Both remote add and remote rename use a slightly different hand-rolled
check if the remote exits. The hand-rolled check may have some subtle
cases in which it might fail to detect when a remote already exists.
One such case was fixed in fb86e32 ("git remote: allow adding remotes
agreeing with url.<...>.insteadOf"). Another case is when a remote is
configured as follows:
[remote "foo"]
vcs = bar
If we try to run `git remote add foo bar` with the above remote
configuration, git segfaults. This change fixes it.
In addition, git remote rename $existing foo with the configuration for
foo as above silently succeeds, even though foo already exists,
modifying its configuration. With this patch it fails with "remote foo
already exists".
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When converting the git remote command to a builtin in 211c89 ("Make
git-remote a builtin"), a few calls to check if a remote exists were
converted from:
if (!exists $remote->{$name}) {
[...]
to:
remote = remote_get(argv[1]);
if (!remote)
[...]
The new check is not quite correct, because remote_get() never returns
NULL if a name is given. This leaves us with the somewhat cryptic error
message "error: Could not remove config section 'remote.test'", if we
are trying to remove a remote that does not exist, or a similar error if
we try to rename a remote.
Use the remote_is_configured() function to check whether the remote
actually exists, and die with a more sensible error message ("No such
remote: $remotename") instead if it doesn't.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}"
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Expanding `insteadOf` is a part of ls-remote --url and there is no way
to expand `pushInsteadOf` as well. Add a get-url subcommand to be able
to query both as well as a way to get all configured urls.
Signed-off-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These are all cases where we do a setup step of the form:
for i in $foo; do
set_up $i || break
done &&
more_setup
would not notice a failure in set_up (because break always
returns a 0 exit code). These are just setup steps that we
do not expect to fail, but it does not hurt to be defensive.
Most can be fixed by converting the "break" to a "return 1"
(since we eval our tests inside a function for just this
purpose). A few of the loops are inside subshells, so we can
use just "exit 1" to break out of the subshell. And a few
can actually be made shorter by just unrolling the loop.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By doing this, clients of upload-pack can now reliably tell what ref
a symbolic ref points at; the updated test in t5505 used to expect
failure due to the ambiguity and made sure we give diagnostics, but
we no longer need to be so pessimistic. Make sure we correctly learn
which branch HEAD points at from the other side instead.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When two or more branches point at the same commit and HEAD is
pointing at one of them, without the symref extension, there is no
way to remotely tell which one of these branches HEAD points at.
The test in question attempts to make sure that this situation is
diagnosed and results in a failure.
However, even if there _were_ a way to reliably tell which branch
the HEAD points at, "set-head --auto" would fail if there is no
remote tracking branch. Make sure that this test does not fail
for that "wrong" reason.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a typo ("remote remote-tracking") going back to the big cleanup
in 2010 (8b3f3f84 etc). Also, remove some more occurrences of
"tracking" and "remote tracking" in favor of "remote-tracking".
Signed-off-by: Michael Schubert <mschub@elegosoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extend the test "migrate a remote from named file in $GIT_DIR/remotes"
to test that multiple "Push:" and "Pull:" lines in the remotes-file
works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add one more test similar to "migrate a remote from named file in
$GIT_DIR/branches" to check that a url with a # can be used to specify
the branch name (as opposed to the constant "master").
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace instances of ! test -f with test_path_is_missing.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test "migrate a remote from named file in $GIT_DIR/branches" reads
the branches-file, but only checks that the url and fetch-refspec are
set correctly. Check that the push-refspec is also set correctly.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Modernize the style of all tests throughout the file:
- Remove spurious blank lines.
- Indent the test body.
- Make sure that all lines end with &&, to make it easier to spot
breaks in the chain.
- When executing something in a subshell, put the parenthesis on
separate lines and indent the body. Also make sure that the
first statement in the subshell is a 'cd'.
- When redirecting input or output, do not use SP between
redirection operator and the target filename.
- Use the <<-\EOF and <<-EOF forms of heredoc, not <<EOF, when the
command is indented and the heredoc text itself does not have to
have a leading tab.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/remote-tighten-commandline-parsing:
remote: 'show' and 'prune' can take more than one remote
remote: check for superfluous arguments in 'git remote add'
remote: add a test for extra arguments, according to docs
The 'git remote show' and 'prune' subcommands are documented as taking
only a single remote name argument, but that is not the case; they
will simply iterate the action over all remotes given. Update the
documentation and tests to match.
With the last user of the -f flag gone, we also remove the code
supporting it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'git remote add' subcommand did not check for superfluous command
line arguments. Make it so.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This adds one test or comment for each subcommand of git-remote
according to its current documentation. All but 'set-branches' and
'update' are listed as taking only a fixed number of arguments; for
those we can write a test with one more (bogus) argument, and see if
the command notices that.
