The "notemodify" fast-import command was introduced in commit a8dd2e7
(fast-import: Add support for importing commit notes, 2009-10-09)
The commit log has slightly different description than the added
documentation. The latter is somewhat confusing. "notemodify" is a
subcommand of "commit" command used to add a note for some commit.
Does this note annotate the commit produced by the "commit" command
or a commit given by it's committish parameter? Which notes tree
does it write notes to?
The exact meaning could be deduced with old description and some
notes machinery knowledge. But let's make it more obvious. This
command is used in a context like "commit refs/notes/test" to
add or rewrite an annotation for a committish parameter. So the
advised way to add notes in a fast-import stream is:
1) import some commits (optional)
2) prepare a "commit" to the notes tree:
2.1) choose notes ref, committer, log message, etc.
2.2) create annotations with "notemodify", where each can refer to
a commit being annotated via a branch name, import mark reference,
sha1 and other expressions specified in the Documentation.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ivankov <divanorama@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make it clear that git-filter-branch will honor and make permanent
replacement refs as well as grafts.
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This has been there since textconv existed, but was never
documented. There is some overlap with what's in
gitattributes(5), but it's important to warn in both places
that textconv diffs probably can't be applied.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix documentation on "git diff --check" by adopting the description from
"git apply --whitespace".
Signed-off-by: Christof Krüger <git@christof-krueger.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/maint-docs:
docs: fix some antique example output
docs: make sure literal "->" isn't converted to arrow
docs: update status --porcelain format
docs: minor grammar fixes to git-status
* jk/maint-docs:
docs: fix some antique example output
docs: make sure literal "->" isn't converted to arrow
docs: update status --porcelain format
docs: minor grammar fixes to git-status
* vh/config-interactive-singlekey-doc:
git-reset.txt: better docs for '--patch'
git-checkout.txt: better docs for '--patch'
git-stash.txt: better docs for '--patch'
git-add.txt: document 'interactive.singlekey'
config.txt: 'interactive.singlekey; is used by...
* rr/doc-content-type:
Documentation: Allow custom diff tools to be specified in 'diff.tool'
Documentation: Add diff.<driver>.* to config
Documentation: Move diff.<driver>.* from config.txt to diff-config.txt
Documentation: Add filter.<driver>.* to config
In v1.7.3.3~2 (Documentation: do not misinterpret pull refspec as bold
text, 2010-12-03) many uses of asterisks in expressions like
"refs/heads/*:refs/svn/origin/branches/*" were escaped as {asterisk}
to avoid being treated as delimiters for bold text, but these two were
missed.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the documentation for the git-sh-i18n--envsubst program to
include a SYNOPSIS section. Include the invocation of the program from
git-sh-i18n.sh.
Not having a SYNOPSIS section caused the "doc" target to fail on
Centos 5.5 with asciidoc 8.2.5, while building with 8.6.4 on Debian
works just fine.
The relevant error was:
ERROR: git-sh-i18n--envsubst.txt: line 9: second section must be named SYNOPSIS
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git-submodule.sh: separate parens by a space to avoid confusing some shells
Documentation/technical/api-diff.txt: correct name of diff_unmerge()
read_gitfile_gently: use ssize_t to hold read result
remove tests of always-false condition
rerere.c: diagnose a corrupt MERGE_RR when hitting EOF between TAB and '\0'
* mk/grep-pcre:
git-grep: Fix problems with recently added tests
git-grep: Update tests (mainly for -P)
Makefile: Pass USE_LIBPCRE down in GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
git-grep: update tests now regexp type is "last one wins"
git-grep: do not die upon -F/-P when grep.extendedRegexp is set.
git-grep: Bail out when -P is used with -F or -E
grep: Add basic tests
configure: Check for libpcre
git-grep: Learn PCRE
grep: Extract compile_regexp_failed() from compile_regexp()
grep: Fix a typo in a comment
grep: Put calls to fixmatch() and regmatch() into patmatch()
contrib/completion: --line-number to git grep
Documentation: Add --line-number to git-grep synopsis
* jc/notes-batch-removal:
show: --ignore-missing
notes remove: --stdin reads from the standard input
notes remove: --ignore-missing
notes remove: allow removing more than one
These diff-index and diff-tree sample outputs date back to
the first month of git's existence. The output format has
changed slightly since then, so let's have it match the
current output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recent versions of asciidoc will treat "->" as a
single-glyph arrow symbol, unless it is inside a literal
code block. This is a problem if we are discussing literal
output and want to show the ASCII characters.
Our usage falls into three categories:
1. Inside a code block. These can be left as-is.
2. Discussing literal output or code, but inside a
paragraph. This patch escapes these as "\->".
3. Using the arrow as a symbolic element, such as "use the
Edit->Account Settings menu". In this case, the
arrow symbol is preferable, so we leave it as-is.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --porcelain format was originally identical to the
--short format, but designed to be stable as the short
format changed. Since this was written, the short format
picked up a few incompatible niceties, but this description
was never changed.
Let's mention the differences. While we're at it, let's add
some sub-section headings to make the "output" section a
little easier to navigate.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jn/format-patch-doc:
Documentation/format-patch: suggest Toggle Word Wrap add-on for Thunderbird
Documentation: publicize hints for sending patches with GMail
Documentation: publicize KMail hints for sending patches inline
Documentation: hints for sending patches inline with Thunderbird
Documentation: explain how to check for patch corruption
The option can be used to check if read-tree with the same set of other
options like "-m" and "-u" would succeed without actually changing either
the index or the working tree.
The relevant tests in the t10?? range were extended to do a read-tree -n
before the real read-tree to make sure neither the index nor any local
files were changed with -n and the same exit code as without -n is
returned. The helper functions added for that purpose reside in the new
t/lib-read-tree.sh file.
The only exception is #13 in t1004 ("unlinking an un-unlink-able
symlink"). As this is an issue of wrong directory permissions it is not
detected with -n.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already talk about how to use each one and how they work,
but it is a reasonable question to wonder why one might use
one over the other.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Somebody tried "git pull" from a random place completely outside the work
tree, while exporting GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE that are set to correct
places, e.g.
GIT_WORK_TREE=$HOME/git.git
GIT_DIR=$GIT_WORK_TREE/.git
export GIT_WORK_TREE GIT_DIR
cd /tmp
git pull
At the beginning of git-pull, we check "require-work-tree" and then
"cd-to-toplevel". I _think_ the original intention when I wrote the
command was "we MUST have a work tree, our $(cwd) might not be at the
top-level directory of it", and no stronger than that. That check is a
very sensible thing to do before doing cd-to-toplevel. We check that the
place we would want to go exists, and then go there.
But the implementation of require_work_tree we have today is quite
different. I don't have energy to dig the history, but currently it says:
test "$(git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null)" = true ||
die "fatal: $0 cannot be used without a working tree."
Which is completely bogus. Even though we may happen to be just outside
of it right now, we may have a working tree that we can cd_to_toplevel
back to.
Add a function "require_work_tree_exists" that implements the check
this function originally intended (this is so that third-party scripts
that rely on the current behaviour do not have to get broken).
For now, update _no_ in-tree scripts, not even "git pull", as nobody on
the list seems to really care about the above corner case workflow that
triggered this. Scripts can be updated after vetting that they do want the
"we want to make sure the place we are going to go actually exists"
semantics.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
