Work around /bin/sh that does not like "return" at the top-level
of a file that is dot-sourced from inside a function definition.
* km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase:
Revert "rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD"
rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD
This reverts commit 99855ddf4b.
The workaround 99855ddf introduced to deal with problematic
"return" statements in scripts run by "dot" commands located
inside functions only handles one part of the problem. The
issue has now been addressed by not using "return" statements
in this way in the git-rebase--*.sh scripts.
This workaround is therefore no longer necessary, so clean
up the code by reverting it.
Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach rebase the same shorthand as checkout and merge to name the
branch to rebase the current branch on; that is, that "-" means "the
branch we were previously on".
Requested-by: Tim Chase <git@tim.thechases.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no functional change. The reason for this change is to be able
to add a new option taking an optional argument.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The -M option does not exist in OPTIONS_SPEC, so there is no use to try
to find it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove a check on the number of arguments for --onto and -x options.
It is not possible for $# to be <= 2 at this point :
- if --onto or -x has an argument, git rev-parse --parseopt will
provide something like this :
set -- --onto 'x' --
when parsing the "--onto" option, $# will be 3 or more if there are
other options.
- if --onto or -x doesn't have an argument, git rev-parse --parseopt
will exit with an error and display usage information.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the variable $OPTIONS_STUCKLONG is not empty, then rev-parse
option parsing is done in --stuck-long mode.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When no arguments are specified, $switch_to is empty so we end up
passing the empty string to "git merge-base --fork-point", which causes
an error. git-rebase carries on at this point, but in fact we have
failed to apply the fork-point operation.
It turns out that the test in t3400 that was meant to test this didn't
actually need the fork-point behaviour, so enhance it to make sure that
the fork-point is applied correctly. The modified test fails without
the change to git-rebase.sh in this patch.
Reported-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 15a147e (rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified,
2011-02-09) says:
Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what
'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that
'git rebase' defaults to the same thing.
but that isn't actually the case. Since commit d44e712 (pull: support
rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19), pull has actually
chosen the most recent reflog entry which is an ancestor of the current
branch if it can find one.
Add a '--fork-point' argument to git-rebase that can be used to trigger
this behaviour. This option is turned on by default if no non-option
arguments are specified on the command line, otherwise we treat an
upstream specified on the command-line literally.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Work around a bug in FreeBSD shell that caused a regression to "git
rebase" in v1.8.4. May need to be later applied to 'maint'.
* mm/rebase-continue-freebsd-WB:
rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD
Since a1549e10, git-rebase--am.sh uses the shell's "return" statement, to
mean "return from the current file inclusion", which is POSIXly correct,
but badly interpreted on FreeBSD, which returns from the current
function, hence skips the finish_rebase statement that follows the file
inclusion.
Make the use of "return" portable by using the file inclusion as the last
statement of a function.
Reported-by: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase [-i]" used to leave just "rebase" as its reflog message
for some operations. This rewords them to be more informative.
* rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword:
rebase -i: use a better reflog message
rebase: use a better reflog message
Finishing touches for the "git rebase --autostash" feature
introduced earlier.
* rr/rebase-stash-store:
rebase: use 'git stash store' to simplify logic
stash: introduce 'git stash store'
stash: simplify option parser for create
stash doc: document short form -p in synopsis
stash doc: add a warning about using create
Allow various commit objects to be given to "git rebase" by ':/look
for this string' syntax, e.g. "git rebase --onto ':/there'".
* rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query:
rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriate
sh-setup: add new peel_committish() helper
t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revision
Now that the "checkout" invoked internally from "rebase" knows to
honor GIT_REFLOG_ACTION, we can start to use it to write a better
reflog message when "rebase anotherbranch", "rebase --onto branch",
etc. internally checks out the new fork point. We will write:
rebase: checkout master
instead of the old
rebase
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase has no reason to know about the implementation of the stash. In
the case when applying the autostash results in conflicts, replace the
relevant code in finish_rebase () to simply call 'git stash store'.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The revisions specified on the command-line as <onto> and <upstream>
arguments could be of the form :/quuxery; so, use peel_committish() to
resolve them. The failing tests in t/rebase and t/rebase-interactive
now pass.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the following case
$ git rebase master
Current branch autostash-fix is up to date.
the autostash is not applied automatically, because this codepath
forgets to call finish_rebase(). Fix this. Also add a test to guard
against regressions.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the following case
$ git rebase master
Fast-forwarded autostash-fix to master.
