When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed
the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from
which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does
not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream
we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with
changes in $upstream..$orig_head.
Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using
this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so
that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode):
git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \
$upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point
This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the
following topology:
C --- D --- E <- dev
/
B <- master@{1}
/
o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master
where:
- B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B;
- C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict
textually if applied in the wrong order;
- E depends textually on D.
The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as
the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that
need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C*
and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is:
o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev
If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch
containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits
are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D
(or equivalently D*) results in a conflict.
This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we
either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the
patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the
patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten.
Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Both refs.c and fsck.c have their own private copies of the is_branch function.
Delete the is_branch function from fsck.c and make the version in refs.c
public.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no fchmod() on native Windows platforms (MinGW and MSVC), and the
equivalent Win32 API (SetFileInformationByHandle) requires Windows Vista.
Use chmod() instead.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An ancient rewrite passed a wrong pointer to a curl library
function in a rarely used code path.
* ah/fix-http-push:
http-push.c: make CURLOPT_IOCTLDATA a usable pointer
* rs/code-cleaning:
fsck: simplify fsck_commit_buffer() by using commit_list_count()
commit: use commit_list_append() instead of duplicating its code
merge: simplify merge_trivial() by using commit_list_append()
use strbuf_addch for adding single characters
use strbuf_addbuf for adding strbufs
* jl/test-lint-scripts:
t/Makefile: always test all lint targets when running tests
t/Makefile: check helper scripts for non-portable shell commands too
"filter-branch" left an empty single-parent commit that results when
all parents of a merge commit gets mapped to the same commit, even
under "--prune-empty".
* cb/filter-branch-prune-empty-degenerate-merges:
filter-branch: eliminate duplicate mapped parents
Merging changes into a file that ends in an incomplete line made the
last line into a complete one, even when the other branch did not
change anything around the end of file.
* mk/merge-incomplete-files:
git-merge-file: do not add LF at EOF while applying unrelated change
t6023-merge-file.sh: fix and mark as broken invalid tests
* jk/strip-suffix:
prepare_packed_git_one: refactor duplicate-pack check
verify-pack: use strbuf_strip_suffix
strbuf: implement strbuf_strip_suffix
index-pack: use strip_suffix to avoid magic numbers
use strip_suffix instead of ends_with in simple cases
replace has_extension with ends_with
implement ends_with via strip_suffix
add strip_suffix function
sha1_file: replace PATH_MAX buffer with strbuf in prepare_packed_git_one()
Teach "git replace --edit" mode a "--raw" option to allow
editing the bare-metal representation data of objects.
* jk/replace-edit-raw:
replace: add a --raw mode for --edit
Teach "git replace" an "--edit" mode.
* cc/replace-edit:
replace: use argv_array in export_object
avoid double close of descriptors handed to run_command
replace: replace spaces with tabs in indentation
An experiment to use two files (the base file and incremental
changes relative to it) to represent the index to reduce I/O cost
of rewriting a large index when only small part of the working tree
changes.
* nd/split-index: (32 commits)
t1700: new tests for split-index mode
t2104: make sure split index mode is off for the version test
read-cache: force split index mode with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX
read-tree: note about dropping split-index mode or index version
read-tree: force split-index mode off on --index-output
rev-parse: add --shared-index-path to get shared index path
update-index --split-index: do not split if $GIT_DIR is read only
update-index: new options to enable/disable split index mode
split-index: strip pathname of on-disk replaced entries
split-index: do not invalidate cache-tree at read time
split-index: the reading part
split-index: the writing part
read-cache: mark updated entries for split index
read-cache: save deleted entries in split index
read-cache: mark new entries for split index
read-cache: split-index mode
read-cache: save index SHA-1 after reading
entry.c: update cache_changed if refresh_cache is set in checkout_entry()
cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on prime_cache_tree()
cache-tree: mark istate->cache_changed on cache tree update
...
"git clone -b brefs/tags/bar" would have mistakenly thought we were
following a single tag, even though it was a name of the branch,
because it incorrectly used strstr().
* jc/fix-clone-single-starting-at-a-tag:
builtin/clone.c: detect a clone starting at a tag correctly
"%G" (nothing after G) is an invalid pretty format specifier, but
the parser did not notice it as garbage.
* jk/pretty-G-format-fixes:
move "%G" format test from t7510 to t6006
pretty: avoid reading past end-of-string with "%G"
t7510: check %G* pretty-format output
t7510: test a commit signed by an unknown key
t7510: use consistent &&-chains in loop
t7510: stop referring to master in later tests
Code to avoid adding the same alternate object store twice was
subtly broken for a long time, but nobody seems to have noticed.
* rs/fix-alt-odb-path-comparison:
sha1_file: avoid overrunning alternate object base string
A handful of code paths had to read the commit object more than
once when showing header fields that are usually not parsed. The
internal data structure to keep track of the contents of the commit
object has been updated to reduce the need for this double-reading,
and to allow the caller find the length of the object.
