We say "SUBDIRECTORY_OK" but we did not chdir to toplevel; this
is fine as long as everything we use can be started from a
subdirectory, but unfortunately "merge-recursive" is not one of
the programs you can safely use from a subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier when we read a tree into a temporary index, we read it
from scratch. Start from the current index and use read-tree -m
to preserve cached stat information as much as possible, in
order to speed up "git add -u". This makes "git stash" usable
in a source tree of nontrivial size.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When given this subcommand, git-stash will try to merge the stashed
index into the current one. Only trivial merges are possible, since
we have no index for the index ;-) If a trivial merge is not possible,
git-stash will bail out with a hint to skip the --index option.
For good measure, finally include a test case.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows you to say:
$ git stash starting to implement X
while creating a stash, and the resulting "stash list entry
would read as:
$ git stash list
stash@{0}: On master: starting to implement X
instead of the default message which talks about the commit the
stash happens to be based on (hence does not have much to do
with what the stashed change is trying to do).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A stash is about a change on top of an existing commit, and not
about that commit that happened to be on which the change was
created. Match the message we see in "git stash list" with the
commit log message to make this clear.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
If I do
git cat-file commit $commitid
for a commit created by stash, the next prompt starts directly after the
shortlog of HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, the git-log invocation would complain if a repo
had not had any stashes created in it yet:
$ git-init
$ git-stash
fatal: ambiguous argument 'refs/stash': unknown revision or
path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
Instead, we only call git-log if we actually have a
refs/stash. We could alternatively create the ref when any
stash command is called, but it's better for the 'list'
command to not require write access to the repo.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When my boss has something to show me and I have to update, for some
reason I am always in the middle of doing something else, and git pull
command refuses to work in such a case.
I wrote this little script to save the changes I made, perform the
update, and then come back to where I was, but on top of the updated
commit.
This is how you would use the script:
$ git stash
$ git pull
$ git stash apply
[jc: with a few fixlets from the list]
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@bluebottle.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