The autostash is not applied automatically, because this codepath
forgets to call finish_rebase(). Fix this. Also add a test to guard
against regressions.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This new feature allows a rebase to be executed on a dirty worktree or
index. It works by creating a temporary "dangling merge commit" out
of the worktree and index changes (via 'git stash create'), and
automatically applying it after a successful rebase or abort.
rebase stores the SHA-1 hex of the temporary merge commit, along with
the rest of the rebase state, in either
.git/{rebase-merge,rebase-apply}/autostash depending on the kind of
rebase. Since $state_dir is automatically removed at the end of a
successful rebase or abort, so is the autostash.
The advantage of this approach is that we do not affect the normal
stash's reflogs, making the autostash invisible to the end-user. This
means that you can use 'git stash' during a rebase as usual.
When the autostash application results in a conflict, we push
$state_dir/autostash onto the normal stash and remove $state_dir
ending the rebase. The user can inspect the stash, and pop or drop at
any time.
Most significantly, this feature means that a caller like pull (with
pull.rebase set to true) can easily be patched to remove the
require_clean_work_tree restriction.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On successful completion of a rebase in git-rebase--$backend.sh, the
$backend script cleans up on its own and exits. The cleanup routine
is however, independent of the $backend, and each $backend script
unnecessarily duplicates this work:
rm -rf "$state_dir"
git gc --auto
Prepare git-rebase.sh for later patches that return control from each
$backend script back to us, for performing this generic cleanup
routine. The code that this patch adds is currently unreachable, and
will only start to be used when git-rebase--$backend.sh scripts are
taught to return control in later patches.
Another advantage is that git-rebase.sh can implement a generic
finish_rebase() to possibly do additional tasks in addition to the
cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we 'git rebase $upstream', git uses 'rev-parse --verify
$current_branch' to find ORIG_HEAD. But if $current_branch
is ambiguous, 'rev-parse --verify' emits a warning and returns
a SHA1 anyway. When the wrong ambiguous choice is used,
git-rebase fails non-gracefully: it emits a warning about
failing to lock $current_branch, an error about being unable to
checkout $current_branch again, and it might even decide the
rebase is a fast-forward when it is not.
In the 'rebase $upstream' case, we already know the unambiguous
spelling of $current_branch is "HEAD". Fix git-rebase to find
$orig_head unambiguously.
Add a test in t3400-rebase.sh which creates an ambiguous branch
name and rebases it implicitly with 'git rebase $other'.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows users to edit the todo file while they're stopped in the
middle of an interactive rebase. When this action is executed, all
comments from the original todo file are stripped, and new help messages
are appended to the end.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 95135b0 (rebase: stricter check of standalone sub command,
2011-02-06), git-rebase has not allowed to use -i together with e.g.
--continue. Yet, when rebase started using OPTIONS_SPEC in 45e2acf
(rebase: define options in OPTIONS_SPEC, 2011-02-28), the usage message
included
git-rebase [-i] --continue | --abort | --skip
Remove the "[-i]" from this line.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a typo in the error messages which is shown if it seems that a
rebase is already in progress.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since there is a modern OPTIONS_SPEC variable in use in this script,
the obsolete USAGE and LONG_USAGE variables are no longer used.
Remove them.
In addition, the obsolete LONG_USAGE variable has the following
message in it:
A'\''--B'\''--C'\''
And such complex LONG_USAGE message will break xgettext when
extracting l10n messages (but if single quotes are removed from the
message, xgettext works fine on 'git-rebase.sh').
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gettext message in a shell script should not start with '-', one
workaround is adding '--' between gettext and the message, like:
gettext -- "--exec option ..."
But due to a bug in the xgettext extraction, xgettext can not
extract the actual message for this case. Rewriting the message
is a simpler and better solution.
Reported-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mark messages in git-rebase.sh for translation. While doing this
Jonathan noticed that the comma usage and sentence structure of the
resolvemsg was not quite right, so correct that and its cousins in
git-am.sh and t/t0201-gettext-fallbacks.sh at the same time.
Some tests would start to fail with GETTEXT_POISON turned on after
this update. Use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep where appropriate
to mark strings that should only be checked in the C locale output
to avoid such issues.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase [-i] --root $tip" can now be used to rewrite all the
history down to the root.
* cw/rebase-i-root:
t3404: make test 57 work with dash and others
Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto
rebase -i: support --root without --onto
Teach "am --rebasing" codepath to grab authorship, log message and
the patch text directly out of existing commits. This will help
rebasing commits that have confusing "diff" output in their log
messages.