* jk/commit-buffer-length:
reuse cached commit buffer when parsing signatures
commit: record buffer length in cache
commit: convert commit->buffer to a slab
commit-slab: provide a static initializer
use get_commit_buffer everywhere
convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_buffer
use get_commit_buffer to avoid duplicate code
use get_cached_commit_buffer where appropriate
provide helpers to access the commit buffer
provide a helper to set the commit buffer
provide a helper to free commit buffer
sequencer: use logmsg_reencode in get_message
logmsg_reencode: return const buffer
do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc
commit: push commit_index update into alloc_commit_node
alloc: include any-object allocations in alloc_report
replace dangerous uses of strbuf_attach
commit_tree: take a pointer/len pair rather than a const strbuf
During "git rebase --merge", a conflicted patch could not be
skipped with "--skip" if the next one also conflicted.
* bc/fix-rebase-merge-skip:
rebase--merge: fix --skip with two conflicts in a row
* maint-1.8.5:
annotate: use argv_array
t7300: repair filesystem permissions with test_when_finished
enums: remove trailing ',' after last item in enum
Simplify the code and get rid of some magic constants by using
argv_array to build the argument list for cmd_blame. Be lazy and let
the OS release our allocated memory, as before.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
MinGW and MSVC before 2010 don't define ELOOP, use EMLINK (aka "Too many
links") instead.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using `git format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream` we are only
allowed to give a single revision range. In the next commit we will
want to add an additional exclusion revision in order to handle fork
points correctly, so convert `git-rebase--am` to use a symmetric
difference with `--cherry-pick --right-only`.
This does not change the result of the format-patch invocation, just how
we spell the arguments.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When adding alternate object directories, we try not to add the
directory of the current repository to avoid cycles. Unfortunately,
that test was broken, since it compared an absolute with a relative
path.
Signed-off-by: Ephrim Khong <dr.khong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test creates some unrelated commits in two separate repositories,
and then fetches from one to the other. Since the commit creation
happens in a subshell, the first commit in each ends up with the
same test_tick value. When fetch-pack looks at the two root commits
"unrelated1" and "new-too", the exact sequence of ACKs is different
depending on which one it pulls out of the queue first.
With the current code, it happens to be "unrelated1" (though this is not
at all guaranteed by the prio_queue data structure, it is deterministic
for this particular sequence of input). We see the ready-ACK, and the
test succeeds.
With the stable queue, we reliably get "new-too" out (since it is our
local tip, it is added to the queue before we even talk to the remote).
We never see a ready-ACK, and the test fails due to the grep on the
TRACE_PACKET output at the end (the fetch itself succeeds as expected).
I'm really not quite clear on what's supposed to be going on in the
test. I can make it pass with this change.
git commit -m with some iso8859-1 encoded stuff is doomed to fail in MinGW,
because Windows don't let you pass encoded bytes to a process (CreateProcessW
always takes a UTF-16LE encoded string).
It is safe to pass the iso8859-1 message using a file or a pipe.
Thanks-to: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Author: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Changes opendir/readdir to use Windows Unicode APIs and convert between
UTF-8/UTF-16.
Removes parameter checks that are already covered by xutftowcs_path. This
changes detection of ENAMETOOLONG from MAX_PATH - 2 to MAX_PATH (matching
is_dir_empty in mingw.c). If name + "/*" or the resulting absolute path is
too long, FindFirstFile fails and errno is set through err_win_to_posix.
Increases the size of dirent.d_name to accommodate the full
WIN32_FIND_DATA.cFileName converted to UTF-8 (UTF-16 to UTF-8 conversion
may grow by factor three in the worst case).
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replaces Windows "ANSI" APIs dealing with file- or path names with their
Unicode equivalent, adding UTF-8/UTF-16LE conversion as necessary.
The dirent API (opendir/readdir/closedir) is updated in a separate commit.
Adds trivial wrappers for access, chmod and chdir.
Adds wrapper for mktemp (needed for both mkstemp and mkdtemp).
The simplest way to convert a repository with legacy-encoded (e.g. Cp1252)
file names to UTF-8 ist to checkout with an old msysgit version and
"git add --all & git commit" with the new version.
Includes a fix for bug reported by John Chen:
On Windows XP (not Win7), directories cannot be deleted while a find handle
is open, causing "Deletion of directory '...' failed. Should I try again?"
prompts.
Prior to this commit, these failures were silently ignored due to
strbuf_free in is_dir_empty resetting GetLastError to ERROR_SUCCESS.
Close the find handle in is_dir_empty so that git doesn't block deletion
of the directory even after all other applications have released it.
Reported-by: John Chen <john0312@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we are traversing to find merge bases, we keep our
usual commit_list of commits to process, sorted by their
commit timestamp. As we add each parent to the list, we have
to spend "O(width of history)" to do the insertion, where
the width of history is the number of simultaneous lines of
development.
If we instead use a heap-based priority queue, we can do
these insertions in "O(log width)" time. This provides minor
speedups to merge-base calculations (timings in linux.git,
warm cache, best-of-five):
[before]
$ git merge-base HEAD v2.6.12
real 0m3.251s
user 0m3.148s
sys 0m0.104s
[after]
$ git merge-base HEAD v2.6.12
real 0m3.234s
user 0m3.108s
sys 0m0.128s
That's only an 0.5% speedup, but it does help protect us
against pathological cases.
