* maint:
Prepare for 1.6.1.4.
Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Clear the delta base cache if a pack is rebuilt
Conflicts:
RelNotes
* maint-1.6.0:
Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Clear the delta base cache if a pack is rebuilt
There is some risk that re-opening a regenerated pack file with
different offsets could leave stale entries within the delta base
cache that could be matched up against other objects using the same
"struct packed_git*" and pack offset.
Throwing away the entire delta base cache in this case is safer,
as we don't have to worry about a recycled "struct packed_git*"
matching to the wrong base object, resulting in delta apply
errors while unpacking an object.
Suggested-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise we may reuse the same memory address for a totally
different "struct packed_git", and a previously cached object from
the prior occupant might be returned when trying to unpack an object
from the new pack.
Found-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The size of the content we are adding may be larger than
2.1G (i.e., "git add gigantic-file"). Most of the code-path
to do so uses size_t or unsigned long to record the size,
but write_loose_object uses a signed int.
On platforms where "int" is 32-bits (which includes x86_64
Linux platforms), we end up passing malloc a negative size.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function is only used from "sha1_file.c".
And as we want to add a "replace_object" hook in "read_sha1_file",
we must not let people bypass the hook using something other than
"read_sha1_file".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
R. Tyler Ballance reported a mysterious transient repository corruption;
after much digging, it turns out that we were not catching and reporting
memory allocation errors from some calls we make to zlib.
This one _just_ wraps things; it doesn't do the "retry on low memory
error" part, at least not yet. It is an independent issue from the
reporting. Some of the errors are expected and passed back to the caller,
but we die when zlib reports it failed to allocate memory for now.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes us able to properly index symlinks even on filesystems where
st_size doesn't match the true size of the link.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Especially on Windows where an opened file cannot be replaced, make
sure pack-objects always close packs it is about to replace. Even on
non Windows systems, this could save potential bad results if ever
objects were to be read from the new pack file using offset from the old
index.
This should fix t5303 on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Tested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> (MinGW)
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bc/maint-keep-pack:
repack: only unpack-unreachable if we are deleting redundant packs
t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects
pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too
sha1_file.c: split has_loose_object() into local and non-local counterparts
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB
builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence
repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A]
repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file
pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep
packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file
* maint:
sha1_file.c: resolve confusion EACCES vs EPERM
sha1_file: avoid bogus "file exists" error message
git checkout: don't warn about unborn branch if -f is already passed
bash: offer refs instead of filenames for 'git revert'
bash: remove dashed command leftovers
git-p4: fix keyword-expansion regex
fast-export: use an unsorted string list for extra_refs
Add new testcase to show fast-export does not always exports all tags
An earlier commit 916d081 (Nicer error messages in case saving an object
to db goes wrong, 2006-11-09) confused EACCES with EPERM, the latter of
which is an unlikely error from mkstemp().
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
This avoids the following misleading error message:
error: unable to create temporary sha1 filename ./objects/15: File exists
mkstemp can fail for many reasons, one of which, ENOENT, can occur if
the directory for the temp file doesn't exist. create_tmpfile tried to
handle this case by always trying to mkdir the directory, even if it
already existed. This caused errno to be clobbered, so one cannot tell
why mkstemp really failed, and it truncated the buffer to just the
directory name, resulting in the strange error message shown above.
Note that in both occasions that I've seen this failure, it has not been
due to a missing directory, or bad permissions, but some other, unknown
mkstemp failure mode that did not occur when I ran git again. This code
could perhaps be made more robust by retrying mkstemp, in case it was a
transient failure.
Signed-off-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This avoids the following misleading error message:
error: unable to create temporary sha1 filename ./objects/15: File exists
mkstemp can fail for many reasons, one of which, ENOENT, can occur if
the directory for the temp file doesn't exist. create_tmpfile tried to
handle this case by always trying to mkdir the directory, even if it
already existed. This caused errno to be clobbered, so one cannot tell
why mkstemp really failed, and it truncated the buffer to just the
directory name, resulting in the strange error message shown above.
Note that in both occasions that I've seen this failure, it has not been
due to a missing directory, or bad permissions, but some other, unknown
mkstemp failure mode that did not occur when I ran git again. This code
could perhaps be made more robust by retrying mkstemp, in case it was a
transient failure.