* mz/rebase-no-mbox:
am: don't call mailinfo if $rebasing
am --rebasing: get patch body from commit, not from mailbox
rebase --root: print usage on too many args
rebase: don't source git-sh-setup twice
Allow --root to be specified to rebase -i without --onto, making it
possible to edit and re-order all commits right back to the root(s).
If there is a conflict to be resolved when applying the first change,
the user will expect a sane index and working tree to get sensible
behaviour from git-diff and friends, so create a sentinel commit with an
empty tree to rebase onto. Automatically squash the sentinel with any
commits rebased directly onto it, so they end up as root commits in
their own right and retain their authorship and commit message.
Implicitly use rebase -i for non-interactive rebase of --root without
an --onto argument now that rebase -i can correctly do this.
Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Just like
git rebase --onto newbase upstream branch error
displays the usage message, so should clearly
git rebase --onto newbase --root branch error
, but it doesn't. Instead, it ignores both "branch" and "error" and
rebases the current HEAD. This is because we try to match the number
of remainging arguments "$#", which fails to match "1" argument and
matches the "*" that really should have been a "0".
Make sure we display usage information when too many arguments are
given. Also fail-fast in case of similar bugs in the future by
matching on exactly 0 arguments and failing on unknown numbers.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During an interactive rebase session, it is sometimes desirable to
run tests on each commit in the resulting history. This can be done
by adding "exec <test command>" when editing the insn sheet, but the
command used for testing is often the same for all resulting commits.
By passing "--exec <cmd>" from the command line, automatically add
these "exec" lines after each commit in the final history. To work
well with the --autosquash option, these are added at the end of
each run of "fixup" and "squash".
Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Duperray <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Franck Jonas <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Nguy <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen <Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 9765b6a (rebase: align variable content, 2011-02-06), the code
to error out was moved up one level. Unfortunately, one reference
to a function parameter wasn't rewritten as it should, leading to
the wrong parameter being errored on.
This error was propagated by 71786f5 (rebase: factor out reference
parsing, 2011-02-06) and merged in 78c6e0f (Merge branch
'mz/rebase', 2011-04-28).
Correct this by reporting $onto_name istead.
Reported-By: Manuela Hutter <manuelah@opera.com>
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The option to autosquash is only used in case of an interactive rebase.
When merges are preserved, rebase uses an interactive rebase internally,
but in this case autosquash should still be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a command line switch to git-rebase to allow a user the ability to specify
that they want to keep any commits in a series that are empty.
When git-rebase's type is am, then this option will automatically keep any
commit that has a tree object identical to its parent.
This patch changes the default behavior of interactive rebases as well. With
this patch, git-rebase -i will produce a revision set passed to
git-revision-editor, in which empty commits are commented out. Empty commits
may be kept manually by uncommenting them. If the new --keep-empty option is
used in an interactive rebase the empty commits will automatically all be
uncommented in the editor.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current message is too long and at too low a level for anybody
to understand it if they don't know about the configuration format
already.
The text about setting up a remote is superfluous and doesn't help
understand or recover from the error that has happened. Show the
usage more prominently and explain how to set up the tracking
information. If there is only one remote, that name is used instead
of the generic <remote>.
Also simplify the message we print on detached HEAD to remove
unnecessary information which is better left for the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
You can't currently run git-pull or git-rebase from outside
of the work tree, even with GIT_WORK_TREE set, due to an
overeager require_work_tree function. Commit e2eb527
documents this problem and provides the infrastructure for a
fix, but left it to later commits to audit and update
individual scripts.
Changing these scripts to use require_work_tree_exists is
easy to verify. We immediately call cd_to_toplevel, anyway.
Therefore no matter which function we use, the state
afterwards is one of:
1. We have a work tree, and we are at the top level.
2. We don't have a work tree, and we have died.
The only catch is that we must also make sure no code that
ran before the cd_to_toplevel assumed that we were already
in the working tree.
In this case, we will only have included shell libraries and
called set_reflog_action, neither of which care about the
current working directory at all.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I found that the patched 4 files were different when this
filter is applied.
expand -i | unexpand --first-only
This patch contains the corrected files.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The description for 'git rebase --abort' currently says:
Restore the original branch and abort the rebase operation.
The "restore" can be misinterpreted to imply that the original branch
was somehow in a broken state during the rebase operation. It is also
not completely clear what "the original branch" is --- is it the
branch that was checked out before the rebase operation was called or
is the the branch that is being rebased (it is the latter)? Although
both issues are made clear in the DESCRIPTION section, let us also
make the entry in the OPTIONS secion more clear.
Also remove the term "rebasing process" from the usage text, since the
user already knows that the text is about "git rebase".
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
