It was mentioned on #git this morning that the lead-in description
of git-rebase is very confusing. Too many branch this and branch
that in a very short run of text.
This new description attempts to walk the user through the command
syntax, while also describing exactly what git-rebase is doing to
their repository.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When we do not trust executable bit from lstat(2), we copied
existing ce_mode bits without checking if the filesystem object
is a regular file (which is the only thing we apply the "trust
executable bit" business) nor if the blob in the index is a
regular file (otherwise, we should do the same as registering a
new regular file, which is to default non-executable).
Noticed by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The 3rd branch in builtin-blame.c should also check for lacking
arguments. Running that in top dir does not trigger the problem
because the 'prefix' is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Tommi Kyntola <tommi.kyntola@ray.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The shell loop to determine if we should skip the trivial
in-index merge stage based on what strategy is given was not
prepared to have more than one strategy listed in the variable
$no_trivial_merge_strategies.
This does not trigger unless you use a modified git but the fix
is simple and straightforward, so let's fix it before 1.5.0.1.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some users may find being able to browse around an arbitrary
branch to be handy, so we now expose our graphical browser
through `git gui browse <committish>`.
Yes, I'm being somewhat lazy and making the user give us
the name of the branch to browse. They can always enter
HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
With a configuration entry like this:
[remote "alt-git"]
url = git://repo.or.cz/alt.git/git/
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/alt-git/*
tagopt = --no-tags
you do not have to say "git pull --no-tags alt-git". Just
saying "git pull alt-git" would suffice.
Obviously, if you want to get the tag from such an alternate
remote in a separate namespace, you could also do something like:
[remote "alt-git"]
url = git://repo.or.cz/alt.git/git/
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/alt-git/*
fetch = +refs/tags/*:refs/remote-tags/alt-git/*
tagopt = --no-tags
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I'm missing the possibility to base a new branch on a tag.
The following adds a tag drop down to the new branch dialog.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* maint:
GIT-VERSION-FILE: check ./version first.
sha1_file.c: Round the mmap offset to half the window size.
Make sure packedgitwindowsize is multiple of (pagesize * 2)
Add RelNotes 1.5.0.1
Still updating 1.5.0 release notes.
git-daemon: Avoid leaking the listening sockets into child processes.
Clarify two backward incompatible repository options.
When somebody else extracts git tarball inside a larger project,
'git describe' would reported the version number of that upper
level project.
Sometimes, using the consistent versioning across subdirectories
of a larger project is useful, but it may not always be the
right thing to do.
This changes the script to check ./vertion file first, and then
fall back to "git describe". This way, by default, tarball
distribution will get our own version. If the upper level wants
to use consistent versioning across its subdirectories, its
Makefile can overwrite ./version file to force whatever version
number they want to give us before descending into us.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This ensures that a given area is mapped at most twice, and greatly
reduces the virtual address space usage.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This tests lowlevel of update/checkout codepaths and some patch
application. Currently, variants of "git apply" that look at
the working tree files does not work, so it does not test the
patch application without parameter and with --index parameter
when autocrlf is set to produce CRLF files.
We should add test for diff generation too.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subtle bugs remained on both Cygwin and Linux that caused the various
window panes to be restored in positions different than where the user
last placed them. Sergey Vlasov posed a pair of suggested fixes to this,
what is done here is slightly different. The basic fix here involves
a) explicitly remembering and restoring the sash positions for the upper
window, and b) using paneconfigure to redundantly set height and width of
other elements. This redundancy is needed as Cygwin Tcl has a nasty habit
of setting pane sizes to zero if their slaves are not configured with a
specific size, but Linux Tcl does not honor the specific size given.
Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mdl123@verizon.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
gitk was saving widget sizes and positions when the main window was
destroyed, which is after all child widgets are destroyed. The cure
is to trap the WM_DELETE_WINDOW event before the gui is torn down. Also,
the saved geometry was captured using "winfo geometry .", rather than
"wm geometry ." Under Linux, these two return different answers and the
latter one is correct.
