Some people always do --annotate, lets not force them to always type
that.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update "git send-email" for issues noticed by PerlCritic.
* rr/send-email-perl-critique:
send-email: use the three-arg form of open in recipients_cmd
send-email: drop misleading function prototype
send-email: use "return;" not "return undef;" on error codepaths
Perlcritic does not want to see the trailing pipe in the two-args
form of open(), i.e.
open my $fh, "$cmd \Q$file\E |";
If $cmd were a single-token command name, it would make a lot more
sense to use four-or-more-args form "open FILEHANDLE,MODE,CMD,ARGS"
to avoid shell from expanding metacharacters in $file, but we do
expect multi-word string in $to_cmd and $cc_cmd to be expanded by
the shell, so we cannot rewrite it to
open my $fh, "-|", $cmd, $file;
for extra safety. At least, by using this in the three-arg form:
open my $fh, "-|", "$cmd \Q$file\E";
we can silence Perlcritic, even though we do not gain much safety by
doing so.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The subroutine check_file_rev_conflict() is called from two places,
both of which expects to pass a single scalar variable and see if
that can be interpreted as a pathname or a revision name. It is
defined with a function prototype ($) to force a scalar context
while evaluating the arguments at the calling site but it does not
help the current calling sites. The only effect it has is to hurt
future calling sites that may want to build an argument list in an
array variable and call it as check_file_rev_confict(@args).
Drop the misleading prototype, as Perlcritic suggests.
While at it, rename the function to avoid new call sites unaware of
this change arising and add a comment clarifying what this function
is for.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All the callers of "ask", "extract_valid_address", and "validate_patch"
subroutines assign the return values from them to a single scalar:
$var = subr(...);
and "return undef;" in these subroutine can safely be turned into a
simpler "return;". Doing so will also future-proof a new caller that
mistakenly does this:
@foo = ask(...);
if (@foo) { ... we got an answer ... } else { ... we did not ... }
Note that we leave "return undef;" in validate_address on purpose,
even though Perlcritic may complain. The primary "return" site of
the function returns whatever is in the scalar variable $address, so
it is pointless to change only the other "return undef;" to "return".
The caller must be prepared to see an array with a single undef as
the return value from this subroutine anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If smtp_user is provided but smtp_pass is not, instead of
prompting for password, make git-send-email use git
credential command instead.
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When user spells "cc:" in lowercase in the fake "header" in the
trailer part, send-email failed to pick up the addresses from
there. As e-mail headers field names are case insensitive, this
script should follow suit and treat "cc:" and "Cc:" the same way.
* nz/send-email-headers-are-case-insensitive:
git-send-email: treat field names as case-insensitively
Field names like To:, Cc:, etc. are case-insensitive; use a
case-insensitive regexp to match them as such.
Previously, git-send-email would fail to pick-up the addresses when
in-body "fake" headers with different cases (e.g. lowercase "cc:")
are manually inserted to the messages it was asked to send, even
though the text will still show them.
Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* km/send-email-remove-cruft-in-address:
git-send-email: allow edit invalid email address
git-send-email: ask what to do with an invalid email address
git-send-email: remove invalid addresses earlier
git-send-email: fix fallback code in extract_valid_address()
git-send-email: remove garbage after email address
In some cases the user may want to send email with "Cc:" line with
email address we cannot extract. Now we allow user to extract
such email address for us.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to warn about invalid emails and just drop them. Such warnings
can be unnoticed by user or noticed after sending email when we are not
giving the "final sanity check [Y/n]?"
Now we quit by default.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some addresses are passed twice to unique_email_list() and invalid addresses
may be reported twice per send_message. Now we warn about them earlier
and we also remove invalid addresses.
This also removes using of undefined values for string comparison
for invalid addresses in cc list processing.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently we keep getting questions even when the user has properly
configured his full name and password:
Who should the emails appear to be from?
[Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]
And once a question pops up, other questions are turned on. This is
annoying.
The reason it's safe to avoid this question is because currently the
script fails completely when the author (or committer) is not correct,
so we won't even be reaching this point in the code.