They fail on several counts: 'add' does not check for extra arguments,
and 'show' and 'prune' actually iterate over remotes (i.e., take any
number of args). We'll fix them in the next two patches.
The -f machinery is only there to make the tests readable while still
ensuring they pass as a whole, and will be removed in the final patch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All remote subcommands are spelled out words except 'rm'. 'rm', being a
popular UNIX command name, may mislead users that there are also 'ls' or
'mv'. Use 'remove' to fit with the rest of subcommands.
'rm' is still supported and used in the test suite. It's just not
widely advertised.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-remote.
This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10-233-gbb16d5:
bb16d5 i18n: remote: mark strings for translation
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git remote rename' will only update the remote's fetch refspec if it
looks like a default one. If the remote has no default fetch refspec,
as in
[remote "origin"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/upstream/*
we would not update the fetch refspec and even if there is a ref
called "refs/remotes/origin/master", we should not rename it, since it
was not created by fetching from the remote.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When renaming a remote called 'o' using 'git remote rename o foo', git
should also rename any remote-tracking branches for the remote. This
does happen, but any remote-tracking branches starting with
'refs/remotes/o', such as 'refs/remotes/origin/bar', will also be
renamed (to 'refs/remotes/foorigin/bar' in this case).
Fix it by simply matching one more character, up to the slash
following the remote name.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When renaming a remote whose name is contained in a configured fetch
refspec for that remote, we currently replace the first occurrence of
the remote name in the refspec. This is correct in most cases, but
breaks if the remote name occurs in the fetch refspec before the
expected place. For example, we currently change
[remote "remote"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/remote/*
into
[remote "origin"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/origins/remote/*
Reduce the risk of changing incorrect sections of the refspec by
matching the entire ":refs/remotes/<name>/" instead of just "<name>".
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 13fc2c1 (remote: disallow some nonsensical option
combinations, 2011-03-30) made it impossible to use "remote
add -t foo --mirror". The argument was that specifying
specific branches is useless because:
1. Push mirrors do not want a refspec at all.
2. The point of fetch mirroring is to use a broad refspec
like "refs/*", but using "-t" overrides that.
Point (1) is valid; "-t" with push mirrors is useless. But
point (2) ignored another side effect of using --mirror: it
fetches the refs directly into the refs/ namespace as they
are found upstream, instead of placing them in a
separate-remote layout.
So 13fc2c1 was overly constrictive, and disallowed
reasonable specific-branch mirroring, like:
git remote add -t heads/foo -t heads/bar --mirror=fetch
which makes the local "foo" and "bar" branches direct
mirrors of the remote, but does not fetch anything else.
This patch restores the original behavior, but only for
fetch mirrors.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-remote currently has one option, "--mirror", which sets
up mirror configuration which can be used for either
fetching or pushing. It looks like this:
[remote "mirror"]
url = wherever
fetch = +refs/*:refs/*
mirror = true
However, a remote like this can be dangerous and confusing.
Specifically:
1. If you issue the wrong command, it can be devastating.
You are not likely to "push" when you meant to "fetch",
but "git remote update" will try to fetch it, even if
you intended the remote only for pushing. In either
case, the results can be quite destructive. An
unintended push will overwrite or delete remote refs,
and an unintended fetch can overwrite local branches.
2. The tracking setup code can produce confusing results.
The fetch refspec above means that "git checkout -b new
master" will consider refs/heads/master to come from
the remote "mirror", even if you only ever intend to
push to the mirror. It will set up the "new" branch to
track mirror's refs/heads/master.
3. The push code tries to opportunistically update
tracking branches. If you "git push mirror foo:bar",
it will see that we are updating mirror's
refs/heads/bar, which corresponds to our local
refs/heads/bar, and will update our local branch.
To solve this, we split the concept into "push mirrors" and
"fetch mirrors". Push mirrors set only remote.*.mirror,
solving (2) and (3), and making an accidental fetch write
only into FETCH_HEAD. Fetch mirrors set only the fetch
refspec, meaning an accidental push will not force-overwrite
or delete refs on the remote end.
The new syntax is "--mirror=<fetch|push>". For
compatibility, we keep "--mirror" as-is, setting up both
types simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
(Just like we did for documentation already)
In the process, we change "non-remote branch" to "branch outside the
refs/remotes/ hierarchy" to avoid the ugly "non-remote-tracking branch".
The new formulation actually corresponds to how the code detects this
case (i.e. prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes")).
Also, we use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages (by
merge an fmt-merge-msg).
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add ‘git remote set-branches’ for changing the list of tracked refs
for a remote repository with one "porcelain-level" command. This
complements the longstanding ‘git remote add --track’ option.
The interface is based on the ‘git remote set-url’ subcommand.
git remote set-branches base --add C
git remote set-branches base A B D
git remote set-branches base --delete D; # not implemented
Suggested-by: martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add '--[no-]tags' options to 'git remote add' which add the
'remote.REMOTE.tagopt = --[no-]tags' to the configuration file.
