"git stash" internally used "git merge-recursive" backend, which did
not trigger "rerere" upon conflicts unlike other mergy operations.
* ph/stash-rerere:
stash: invoke rerere in case of conflict
test: git-stash conflict sets up rerere
"stash apply" directly calls a backend merge function which does not
automatically invoke rerere. This confuses mergetool when leftover
rerere state is left behind from previous merges.
Invoke rerere explicitly when we encounter a conflict during stash
apply. This turns the test introduced by the previous commit to
succeed.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise, passing an invalid option, git stash -v, gave:
git-stash: line 204: $'error: unknown option for \'stash save\':
$option\n To provide a message, use git stash save -- \'$option\'':
command not found
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerwall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When performing a plain "git stash" (without --patch), git-diff would fail
with "fatal: ambiguous argument 'HEAD': both revision and filename". The
output was piped into git-update-index, masking the failed exit status.
The output is now sent to a temporary file (which is cleaned up by
existing code), and the exit status is checked. The "HEAD" arg to the
git-diff invocation has been disambiguated too, of course.
In patch mode, "git stash -p" would fail harmlessly, leaving the working
dir untouched. Interactive adding is fine, but the resulting tree was
diffed with an ambiguous 'HEAD' argument.
Use >foo (no space) when redirecting output.
In t3904, checks and operations on each file are in the order they'll
appear when interactively staging.
In t3905, fix a bug in "stash save --include-untracked -q is quiet": The
redirected stdout file was considered untracked, and so was removed from
the working directory. Use test path helper functions where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Jonathon Mah <me@JonathonMah.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bc/unstash-clean-crufts:
git-stash: remove untracked/ignored directories when stashed
t/t3905: add missing '&&' linkage
git-stash.sh: fix typo in error message
t/t3905: use the name 'actual' for test output, swap arguments to test_cmp
The two new stash options --include-untracked and --all do not remove the
untracked and/or ignored files that are stashed if those files reside in
a subdirectory. e.g. the following sequence fails:
mkdir untracked &&
echo hello >untracked/file.txt &&
git stash --include-untracked &&
test ! -f untracked/file.txt
Within the git-stash script, git-clean is used to remove the
untracked/ignored files, but since the -d option was not supplied, it does
not remove directories.
So, add -d to the git-clean arguments, and update the tests to test this
functionality.
Reported-by: Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --include-untracked option acts like the normal "git stash save" but
also adds all untracked files in the working directory to the stash and then
calls "git clean --force --quiet" to restore the working directory to a
pristine state.
This is useful for projects that need to run release scripts. With this
option, the release scripts can be from the main working directory so one
does not have to maintain a "clean" directory in parallel just for
releasing. Basically the work-flow becomes:
$ git tag release-1.0
$ git stash --include-untracked
$ make release
$ git clean -f
$ git stash pop
"git stash" alone is not enough in this case--it leaves untracked files
lying around that might mess up a release process that expects everything to
be very clean or might let a release succeed that should actually fail (due
to a new source file being created that hasn't been committed yet).
Signed-off-by: David Caldwell <david@porkrind.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gettextize the say/die eval_gettext messages in the drop_stash
function. Since making these translatable would result in a long line
I've wrapped this into two lines.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gettextize the "unknown option for 'stash save'" message that's shown
on:
$ git stash save --blah-blah
error: unknown option for 'stash save': --blah-blah
To provide a message, use git stash save -- '--blah-blah'
Usage: git stash list [<options>]
In a translation the second line should be aligned with the first
one. I've added a TRANSLATORS comment to indicate this.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gettextize a messages that used the $1 variable. Since it's subroutine
local we have to provide an alias for it for eval_gettext.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gettextize messages that used the $* variable. Since it's subroutine
local we have to provide an alias for it for eval_gettext.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't assume one comes after the other on the command line. Use a
three-state variable to track and check its value accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before we apply a stash, we make sure there are no changes
in the worktree that are not in the index. This check dates
back to the original git-stash.sh, and is presumably
intended to prevent changes in the working tree from being
accidentally lost during the merge.
However, this check has two problems:
1. It is overly restrictive. If my stash changes only file
"foo", but "bar" is dirty in the working tree, it will
prevent us from applying the stash.
