Untracked content in the working tree may prevent rebase -i from checking out
the new base onto which it wants to replay commits, if the new base commit
includes files at those (now untracked) paths. Currently, rebase -i dies
uncleanly in this situation, updating ORIG_HEAD and leaving a useless
.git/rebase-merge directory, with which the user can do nothing useful except
rebase --abort. Make rebase -i abort the procedure itself instead, as
non-interactive rebase already does, and add a test for this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Ian Ward Comfort <icomfort@stanford.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If you do a "rebase -i" and don't change any commits,
nothing is rewritten, and we have no REWRITTEN_LIST. The
shell prints out an ugly message:
$ GIT_EDITOR=true git rebase -i HEAD^
/path/to/git-rebase--interactive: 1: cannot open
/path/to/repo/.git/rebase-merge/rewritten-list: No such file
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/master.
We can fix it by not running "notes copy" at all if nothing
was rewritten.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* cc/cherry-pick-ff:
revert: fix tiny memory leak in cherry-pick --ff
rebase -i: use new --ff cherry-pick option
Documentation: describe new cherry-pick --ff option
cherry-pick: add tests for new --ff option
revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking
builtin/merge: make checkout_fast_forward() non static
parse-options: add parse_options_concat() to concat options
The post-rewrite support, in the form of the call to
'record_in_rewritten', was hidden in the arm where we have to record a
new commit for the user. This meant that it was never invoked in the
case where the user has already amended the commit by herself.
[The test is designed to exercise both arms of the 'if' in question.]
Furthermore, recording the stopped-sha (the SHA1 of the commit before
the editing) suffered from a cut&paste error from die_with_patch and
used the wrong variable, hence it never recorded anything.
Noticed by Junio.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/notes-display:
git-notes(1): add a section about the meaning of history
notes: track whether notes_trees were changed at all
notes: add shorthand --ref to override GIT_NOTES_REF
commit --amend: copy notes to the new commit
rebase: support automatic notes copying
notes: implement helpers needed for note copying during rewrite
notes: implement 'git notes copy --stdin'
rebase -i: invoke post-rewrite hook
rebase: invoke post-rewrite hook
commit --amend: invoke post-rewrite hook
Documentation: document post-rewrite hook
Support showing notes from more than one notes tree
test-lib: unset GIT_NOTES_REF to stop it from influencing tests
Conflicts:
git-am.sh
refs.c
For git-rebase.sh, --no-ff is a synonym for --force-rebase.
For git-rebase--interactive.sh, --no-ff cherry-picks all the commits in
the rebased branch, instead of fast-forwarding over any unchanged commits.
--no-ff offers an alternative way to deal with reverted merges. Instead of
"reverting the revert" you can use "rebase --no-ff" to recreate the branch
with entirely new commits (they're new because at the very least the
committer time is different). This obviates the need to revert the
reversion, as you can re-merge the new topic branch directly. Added an
addendum to revert-a-faulty-merge.txt describing the situation and how to
use --no-ff to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git rebase allows you to specify a non-branch commit-ish as the "branch"
argument, which leaves HEAD detached when it's finished. This is
occasionally useful, and this patch brings the same functionality to git
rebase --interactive.
Signed-off-by: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Luckily, all the support already happens to be there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Aside from the same issue that rebase also has (remembering the
original commit across a conflict resolution), rebase -i brings an
extra twist: We need to defer writing the rewritten list in the case
of {squash,fixup} because their rewritten result should be the last
commit in the squashed group.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The rough structure of run_rewrite_hook() comes from
run_receive_hook() in receive-pack.
We introduce a --no-post-rewrite option and use it to avoid the hook
when called from git-rebase -i 'edit'. The next patch will add full
support in git-rebase, and we only want to invoke the hook once.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Bash (4.0.24) on OpenBSD 4.6 refuses to run this snippet:
$ cat gomi.sh
#!/bin/sh
one="/var/tmp/1 1"
rm -f /var/tmp/1 "/var/tmp/1 1"
echo hello >$one
$ sh gomi.sh; ls /var/tmp/1*
/var/tmp/1 1
$ bash gomi.sh; ls /var/tmp/1*
gomi.sh: line 4: $one: ambiguous redirect
ls: /var/tmp/1*: No such file or directory
Every competent shell programmer knows that a <$word in redirection is not
subject to field splitting (POSIX.1 "2.7 Redirection" explicitly lists the
kind of expansion performed: "... the word that follows the redirection
operator shall be subjected to ...", and "Field Splitting" is not among
them).
Some clueless folks apparently decided that users need to be protected in
the name of "security", however.
