Suggested-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This even dates back to the very beginning of "git name-rev";
it does not make much sense to dump all objects in the repository
and label non-commits as "undefined".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
resolve_ref() may return a pointer to a static buffer, which is not
safe for long-term use because if another resolve_ref() call happens,
the buffer may be changed. Many call sites though do not care about
this buffer. They simply check if the return value is NULL or not.
Convert all these call sites to new wrappers to reduce resolve_ref()
calls from 57 to 34. If we change resolve_ref() prototype later on
to avoid passing static buffer out, this helps reduce changes.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add new placeholders related to the GPG signature on signed commits.
- %GG to show the raw verification message from GPG;
- %G? to show either "G" for Good, "B" for Bad;
- %GS to show the name of the signer.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This teaches the "log" family of commands to pass the GPG signature in the
commit objects to "gpg --verify" via the verify_signed_buffer() interface
used to verify signed tag objects. E.g.
$ git show --show-signature -s HEAD
shows GPG output in the header part of the output.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This uses the gpg-interface.[ch] to allow signing the commit, i.e.
$ git commit --gpg-sign -m foo
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: "Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>"
4096-bit RSA key, ID 96AFE6CB, created 2011-10-03 (main key ID 713660A7)
[master 8457d13] foo
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
The lines of GPG detached signature are placed in a new multi-line header
field, instead of tucking the signature block at the end of the commit log
message text (similar to how signed tag is done), for multiple reasons:
- The signature won't clutter output from "git log" and friends if it is
in the extra header. If we place it at the end of the log message, we
would need to teach "git log" and friends to strip the signature block
with an option.
- Teaching new versions of "git log" and "gitk" to optionally verify and
show signatures is cleaner if we structurally know where the signature
block is (instead of scanning in the commit log message).
- The signature needs to be stripped upon various commit rewriting
operations, e.g. rebase, filter-branch, etc. They all already ignore
unknown headers, but if we place signature in the log message, all of
these tools (and third-party tools) also need to learn how a signature
block would look like.
- When we added the optional encoding header, all the tools (both in tree
and third-party) that acts on the raw commit object should have been
fixed to ignore headers they do not understand, so it is not like that
new header would be more likely to break than extra text in the commit.
A commit made with the above sample sequence would look like this:
$ git cat-file commit HEAD
tree 3cd71d90e3db4136e5260ab54599791c4f883b9d
parent b87755351a47b09cb27d6913e6e0e17e6254a4d4
author Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1317862251 -0700
committer Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1317862251 -0700
gpgsig -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOjPtrAAoJELC16IaWr+bL4TMP/RSe2Y/jYnCkds9unO5JEnfG
...
=dt98
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
foo
but "git log" (unless you ask for it with --pretty=raw) output is not
cluttered with the signature information.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* commit '633e3556ccbc': (5835 commits)
build-in git-mktree
allow -t abbreviation for --track in git branch
gitweb: Remove function prototypes (cleanup)
Documentation: cloning to empty directory is allowed
Clarify kind of conflict in merge-one-file helper
git config: clarify --add and --get-color
archive-tar.c: squelch a type mismatch warning
Start 1.6.4 development
Start 1.6.3.1 maintenance series.
GIT 1.6.3
t4029: use sh instead of bash
t4200: convert sed expression which operates on non-text file to perl
t4200: remove two unnecessary lines
t/annotate-tests.sh: avoid passing a non-newline terminated file to sed
t4118: avoid sed invocation on file without terminating newline
t4118: add missing '&&'
t8005: use egrep when extended regular expressions are required
git-clean doc: the command only affects paths under $(cwd)
improve error message in config.c
t4018-diff-funcname: add cpp xfuncname pattern to syntax test
...
We forget to call strbuf_release to release the buf memory.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <tailai.ly@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have kept the original "git commit-tree <tree> -p <parent> ..." syntax
forever, but "git commit-tree -p <parent> -p <parent> ... <tree>" would be
more intuitive way to spell it. Dashed flags along with their arguments
come first and then the "thing" argument after the flags.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After running "git pull $there for-linus" to merge a signed tag, the
integrator may need to amend the resulting merge commit to fix typoes
in it. Teach --amend option to read the existing extra headers, and
carry them forward.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we allow pulling a tag from the remote site to validate the
authenticity, we should give the user the final chance to verify and edit
the merge message. The integrator is expected to leave a meaningful merge
commit log in the history. Disallow fast-forwarding in such a case to
ensure that a merge commit is always recorded.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now MERGE_HEAD records the tag objects without peeling, we could record
the result of manual conflict resolution via "git commit" without losing
the tag information. Introduce a new "mergetag" multi-line header field to
the commit object, and use it to store the entire contents of each signed
tag merged.
A commit header that has a multi-line payload begins with the header tag
(e.g. "mergetag" in this case), SP, the first line of payload, LF, and all
the remaining lines have a SP inserted at the beginning.
