Often users want to know not which tagged version a commit came
after, but which tagged version a commit is contained within.
This latter task is the job of git-name-rev, but most users are
looking to git-describe to do the job.
Junio suggested we make `git describe --contains` run the correct
tool, `git name-rev`, and that's exactly what we do here. The output
of name-rev was adjusted slightly through the new --name-only option,
allowing describe to execv into name-rev and maintain its current
output format.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When the per-method enable logic disables the access, we should
not even look at the global one.
git-cvsserver.perl | 8 +++-----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-add reads this variable, and honours the contents of that file if that
exists. Match this behaviour in git-status, too.
Noticed by Evan Carroll on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We do not appreciate C99 initializers, declarations after statements,
or "0" instead of "NULL".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Note: since the consequence of failure is to call die,
I don't bother to close "f".
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The earlier code removed one newline too many from the hunk that
adds new lines at the end of the file. Also the way the code
counted the added blank lines was somewhat roundabout; I think
the way updated code does it is more direct and easier to
follow:
* We keep track of the number of blank lines added;
* While processing each line, we notice if it adds a blank
line, and increment the counter, or reset it to zero
otherwise;
* When actually we apply the data, we remove the empty lines we
counted earlier if we are applying it at the end of the
file.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
[sp: Modified Jonas' original patch to keep checkout-index
as a a valid completion.]
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Add -l/--long option to git-ls-tree command, which displays
object size of a blob entry. Object size is placed after
object id (left-justified with minimum width of 7 characters).
For non-blob entries `-' is used.
Rationale: for non-blob entries size of an object has no much
meaning, and is not very interesting. Moreover, in planned
pack v4 tree objects would be constructed on demand, so tree
size would need to be calculated.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
[jc: with an obvious microfix to avoid doing this unless --whitespace=strip]
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch introduces --extended-regexp and --regexp-ignore-case options to
tune what kind of patterns the pattern-limiting options (--grep, --author,
...) accept.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This test runs gitweb (git web interface) as CGI script from
commandline, and checks that it would not write any errors
or warnings to log.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* maint:
annotate: make it work from subdirectories.
git-config: Correct asciidoc documentation for --int/--bool
t1300: Add tests for git-config --bool --get
unpack-trees.c: verify_uptodate: remove dead code
Use PATH_MAX instead of TEMPFILE_PATH_LEN
branch: fix segfault when resolving an invalid HEAD
* maint-1.5.1:
annotate: make it work from subdirectories.
git-config: Correct asciidoc documentation for --int/--bool
t1300: Add tests for git-config --bool --get
unpack-trees.c: verify_uptodate: remove dead code
Use PATH_MAX instead of TEMPFILE_PATH_LEN
branch: fix segfault when resolving an invalid HEAD
The asciidoc documentation seemed to indicate that type specifiers
are honoured on writing operations which they aren't. Make this
more clear.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Noticed that there were only tests for --int, but not
for --bool. Add some.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Caused by return value of resolve_ref being passed directly
to xstrdup whereby the sanity checking was never reached.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* np/pack:
deprecate the new loose object header format
make "repack -f" imply "pack-objects --no-reuse-object"
allow for undeltified objects not to be reused
I didn't have a chance to test the off-by-default minimize-url
stuff enough before, but it's quite broken for people passing
the --trunk/-T, --tags/-t, --branches/-b switches to "init" or
"clone" commands.
Additionally, follow-parent functionality seems broken when we're
not connected to the root of the repository.
Default behavior for "traditional" git-svn users who only track
one directory (without needing follow-parent) should be
reasonable, as those users started using things before
minimize-url functionality existed.
Behavior for users more used to the git-svnimport-like command
line will also benefit from a more-flexible command-line than
svnimport given the assumption they're working with
non-restrictive read permissions on the repository.
I hope to properly fix these bugs when I get a chance to in the
next week or so, but I would like to get this stopgap measure of
reverting to the old behavior as soon as possible.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When sorting directory names by depth (slash ("/") count) and
closing the deepest directories first (as the protocol
requires), we failed to put the root baton (with an empty string
as its key "") after top-level directories (which did not have
any slashes).
This resulted in svnserve being in a situation it couldn't
handle and caused a segmentation fault on the remote server.
This bug did not affect users of DAV and filesystem repositories.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Confirmed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The todo list at the end of the user manual says that something must be
said about .gitignore. Also, there seems to be a lack of documentation
on how to choose between the various types of ignore files (.gitignore
vs. .git/info/exclude, etc.).
This patch adds a section on ignoring files which try to introduce how
to tell git about ignored files, and how the different strategies
complement eachother.
The syntax of exclude patterns is explained in a simplified manner, with
a reference to git-ls-files(1) which already contains a more thorough
explanation.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Another amusing git exploration example brought up in irc. (Credit to
aeruder for the complete solution.)
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
I don't really want to look like we're encouraging the shared repository
thing. Take down some of the argument for using purely
single-developer-owned repositories and collaborating using patches and
pulls instead.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The embarassing history of this tutorial is that I started it without
really understanding the index well, so I avoided mentioning it.
And we all got the idea that "index" was a word to avoid using around
newbies, but it was reluctantly mentioned that *something* had to be
said. The result is a little awkward: the discussion of the index never
actually uses that word, and isn't well-integrated into the surrounding
material.
Let's just go ahead and use the word "index" from the very start, and
try to demonstrate its use with a minimum of lecturing.
Also, remove discussion of using git-commit with explicit filenames.
We're already a bit slow here to get people to their first commit, and
I'm not convinced this is really so important.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Mention the user manual, especially as an alternative introduction for
user's mainly interested in read-only operations.
And fix a typo while we're there.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Initial (root) commit has no parents, and $co{'parent'} is
undefined. Use '--root' for initial commit.
This fixes "Use of uninitialized value in open at gitweb/gitweb.perl
line 4925." warning.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
