I figured the sections might as well be in some order, so I chose alphabetical
but with "core" at the beginning. This should help people add new variables
in the right places.
Signed-off-by: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation for -n implies that -x is normally
used, however this is no longer true.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The example that tells users how to centralize the effort of the initial
git svn clone operation doesn't work properly. It uses rebase but that
only works if HEAD exists. This adds one extra command to create a
somewhat sensible HEAD that should work in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some places the links are wrong. They should be:
"link:everyday.html", instead of: "linkgit:everyday[7]".
This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The period at the end of the git-check-attr summary causes there to be
two periods after the summary in the git(1) manual page.
Signed-off-by: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Current git versions ignore everything after # (called <head> in the
following) when pushing. Older versions (before cf818348f1),
interpret #<head> as part of the URL, which make git bail out.
As branches origin from Cogito, it is the best to correct this by using
the behaviour of cg-push, that is to push HEAD to remote refs/heads/<head>.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even long timers seem to have missed that "format-patch -1 $commit" is a
much simpler and more obvious way to say "format-patch $commit^..$commit"
from the current documentation (and an example "format-patch -3 $commit"
to get three patches). Add an explicit instruction in a much earlier part
of the documentation to make it easier to find.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also fix error in diff_filepair::status documentation, and point to
the in-code reference as well as the doc.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gmail is one of the most popular email providers in the world. Now that Gmail
supports IMAP, sending properly formatted patches via `git imap-send` is
trivial. This section in SubmittingPatches explains how to do so.
Signed-off-by: Tom Preston-Werner <tom@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes attributes easier to find; before this patch some
attributes had individual subsections, and some didn't.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation spoke of the attribute being set "to" a path; this can
mistakenly be interpreted as "the attribute needs to have its value set to
some kind of path". This clarifies things.
Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Insert an empty <simpara> in manpages after code blocks to force and
empty line.
The problem can be seen on the manpage for the git tutorial, where an
example command and the following paragraph is printed with no empty
line between them:
First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as git
log --graph with:
$ man git-log
It is a good idea to introduce yourself to git [...]
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'--signoff' uses commiter name always to add the signoff line,
make it explicit in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Abhijit Bhopatkar <bain@devslashzero.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Plumbing tools should document what output can be expected.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --repo option was described in a way that the reader would have to
assume that it is the same as the <repository> parameter. But it actually
servers a purpose, which is now written down.
Furthermore, the --mirror option was missing from the synopsis.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Documentation/git-rebase.txt talks about pre-rebase hook, but it
appears that Documentation/git-hooks.txt does not have corresponding
entry for it.
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The need for "--" in the git-log synopsis was previously unclear and
confusing. This patch makes it a little clearer.
Thanks to hyy <yiyihu@gmail.com> for his help.
[sp: Changed -- to \-- per prior commit e1ccf53.]
Signed-off-by: martin f. krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
... because they show up in the man and html outputs.
This escaping is only needed for double dashes to be compatible with
older asciidoc versions; see commit e1ccf53 ([PATCH] Escape asciidoc's
built-in em-dash replacement, 2005-09-12).
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
foo.org is an existing domain, use RFC 2606 complying example.com instead
as used in other docs as well.
Signed-off-by: Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* bc/maint-diff-hunk-header-fix:
t4018-diff-funcname: test syntax of builtin xfuncname patterns
diff hunk pattern: fix misconverted "\{" tex macro introducers
diff: use extended regexp to find hunk headers
diff.*.xfuncname which uses "extended" regex's for hunk header selection
diff.c: associate a flag with each pattern and use it for compiling regex
diff.c: return pattern entry pointer rather than just the hunk header pattern
Conflicts:
Documentation/gitattributes.txt
The process of overriding the default LESS options using only
git-specific methods is rather obscure. Show the end user how
to do it in a step-by-step manner.
Signed-off-by: Chris Frey <cdfrey@foursquare.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This concept was retired by 77882f6 (Retire diffcore-pathspec.,
2006-04-10), more than 2 years ago.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, the hunk headers produced by 'diff -p' are customizable by
setting the diff.*.funcname option in the config file. The 'funcname' option
takes a basic regular expression. This functionality was designed using the
GNU regex library which, by default, allows using backslashed versions of
some extended regular expression operators, even in Basic Regular Expression
mode. For example, the following characters, when backslashed, are
interpreted according to the extended regular expression rules: ?, +, and |.
As such, the builtin funcname patterns were created using some extended
regular expression operators.
Other platforms which adhere more strictly to the POSIX spec do not
interpret the backslashed extended RE operators in Basic Regular Expression
mode. This causes the pattern matching for the builtin funcname patterns to
fail on those platforms.
Introduce a new option 'xfuncname' which uses extended regular expressions,
and advertise it _instead_ of funcname. Since most users are on GNU
platforms, the majority of funcname patterns are created and tested there.
Advertising only xfuncname should help to avoid the creation of non-portable
patterns which work with GNU regex but not elsewhere.
Additionally, the extended regular expressions may be less ugly and
complicated compared to the basic RE since many common special operators do
not need to be backslashed.
For example, the GNU Basic RE:
^[ ]*\\(\\(public\\|static\\).*\\)$
becomes the following Extended RE:
^[ ]*((public|static).*)$
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The only part of the hunk header that we can change is the "TEXT"
portion. Additionally, a few grammatical errors have been corrected.
Signed-off-by: Garry Dolley <gdolley@ucla.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The logic to checkout a different commit implements the safety to never
lose user's local changes. For example, switching from a commit to
another commit, when you have changed a path that is different between
them, need to merge your changes to the version from the switched-to
commit, which you may not necessarily be able to resolve easily. By
default, "git checkout" refused to switch branches, to give you a chance
to stash your local changes (or use "-m" to merge, accepting the risks of
getting conflicts).
This safety, however, had one deliberate hole since early June 2005. When
your local change was to remove a path (and optionally to stage that
removal), the command checked out the path from the switched-to commit
nevertheless.
This was to allow an initial checkout to happen smoothly (e.g. an initial
checkout is done by starting with an empty index and switching from the
commit at the HEAD to the same commit). We can tighten the rule slightly
to allow this special case to pass, without losing sight of removal
explicitly done by the user, by noticing if the index is truly empty when
the operation begins.
For historical background, see:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/4641/focus=4646
This case is marked as *0* in the message, which both Linus and I said "it
feels somewhat wrong but otherwise we cannot start from an empty index".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When somebody is reading git-blame.txt (or git-annotate.txt) for the first
time, the message we would like to send is:
(1) Here is why you would want to use this command, what it can do
(perhaps more than what you would have expected from "$scm blame"),
and how you tell it to do what it does.
This is obvious.
(2) You might have heard of the command with the other name. There is no
difference between the two, except they differ in their default
output formats.
This is essential to answer: "git has both? how are they different?"
(3) We tend to encourage blame over annotate for new scripts and new
people, but there is no reason to choose one over the other.
This is not as important as (2), but would be useful to avoid
repeated questions about "when will we start deprecating this?"
As long as we describe (2) on git-annotate page clearly enough, people who
read git-blame page first and get curious can refer to git-annotate page.
While at it, subtly hint (3) without being overly explicit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