The scenarios, and the current situation:
1) No information at all, no fully qualified domain name
fatal: empty ident name (for <felipec@nysa.(none)>) not allowed
2) Only full name
fatal: unable to auto-detect email address (got 'felipec@nysa.(none)')
3) Full name + fqdm
Who should the emails appear to be from?
[Felipe Contreras <felipec@nysa.felipec.org>]
4) Full name + EMAIL
Who should the emails appear to be from?
[Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]
5) User configured
6) GIT_COMMITTER
7) GIT_AUTHOR
All these are the same as 4)
After this patch:
1) 2) won't change: git send-email would still die
4) 5) 6) 7) will change: git send-email won't ask the user
This is good, that's what we would expect, because the identity is
explicit.
3) will change: git send-email won't ask the user
This is bad, because we will try with an address such as
'felipec@nysa.felipec.org', which is most likely not what the user
wants, but the user will get warned by default (confirm=auto), and if
not, most likely the sending won't work, which the user would readily
note and fix.
The worst possible scenario is that such mail address does work, and the
user sends an email from that address unintentionally, when in fact the
user expected to correct that address in the prompt. This is a very,
very, very unlikely scenario, with many dependencies:
1) No configured user.name/user.email
2) No specified $EMAIL
3) No configured sendemail.from
4) No specified --from argument
5) A fully qualified domain name
6) A full name in the geckos field
7) A sendmail configuration that allows sending from this domain name
8) confirm=never, or
8.1) confirm configuration not hitting, or
8.2) Getting the error, not being aware of it
9) The user expecting to correct this address in the prompt
In a more likely scenario where 7) is not the case (can't send from
nysa.felipec.org), the user will simply see the mail was not sent
properly, and fix the problem.
The much more likely scenario though, is where 5) is not the case
(nysa.(none)), and git send-email will fail right away like it does now.
So the likelihood of this affecting anybody seriously is very very slim,
and the chances of this affecting somebody slightly are still very
small. The vast majority, if not all, of git users won't be affected
negatively, and a lot will benefit from this.
Tests-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the fallback check, used when Email::Valid is not available, the
extract_valid_address() uses $1 without checking for success of matching
regex. The $1 variable may still hold the result of previous match,
which is the address when email address was in '<>' or be undefined
otherwise.
Now if match fails undefined value is always returned to indicate error.
The same value is used by Email::Valid->address() in that case.
Previously 'foo@bar' address was rejected by Email::Valid and fallback,
but '<foo@bar>' was rejected by Email::Valid, but accepted by fallback.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some cases it is useful to add additional information after the
email address on the Cc: footer in a commit log, for instance:
"Cc: Stable kernel <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v3.4 v3.5 v3.6"
However, git-send-email refuses to pick up such an invalid address
when the Email::Valid perl module is available, or just uses the
whole line as the email address.
In sanitize_address(), remove everything after the email address, so
that the result is a valid email address that makes Email::Valid
happy.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Tested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For raw subjects rfc2047 quoting is needed not only for non-ASCII characters,
but also for any possible rfc2047 in it.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
The quote_rfc2047() always adds RFC2047 quoting. To avoid
quoting ASCII subjects, before calling quote_rfc2047()
subject must be tested for non-ASCII characters. This patch
introduces a new quote_subject() function, which performs
the test and calls quote_rfc2047 only if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
The git-send-email always use RFC2047 subject quoting for
files with "broken" encoding - non-ASCII files without
Content-Transfer-Encoding, even for ASCII subjects. This is
harmless but unnecessarily ugly for people reading the raw
headers. This patch skips rfc2047 quoting when the subject
does not need it.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
The commit "git-send-email: introduce compose-encoding" introduced
the compose-encoding option to specify the introduction email encoding
(--compose option), but the email Subject encoding was still hardcoded
to UTF-8.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
The introduction email (--compose option) have encoding hardcoded to
UTF-8, but invoked editor may not use UTF-8 encoding.
The encoding used by patches can be changed by the "8bit-encoding"
option, but this option does not have effect on introduction email
and equivalent for introduction email is missing.
