Teaches 'git commit --amend' to copy notes. The catch is that this
must also be guarded by --no-post-rewrite, which we use to prevent
--amend from copying notes during a rebase -i 'edit'/'reword'.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/warn-author-committer-after-commit:
user_ident_sufficiently_given(): refactor the logic to be usable from elsewhere
commit.c::print_summary: do not release the format string too early
commit: allow suppression of implicit identity advice
commit: show interesting ident information in summary
strbuf: add strbuf_addbuf_percentquote
strbuf_expand: convert "%%" to "%"
Conflicts:
builtin-commit.c
ident.c
There are a few cases of user identity information that we consider
interesting:
(1) When the author and committer identities do not match.
(2) When the committer identity was picked automatically from the
username, hostname and GECOS information.
In these cases, we already show the information in the commit
message template. However, users do not always see that template
because they might use "-m" or "-F". With this patch, we show these
interesting cases after the commit, along with the subject and
change summary. The new output looks like:
$ git commit \
-m "federalist papers" \
--author='Publius <alexander@hamilton.com>'
[master 3d226a7] federalist papers
Author: Publius <alexander@hamilton.com>
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
for case (1), and:
$ git config --global --unset user.name
$ git config --global --unset user.email
$ git commit -m foo
[master 7c2a927] foo
Committer: Jeff King <peff@c-71-185-130-222.hsd1.va.comcast.net>
Your name and email address were configured automatically based
on your username and hostname. Please check that they are accurate.
You can suppress this message by setting them explicitly:
git config --global user.name Your Name
git config --global user.email you@example.com
If the identity used for this commit is wrong, you can fix it with:
git commit --amend --author='Your Name <you@example.com>'
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
for case (2).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is like --author: allow a user to specify a given date without
using the GIT_AUTHOR_DATE environment variable.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refuse to use $VISUAL and fall back to $EDITOR if TERM is unset
or set to "dumb". Traditionally, VISUAL is set to a screen
editor and EDITOR to a line-based editor, which should be more
useful in that situation.
vim, for example, is happy to assume a terminal supports ANSI
sequences even if TERM is dumb (e.g., when running from a text
editor like Acme). git already refuses to fall back to vi on a
dumb terminal if GIT_EDITOR, core.editor, VISUAL, and EDITOR are
unset, but without this patch, that check is suppressed by
VISUAL=vi.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git commit -s' will insert a blank line before the Signed-off-by
line at the end of the message, unless this last line is a
Signed-off-by line itself. Common use has other trailing lines
at the ends of commit text, in the style of RFC2822 headers.
Be more generous in considering lines to be part of this footer.
If the last paragraph of the commit message reasonably resembles
RFC-2822 formatted lines, don't insert that blank line.
The new Signed-off-by line is still only suppressed when the
author's existing Signed-off-by is the last line of the message.
Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These scripts all test git programs that are written in
perl, and thus obviously won't work if NO_PERL is defined.
We pass NO_PERL to the scripts from the building Makefile
via the GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS file.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--signoff" test case in t7500-commit.sh was setting VISUAL while
using -F -, which indeed tested that the editor is not spawned with -F.
However, having it there was confusing, since there was no obvious reason
to the casual reader for it to be there.
This commits removes the setting of VISUAL from the --signoff test, and
adds in t7501-commit.sh a dedicated test case, where the rest of tests for
-F are.
Signed-off-by: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>
Okay-then-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This should make the output more readable (by default using diff -u)
when some tests fail.
Also changed the diff order from "current expected" to "expected
current".
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".
This is useful to
- make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
e.g. SIGSEGV, and
- advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bd/tests:
Rename the test trash directory to contain spaces.