While we are munging the "interesting" function, we also
take the opportunity to give it a more descriptive name, and
convert the return value to an int (we returned the first
interesting commit, but nobody ever looked at it).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If two items are added to a prio_queue and compare equal,
they currently come out in an apparently random order (this
order is deterministic for a particular sequence of
insertions and removals, but does not necessarily match the
insertion order). This makes it unlike using a date-ordered
commit_list, which is one of the main types we would like to
replace with it (because prio_queue does not suffer from
O(n) insertions).
We can make the priority queue stable by keeping an
insertion counter for each element, and using it to break
ties. This does increase the memory usage of the structure
(one int per element), but in practice it does not seem to
affect runtime. A best-of-five "git rev-list --topo-order"
on linux.git showed less than 1% difference (well within the
run-to-run noise).
In an ideal world, we would offer both stable and unstable
priority queues (the latter to try to maximize performance).
However, given the lack of a measurable performance
difference, it is not worth the extra code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When manipulating the priority queue's heap, we frequently
have to compare and swap heap entries. As we are storing
only void pointers right now, this is quite easy to do
inline in a few lines. However, when we start using a more
complicated heap entry in a future patch, that will get
longer. Factoring out these operations lets us make future
changes in one place. It also makes the code a little
shorter and more readable.
Note that we actually accept indices into the queue array
instead of pointers. This is slightly less flexible than
passing pointers-to-pointers (we could not swap items from
unrelated arrays, but we would not want to), but will make
further refactoring simpler (and lets us avoid repeating
"queue->array" at each callsite, which led to some long
lines).
And finally, note that we are cleaning up an accidental use
of a "struct commit" pointer to hold a temporary entry
during swap. Even though we currently only use this code for
commits, it is supposed to be type-agnostic. In practice
this didn't matter anyway because we never dereferenced the
commit pointer (and on most systems, the pointer values
themselves are interchangeable between types).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin/verify-commit.c was added in commit d07b00b ("verify-commit:
scriptable commit signature verification", 2014-06-23), update
.gitignore to ignore the generated file.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind A. Holm <sunny@sunbase.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This fixes a segfault in git-status with long paths on Windows,
where PATH_MAX is only 260.
This also fixes the problem of silently ignoring .gitignore if the
full path exceeds PATH_MAX. Now add_excludes_from_file() will report
if it gets ENAMETOOLONG.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no actual nested struct here. Move it out for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some code paths (e.g. giving "add -i" to prepare the contents to
be committed interactively inside "commit -p") where a caller takes
a lock, writes the new content, give chance for others to use it
while still holding the lock, and then releases the lock when all is
done. As an extension, allow the caller to re-update an already
closed file while still holding the lock (i.e. not yet committed) by
re-opening the file, to be followed by updating the contents and
then by the usual close_lock_file() or commit_lock_file().
This is necessary if we want to add code to rebuild the cache-tree
and write the resulting index out after "add -i" returns the control
to "commit -p", for example.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During the commit process, update the cache-tree. Write this updated
cache-tree so that it's ready for subsequent commands.
Add test code which demonstrates that git commit now writes the cache
tree. Make all tests test the entire cache-tree, not just the root
level.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twitter.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test that the revert command updates the work tree as expected (for
submodule changes which don't result in conflicts). Add a helper function
to first revert the checked out target commit to make the last revert
produce the to-be-tested work tree.
Set the KNOWN_FAILURE_CHERRY_PICK_SEES_EMPTY_COMMIT and
KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_DOESNT_CREATE_EMPTY_SUBMODULE_DIR switches to
document that revert has the similar failures.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test that the stash apply command updates the work tree as expected for
changes which don't result in conflicts. To make that work add a helper
function that uses read-tree to apply the changes of the target commit
to the work tree, then stashes these changes and at last applies that
stash.
Implement the KNOWN_FAILURE_STASH_DOES_IGNORE_SUBMODULE_CHANGES switch
and reuse two other already present switches to expect the known
failure that stash does ignore submodule changes.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test that the am command updates the work tree as expected (for submodule
changes which don't result in conflicts). To make that work add two
helper functions that use format-patch to create the input for am.
Add the KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_ATTEMPTS_TO_MERGE_REMOVED_SUBMODULE_FILES
switch to expect the known failure that --no-ff merges attempt to merge
the new files in the former submodule directory with those of the removed
submodule.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test that the cherry-pick command updates the work tree as expected (for
submodule changes which don't result in conflicts).
Set KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_ATTEMPTS_TO_MERGE_REMOVED_SUBMODULE_FILES
and KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_DOESNT_CREATE_EMPTY_SUBMODULE_DIR to
document that cherry-pick has the same --no-ff known failures merge has.
Implement the KNOWN_FAILURE_CHERRY_PICK_SEES_EMPTY_COMMIT switch to expect
the known failure that while cherry picking just a SHA-1 update for an
ignored submodule the commit incorrectly fails with "The previous
cherry-pick is now empty, possibly due to conflict resolution.".
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
