We liberally use "committish" and "commit-ish" (and "treeish" and
"tree-ish"); as these are non-words, let's unify these terms to
their dashed form. More importantly, clarify the documentation on
object peeling using these terms.
* rh/ishes-doc:
glossary: fix and clarify the definition of 'ref'
revisions.txt: fix and clarify <rev>^{<type>}
glossary: more precise definition of tree-ish (a.k.a. treeish)
use 'commit-ish' instead of 'committish'
use 'tree-ish' instead of 'treeish'
glossary: define commit-ish (a.k.a. committish)
glossary: mention 'treeish' as an alternative to 'tree-ish'
Use "das Tag" to avoid confusion with the German word "Tag" (day).
Reported-by: Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@altum.de>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Replace 'committish' in documentation and comments with 'commit-ish'
to match gitglossary(7) and to be consistent with 'tree-ish'.
The only remaining instances of 'committish' are:
* variable, function, and macro names
* "(also committish)" in the definition of commit-ish in
gitglossary[7]
Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Translate 99 new messages came from git.pot update in
28b3cff (l10n: git.pot: v1.8.4 round 1 (99 new, 46 removed)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
This switches the translation from pure German to German+English.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Translate 44 new messages came from git.pot update in
c6bc7d4 (l10n: git.pot: v1.8.3 round 2 (44 new, 12 removed)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Translate 54 new messages came from git.pot update in
c138af5 (l10n: git.pot: v1.8.3 round 1 (54 new, 15 removed)).
While at there, fix some small issues.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The term "bisect" was translated as "halbieren", we should
translate it as "binäre Suche" (binary search). While at
there, we should leave "bisect run" untranslated since it's
a subcommand of "git bisect".
Suggested-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Translate 5 new messages came from git.pot update in 235537a
(l10n: git.pot: v1.8.2 round 3 (5 new)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Translate 35 new messages came from git.pot update
in 9caaf23 (l10n: Update git.pot (35 new, 14 removed
messages)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
According to the glossary, "reset" should be
translated as "neu setzen" but in a couple of
messages we've translated it as "zurücksetzen".
This fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
In the current German translation, the word "revision" was
translated as both "Version" (translation of "commit") and
"Revision". Since a revision in Git is not necessarily a
commit, we should not translate it with the same word in
order to give the user an idea that it's not necessarily
the same. After this commit, "revision" is consistently
translated as "Revision".
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
