Current code uses a fixed PATH_MAX-sized buffer for reading
packed-refs lines. This is a reasonable guess, in the sense
that git generally cannot work with refs larger than
PATH_MAX. However, there are a few cases where it is not
great:
1. Some systems may have a low value of PATH_MAX, but can
actually handle larger paths in practice. Fixing this
code path probably isn't enough to make them work
completely with long refs, but it is a step in the
right direction.
2. We use fgets, which will happily give us half a line on
the first read, and then the rest of the line on the
second. This is probably OK in practice, because our
refline parser is careful enough to look for the
trailing newline on the first line. The second line may
look like a peeled line to us, but since "^" is illegal
in refnames, it is not likely to come up.
Still, it does not hurt to be more careful.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our loop should always process all lines, even if we hit the
beginning of the file. We have a conditional after the loop
ends to double-check that there is nothing left and to
process it. But this should never happen, and is a sign of a
logic bug in the loop. Let's turn it into a BUG assertion.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we read a reflog file in reverse, we read whole chunks
of BUFSIZ bytes, then loop over the buffer, parsing any
lines we find. We find the beginning of each line by looking
for the newline from the previous line. If we don't find
one, we know that we are either at the beginning of
the file, or that we have to read another block.
In the latter case, we stuff away what we have into a
strbuf, read another block, and continue our parse. But we
missed one case here. If we did find a newline, and it is at
the beginning of the block, we must also stuff that newline
into the strbuf, as it belongs to the block we are about to
read.
The minimal fix here would be to add this special case to
the conditional that checks whether we found a newline.
But we can make the flow a little clearer by rearranging a
bit: we first handle lines that we are going to show, and
then at the end of each loop, stuff away any leftovers if
necessary. That lets us fold this special-case in with the
more common "we ended in the middle of a line" case.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The plan for the push.default transition had all along been
to use the "simple" method rather than "upstream" as a
default if the user did not specify their own push.default
value. Commit 11037ee (push: switch default from "matching"
to "simple", 2013-01-04) tried to implement that by moving
PUSH_DEFAULT_UNSPECIFIED in our switch statement to
fall-through to the PUSH_DEFAULT_SIMPLE case.
When the commit that became 11037ee was originally written,
that would have been enough. We would fall through to
calling setup_push_upstream() with the "simple" parameter
set to 1. However, it was delayed for a while until we were
ready to make the transition in Git 2.0.
And in the meantime, commit ed2b182 (push: change `simple`
to accommodate triangular workflows, 2013-06-19) threw a
monkey wrench into the works. That commit drops the "simple"
parameter to setup_push_upstream, and instead checks whether
the global "push_default" is PUSH_DEFAULT_SIMPLE. This is
right when the user has explicitly configured push.default
to simple, but wrong when we are a fall-through for the
"unspecified" case.
We never noticed because our push.default tests do not cover
the case of the variable being totally unset; they only
check the "simple" behavior itself.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An example where this happens is when doing an ls-tree on a tree that
contains a commit link. In that case, find_unique_abbrev is called
to get a non-abbreviated hex sha1, but still, a lookup is done as
to whether the sha1 is in the repository (which ends up looking for
a loose object in .git/objects), while the result of that lookup is
not used when returning a non-abbreviated hex sha1.
Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git add foo bar" adds neither foo nor bar when bar is ignored, but dies
to let the user recheck their command invocation. This becomes less
helpful when "git add foo.*" is subject to shell expansion and some of
the expanded files are ignored.
"git add --ignore-errors" is supposed to ignore errors when indexing
some files and adds the others. It does ignore errors from actual
indexing attempts, but does not ignore the error "file is ignored" as
outlined above. This is unexpected.
Change "git add foo bar" to add foo when bar is ignored, but issue
a warning and return a failure code as before the change.
That is, in the case of trying to add ignored files we now act the same
way (with or without "--ignore-errors") in which we act for more
severe indexing errors when "--ignore-errors" is specified.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user specifiers "normal" for a foreground color, this
should be a noop (while this may sound useless, it is the
only way to specify an unchanged foreground color followed
by a specific background color).
We also check that color "-1" does the same thing. This is
not documented, but has worked forever, so let's make sure
we keep supporting it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of git-config's command line options use OPT_BIT to
choose an action, and then parse the non-option arguments
in a context-dependent way. However, --get-color and
--get-colorbool are unlike the rest of the options, in that
they are OPT_STRING, taking the option name as a parameter.
