1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-09 02:33:11 +01:00
Commit graph

16 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Felipe Contreras
7495a17363 rev-parse test: use standard test functions for setup
Save the reader from learning specialized t6* setup functions
where familiar commands like test_commit, "git checkout --orphan",
and "git merge" will do.

While at it, wrap the setup commands in a test assertion so errors can
be caught and stray output suppressed when running without --verbose
as in other tests.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-03 13:01:40 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder
c812be9d81 rev-parse test: use test_cmp instead of "test" builtin
Use test_cmp instead of passing two command substitutions to the
"test" builtin.  This way:

 - when tests fail, they can print a helpful diff if run with
   "--verbose"

 - the argument order "test_cmp expect actual" feels natural,
   unlike test <known> = <unknown> that seems backwards

 - the exit status from invoking git is checked, so if rev-parse
   starts segfaulting then the test will notice and fail

Use a custom function for this instead of test_cmp_rev to emphasize
that we are testing the output from "git rev-parse" with certain
arguments, not checking that the revisions are equal in abstract.

Reported-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-03 12:55:30 -07:00
Felipe Contreras
d8f7681337 rev-parse test: use test_must_fail, not "if <command>; then false; fi"
This way, if rev-parse segfaults then the test will fail instead
of treating it the same way as a controlled failure.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-03 12:54:52 -07:00
Felipe Contreras
dfb1dc5c33 rev-parse test: modernize quoting and whitespace
Instead of cramming everything in one line, put the test body in an
indented block after the opening test_expect_success line and quote
and put the closing quote on a line by itself.

Use single-quote instead of double-quote to quote the test body
for more useful --verbose output.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-03 12:54:43 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
9d488eb40e Move t6000lib.sh to lib-*
The naming of this test library conflicted with the recommendation in
t/README's "Naming Tests" section.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-07 21:36:27 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
bfdbee9810 tests: use $TEST_DIRECTORY to refer to the t/ directory
Many test scripts assumed that they will start in a 'trash' subdirectory
that is a single level down from the t/ directory, and referred to their
test vector files by asking for files like "../t9999/expect".  This will
break if we move the 'trash' subdirectory elsewhere.

To solve this, we earlier introduced "$TEST_DIRECTORY" so that they can
refer to t/ directory reliably.  This finally makes all the tests use
it to refer to the outside environment.

With this patch, and a one-liner not included here (because it would
contradict with what Dscho really wants to do):

| diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
| index 70ea7e0..60e69e4 100644
| --- a/t/test-lib.sh
| +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
| @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ fi
|  . ../GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
|
|  # Test repository
| -test="trash directory"
| +test="trash directory/another level/yet another"
|  rm -fr "$test" || {
|         trap - exit
|         echo >&5 "FATAL: Cannot prepare test area"

all the tests still pass, but we would want extra sets of eyeballs on this
type of change to really make sure.

[jc: with help from Stephan Beyer on http-push tests I do not run myself;
 credits for locating silly quoting errors go to Olivier Marin.]

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-17 00:41:52 -07:00
Björn Steinbrink
2122f8b963 rev-parse: Add support for the ^! and ^@ syntax
Those shorthands are explained in the rev-parse documentation but were not
actually supported by rev-parse itself.

gitk internally uses rev-parse to interpret its command line arguments, and
being able to use these "limit with parents" syntax is handy there.

Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-27 14:14:01 -07:00
Stephan Beyer
d492b31caf t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".

This is useful to

 - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
   e.g. SIGSEGV, and

 - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13 13:21:26 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
41ac414ea2 Sane use of test_expect_failure
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision.  Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:

    test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        what is to be tested
    '

And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests.  Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test.  The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.

This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:

    test_expect_success 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        ! this command should fail
    '

test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass.  So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:

    test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
        rm -f bar &&
        git foo &&
        test -f bar
    '

This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 20:49:34 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
5be60078c9 Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02 22:52:14 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
a6080a0a44 War on whitespace
This uses "git-apply --whitespace=strip" to fix whitespace errors that have
crept in to our source files over time.  There are a few files that need
to have trailing whitespaces (most notably, test vectors).  The results
still passes the test, and build result in Documentation/ area is unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-07 00:04:01 -07:00
Shawn O. Pearce
7ff895c0d2 Test for recent rev-parse $abbrev_sha1 regression
My recent patch "Lazily open pack index files on demand" caused a
regression in the case of parsing abbreviated SHA-1 object names.
Git was unable to translate the abbreviated name into the full name
if the object was packed, as the pack .idx files were not opened
before being accessed.

This is a simple test to repack a repository then test for an
abbreviated SHA-1 within the packfile.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-29 22:50:10 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
205df2796d tests: adjust breakage by stricter rev-parse
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-01-25 15:10:22 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
1fdfd05db2 tests: make scripts executable
just for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-12-19 18:27:04 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
215a7ad1ef Big tool rename.
As promised, this is the "big tool rename" patch.  The primary differences
since 0.99.6 are:

  (1) git-*-script are no more.  The commands installed do not
      have any such suffix so users do not have to remember if
      something is implemented as a shell script or not.

  (2) Many command names with 'cache' in them are renamed with
      'index' if that is what they mean.

There are backward compatibility symblic links so that you and
Porcelains can keep using the old names, but the backward
compatibility support  is expected to be removed in the near
future.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-07 17:45:20 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
ef0bd2e6e6 [PATCH] Fix git-rev-parse's parent handling
git-rev-parse HEAD^1 would fail, because of an off-by-one bug (but HEAD^
would yield the expected result). Also, when the parent does not exist, do
not silently return an incorrect SHA1. Of course, this no longer applies
to git-rev-parse alone, but every user of get_sha1().

While at it, add a test.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-10 10:22:49 -07:00