It's not really useful anymore now that we have a better
--follow-parent for the valid cases. Any other use
of it is not valid.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
While 'init-db' still is and probably will always remain a valid git
command for obvious backward compatibility reasons, it would be a good
idea to move shipped tools and docs to using 'init' instead.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now that git-svn requires the SVN::* Perl library, the manpage doesn't need
to describe what happens when you don't have it.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Also, document --{trunk,branches,tags} options while we're
documenting multi-init options.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Clarify that dcommit creates a revision in SVN for every commit
in git. Also, add 'merge' to the rebase vs pull section because
git-merge is now a first-class UI.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
'set-tree' probably accurately describes what the command
formerly known as 'commit' does.
I'm not entirely sure that 'dcommit' should be renamed to 'commit'
just yet... Perhaps 'push' or 'push-changes'?
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Previously dcommit would unconditionally commit all patches
up-to and including the current HEAD. Now if an optional
command-line argument is specified, it will only commit
up to the specified revision.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Eliminate 'commit' from some places and plug 'dcommit' more.
Also update the section --id (GIT_SVN_ID) usage since we
have multi-init/multi-fetch now.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There was a bug in dcommit (and commit-diff) which caused deltas
to be generated against the latest version of the changed file
in a repository, and not the revision we are diffing (the tree)
against locally.
This bug can cause recent changes to the svn repository to be
silently clobbered by git-svn if our repository is out-of-date.
Thanks to Steven Grimm for noticing the bug.
The (few) people using the commit-diff command are now required
to use the -r/--revision argument. dcommit usage is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I've forgotten to document many of the features added along the
way in the manpages. This fills in some holes in the
documentation and adds updates some outdated information.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Added --ignore-nodate to allow 'git svn fetch' to import revisions
from Subversion which have '(no date)' listed as the date of the
revision. By default 'git svn fetch' will crash with an error
when encountering such a revision. The user may restart the fetch
operation by adding --ignore-nodate if they want to continue tracking
that repository.
I'm not entirely sure why a centralized version control system such
as Subversion permits revisions to be created with absolutely no
date/time associated with it but it apparently is possible as one
of the Subversion repositories that I'm tracking with 'git svn'
created such a revision on '(no date)' and by '(no user)'.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is a high-level wrapper around the 'commit-diff' command
and used to produce cleaner history against the mirrored repository
through rebase/reset usage.
It's basically a more polished version of this:
for i in `git rev-list --no-merges remotes/git-svn..HEAD | tac`; do
git-svn commit-diff $i~1 $i
done
git reset --hard remotes/git-svn
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Does this make sense to other git-svn users out there?
pull can give funky history unless you understand how git-svn works
internally, which users should not be expected to do.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Use list continuation to have better wrapping. This accounts for most of
the changes because it reindents a lot of text without applying other
changes.
Use cross-referencing for interlinking and the gitlink macro for pointing
to other tools in the git suite.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Allow NO_SVN_TESTS to be defined to skip git-svn tests. These
tests are time-consuming due to SVN being slow, and even more so
if SVN Perl libraries are not available.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