This generally works, because we then use the presence of
those strings to set an action bit anyway. But it does mean
that the option-parser will continue looking for options
even after the key (because it is not a non-option; it is an
argument to an option). And running:
git config --get-color some.key -1
(to use "-1" as the default color spec) will barf, claiming
that "-1" is not an option. Instead, we should treat
--get-color and --get-colorbool as action bits, just like
--add, --get, and all the other actions, and then check that
the non-option arguments we got are sane. This fixes the
weirdness above, and makes those two options like all the
others.
This "fixes" a test in t4026, which checked that feeding
"-2" as a color should fail (it does fail, but prior to this
patch, because parseopt barfed, not because we actually ever
tried to parse the color).
This also catches other errors, like:
git config --get-color some.key black blue
which previously silently ignored "blue" (and now will
complain that you gave too many arguments).
There are some possible regressions, though. We now disallow
these, which currently do what you would expect:
# specifying other options after the action
git config --get-color some.key --file whatever
# using long-arg syntax
git config --get-color=some.key
However, we have never advertised these in the
documentation, and in fact they did not work in some older
versions of git. The behavior was apparently switched as an
accidental side effect of d64ec16 (git config: reorganize to
use parseopt, 2009-02-21).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our color specifications have supported the 256-color ANSI
extension for years, but we never documented it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ralf reported that '--recurse-submodules' option in push.c should not be
translated [1]. Before his commit is merged, remove superfluous
translations for push.c.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg241964.html
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
In order to catch up with the release of Git 2.2.0 final, make a batch
l10n update for the new l10n change brought by commit d52adf1 (trailer:
display a trailer without its trailing newline).
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Small fixes to a new experimental command already in 'master'.
* cc/interpret-trailers:
trailer: display a trailer without its trailing newline
trailer: ignore comment lines inside the trailers
As of CGI.pm's 4.08 release, the behavior to call
CGI::param() in a list context is deprecated (because it can
be potentially unsafe if called inside a hash constructor).
This causes gitweb to issue a warning for some of our code,
which in turn causes the tests to fail.
Our use is in fact _not_ one of the dangerous cases, as we
are intentionally using a list context. The recommended
route by 4.08 is to use the new CGI::multi_param() call to
make it explicit that we know what we are doing.
However, that function is only available in 4.08, which is
about a month old; we cannot rely on having it.
One option would be to set $CGI::LIST_CONTEXT_WARN globally,
which turns off the warning. However, that would eliminate
the protection these newer releases are trying to provide.
We want to annotate each site as OK using the new function.
So instead, let's check whether CGI provides the
multi_param() function, and if not, provide an
implementation that just wraps param(). That will work on
both old and new versions of CGI. Sadly, we cannot just
check defined(\&CGI::multi_param), because CGI uses the
autoload feature, which claims that all functions are
defined. Instead, we just do a version check.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Like the perl scripts, python scripts need a dependency to ensure they
are rebuilt when switching between the "dummy" versions that run
without Python and the real thing.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
SCRIPT_PERL_GEN is defined as $(patsubst %.perl,%,$(SCRIPT_PERL))
for use in targets like build-perl-script used by makefiles in
subdirectories that override SCRIPT_PERL (see v1.8.2-rc0~17^2,
"git-remote-mediawiki: use toplevel's Makefile", 2013-02-08).
The same expression is used in the rules that actually write the
generated perl scripts, and since these rules were introduced before
SCRIPT_PERL_GEN, they use the longhand instead of that macro. Use the
macro to make reading easier.
Likewise for SCRIPT_SH_GEN. The Python rules already got the same
simplification in v1.8.4-rc0~162^2~8 (2013-05-24).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git-cvsimport is written in perl, which understandably
causes the tests to fail if you build with NO_PERL (which
will avoid building cvsimport at all). The earlier cvsimport
tests in t9600-t9602 are all marked with a PERL
prerequisite, but these ones are not.
The one in t9603 was likely not noticed because it is an
expected failure anyway.
The ones in t9604 have been around for a long time, but it
is likely that the combination of NO_PERL and having cvsps
installed is rare enough that nobody noticed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The add-interactive system is built in perl. If you build
with NO_PERL, running "git commit --interactive" will exit
with an error and the test will fail.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If NO_PERL is not set, our perl scripts are built as
usual. If it is set, then we build "dummy" versions that
tell you git was built without perl support and exit
gracefully.