Signed-off-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the case of bad packed object CRC, unuse_pack wasn't called after
check_pack_crc which calls use_pack.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* np/pack-safer:
t5303: fix printf format string for portability
t5303: work around printf breakage in dash
pack-objects: don't leak pack window reference when splitting packs
extend test coverage for latest pack corruption resilience improvements
pack-objects: allow "fixing" a corrupted pack without a full repack
make find_pack_revindex() aware of the nasty world
make check_object() resilient to pack corruptions
make packed_object_info() resilient to pack corruptions
make unpack_object_header() non fatal
better validation on delta base object offsets
close another possibility for propagating pack corruption
* bc/maint-keep-pack:
t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects
pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too
sha1_file.c: split has_loose_object() into local and non-local counterparts
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB
builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence
repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A]
repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file
pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep
packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file
This can potentially be used in a few places, so let's make
it available to all parts of the code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pack_keep will be set when a pack file has an associated .keep file.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It currently calls die() whenever given offset is not found thinking
that such thing should never happen. But this offset may come from a
corrupted pack whych _could_ happen and not be found. Callers should
deal with this possibility gracefully instead.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the same spirit as commit 8eca0b47ff, let's try to survive a pack
corruption by making packed_object_info() able to fall back to alternate
packs or loose objects.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is possible to have pack corruption in the object header. Currently
unpack_object_header() simply die() on them instead of letting the caller
deal with that gracefully.
So let's have unpack_object_header() return an error instead, and find
a better name for unpack_object_header_gently() in that context. All
callers of unpack_object_header() are ready for it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In one case, it was possible to have a bad offset equal to 0 effectively
pointing a delta onto itself and crashing git after too many recursions.
In the other cases, a negative offset could result due to off_t being
signed. Catch those.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Abstract
--------
With index v2 we have a per object CRC to allow quick and safe reuse of
pack data when repacking. This, however, doesn't currently prevent a
stealth corruption from being propagated into a new pack when _not_
reusing pack data as demonstrated by the modification to t5302 included
here.
The Context
-----------
The Git database is all checksummed with SHA1 hashes. Any kind of
corruption can be confirmed by verifying this per object hash against
corresponding data. However this can be costly to perform systematically
and therefore this check is often not performed at run time when
accessing the object database.
First, the loose object format is entirely compressed with zlib which
already provide a CRC verification of its own when inflating data. Any
disk corruption would be caught already in this case.
Then, packed objects are also compressed with zlib but only for their
actual payload. The object headers and delta base references are not
deflated for obvious performance reasons, however this leave them
vulnerable to potentially undetected disk corruptions. Object types
are often validated against the expected type when they're requested,
and deflated size must always match the size recorded in the object header,
so those cases are pretty much covered as well.
Where corruptions could go unnoticed is in the delta base reference.
Of course, in the OBJ_REF_DELTA case, the odds for a SHA1 reference to
get corrupted so it actually matches the SHA1 of another object with the
same size (the delta header stores the expected size of the base object
to apply against) are virtually zero. In the OBJ_OFS_DELTA case, the
reference is a pack offset which would have to match the start boundary
of a different base object but still with the same size, and although this
is relatively much more "probable" than in the OBJ_REF_DELTA case, the
probability is also about zero in absolute terms. Still, the possibility
exists as demonstrated in t5302 and is certainly greater than a SHA1
collision, especially in the OBJ_OFS_DELTA case which is now the default
when repacking.
Again, repacking by reusing existing pack data is OK since the per object
CRC provided by index v2 guards against any such corruptions. What t5302
failed to test is a full repack in such case.
The Solution
------------
As unlikely as this kind of stealth corruption can be in practice, it
certainly isn't acceptable to propagate it into a freshly created pack.
But, because this is so unlikely, we don't want to pay the run time cost
associated with extra validation checks all the time either. Furthermore,
consequences of such corruption in anything but repacking should be rather
visible, and even if it could be quite unpleasant, it still has far less
severe consequences than actively creating bad packs.
So the best compromize is to check packed object CRC when unpacking
objects, and only during the compression/writing phase of a repack, and
only when not streaming the result. The cost of this is minimal (less
than 1% CPU time), and visible only with a full repack.
Someone with a stats background could provide an objective evaluation of
this, but I suspect that it's bad RAM that has more potential for data
corruptions at this point, even in those cases where this extra check
is not performed. Still, it is best to prevent a known hole for
corruption when recreating object data into a new pack.
What about the streamed pack case? Well, any client receiving a pack
must always consider that pack as untrusty and perform full validation
anyway, hence no such stealth corruption could be propagated to remote
repositoryes already. It is therefore worthless doing local validation
in that case.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/maint-co-track:
Enhance hold_lock_file_for_{update,append}() API
demonstrate breakage of detached checkout with symbolic link HEAD
Fix "checkout --track -b newbranch" on detached HEAD
* jc/maint-co-track:
Enhance hold_lock_file_for_{update,append}() API
demonstrate breakage of detached checkout with symbolic link HEAD
Fix "checkout --track -b newbranch" on detached HEAD
Conflicts:
builtin-commit.c
This changes the "die_on_error" boolean parameter to a mere "flags", and
changes the existing callers of hold_lock_file_for_update/append()
functions to pass LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Hopefully the final draft release notes update before 1.6.0.3
diff(1): clarify what "T"ypechange status means
contrib: update packinfo.pl to not use dashed commands
force_object_loose: Fix memory leak
tests: shell negation portability fix
read_packed_sha1 expectes its caller to free the buffer it returns, which
force_object_loose didn't do.