Fix tests breaking when checkout path contains shell metacharacters
Don't use the 'export NAME=value' in the test scripts.
lib-git-svn.sh: Fix quoting issues with paths containing shell metacharacters
test-lib.sh: Fix some missing path quoting
Use test_set_editor in t9001-send-email.sh
test-lib.sh: Add a test_set_editor function to safely set $VISUAL
git-send-email.perl: Handle shell metacharacters in $EDITOR properly
config.c: Escape backslashes in section names properly
git-rebase.sh: Fix --merge --abort failures when path contains whitespace
Conflicts:
t/t9115-git-svn-dcommit-funky-renames.sh
On some shells (notably /bin/sh on FreeBSD 6.1), the
construct
foo && ! bar | baz
is true if
foo && baz
whereas for most other shells (such as bash) is true if
foo && ! baz
We can work around this by specifying
foo && ! (bar | baz)
which works everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This fixes the remainder of the issues where the test script itself is at
fault for failing when the git checkout path contains whitespace or other
shell metacharacters.
The majority of git svn tests used the idiom
test_expect_success "title" "test script using $svnrepo"
These were changed to have the test script in single-quotes:
test_expect_success "title" 'test script using "$svnrepo"'
which unfortunately makes the patch appear larger than it really is.
One consequence of this change is that in the verbose test output the
value of $svnrepo (and in some cases other variables, too) is no
longer expanded, i.e. previously we saw
* expecting success:
test script using /path/to/git/t/trash/svnrepo
but now it is:
* expecting success:
test script using "$svnrepo"
Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many scripts compare actual and expected output using
"diff -u". This is nicer than "cmp" because the output shows
how the two differ. However, not all versions of diff
understand -u, leading to unnecessary test failure.
This adds a test_cmp function to the test scripts and
switches all "diff -u" invocations to use it. The function
uses the contents of "$GIT_TEST_CMP" to compare its
arguments; the default is "diff -u".
On systems with a less-capable diff, you can do:
GIT_TEST_CMP=cmp make test
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The scripted version might not have handled this correctly
either, but the version rewritten in C definitely does not grok
this and complains $tag is not a commit object.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:
test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
what is to be tested
'
And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.
This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:
test_expect_success 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
! this command should fail
'
test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:
test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
rm -f bar &&
git foo &&
test -f bar
'
This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After tentatively applying a patch from a contributor, you can get a
replacement patch with corrected code and unusable commit log message.
In such a case, this sequence ought to give you an editor based on the
message in the earlier commit, to let you describe an incremental
improvement:
git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# discard the earlier one
git am <corrected-patch
git commit --amend -c HEAD@{1}
Unfortunately, --amend insisted reusing the message from the commit
being amended, ignoring the -c option. This corrects it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As desired, these pass for git-commit.sh, fail for builtin-commit (prior
to the fixes), and succeeded for builtin-commit (after the fixes).
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* kh/commit: (33 commits)
git-commit --allow-empty
git-commit: Allow to amend a merge commit that does not change the tree
quote_path: fix collapsing of relative paths
Make git status usage say git status instead of git commit
Fix --signoff in builtin-commit differently.
git-commit: clean up die messages
Do not generate full commit log message if it is not going to be used
Remove git-status from list of scripts as it is builtin
Fix off-by-one error when truncating the diff out of the commit message.
builtin-commit.c: export GIT_INDEX_FILE for launch_editor as well.
Add a few more tests for git-commit
builtin-commit: Include the diff in the commit message when verbose.
builtin-commit: fix partial-commit support
Fix add_files_to_cache() to take pathspec, not user specified list of files
Export three helper functions from ls-files
builtin-commit: run commit-msg hook with correct message file
builtin-commit: do not color status output shown in the message template
file_exists(): dangling symlinks do exist
Replace "runstatus" with "status" in the tests
t7501-commit: Add test for git commit <file> with dirty index.
...
It does not usually make sense to record a commit that has the exact
same tree as its sole parent commit and that is why git-commit prevents
you from making such a mistake, but when data from foreign scm is
involved, it is a different story. We are equipped to represent such an
(perhaps insane, perhaps by mistake, or perhaps done on purpose) empty
change, and it is better to represent it bypassing the safety valve for
native use.