2. It is redundant. We don't touch the working tree at all
until we actually call merge-recursive. But it has its
own (much more accurate) checks to avoid losing working
tree data, and will abort the merge with a nicer
message telling us which paths were problems.
So we can simply drop the check entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Once upon a time, "git rev-parse ref@{9999999}" did not
generate an error. Therefore when we got an invalid stash
reference in "stash apply", we could end up not noticing
until quite late. Commit b0f0ecd (detached-stash: work
around git rev-parse failure to detect bad log refs,
2010-08-21) handled this by checking for the "Log for stash
has only %d entries" warning on stderr when we validated the
ref.
A few days later, e6eedc3 (rev-parse: exit with non-zero
status if ref@{n} is not valid., 2010-08-24) fixed the
original issue. That made the extra stderr test superfluous,
but also introduced a new bug. Now the early call to:
git rev-parse --symbolic "$@"
fails, but we don't notice the exit code. Worse, its empty
output means we think the user didn't provide us a ref, and
we try to apply stash@{0}.
This patch checks the rev-parse exit code and fails early in
the revision parsing process. We can also get rid of the
stderr test; as a bonus, this means that "stash apply" can
now run under GIT_TRACE=1 properly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git stash create' must operate with a temporary index. For this purpose,
it used 'cp -p' to create a copy. -p is needed to preserve the timestamp
of the index file. Now Jakob Pfender reported a certain combination of
a Linux NFS client, OpenBSD NFS server, and cp implementation where this
operation failed.
Luckily, the first operation in git-stash after copying the index is to
call 'git read-tree'. Therefore, use --index-output instead of 'cp -p'
to write the copy of the index.
--index-output requires that the specified file is on the same volume as
the source index, so that the lock file can be rename()d. For this reason,
the name of the temporary index is constructed in a way different from the
other temporary files. The code path of 'stash -p' also needs a temporary
index, but we do not use the new name because it does not depend on the
same precondition as --index-output.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The * was inside the quotes, so that the pattern was never expanded and the
temporary files were never removed. As a consequence, 'stash -p' left a
.git-stash-*-patch file in $GIT_DIR. Other code paths did not leave files
behind because they removed the temporary file themselves, at least in
non-error paths.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git status shows modified paths relative to current directory, so it's
possible to copy&paste them directly, even if you're in a subdirectory.
But "git stash apply" always shows status from root of git repository.
This is misleading because you can't use the paths without modifications.
This is caused by changing directory to root of repository at the
beginning of git stash.
This patch makes git stash show status relative to current directory.
Instead of removing the "cd to toplevel", which would affect whole
script and might have other side-effects, the fix is to change directory
temporarily back to original dir just before displaying status.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch simplifies Brian's fix for the recent regression by:
* eliminating the extra loop
* eliminating use of git rev-parse for parsing flags
* making use of the for opt idiom for the retained loop
* eliminating the redundant -- case
The patch has been tested with the tests in current maint.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git stash branch <branch> <stash>" started discarding the stash
when the branch creation fails. It should have kept the stash
intact when aborting.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently git-stash uses `git rev-parse --no-revs -- "$@"` to set its
FLAGS variable. This is the same as `FLAGS="-- $@"`. It should use
`git rev-parse --no-revs --flags "$@"`, but that eats any "-q" or
"--quiet" argument. So move the check for quiet before rev-parse.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <brian@gernhardtsoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit refactors git stash show to make use of the assert_stash_like function.
git show now dies if the presented argument is non-stash-like.
Previous behaviour was to tolerate commits that were not even stash-like.
Previously, git stash show would accept stash-like arguments, but
only if there was a stash on the stack.
Now, git stash accepts stash-like arguments always and only fails
if no stash-like argument is specified and there is no stash stack.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch teaches git stash branch to tolerate stash-like arguments.
In particular, a stash is only required if an argument isn't specified
and the stash is only dropped if a stash entry reference was
specified or implied.
The implementation has been simplified by taking advantage of
assert_stash_like() and the variables established by
parse_flags_and_rev().
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git stash pop is abstracted into its own implementation function - pop_stash.
The behaviour is changed so that git stash pop fails early if the
the specified stash reference does not exist or does not refer to
an extant entry in the reflog of the reference stash.
This fixes the case where the apply succeeds, but the drop fails.