[jc: credit goes to Brett Schwarz for suggesting the use of "wm protocol";
I also squashed the follow-up patch to remove extraneous -0
from expressions.]
Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mdl123@verizon.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It used to be ls-remote on self was the only easy way to grab
the ref information. Now we have show-ref which does not
involve fork and IPC, so use it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
The gitk gui layout was completely broken on Cygwin. If gitk was started
without previous geometry in ~/.gitk, the user could drag the window sashes
to get a useable layout. However, if ~/.gitk existed, this was not possible
at all.
The fix was to rewrite makewindow, changing the toplevel containers and
the particular geometry information saved between sessions. Numerous bugs
in both the Cygwin and the Linux Tk versions make this a delicate
balancing act: the version here works in both but many subtle variants
are competely broken in one or the other environment.
Three user visible changes result:
1 - The viewer is fully functional under Cygwin.
2 - The search bar moves from the bottom to the top of the lower left
pane. This was necessary to get around a layout problem on Cygwin.
3 - The window size and position is saved and restored between sessions.
Again, this is necessary to get around a layout problem on Cygwin.
Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mdl123@verizon.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This allows you to do:
[core]
AutoCRLF = input
and it should do only the CRLF->LF translation (ie it simplifies CRLF only
when reading working tree files, but when checking out files, it leaves
the LF alone, and doesn't turn it into a CRLF).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It currently does NOT know about file attributes, so it does its
conversion purely based on content. Maybe that is more in the "git
philosophy" anyway, since content is king, but I think we should try to do
the file attributes to turn it off on demand.
Anyway, BY DEFAULT it is off regardless, because it requires a
[core]
AutoCRLF = true
in your config file to be enabled. We could make that the default for
Windows, of course, the same way we do some other things (filemode etc).
But you can actually enable it on UNIX, and it will cause:
- "git update-index" will write blobs without CRLF
- "git diff" will diff working tree files without CRLF
- "git checkout" will write files to the working tree _with_ CRLF
and things work fine.
Funnily, it actually shows an odd file in git itself:
git clone -n git test-crlf
cd test-crlf
git config core.autocrlf true
git checkout
git diff
shows a diff for "Documentation/docbook-xsl.css". Why? Because we have
actually checked in that file *with* CRLF! So when "core.autocrlf" is
true, we'll always generate a *different* hash for it in the index,
because the index hash will be for the content _without_ CRLF.
Is this complete? I dunno. It seems to work for me. It doesn't use the
filename at all right now, and that's probably a deficiency (we could
certainly make the "is_binary()" heuristics also take standard filename
heuristics into account).
I don't pass in the filename at all for the "index_fd()" case
(git-update-index), so that would need to be passed around, but this
actually works fine.
NOTE NOTE NOTE! The "is_binary()" heuristics are totally made-up by yours
truly. I will not guarantee that they work at all reasonable. Caveat
emptor. But it _is_ simple, and it _is_ safe, since it's all off by
default.
The patch is pretty simple - the biggest part is the new "convert.c" file,
but even that is really just basic stuff that anybody can write in
"Teaching C 101" as a final project for their first class in programming.
Not to say that it's bug-free, of course - but at least we're not talking
about rocket surgery here.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes it possible to restart git-daemon even if some children are
still running.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
44478d99ee introduced a filter using "git-rev-parse --not --all" to the
log display to prevent the display of revisions already in the
repository. However, the table of contents generation didn't get that
same update.
This patch fixes that. The table of contents before the log and the log
now both display the same list of revisions.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-cvsserver is analogous to git-receive-pack; a checking from a cvs
client to a central server is like a git-push from a working repository.
Therefore it's nice to use the same access control (and email sending)
that a receive-pack would perform.