This leak is eventually triggered by "git gc", when it is manually invoked
or there are too many packs around, making gc totally unusable when there
are lots of unreachable objects.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many call sites use strbuf_init(&foo, 0) to initialize local
strbuf variable "foo" which has not been accessed since its
declaration. These can be replaced with a static initialization
using the STRBUF_INIT macro which is just as readable, saves a
function call, and takes up fewer lines.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This patch just removes an unnecessary goto which makes the code easier
to read and shorter.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
On ARM I have the following compilation errors:
CC fast-import.o
In file included from cache.h:8,
from builtin.h:6,
from fast-import.c:142:
arm/sha1.h:14: error: conflicting types for 'SHA_CTX'
/usr/include/openssl/sha.h:105: error: previous declaration of 'SHA_CTX' was here
arm/sha1.h:16: error: conflicting types for 'SHA1_Init'
/usr/include/openssl/sha.h:115: error: previous declaration of 'SHA1_Init' was here
arm/sha1.h:17: error: conflicting types for 'SHA1_Update'
/usr/include/openssl/sha.h:116: error: previous declaration of 'SHA1_Update' was here
arm/sha1.h:18: error: conflicting types for 'SHA1_Final'
/usr/include/openssl/sha.h:117: error: previous declaration of 'SHA1_Final' was here
make: *** [fast-import.o] Error 1
This is because openssl header files are always included in
git-compat-util.h since commit 684ec6c63c whenever NO_OPENSSL is not
set, which somehow brings in <openssl/sha1.h> clashing with the custom
ARM version. Compilation of git is probably broken on PPC too for the
same reason.
Turns out that the only file requiring openssl/ssl.h and openssl/err.h
is imap-send.c. But only moving those problematic includes there
doesn't solve the issue as it also includes cache.h which brings in the
conflicting local SHA1 header file.
As suggested by Jeff King, the best solution is to rename our references
to SHA1 functions and structure to something git specific, and define those
according to the implementation used.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* jc/alternate-push:
push: receiver end advertises refs from alternate repositories
push: prepare sender to receive extended ref information from the receiver
receive-pack: make it a builtin
is_directory(): a generic helper function
* maint:
sha1_file: link() returns -1 on failure, not errno
Make git archive respect core.autocrlf when creating zip format archives
Add new test to demonstrate git archive core.autocrlf inconsistency
gitweb: avoid warnings for commits without body
Clarified gitattributes documentation regarding custom hunk header.
git-svn: fix handling of even funkier branch names
git-svn: Always create a new RA when calling do_switch for svn://
git-svn: factor out svnserve test code for later use
diff/diff-files: do not use --cc too aggressively
5723fe7 (Avoid cross-directory renames and linking on object creation,
2008-06-14) changed the call to use link() directly instead of through a
custom wrapper, but forgot that it returns 0 or -1, not 0 or errno.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, when pushing into a repository that borrows from alternate object
stores, we followed the longstanding design decision not to trust refs in
the alternate repository that houses the object store we are borrowing
from. If your public repository is borrowing from Linus's public
repository, you pushed into it long time ago, and now when you try to push
your updated history that is in sync with more recent history from Linus,
you will end up sending not just your own development, but also the
changes you acquired through Linus's tree, even though the objects needed
for the latter already exists at the receiving end. This is because the
receiving end does not advertise that the objects only reachable from the
borrowed repository (i.e. Linus's) are already available there.
This solves the issue by making the receiving end advertise refs from
borrowed repositories. They are not sent with their true names but with a
phoney name ".have" to make sure that the old senders will safely ignore
them (otherwise, the old senders will misbehave, trying to push matching
refs, and mirror push that deletes refs that only exist at the receiving
end).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A simple "grep -e stat --and -e S_ISDIR" revealed there are many
open-coded implementations of this function.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to allow callers to pass "foo/bar/" to make sure both "foo" and
"foo/bar" exist and have good permissions, but this interface is too error
prone. If a caller mistakenly passes a path with trailing slashes
(perhaps it forgot to verify the user input) even when it wants to later
mkdir "bar" itself, it will find that it cannot mkdir "bar". If such a
caller does not bother to check the error for EEXIST, it may even
errorneously die().
Because we have no existing callers to use that obscure feature, this
patch removes it to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is needed to fix verify-pack -v with multiple pack arguments.
Also, in theory, revindex data (if any) must be discarded whenever
reprepare_packed_git() is called. In practice this is hard to trigger
though.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