This mimics the "--tags" and "--no-tags" options of "git fetch".
Signed-off-by: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test is supposed to check that git-remote correctly refuses to delete
all URLS for the specified remote which match the '.*' regular expression.
Since the '*' was not protected, it was interpreted by the shell as a file
glob and expanded before being passed to git-remote. The call to
git-remote still exited non-zero in this case, and the overall test still
passed, but it exited non-zero because git-remote was passed the incorrect
number of arguments, not for the reason it was supposed to fail.
Correct the test by escaping the '*'.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Brandon Casey noticed that t5505 had accidentally broken its && chain,
hiding inconsistency between the code that writes the warning to the
standard output and the test that expects to see the warning on the
standard error, which was introduced by f8948e2 (remote prune: warn
dangling symrefs, 2009-02-08).
It turns out that the issue is deeper than that. After f8948e2, a symref
that is dangling is marked with a NULL sha1, and the idea of using NULL
sha1 to mean a deleted ref was scrapped, but somehow a follow-up eafb452
(do_one_ref(): null_sha1 check is not about broken ref, 2009-07-22)
incorrectly reorganized do_one_ref(), still thinking NULL sha1 is never
used in the code.
Fix this by:
- adopt Brandon's fix to t5505 test;
- introduce REF_BROKEN flag to mark a ref that fails to resolve (dangling
symref);
- move the check for broken ref back inside the "if we are skipping
dangling refs" code block.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add 'git remote set-url' for changing URL of remote repository with
one "porcelain-level" command.
Signed-off-by: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Starting from commit 8db35596, "git remote update" (with no
group name given) will fail with the following message if
remotes.default has been set in the config file:
fatal: 'default' does not appear to be a git repository
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
The problem is that the --multiple option is not passed to
"git fetch" if no remote or group name is given on the command
line. Fix the problem by always passing the --multiple
option to "git fetch" (which actually simplifies the code).
Reported-by: YONETANI Tomokazu
Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bg/fetch-multi:
Re-implement 'git remote update' using 'git fetch'
builtin-fetch: add --dry-run option
builtin-fetch: add --prune option
teach warn_dangling_symref to take a FILE argument
remote: refactor some logic into get_stale_heads()
Add missing test for 'git remote update --prune'
Add the configuration option skipFetchAll
Teach the --multiple option to 'git fetch'
Teach the --all option to 'git fetch'
Teach builtin remote to show push urls also when asked to
"show" a specific remote.
This improves upon the standard display mode: multiple specified "url"s
mean that the first one is for fetching, all are used for pushing. We
make this clearer now by displaying the first one prefixed with "Fetch
URL", and all "url"s (or, if present, all "pushurl"s) prefixed with
"Push URL".
Example with "one" having one url, "two" two urls, "three" one url and
one pushurl (URL part only):
* remote one
Fetch URL: hostone.com:/somepath/repoone.git
Push URL: hostone.com:/somepath/repoone.git
* remote two
Fetch URL: hosttwo.com:/somepath/repotwo.git
Push URL: hosttwo.com:/somepath/repotwo.git
Push URL: hosttwobackup.com:/somewheresafe/repotwo.git
* remote three
Fetch URL: http://hostthree.com/otherpath/repothree.git
Push URL: hostthree.com:/pathforpushes/repothree.git
Also, adjust t5505 accordingly and make it test for the new output.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In case of an empty list, the search for its tail caused a
NULL-pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Reported-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The existing output of "git remote show <remote>" with respect to push
ref specs is basically just to show the raw refspec. This patch teaches
the command to interpret the refspecs and show how each branch will be
pushed to the destination. The output gives the user an idea of what
"git push" should do if it is run w/o any arguments.
Example new output:
1a. Typical output with no push refspec (i.e. matching branches only)
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
[...]
Local refs configured for 'git push':
master pushes to master (up to date)
next pushes to next (local out of date)
1b. Same as above, w/o querying the remote:
$ git remote show origin -n
* remote origin
[...]
Local ref configured for 'git push' (status not queried):
(matching) pushes to (matching)
2a. With a forcing refspec (+), and a new topic
(something like push = refs/heads/*:refs/heads/*):
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
[...]
Local refs configured for 'git push':
master pushes to master (fast forwardable)
new-topic pushes to new-topic (create)
next pushes to next (local out of date)
pu forces to pu (up to date)
2b. Same as above, w/o querying the remote
$ git remote show origin -n
* remote origin
[...]
Local refs configured for 'git push' (status not queried):
master pushes to master
new-topic pushes to new-topic
next pushes to next
pu forces to pu
3. With a remote configured as a mirror:
* remote backup
[...]
Local refs will be mirrored by 'git push'
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