However, if you switch to NO_PERL in a directory with
existing build artifacts, we do not notice that the files
need rebuilt. We see only that they are newer than the
"unimplemented.sh" wrapper and assume they are done. So
doing:
make
make NO_PERL=Nope
would result in a git-add--interactive script that uses perl
(and running the test suite would make use of it).
Instead, we should trigger a rebuild of the perl scripts
anytime NO_PERL changes.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since time immemorial, the test of whether to set "core.filemode"
has been done by trying to toggle the u+x bit on $GIT_DIR/config,
which we know always exists, and then testing whether the change
"took". I find it somewhat odd to use the config file for this
test, but whatever.
The test code didn't set the u+x bit back to its original state
itself, instead relying on the subsequent call to git_config_set()
to re-write the config file with correct permissions.
But ever since
daa22c6f8d config: preserve config file permissions on edits (2014-05-06)
git_config_set() copies the permissions from the old config file to
the new one. This is a good change in and of itself, but it
invalidates the create_default_files()'s assumption, causing "git
init" to leave the executable bit set on $GIT_DIR/config.
Reset the permissions on $GIT_DIR/config when we are done with the
test in create_default_files().
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'master' of git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po:
l10n: de.po: translate 62 new messages
l10n: de.po: Fixup one translation
l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options
The git-push manual page used "gitlink" in one place instead of
"linkgit". Fix this so the link renders correctly.
Noticed-by: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using abs() on long values can cause truncation, so use labs() instead.
Reported by Clang 3.5 (-Wabsolute-value, enabled by -Wall).
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using abs() on long values can cause truncation, so use labs() instead.
Reported by Clang 3.5 (-Wabsolute-value, enabled by -Wall).
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
According to the Linux open(2) man page, open() must return EISDIR
if a directory was attempted to be opened for writing. Our emulation
in mingw_open() does not get this right: it checks only for O_CREAT.
Fix it to check for a write request.
This fixes a failure in reflog handling, which opens files with
O_APPEND|O_WRONLY, but without O_CREAT, and expects EISDIR when the
named file happens to be a directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Translate 62 new messages came from git.pot update in 16742b0
(l10n: git.pot: proposed updates for v2.2.0 (+62)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
English grammar with German words doesn't make it a German translation. ;)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
run_merge_tool() was not setting $status, which prevented the
exit code for builtin tools from being forwarded to the caller.
Capture the exit status and add a test to guarantee the behavior.
Reported-by: Adria Farres <14farresa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we are parsing approxidate strings and we find three
numbers separate by one of ":/-.", we guess that it may be a
date. We feed the numbers to match_multi_number, which
checks whether it makes sense as a date in various orderings
(e.g., dd/mm/yy or mm/dd/yy, etc).
One of the checks we do is to see whether it is a date more
than 10 days in the future. This was added in 38035cf (date
parsing: be friendlier to our European friends.,
2006-04-05), and lets us guess that if it is currently April
2014, then "10/03/2014" is probably March 10th, not October
3rd.
This has a downside, though; if you want to be overly
generous with your "--until" date specification, we may
wrongly parse "2014-12-01" as "2014-01-12" (because the
latter is an in-the-past date). If the year is a future year
(i.e., both are future dates), it gets even weirder. Due to
the vagaries of approxidate, months _after_ the current date
(no matter the year) get flipped, but ones before do not.
This patch drops the "in the future" check for dates of this
form, letting us treat them always as yyyy-mm-dd, even if
they are in the future. This does not affect the normal
dd/mm/yyyy versus mm/dd/yyyy lookup, because this code path
only kicks in when the first number is greater than 70
(i.e., it must be a year, and cannot be either a date or a
month).
The one possible casualty is that "yyyy-dd-mm" is less
likely to be chosen over "yyyy-mm-dd". That's probably OK,
though because:
1. The difference happens only when the date is in the
future. Already we prefer yyyy-mm-dd for dates in the
past.
2. It's unclear whether anybody even uses yyyy-dd-mm
regularly. It does not appear in lists of common date
formats in Wikipedia[1,2].
3. Even if (2) is wrong, it is better to prefer ISO-like
dates, as that is consistent with what we use elsewhere
in git.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_representation_by_country
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
