These scripts are not run directly as part of a normal build, so no
one noticed that they did not have the +x bit. Mark them executable
to make it more obvious that they can be run directly (when debugging,
for example).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When svn:mergeinfo contains two new parents in a specific order and
one is ancestor of the other, it is possible that git-svn discards the
wrong one. The first test case ("commit made to merged branch is
reachable from the merge") proves this.
The second test case ("merging two branches in one commit is detected
correctly") is just for completeness, since there was no test for
merging two (feature) branches to trunk in one commit.
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Suutari <tuomas.suutari@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
A few "svn cp" commands and commit commands were executed in incorrect
order. Therefore some of the desired commits were missing and some
were committed with wrong revision number in the commit message. This
made it hard to compare the produced git repository with the SVN
repository.
The dump file is updated too, but only the relevant parts and with
hand-edited timestamps to make history linear.
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Suutari <tuomas.suutari@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Add a partial branch (e.g., a branch from a project subdirectory) to the
git-svn mergeinfo test repository.
Add a tag and a branch from that tag to the git-svn mergeinfo test repository.
Update the test script to expect a known failure in git-svn exposed by these
additions where merge info for partial branches is not preserved.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Myrick <amyrick@apple.com>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
As shown, git-svn has some problems; not all svn merges are correctly
detected, and cherry picks may incorrectly be detected as real merges.
These test cases will be marked as _success once the relevant fixes are in.
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
When recording the revisions that it has merged, SVN sets the top
revision to be the latest revision in the repository, which is not
necessarily a revision on the branch that is being merged from. When
it is not on the branch, git-svn fails to add the extra parent to
represent the merge because it relies on finding the commit on the
branch that corresponds to the top of the SVN merge range.
In order to correctly handle this case, we look for the maximum
revision less than or equal to the top of the SVN merge range that is
actually on the branch being merged from.
[ew: This includes the following (squashed) commit to prevent
errors during bisect:]
Author: Toby Allsopp <toby.allsopp@navman.co.nz>
Date: Fri Nov 13 09:48:39 2009 +1300
git-svn: add (failing) test for SVN 1.5+ merge with intervening commit
This test exposes a bug in git-svn's handling of SVN 1.5+ mergeinfo
properties. The problematic case is when there is some commit on an
unrelated branch after the last commit on the merged-from branch.
When SVN records the mergeinfo property, it records the latest
revision in the whole repository, which, in the problematic case, is
not on the branch it is merging from.
To trigger the git-svn bug, we modify t9151 to include two SVN merges,
the second of which has an intervening commit. The SVN dump was
generated using SVN 1.6.6 (on Debian squeeze amd64).
Signed-off-by: Toby Allsopp <toby.allsopp@navman.co.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Dump generated with SVN 1.5.1 (on lenny amd64). This test
should hopefully cover all but a few intermediate versions of
the svnmerge.py script.
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
