add three dashes before the note. Record the fact that we
did so in the rev_info and omit showing duplicated three dashes in
the usual codepath that is used when notes are not being shown.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git cherry-pick A C B" used to replay changes in A and then B and
then C if these three commits had committer timestamps in that
order, which is not what the user who said "A C B" naturally expects.
* mz/cherry-pick-cmdline-order:
cherry-pick/revert: respect order of revisions to pick
demonstrate broken 'git cherry-pick three one two'
teach log --no-walk=unsorted, which avoids sorting
When 'git log' is passed the --no-walk option, no revision walk takes
place, naturally. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, however, the provided
revisions still get sorted by commit date. So e.g 'git log --no-walk
HEAD HEAD~1' and 'git log --no-walk HEAD~1 HEAD' give the same result
(unless the two revisions share the commit date, in which case they
will retain the order given on the command line). As the commit that
introduced --no-walk (8e64006 (Teach revision machinery about
--no-walk, 2007-07-24)) points out, the sorting is intentional, to
allow things like
git log --abbrev-commit --pretty=oneline --decorate --all --no-walk
to show all refs in order by commit date.
But there are also other cases where the sorting is not wanted, such
as
<command producing revisions in order> |
git log --oneline --no-walk --stdin
To accomodate both cases, leave the decision of whether or not to sort
up to the caller, by allowing --no-walk={sorted,unsorted}, defaulting
to 'sorted' for backward-compatibility reasons.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teaches the object name parser things like a "git describe" output
is always a commit object, "A" in "git log A" must be a committish,
and "A" and "B" in "git log A...B" both must be committish, etc., to
prolong the lifetime of abbreviated object names.
* jc/sha1-name-more: (27 commits)
t1512: match the "other" object names
t1512: ignore whitespaces in wc -l output
rev-parse --disambiguate=<prefix>
rev-parse: A and B in "rev-parse A..B" refer to committish
reset: the command takes committish
commit-tree: the command wants a tree and commits
apply: --build-fake-ancestor expects blobs
sha1_name.c: add support for disambiguating other types
revision.c: the "log" family, except for "show", takes committish
revision.c: allow handle_revision_arg() to take other flags
sha1_name.c: introduce get_sha1_committish()
sha1_name.c: teach lookup context to get_sha1_with_context()
sha1_name.c: many short names can only be committish
sha1_name.c: get_sha1_1() takes lookup flags
sha1_name.c: get_describe_name() by definition groks only commits
sha1_name.c: teach get_short_sha1() a commit-only option
sha1_name.c: allow get_short_sha1() to take other flags
get_sha1(): fix error status regression
sha1_name.c: restructure disambiguation of short names
sha1_name.c: correct misnamed "canonical" and "res"
...
Add a field to setup_revision_opt structure and allow these callers
to tell the setup_revisions command parsing machinery that short SHA1
it encounters are meant to name committish.
This step does not go all the way to connect the setup_revisions()
to sha1_name.c yet.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The existing "cant_be_filename" that tells the function that the
caller knows the arg is not a path (hence it does not have to be
checked for absense of the file whose name matches it) is made into
a bit in the flag word.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The command line parser choked "git cherry-pick $name" when $name can be
both revision name and a pathname, even though $name can never be a path
in the context of the command.
The issue the patch addresses is real, but the way it is implemented felt
unnecessarily invasive a bit. It may be cleaner for this caller to add
the "--" to the end of the argv_array it passes to setup_revisions().
By Clemens Buchacher
* cb/cherry-pick-rev-path-confusion:
cherry-pick: do not expect file arguments
If a commit-ish passed to cherry-pick or revert happens to have a file
of the same name, git complains that the argument is ambiguous and
advises to use '--'. To make things worse, the '--' argument is removed
by parse_options, und so passing '--' has no effect.
Instead, always interpret cherry-pick/revert arguments as revisions.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously it was not possible to iterate revisions twice using the
revision walking api. We add a reset_revision_walk() which clears the
used flags. This allows us to do multiple sequencial revision walks.
We add the appropriate calls to the existing submodule machinery doing
revision walks. This is done to avoid surprises if future code wants to
call these functions more than once during the processes lifetime.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This teaches the "log" family of commands to pass the GPG signature in the
commit objects to "gpg --verify" via the verify_signed_buffer() interface
used to verify signed tag objects. E.g.
$ git show --show-signature -s HEAD
shows GPG output in the header part of the output.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rs/pending:
commit: factor out clear_commit_marks_for_object_array
checkout: use leak_pending flag
bundle: use leak_pending flag
bisect: use leak_pending flag
revision: add leak_pending flag
checkout: use add_pending_{object,sha1} in orphan check
revision: factor out add_pending_sha1
checkout: check for "Previous HEAD" notice in t2020
Conflicts:
builtin/checkout.c
revision.c
* jc/fetch-verify:
fetch: verify we have everything we need before updating our ref
rev-list --verify-object
list-objects: pass callback data to show_objects()
* bk/ancestry-path:
t6019: avoid refname collision on case-insensitive systems
revision: do not include sibling history in --ancestry-path output
revision: keep track of the end-user input from the command line
rev-list: Demonstrate breakage with --ancestry-path --all
The new flag leak_pending in struct rev_info can be used to prevent
prepare_revision_walk from freeing the list of pending objects. It
will still forget about them, so it really is leaked. This behaviour
may look weird at first, but it can be useful if the pointer to the
list is saved before calling prepare_revision_walk.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