Added compose-encoding command line option and sendemail.composeencoding
configuration option specify encoding of introduction email.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We may pick up additional recipients from the format-patch output
files we are sending, in which case it is perfectly valid to leave
the @initial_to empty when the prompt asks. We may want to start
a new discussion thread without replying to anything, and it is
valid to leave $initial_reply_to empty.
An earlier update to avoid y@example.com stuffed in address fields
did not take these two cases into account.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Validate interactive input to "git send-email" to avoid common
mistakes such as saying "y<RETURN>" to sender mail address whose
prompt is given with a correctly guessed default.
* jc/send-email-reconfirm:
send-email: validate & reconfirm interactive responses
People answer 'y' to "Who should the emails appear to be from?" and
'n' to "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first email?"
for some unknown reason. While it is possible that your local
username really is "y" and you are sending the mail to your local
colleagues, it is possible, and some might even say it is likely,
that it is a user error.
Fortunately, our interactive prompter already has input validation
mechanism built-in. Enhance it so that we can optionally reconfirm
and allow the user to pass an input that does not validate, and
"softly" require input to the sender, in-reply-to, and recipient to
contain "@" and "." in this order, which would catch most cases of
mistakes.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The RFC2047 unquoting, used to parse email addresses in From and Cc
headers, is broken in several ways:
* It erroneously substitutes ' ' for '_' in *the whole* header, even
outside the quoted field. [Noticed by Christoph.]
* It is too liberal in its matching, and happily matches the start
of one quoted chunk against the end of another, or even just
something that looks like such an end. [Noticed by Junio.]
* It fundamentally cannot cope with encodings that are not a
superset of ASCII, nor several (incompatible) encodings in the
same header.
This patch fixes the first two by doing a more careful decoding of
the outer quoting (e.g. "=AB" to represent an octet whose value is
0xAB). Fixing the fundamental issues is left for a future, more
intrusive, patch.
Noticed-by: Christoph Miebach <christoph.miebach@web.de>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The sendemail.multiedit variable is meant to be a boolean.
However, it is not marked as such in the code, which means
we store its value literally. Thus in the do_edit function,
perl ends up coercing it to a boolean value according to
perl rules, not git rules. This works for "0", but "false",
"no", or "off" will erroneously be interpreted as true.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-send-email sends two SMTP EHLOs when using TLS encryption, however
only the first, unencrypted EHLO uses the SMTP domain that can be
optionally specified by the user (--smtp-domain). This is because the
call to hello() that produces the second, encrypted EHLO does not pass
the SMTP domain as an argument, and hence a default of
'localhost.localdomain' is used instead.
Fix by passing in the SMTP domain in this call.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Daley <mattjd@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30) broke
the expansion of aliases.
This was caused by treating %config_path_settings, newly introduced in
said patch, like %config_bool_settings instead of like %config_settings.
Copy from %config_settings, making it more readable.
While at it add basic test for expansion of aliases, and for path
expansion, which would catch this error.
Nb. there were a few issues that were responsible for this error:
1. %config_bool_settings and %config_settings despite similar name have
different semantic.
%config_bool_settings values are arrays where the first element is
(reference to) the variable to set, and second element is default
value... which admittedly is a bit cryptic. More readable if more
verbose option would be to use hash reference, e.g.:
my %config_bool_settings = (
"thread" => { variable => \$thread, default => 1},
[...]
%config_settings values are either either reference to scalar variable
or reference to array. In second case it means that option (or config
option) is multi-valued. BTW. this is similar to what Getopt::Long does.
2. In cec5dae (use new Git::config_path() for aliasesfile, 2011-09-30)
the setting "aliasesfile" was moved from %config_settings to newly
introduced %config_path_settings. But the loop that parses settings
from %config_path_settings was copy'n'pasted *wrongly* from
%config_bool_settings instead of from %config_settings.
It looks like cec5dae author cargo-culted this change...
3. 994d6c6 (send-email: address expansion for common mailers, 2006-05-14)
didn't add test for alias expansion to t9001-send-email.sh
Signed-off-by: Cord Seele <cowose@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git send-email was not authenticating properly when communicating over
TLS with a server supporting only AUTH PLAIN and AUTH LOGIN. This is
e.g. the standard server setup under debian with exim4 and probably
everywhere where system accounts are used.