This is primarily for use by foreign scm interface scripts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Normally, it should not be allowed to generate an empty commit. A merge
commit generated with git 'merge -s ours' does not change the tree (along
the first parent), but merges are not "empty" even if they do not change
the tree. Hence, commit 8588452ceb allowed to amend a merge commit that
does not change the tree, but 4fb5fd5d30 disallowed it again in an
attempt to avoid that an existing commit is amended such that it becomes
empty. With this change, a commit can be edited (create a new one or amend
an existing one) either if there are changes or if there are at least two
parents.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* js/mingw-fallouts:
fetch-pack: Prepare for a side-band demultiplexer in a thread.
rehabilitate some t5302 tests on 32-bit off_t machines
Allow ETC_GITCONFIG to be a relative path.
Introduce git_etc_gitconfig() that encapsulates access of ETC_GITCONFIG.
Allow a relative builtin template directory.
Close files opened by lock_file() before unlinking.
builtin run_command: do not exit with -1.
Move #include <sys/select.h> and <sys/ioctl.h> to git-compat-util.h.
Use is_absolute_path() in sha1_file.c.
Skip t3902-quoted.sh if the file system does not support funny names.
t5302-pack-index: Skip tests of 64-bit offsets if necessary.
t7501-commit.sh: Not all seds understand option -i
t5300-pack-object.sh: Split the big verify-pack test into smaller parts.
* bs/maint-commit-options:
git-commit: Add tests for invalid usage of -a/--interactive with paths
git-commit.sh: Fix usage checks regarding paths given when they do not make sense
git-commit was/is broken in that it accepts paths together with -a or
--interactive, which it shouldn't. There tests check those usage errors.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because a partial commit is meant to be a way to ignore what are
staged in the index, "git rm --cached A && git commit A" should
just record what is in A on the filesystem. The previous patch
made the command sequence to barf, saying that A has not been
added yet. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When making a partial commit, git-commit uses git-ls-files with
the --error-unmatch option to expand and sanity check the user
supplied path patterns. When any path pattern does not match
with the paths known to the index, it errors out, in order to
catch a common mistake to say "git commit Makefiel cache.h"
and end up with a commit that touches only cache.h (notice the
misspelled "Makefile"). This detection however does not work
well when the path has already been removed from the index.
If you drop a path from the index and try to commit that
partially, i.e.
$ git rm COPYING
$ git commit -m 'Remove COPYING' COPYING
the command complains because git does not know anything about
COPYING anymore.
This introduces a new option --with-tree to git-ls-files and
uses it in git-commit when we build a temporary index to
write a tree object for the partial commit.
When --with-tree=<tree-ish> option is specified, names from the
given tree are added to the set of names the index knows about,
so we can treat COPYING file in the example as known.
Of course, there is no reason to use "git rm" and git-aware
people have long time done:
$ rm COPYING
$ git commit -m 'Remove COPYING' COPYING
which works just fine. But this caused a constant confusion.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because a partial commit is meant to be a way to ignore what are
staged in the index, "git rm --cached A && git commit A" should
just record what is in A on the filesystem. The previous patch
made the command sequence to barf, saying that A has not been
added yet. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When making a partial commit, git-commit uses git-ls-files with
the --error-unmatch option to expand and sanity check the user
supplied path patterns. When any path pattern does not match
with the paths known to the index, it errors out, in order to
catch a common mistake to say "git commit Makefiel cache.h"
and end up with a commit that touches only cache.h (notice the
misspelled "Makefile"). This detection however does not work
well when the path has already been removed from the index.
If you drop a path from the index and try to commit that
partially, i.e.
$ git rm COPYING
$ git commit -m 'Remove COPYING' COPYING
the command complains because git does not know anything about
COPYING anymore.
This introduces a new option --with-tree to git-ls-files and
uses it in git-commit when we build a temporary index to
write a tree object for the partial commit.
When --with-tree=<tree-ish> option is specified, names from the
given tree are added to the set of names the index knows about,
so we can treat COPYING file in the example as known.
Of course, there is no reason to use "git rm" and git-aware
people have long time done:
$ rm COPYING
$ git commit -m 'Remove COPYING' COPYING
which works just fine. But this caused a constant confusion.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
[jc: adjusted t/t7501 as this makes -F and --amend compatible]
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