Output from "git grep -e '> *\$' -- '*.sh'" indicates that rebase-i
suffers from this bogus "safety". Work it around by surrounding the
variable reference with a dq pair.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using a dollar sign in double quotes isn't portable. Escape them with
a backslash or replace the double quotes with single quotes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no point doing self-assignments of these variables. Instead,
just export them to the environment, but do so in a sub-shell, because
VAR1=VAL1 VAR2=VAL2 ... command arg1 arg2...
does not mark the variables exported if command that is run
is a shell function, according to POSIX.1.
The callers of do_with_author do not rely on seeing the effect of any
shell variable assignments that may happen inside what was called through
this shell function (currently "output" is the only one), so running it in
the subshell doesn't have an adverse semantic effect.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* mh/rebase-fixup:
rebase -i: Retain user-edited commit messages after squash/fixup conflicts
t3404: Set up more of the test repo in the "setup" step
rebase -i: For fixup commands without squashes, do not start editor
rebase -i: Change function make_squash_message into update_squash_message
rebase -i: Extract function do_with_author
rebase -i: Handle the author script all in one place in do_next
rebase -i: Extract a function "commit_message"
rebase -i: Simplify commit counting for generated commit messages
rebase -i: Improve consistency of commit count in generated commit messages
t3404: Test the commit count in commit messages generated by "rebase -i"
rebase -i: Introduce a constant AMEND
rebase -i: Introduce a constant AUTHOR_SCRIPT
rebase -i: Document how temporary files are used
rebase -i: Use symbolic constant $MSG consistently
rebase -i: Use "test -n" instead of "test ! -z"
rebase -i: Inline expression
rebase -i: Remove dead code
rebase -i: Make the condition for an "if" more transparent
* 'mh/rebase-fixup' (early part):
rebase-i: Ignore comments and blank lines in peek_next_command
lib-rebase: Allow comments and blank lines to be added to the rebase script
lib-rebase: Provide clearer debugging info about what the editor did
Add a command "fixup" to rebase --interactive
t3404: Use test_commit to set up test repository
When a squash/fixup fails due to a conflict, the user is required to
edit the commit message. Previously, if further squash/fixup commands
followed the conflicting squash/fixup, this user-edited message was
discarded and a new automatically-generated commit message was
suggested.
Change the handling of conflicts within squash/fixup command series:
Whenever the user is required to intervene, consider the resulting
commit to be a new basis for the following squash/fixups and use its
commit message in later suggested combined commit messages.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the "rebase -i" commands include a series of fixup commands without
any squash commands, then commit the combined commit using the commit
message of the corresponding "pick" without starting up the
commit-message editor.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Alter the file $SQUASH_MSG in place rather than outputting the new
message then juggling it around. Change the function name
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Call it instead of repeating similar code blocks in several places.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This change has no practical effect but makes the code easier to
follow.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
...instead of repeating the same short but slightly obscure blob of
code in several places.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Read the old count from the first line of the old commit message
rather than counting the number of commit message blocks in the file.
This is simpler, faster, and more robust (e.g., it cannot be confused
by strange commit message contents).
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the numeral "2" instead of the word "two" when two commits are
being interactively squashed. This makes the treatment consistent
with that for higher numbers of commits.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a constant AMEND holding the filename of the $DOTEST/amend file,
and document how this temporary file is used.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a constant AUTHOR_SCRIPT, holding the filename of the
$DOTEST/author_script file, and document how this temporary file is
used.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add documentation, inferred by reverse-engineering, about how
git-rebase--interactive.sh uses many of its temporary files.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The filename constant $MSG was previously used in some places and
written out literally in others.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Inline expression when generating output rather than overwriting the
"sha1" local variable with a short SHA1.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This branch of the "if" is only executed if $no_ff is empty, which
only happens if $1 was not '-n'. (This code has been dead since
1d25c8cf82eead72e11287d574ef72d3ebec0db1.)
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test $no_ff separately rather than testing it indirectly by gluing it
onto a comparison of two SHA1s.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/checkout-merge-base:
rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax
rebase: fix --onto A...B parsing and add tests
"rebase --onto A...B" replays history on the merge base between A and B
"checkout A...B" switches to the merge base between A and B
Previously, blank lines and/or comments within a series of
squash/fixup commands would confuse "git rebase -i" into thinking that
the series was finished. It would therefore require the user to edit
the commit message for the squash/fixup commits seen so far. Then,
after continuing, it would ask the user to edit the commit message
again.
Ignore comments and blank lines within a group of squash/fixup
commands, allowing them to be processed in one go.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, blank lines and/or comments within a series of
squash/fixup commands would confuse "git rebase -i" into thinking that
the series was finished. It would therefore require the user to edit
the commit message for the squash/fixup commits seen so far. Then,
after continuing, it would ask the user to edit the commit message
again.
