When asking "git log -g --all", clearly you want to see only those refs
that do have reflogs, but you do not want it to fail, either.
So instead of die()ing, complain about it, but move on to the other refs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since "git log origin/master" uses dwim_log() to match
"refs/remotes/origin/master", it makes sense to do that for
"git log --reflog", too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If you say "git log -g --relative-date", it is very likely that
you want to see the reflog names in terms of a relative date.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In the context of reflog output the reflog message is more useful than
the commit message's first line. When relevant the reflog message
will contain that line anyway.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Do not allow uninteresting commits with --walk-reflogs, since it is
not clear what should be shown in these cases:
$ git log --walk-reflogs master..next
$ git log --walk-reflogs ^master
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
When called with "--walk-reflogs", as long as there are reflogs
available, the walker will take this information into account, rather
than the parent information in the commit object.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