This patch tests for an executable update hook; if it is it is run with
the ref being updated and the old and new hashes as normal. If the
update hook returns an error code the update is aborted and the ref is
never updated. The cvsserver returns "error 1" to the client to signal
there was an EPERM error.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It was unclear if the backward compatible features were disabled
or the configuration variables that controls them were set to
false by default from the description. Obviously we meant the
former, but the problem was made worse by the fact that one
configuration variable breaks compatibility when set to true and
the other one breaks it when set to false.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Instead of running around listing the changes near the release,
let's keep things nicely organized by summarizing the changes as
we merge things to the 'master' branch.
I haven't decided how well this will go with people's patch
submission procedure yet --- we'll play it by the ear and see
what happens.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some distributions are using Git for part of their package
management system, but unpack Git's own source code for
delivery from the .tar.gz. This means that when we walk
up the directory tree with git-describe to locate a Git
repository, the repository we find is for the distribution
and *not* for git-gui. Consequently any tag we might find
there is bogus and does not apply to us.
In this case the version file should always exist and be
readable, as the packager is working from the released
.tar.gz sources. So we should always favor the version
file over anything git-describe guess for us.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* maint:
Makefile: update check-docs target
cmd-list: add git-remote
Documentation: Drop full-stop from git-fast-import title.
Minor corrections to release notes
Old aliases are not linked to the main command list. Also the internal
git-add--interactive does not need to be on the list.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
`git diff --ignore-space-at-eol` will ignore whitespace at the
line ends.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If you were issuing emails for two branches, and one merged the other,
you would get the same log messages appearing in two separate emails.
e.g. A working repository, where the last push to central was done at
the revision marked "B", after which two branches were developed
further.
* -- B -- 1 -- 1 -- M (branch1)
\ /
2 -- 2 -- 2 (branch2)
Now imagine that branch2 is pushed to the email-generating repository;
an email containing all the "2" revisions would be sent. Now, let's say
branch1 is pushed, the old update hook would run
git-rev-list $newrev ^$baserev
Where $newrev would be "M" and $baserev would be "B". This list
includes all the "2" revisions as well as all the "1" revisions.
This patch addresses this problem by using
git-rev-parse --not --all | git-rev-list --stdin $newrev ^$baserev
To inhibit the display of all revisions that are already in the
repository.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Like `git version`, `git gui version` (or `git gui --version`) shows
the version of git-gui, in case the user needs to know this, without
looking at it in the GUI about dialog.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I started to find it confusing that git-gui would refer to itself
as git-citool when it was started through the citool hardlink, or
with the citool subcommand. What was especially confusing was the
options dialog and the about dialog, as both seemed to imply they
were somehow different from the git-gui versions. In actuality
there is no difference at all.
Now we just call our options menu item 'Options...' (skipping the
application name) and our About dialog now always shows git-gui
within the short description (above the copyleft notice) and in
the version field.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Update section about warning when leaving a detached head.
Also fix a few indentations that weren't like the rest of the file.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It was pointed out on the git mailing list by Martin Koegler that
we did not show tags as possible things to merge into the current
branch. They actually are, and core Git's Grand Unified Merge
Driver will accept them just like any other commit.
So our merge dialog now requests all refs/heads, refs/remotes and
refs/tags named refs and attempts to match them against the commits
not in HEAD. One complicating factor here is that we must use the
%(*objectname) field when talking about an annotated tag, as they
will not appear in the output of rev-list.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is a very crude (but hopefully effective) check against the
`git` executable found in our PATH. Some of the subcommands and
options that git-gui requires to be present to operate were created
during the 1.5.0 development cycle, so 1.5 is the minimum version
of git that we can expect to support.
There actually are early releases of 1.5 (e.g. 1.5.0-rc0) that
don't have everything we expect (like `blame --incremental`) but
these are purely academic at this point. 1.5.0 final was tagged
and released just a few hours ago. The release candidates will
(hopefully) fade into the dark quickly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
As we frequently need to execute a Git subcommand and obtain
its returned output we are making heavy use of [exec git foo]
to run foo. As I'm concerned about possibly needing to carry
environment data through a shell on Cygwin for at least some
subcommands, I'm migrating all current calls to a new git
proc. This actually makes the code look cleaner too, as
we aren't saying 'exec git' everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