Ignore comments and blank lines within a group of squash/fixup
commands, allowing them to be processed in one go.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When rewriting commits on a topic branch, sometimes it is easier to
compare the version of commits before and after the rewrite if they are
based on the same commit that forked from the upstream. An earlier commit
by Junio (fixed up by the previous commit) gives "--onto A...B" syntax to
rebase command, and rebases on top of the merge base between A and B;
teach the same to the interactive version, too.
Signed-off-by: しらいし ななこ <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach a new option, --autosquash, to the interactive rebase.
When the commit log message begins with "!fixup ...", and there
is a commit whose title begins with the same ..., automatically
modify the todo list of rebase -i so that the commit marked for
squashing come right after the commit to be modified, and change
the action of the moved commit from pick to squash.
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
rebase -i: abort cleanly if the editor fails to launch
technical-docs: document hash API
api-strbuf.txt: fix typos and document launch_editor()
If the user's configured editor is emacsclient, the editor
will fail to launch if emacs is not running and the git
command that tried to lanuch the editor will abort. For most
commands, all you have to do is to start emacs and repeat
the command.
The "git rebase -i" command, however, aborts without cleaning
the "$GIT_DIR/rebase-merge" directory if it fails to launch the
editor, so you'll need to do "git rebase --abort" before
repeating the rebase command.
Change "git rebase -i" to terminate using "die_abort" (instead of
with "die") if the initial launch of the editor fails.
Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The command is like "squash", except that it discards the commit message
of the corresponding commit.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user has exported the GREP_OPTIONS environment variable, the output
from "grep" and "egrep" in scripted Porcelains may be different from what
they expect. For example, we may want to count number of matching lines,
by "grep" piped to "wc -l", and GREP_OPTIONS=-C3 will break such use.
The approach taken by this change to address this issue is to protect only
our own use of grep/egrep. Because we do not unset it at the beginning of
our scripts, hook scripts run from the scripted Porcelains are exposed to
the same insanity this environment variable causes when grep/egrep is used
to implement logic (e.g. "grep | wc -l"), and it is entirely up to the
hook scripts to protect themselves.
On the other hand, applypatch-msg hook may want to show offending words in
the proposed commit log message using grep to the end user, and the user
might want to set GREP_OPTIONS=--color to paint the match more visibly.
The approach to protect only our own use without unsetting the environment
variable globally will allow this use case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
help -a: do not unnecessarily look for a repository
Do not try to remove directories when removing old links
rebase -i: more graceful handling of invalid commands
help -i: properly error out if no info viewer can be found
Currently, when there is an invalid command, the rest of the line is
still treated as if the command had been valid, i.e. rebase -i attempts
to produce a patch, using the next argument as a SHA1 name. If there is
no next argument or an invalid one, very confusing error messages
appear (the line was '.'; path to git-rebase-todo substituted):
Unknown command: .
fatal: ambiguous argument 'Please fix this in the file $somefile.':
unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
fatal: Not a valid object name Please fix this in the file $somefile.
fatal: bad revision 'Please fix this in the file $somefile.'
Instead, verify the validity of the remaining line and error out earlier
if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't want to use output() on git-commit --amend when rewording the
commit message. This leads to confusion as the editor is run in a
subshell with it's output saved away, leaving the user with a seemingly
frozen terminal.
Fix by removing the output part.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make it easier to edit just the commit message for a commit
using 'git rebase -i' by introducing the "reword" command.
Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a rebase with --onto, the correct test for whether we can skip
rewriting a commit is if it is already on top of $ONTO, not $UPSTREAM.
Without --onto, this distinction does not exist and the behavior does
not change.
In a situation with two merged branches on a common base X:
X---o---o---o---M
\ /
x---x---x---x
Y
if we try to move the branches from their base on X to be based on Y,
so as to get
X
Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
\ /
x'--x'--x'--x'
then we fail. The command `git rebase -p --onto Y X M` moves only the
first-parent chain, like so:
X
\
x---x---x---x
\
Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
because it mistakenly drops the other branch(es) x---x---x---x from
the TODO file. This tests and fixes this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Greg Price <price@ksplice.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
it was introduced in 68a163c9b4
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jöhännës "Dschö" Schindëlin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When picking commits whose parents have not changed, we do not need to
rewrite the commit. We do not need to reset the working directory to
the parent's state, either.
Requested by Sverre Rabbelier.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Actually, I think the issue is pretty independent of submodules; when
"git commit" gets an empty parameter, it misinterprets it as a file.
So avoid passing an empty parameter to "git commit".
Actually, this is a nice cleanup, as MSG_FILE and EDIT_COMMIT were mutually
exclusive; use one variable instead
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
d911d14 (rebase -i: learn to rebase root commit, 2009-01-02) tried to
remember the --root flag across a merge conflict in a broken way.
Introduce a flag file $DOTEST/rebase-root to fix and clarify.
While at it, also make sure $UPSTREAM is always initialized to guard
against existing values in the environment.