In hindsight, it would have been better to make "merge --continue" as the
way to continue from such an interrupted merge, not "commit", but this is
a backward compatibility baggage we would need to carry around for now.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit e5b8eebc (completion: fix issue with process substitution not
working on Git for Windows, 2011-10-26) introduced a new variable in
__git_ps1_show_upstream(), but didn't declare it as local to prevent it
from leaking into the environment.
We may want to rewrite it like the following, but that can wait until the
next cycle.
while read key value
do
...
done <<-EOF
$(git config -z --get-regexp ...)
EOF
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The integrator tool will start allowing to pull a signed or an annotated
tag, i.e.
$ git pull $there tags/for-linus
and the description in the tag is used to convey a meaningful message from
the lieutenant to the integrator to justify the history being pulled.
Include the message in the pull request e-mail, as the same information is
useful in this context, too. It would encourage the lieutenants to write
meaningful messages in their signed tags.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* dm/pack-objects-update:
pack-objects: don't traverse objects unnecessarily
pack-objects: rewrite add_descendants_to_write_order() iteratively
pack-objects: use unsigned int for counter and offset values
pack-objects: mark add_to_write_order() as inline
The preformatted documentation pages live in their own repositories
these days. Adjust the installation procedure to the updated layout.
Tested-by: Stefan Naewe <stefan.naewe@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These are diff-options, but they don't actually make sense
in the context of log.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise, "git commit" wouldn't have a way to tell that we were in the
middle of merging an annotated or signed tag, not a plain commit, after
"git merge" stops to ask the user to resolve conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The merge-recursive code uses the commit->util field directly to annotate
the commit objects given from the command line, i.e. the remote heads to
be merged, with a single string to be used to describe it in its trace
messages and conflict markers.
Correct this short-signtedness by redefining the field to be a pointer to
a structure "struct merge_remote_desc" that later enhancements can add
more information. Store the original objects we were told to merge in a
field "obj" in this struct, so that we can recover the tag we were told to
merge.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a contributor asks the integrator to merge her history, a signed tag
can be a good vehicle to communicate the authenticity of the request while
conveying other information such as the purpose of the topic.
E.g. a signed tag "for-linus" can be created, and the integrator can run:
$ git pull git://example.com/work.git/ for-linus
This would allow the integrator to run "git verify-tag FETCH_HEAD" to
validate the signed tag.
Update fmt-merge-msg so that it pre-fills the merge message template with
the body (but not signature) of the tag object to help the integrator write
a better merge message, in the same spirit as the existing merge.log summary
lines.
The message that comes from GPG signature validation is also included in
the merge message template to help the integrator verify it, but they are
prefixed with "#" to make them comments.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current progress code really just counts commits.
This patch makes it count all objects, giving us a "total"
count close to what a repack would show. This is nice when
using "git gc", which will usually have just repacked the
whole repo.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
prune already shows progress meter while pruning. The marking part may
take a few seconds or more, depending on repository size. Show
progress meter during this time too.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2564aa4 started to initialize buf.alloc, but that should actually be one
more byte than the string length due to the trailing \0. Also, do not
modify buf.alloc out of the strbuf code. Use the existing strbuf_attach
instead.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In various places in the codepath, the program tries to return early
assuming there is no more work needed. That is generally untrue when
over time new features are added.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git log frotz" can DWIM to "refs/remotes/frotz/HEAD", but in the remote
access context, "git fetch frotz" to fetch what the other side happened to
have fetched from what it calls 'frotz' (which may not have any relation
to what we consider is 'frotz') the last time would not make much sense,
so the fetch rules table did not include "refs/remotes/%.*s/HEAD".
When the user really wants to, "git fetch $there remotes/frotz/HEAD" would
let her do so anyway, so this is not about safety or security; it merely
is about confusion avoidance and discouraging meaningless usage.
Specifically, it is _not_ about ambiguity avoidance. A name that would
become ambiguous if we use the same rules table for both fetch and local
rev-parse would be ambiguous locally at the remote side.
So for the same reason as we added rule to allow "git fetch $there v1.0"
instead of "git fetch $there tags/v1.0" in the previous commit, here is a
bit longer rope for the users, which incidentally simplifies our code.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
You can already do so with "git fetch $there tags/v1.0" but if it is not
ambiguous there is no reason to force users to type more.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This also updates the autogenerated merge title message from "merge commit X"
to "merge tag X", and its effect can be seen in the changes to the test suite.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently we either need to set branch.<name>.rebase for existing
branches if we'd like "git pull" to mean "git pull --rebase", or have
the forethought of setting "branch.autosetuprebase" before we create
the branch.
Introduce a "pull.rebase" option to globally configure "git pull" to
mean "git pull --rebase" for any branch.
This option will be considered at a lower priority than
branch.<name>.rebase, i.e. we could set pull.rebase=true and
branch.<name>.rebase=false and the latter configuration option would
win.
Reviewed-by: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fernando Vezzosi <buccia@repnz.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Herman <eric@freesa.org>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Liked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