The problem (only?) exists when libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl
(Authen::SASL::Cyrus) is installed. Importing Authen::SASL::Perl
makes Authen::SASL use the perl implementation which works
better.
The solution is based on this forum thread:
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=904354.
This patch is tested by sending it. Without this fix, the interaction with
the server failed like this:
$ git send-email --smtp-encryption=tls --smtp-server=... --smtp-debug=1 change1.patch
...
Net::SMTP::SSL=GLOB(0x238f668)<<< 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
Password:
Net::SMTP::SSL=GLOB(0x238f668)>>> AUTH
Net::SMTP::SSL=GLOB(0x238f668)<<< 501 5.5.2 AUTH mechanism must be specified
5.5.2 AUTH mechanism must be specified
Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most other git commands print a synopsis when passed -h. Make
send-email do the same.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the command cannot make a connection to the SMTP server the error
message to diagnose the broken configuration is issued. However, when an
optional smtp-server-port is given and needs to be reported, the message
lacked a space between "hello=<smtp-domain>" and "port=<smtp-server-port>".
Signed-off-by: Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@abstraction.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ao/send-email-irt:
git-send-email.perl: make initial In-Reply-To apply only to first email
t9001: send-email interation with --in-reply-to and --chain-reply-to
* maint:
imap-send: link against libcrypto for HMAC and others
git-send-email.perl: Deduplicate "to:" and "cc:" entries with names
mingw: do not set errno to 0 on success
If an email address in the "to:" list is in the style
"First Last <email@domain.tld>", ie: not just a bare
address like "email@domain.tld", and the same named
entry style exists in the "cc:" list, the current
logic will not remove the entry from the "cc:" list.
Add logic to better deduplicate the "cc:" list by also
matching the email address with angle brackets.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When an initial --in-reply-to is supplied, make it apply only to the
first message; --[no-]chain-reply-to setting are honored by second and
subsequent messages; this is also how the git-format-patch option with
the same name behaves.
Moreover, when $initial_reply_to is asked to the user interactively it
is asked as the "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the _first_
email", this makes the user think that the second and subsequent
patches are not using it but are considered as replies to the first
message or chained according to the --[no-]chain-reply setting.
Look at the v2 series in the illustration to see what the new behavior
ensures:
(before the patch) | (after the patch)
[PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... | [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did...
[PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests | [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests
[PATCH 2/2] Implementation | [PATCH 2/2] Implementation
[PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll | [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll
[PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up | [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up
[PATCH v2 2/3] New tests | [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests
[PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation | [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation
This is the typical behaviour we want when we send a series with cover
letter in reply to some discussion, the new patch series should appear
as a separate subtree in the discussion.
Also update the documentation on --in-reply-to to describe the new
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ab/send-email-perl:
send-email: extract_valid_address use qr// regexes
send-email: is_rfc2047_quoted use qr// regexes
send-email: use Perl idioms in while loop
send-email: make_message_id use "require" instead of "use"
send-email: send_message die on $!, not $?
send-email: use (?:) instead of () if no match variables are needed
send-email: sanitize_address use qq["foo"], not "\"foo\""
send-email: sanitize_address use $foo, not "$foo"
send-email: use \E***\Q instead of \*\*\*
send-email: cleanup_compose_files doesn't need a prototype
send-email: unique_email_list doesn't need a prototype
send-email: file_declares_8bit_cte doesn't need a prototype
send-email: get_patch_subject doesn't need a prototype
send-email: use lexical filehandles during sending
send-email: use lexical filehandles for $compose
send-email: use lexical filehandle for opendir
Conflicts:
git-send-email.perl
* sb/send-email-use-to-from-input:
send-email: Don't leak To: headers between patches
send-email: Use To: headers in patch files
Conflicts:
git-send-email.perl
If the first patch in a series has a To: header in the file and the
second patch in the series doesn't the address from the first patch will
be part of the To: addresses in the second patch. Fix this by treating the
to list like the cc list. Have an initial to list come from the command
line, user input and config options. Then build up a to list from each
patch and concatenate the two together before sending the patch. Finally,
reset the list after sending each patch so the To: headers from a patch
don't get used for the next one.
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
