1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-14 21:23:03 +01:00
Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
0cd993a778 Merge branch 'cw/rebase-i-root'
"git rebase [-i] --root $tip" can now be used to rewrite all the
history down to the root.

* cw/rebase-i-root:
  t3404: make test 57 work with dash and others
  Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto
  rebase -i: support --root without --onto
2012-07-15 21:38:42 -07:00
Chris Webb
b64b7feb73 Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto
Test for likely breakages in t3404, including successful reordering of
non-conflicting changes with a new root, correct preservation of commit
message and author in a root commit when it is squashed with the
sentinel, and presence of the sentinel following a conflicting
cherry-pick of a new root.

Remove test_must_fail for git rebase --root without --onto from t3412 as
this case will now be successfully handled by an implicit git rebase -i.

Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-26 15:09:29 -07:00
Martin von Zweigbergk
f2b6a19907 rebase --root: print usage on too many args
Just like

  git rebase --onto newbase upstream branch error

displays the usage message, so should clearly

  git rebase --onto newbase --root branch error

, but it doesn't. Instead, it ignores both "branch" and "error" and
rebases the current HEAD. This is because we try to match the number
of remainging arguments "$#", which fails to match "1" argument and
matches the "*" that really should have been a "0".

Make sure we display usage information when too many arguments are
given. Also fail-fast in case of similar bugs in the future by
matching on exactly 0 arguments and failing on unknown numbers.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-26 13:17:53 -07:00
Jonathan Nieder
a48fcd8369 tests: add missing &&
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide
failures from earlier commands in the chain.

Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or
test_might_fail.  The examples in this patch do not require that.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09 11:59:49 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
61d86605dd t3412: further simplify setting of GIT_EDITOR
2182896 (t3412: clean up GIT_EDITOR usage, 2009-01-30) tried to clean up
the script's use of GIT_EDITOR, but it can further be simplified, because
that is how test-lib.sh sets things up already.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-03 21:07:11 -08:00
Thomas Rast
2ea3c17189 t3412: use log|name-rev instead of log --graph
Replace all 'git log --graph' calls for history verification with the
combination of 'git log ...| git name-rev' first introduced by a6c7a27
(rebase -i: correctly remember --root flag across --continue,
2009-01-26).  This should be less susceptible to format changes than
the --graph code.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-01 18:54:04 -08:00
Thomas Rast
2182896440 t3412: clean up GIT_EDITOR usage
a6c7a27 (rebase -i: correctly remember --root flag across --continue,
2009-01-26) introduced a more portable GIT_EDITOR usage, but left the
old tests unchanged.

Since we never use the editor (all tests run the rebase script as
proposed by rebase -i), just disable it outright, which simplifies the
tests.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-30 21:11:59 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
f7951e1d97 Simplify t3412
Use the newly introduced test_commit() and test_merge() helpers.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-28 20:17:46 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
2d6061537f tests: Avoid single-shot environment export for shell function invocation
Some shells have issues with a single-shot environment variable export
when invoking a shell function.  This fixes the ones I found that invoke
test_must_fail that way.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-26 21:33:51 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
a6c7a27691 rebase -i: correctly remember --root flag across --continue
d911d14 (rebase -i: learn to rebase root commit, 2009-01-02) tried to
remember the --root flag across a merge conflict in a broken way.
Introduce a flag file $DOTEST/rebase-root to fix and clarify.

While at it, also make sure $UPSTREAM is always initialized to guard
against existing values in the environment.

[tr: added tests]

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-26 21:23:19 -08:00
Thomas Rast
d911d1465d rebase -i: learn to rebase root commit
Teach git-rebase -i a new option --root, which instructs it to rebase
the entire history leading up to <branch>.  This is mainly for
symmetry with ordinary git-rebase; it cannot be used to edit the root
commit in-place (it requires --onto <newbase>).  Commits that already
exist in <newbase> are skipped.

In the normal mode of operation, this is fairly straightforward.  We
run cherry-pick in a loop, and cherry-pick has supported picking the
root commit since f95ebf7 (Allow cherry-picking root commits,
2008-07-04).

In --preserve-merges mode, we track the mapping from old to rewritten
commits and use it to update the parent list of each commit.  In this
case, we define 'rebase -i -p --root --onto $onto $branch' to rewrite
the parent list of all root commit(s) on $branch to contain $onto
instead.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-11 23:04:45 -08:00
Thomas Rast
190f53232d rebase: learn to rebase root commit
Teach git-rebase a new option --root, which instructs it to rebase the
entire history leading up to <branch>.  This option must be used with
--onto <newbase>, and causes commits that already exist in <newbase>
to be skipped.  (Normal operation skips commits that already exist in
<upstream> instead.)

One possible use-case is with git-svn: suppose you start hacking
(perhaps offline) on a new project, but later notice you want to
commit this work to SVN.  You will have to rebase the entire history,
including the root commit, on a (possibly empty) commit coming from
git-svn, to establish a history connection.  This previously had to
be done by cherry-picking the root commit manually.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-11 23:03:36 -08:00