Previously this caused caused git stash pop to exit with a non-zero exit code
and a dirty tree.
Now, git stash pop fails with a non-zero exit code, but the working
tree is not modified.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, git stash drop would fail noisily while executing git reflog
delete if the specified revision was not a stash reference.
Now, git stash drop fails with an error message which more precisely
indicates the reason for failure.
Furthermore, git stash drop will now fail with a non-zero status code
if stash@{n} specifies a stash log entry that does not actually exist.
This change in behaviour is achieved by delegating argument parsing
to the common parse_flags_and_rev() function (via a call to
assert_stash_ref).
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The implementation of stash_apply() is simplified to take
advantage of the common parsing function parse_flags_and_rev().
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is required because git rev-parse in 1.7.2 does not correctly
indicate invalid log references using a non-zero status code.
We use a proxy for the condition (non-empty error output) as
a substitute. This commit can be reverted when, and if, rev-parse
is fixed to indicate invalid log references with a status code.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce parse_flags_and_revs. This function requires that
there is at most one stash-like revision parameter and
zero or more flags.
It knows how to parse -q,--quiet and --index flags, but leaves
other flags parsed.
Specified revisions are checked to see that they are at
least stash-like (meaning: they look like something created
by git stash save or git stash create).
If this is so, then IS_STASH_LIKE is initialized to a non-empty value.
If the specified revision also looks like a stash log entry reference,
then IS_STASH_REF is initialized to a non-empty value.
References of the form ref@{spec} are required to precisely identify
an individual commit.
If no reference is specified, stash@{0} is assumed.
Once the specified reference is validated to be at least stash_like
an ensemble of derived variables, (w_commit, w_tree, b_commit, etc)
is initialized with a single call to git rev-parse.
Repeated calls to parse_flags_and_rev() avoid repeated calls
to git rev-parse if the specified arguments have already been
parsed.
Subsequent patches in the series modify the existing
git stash subcommands to make use of these functions
as appropriate.
An ensemble of supporting functions that make use of the state
established by parse_flags_and_rev(). These are described below:
The ancillary functions are:
is_stash_like(): which can be used to test
whether a specified commit looks like a commit created with
git stash save or git stash create.
assert_stash_like(): which can be used by
commands that misbehave unless their arguments stash-like.
is_stash_ref(): which checks whether an argument
is valid stash reference(e.g. is of the form
['refs/']stash['@{'something'}])
assert_stash_ref(): which can be used by commands
that misbehave unless their arguments are both stash-like and
refer to valid stash entries.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* cb/maint-stash-orphaned-file:
stash tests: stash can lose data in a file removed from the index
stash: Don't overwrite files that have gone from the index
The use of git add -u in create_stash isn't always complete. In
particular, if a file has been removed from the index but changed in the
work tree it will not be added to the stash's saved work tree tree
object. When stash then resets the work tree to match HEAD, any changes
will be lost.
To be complete, any work tree file which differs from HEAD needs to be
saved, regardless of whether it still appears in the index or not.
This is achieved with a combination of a diff against HEAD and a call to
update-index with an explicit list of paths that have changed.
Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because log.decorate now shows decorations for --pretty=oneline,
we must explicitly turn it off when scripting. Otherwise,
users with log.decorate set will get cruft like:
$ git stash
Saved working directory and index state WIP on master:
2c1f7f5 (HEAD, master) commit subject
Instead of adding --no-decorate to the log command line,
let's just use the rev-list plumbing interface instead,
which does the right thing.
git-submodule has a similar call. Since it just counts the
commit lines, nothing is broken, but let's switch it, too,
for the sake of consistency and cleanliness.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous error message "fatal: Needed a single revision" is not
very informative.
Signed-off-by: Gustaf Hendeby <hendeby@isy.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'git stash pop' option parsing used to remove the first argument
in --index mode. At the time this was implemented, this first
argument was always --index. However, since the invention of the -q
option in fcdd0e9 (stash: teach quiet option, 2009-06-17) you can
cause an internal invocation of
git stash drop --index
by running
git stash pop -q --index
which then of course fails because drop doesn't know --index.
To handle this, instead let 'git stash apply' decide what the future
argument to 'drop' should be.
Warning: this means that 'git stash apply' must parse all options that
'drop' can take, and deal with them in the same way. This is
currently true for its only option -q.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
