1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-01 14:57:52 +01:00
Commit graph

16 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dennis Kaarsemaker
171c646f8c worktree: allow the main brach of a bare repository to be checked out
In bare repositories, get_worktrees() still returns the main repository,
so git worktree list can show it. ignore it in find_shared_symref so we
can still check out the main branch.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net>
Acked-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-10-14 09:58:58 -07:00
Jordan DE GEA
1a450e2fd1 worktree: allow "-" short-hand for @{-1} in add command
Since `git worktree add` uses `git checkout` when `[<branch>]` is used,
and `git checkout -` is already supported, it makes sense to allow the
same shortcut in `git worktree add`.

Signed-off-by: Jordan DE GEA <jordan.de-gea@grenoble-inp.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-31 12:28:25 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
14ace5b77b branch: do not rename a branch under bisect or rebase
The branch name in that case could be saved in rebase's head_name or
bisect's BISECT_START files. Ideally we should try to update them as
well. But it's trickier (*). Let's play safe and see if the user
complains about inconveniences before doing that.

(*) If we do it, bisect and rebase need to provide an API to rename
branches. We can't do it in worktree.c or builtin/branch.c because
when other people change rebase/bisect code, they may not be aware of
this code and accidentally break it (e.g. rename the branch file, or
refer to the branch in new files). It's a lot more work.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-22 14:09:39 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
04a3dfb8b5 worktree.c: check whether branch is bisected in another worktree
Similar to the rebase case, we want to detect if "HEAD" in some worktree
is being bisected because

1) we do not want to checkout this branch in another worktree, after
   bisect is done it will want to go back to this branch

2) we do not want to delete the branch is either or git bisect will
   fail to return to the (long gone) branch

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-22 14:09:39 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
8d9fdd7087 worktree.c: check whether branch is rebased in another worktree
This function find_shared_symref() is used in a couple places:

1) in builtin/branch.c: it's used to detect if a branch is checked out
   elsewhere and refuse to delete the branch.

2) in builtin/notes.c: it's used to detect if a note is being merged in
   another worktree

3) in branch.c, the function die_if_checked_out() is actually used by
   "git checkout" and "git worktree add" to see if a branch is already
   checked out elsewhere and refuse the operation.

In cases 1 and 3, if a rebase is ongoing, "HEAD" will be in detached
mode, find_shared_symref() fails to detect it and declares "no branch is
checked out here", which is not really what we want.

This patch tightens the test. If the given symref is "HEAD", we try to
detect if rebase is ongoing. If so return the branch being rebased. This
makes checkout and branch delete operations safer because you can't
checkout a branch being rebased in another place, or delete it.

Special case for checkout. If the current branch is being rebased,
git-rebase.sh may use "git checkout" to abort and return back to the
original branch. The updated test in find_shared_symref() will prevent
that and "git rebase --abort" will fail as a result.
find_shared_symref() and die_if_checked_out() have to learn a new
option ignore_current_worktree to loosen the test a bit.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-22 14:09:38 -07:00
Ray Zhang
ef2a0ac9a0 worktree: add: introduce --checkout option
By adding this option which defaults to true, we can use the
corresponding --no-checkout to make some customizations before
the checkout, like sparse checkout, etc.

Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Ray Zhang <zhanglei002@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-03-29 11:12:36 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
beb6f24bee worktree add -B: do the checkout test before update branch
If --force is not given but -B is, we should not proceed if the given
branch is already checked out elsewhere. add_worktree() has this test,
but it kicks in too late when "git branch --force" is already
executed. As a result, even though we correctly refuse to create a new
worktree, we have already updated the branch and mess up the other
checkout.

Repeat the die_if_checked_out() test again for this specific case before
"git branch" runs.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-15 15:54:13 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
0ebf4a2af3 worktree: fix "add -B"
Current code does not update "symref" when -B is used. This string
contains the new HEAD. Because it's empty "git worktree add -B" fails at
symbolic-ref step.

Because branch creation is already done before calling add_worktree(),
-B is equivalent to -b from add_worktree() point of view. We do not need
the special case for -B.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-15 15:49:33 -08:00
Elia Pinto
697b90d7e6 t/t2025-worktree-add.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.

The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX.  However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly.  In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.

The patch was generated by:

for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
	perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg'  "${_f}"
done

and then carefully proof-read.

Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-27 15:44:49 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
744e469755 clone: allow --local from a linked checkout
Noticed-by: Bjørnar Snoksrud <snoksrud@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-09-28 10:46:35 -07:00
Eric Sunshine
5c942570fe worktree: add: suppress auto-vivication with --detach and no <branch>
Fix oversight where branch auto-vivication incorrectly kicks in when
--detach is specified and <branch> omitted. Instead, treat:

    git worktree add --detach <path>

as shorthand for:

    git worktree add --detach <path> HEAD

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-20 11:29:51 -07:00
Eric Sunshine
ab0b2c53ed worktree: make --detach mutually exclusive with -b/-B
Be consistent with git-checkout which disallows this (not particularly
meaningful) combination.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-20 11:29:24 -07:00
Eric Sunshine
746bbdc64f checkout: teach check_linked_checkout() about symbolic link HEAD
check_linked_checkout() only understands symref-style HEAD (i.e. "ref:
refs/heads/master"), however, HEAD may also be a an actual symbolic link
(on platforms which support it). To accurately detect if a branch is
checked out elsewhere, it needs to handle symbolic link HEAD, as well.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-20 11:29:24 -07:00
Eric Sunshine
1eb07d829f worktree: add: auto-vivify new branch when <branch> is omitted
As a convenience, when <branch> is omitted from "git worktree <path>
<branch>" and neither -b nor -B is used, automatically create a new
branch named after <path>, as if "-b $(basename <path>)" was specified.
Thus, "git worktree add ../hotfix" creates a new branch named "hotfix"
and associates it with new worktree "../hotfix".

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-07 14:34:32 -07:00
Eric Sunshine
0f4af3b9ea worktree: add: make -b/-B default to HEAD when <branch> is omitted
As a convenience, like "git branch" and "git checkout -b", make
"git worktree add -b <newbranch> <path> <branch>" default to HEAD when
<branch> is omitted.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-06 11:07:48 -07:00
Eric Sunshine
f194b1ef6e tests: worktree: retrofit "checkout --to" tests for "worktree add"
With the introduction of "git worktree add", "git checkout --to" is
slated for removal. Therefore, retrofit linked worktree creation tests
to use "git worktree add" instead.

(The test to check exclusivity of "checkout --to" and "checkout <paths>"
is dropped altogether since it becomes meaningless with retirement of
"checkout --to".)

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-06 11:07:47 -07:00
Renamed from t/t2025-checkout-to.sh (Browse further)