1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-14 13:13:01 +01:00
Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
3af828634f tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index"
As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the
results of what git command that is being tested has done.  We would not
know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the
cute hack of "git diff --no-index".

Rather use test_cmp for that purpose.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 00:01:56 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
c3b088d9da t6024: move "git reset" to prepare for a test inside the test itself
Noticed by Mike Hommey.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-01 01:10:12 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
41ac414ea2 Sane use of test_expect_failure
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision.  Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:

    test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        what is to be tested
    '

And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests.  Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test.  The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.

This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:

    test_expect_success 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        ! this command should fail
    '

test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass.  So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:

    test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
        rm -f bar &&
        git foo &&
        test -f bar
    '

This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 20:49:34 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
5be60078c9 Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02 22:52:14 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
9f30855d0f merge-recursive: refuse to merge binary files
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-04 23:07:19 -07:00
Alex Riesen
4848509a97 Fix permissions on test scripts
Make every test executable. Remove exec-attribute from included shell files,
they can't used standalone anyway.

Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-16 16:53:09 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
5bd74506cd Get rid of the dependency to GNU diff in the tests
Now that "git diff" handles stdin and relative paths outside the
working tree correctly, we can convert all instances of "diff -u"
to "git diff".

This commit is really the result of

$ perl -pi.bak -e 's/diff -u/git diff/' $(git grep -l "diff -u" t/)

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

(cherry picked from commit c699a40d68215c7e44a5b26117a35c8a56fbd387)
2007-03-04 00:24:15 -08:00
Eric Wong
7d2ba1229c t6024-recursive-merge: quiet down this test
We get an extra measure of error checking here as well.
While we're at it, also removed a less portable use of export.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-28 01:28:07 -08:00
Shawn O. Pearce
e0ec18192d Display 'theirs' branch name when possible in merge.
Displaying the SHA1 of 'their' branch (the branch being merged into
the current branch) is not nearly as friendly as just displaying
the name of that branch, especially if that branch is already local
to this repository.

git-merge now sets the environment variable 'GITHEAD_%(sha1)=%(name)'
for each argument it gets passed, making the actual input name that
resolved to the commit '%(sha1)' easily available to the invoked
merge strategy.

git-merge-recursive makes use of these environment variables when
they are available by using '%(name)' whenever it outputs the commit
identification rather than '%(sha1)'.  This is most obvious in the
conflict hunks created by xdl_merge:

  $ git mege sideb~1
  <<<<<<< HEAD:INSTALL
     Good!
  =======
     Oops.
  >>>>>>> sideb~1:INSTALL

[jc: adjusted a test script and a minor constness glitch.]

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-23 01:29:37 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
f953831e03 merge-recursive: add/add really is modify/modify with an empty base
Unify the handling for cases C (add/add) and D (modify/modify).

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-12 21:55:37 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
c93be3b539 add test case for recursive merge
This test case is based on the bug report by Shawn Pearce.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-12 17:07:05 -08:00