[tr: added tests]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we are not rebasing with --root, then $# can only be either 1 (base)
or 2 (base and the name of the branch to be rebased).
If we are rebasing with --root, then it is Ok if $# is 0 (rebase the
current branch down to everything) or 1 (rebase the named branch down to
everything).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/rebase-root:
rebase: update documentation for --root
rebase -i: learn to rebase root commit
rebase: learn to rebase root commit
rebase -i: execute hook only after argument checking
Prior to that, if the user chose "squash" as a first action, the stderr
looked like:
grep: /home/madcoder/dev/scm/git/.git/rebase-merge/done: No such file or directory
Cannot 'squash' without a previous commit
Now the first line is gone.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach git-rebase -i a new option --root, which instructs it to rebase
the entire history leading up to <branch>. This is mainly for
symmetry with ordinary git-rebase; it cannot be used to edit the root
commit in-place (it requires --onto <newbase>). Commits that already
exist in <newbase> are skipped.
In the normal mode of operation, this is fairly straightforward. We
run cherry-pick in a loop, and cherry-pick has supported picking the
root commit since f95ebf7 (Allow cherry-picking root commits,
2008-07-04).
In --preserve-merges mode, we track the mapping from old to rewritten
commits and use it to update the parent list of each commit. In this
case, we define 'rebase -i -p --root --onto $onto $branch' to rewrite
the parent list of all root commit(s) on $branch to contain $onto
instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, the pre-rebase-hook would be launched before we knew if
the <upstream> [<branch>] arguments were supplied.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a merge that has a conflict was rebased, then rebase stopped to let
the user resolve the conflicts. However, thereafter --continue failed
because the author-script was not saved. (This is rebase -i's way to
preserve a commit's authorship.) This fixes it by doing taking the same
failure route after a merge that is also taken after a normal cherry-pick.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* sh/rebase-i-p:
git-rebase--interactive.sh: comparision with == is bashism
rebase-i-p: minimum fix to obvious issues
rebase-i-p: if todo was reordered use HEAD as the rewritten parent
rebase-i-p: do not include non-first-parent commits touching UPSTREAM
rebase-i-p: only list commits that require rewriting in todo
rebase-i-p: fix 'no squashing merges' tripping up non-merges
rebase-i-p: delay saving current-commit to REWRITTEN if squashing
rebase-i-p: use HEAD for updating the ref instead of mapping OLDHEAD
rebase-i-p: test to exclude commits from todo based on its parents
Jeff King noticed that this series uses non-portable ${var:0:7} syntax
to splice a string, which is not even in POSIX, in the script. A quick
look at around the offending part revealed a few issues, which this commit
fixes:
* Why filter output from "rev-list --left-right A...B" and look for the
ones that begin with ">"? Wouldn't "rev-list A..B" give that?
* The abbreviated SHA-1 are made with "rev-list --abbrev=7" into $TODO in
an earlier invocation, and it can be more than 7 letters to avoid
ambiguity. Not just that "${r:0:7} is not even in POSIX", but use of
it here is actively wrong.
* There is no point in catting a single file and piping it into grep.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This seems like the best guess we can make until git sequencer marks are
available. That being said, within the context of re-ordering a commit before
its parent in todo, I think applying it on top of the current commit seems like
a reasonable assumption of what the user intended.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This covers an odd boundary case found by Avi Kivity's script where a branch
coming off of UPSTREAM is merged into HEAD. Initially it show up in
UPSTREAM..HEAD, but technically UPSTREAM is not moving, the rest of head is, so
we should not need to rewrite the merge.
This adds a check saying we can keep `preserve=t` if `p=UPSTREAM`...unless this
is the first first-parent commit in our UPSTREAM..HEAD rev-list, which could
very well point to UPSTREAM, but we still need to consider it as rewritten so we
start pulling in the rest of the UPSTREAM..HEAD commits that point to it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is heavily based on Stephan Beyer's git sequencer rewrite of rebase-i-p.
Each commit is still found by rev-list UPSTREAM..HEAD, but a commit is only
included in todo if at least one its parents has been marked for rewriting.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also only check out the first parent if this commit if not a squash--if it is a
squash, we want to explicitly ignore the parent and leave the wc as is, as
cherry-pick will apply the squash on top of it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the current-commit was dumped to REWRITTEN, but then we squash the next
commit in to it, we have invalidated the HEAD was just written to REWRITTEN.
Instead, append the squash hash to current-commit and save both of them the next
time around.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If OLDHEAD was reordered in the todo, and its mapped NEWHEAD was used to set the
ref, commits reordered after OLDHEAD in the todo would should up as un-committed
changes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`rebase -i -p` got its rev-list of commits to keep by --left-right and
--cherry-pick. Adding --cherry-pick would drop commits that duplicated changes
already in the rebase target.
The dropped commits were then forgotten about when it came to rewriting the
parents of their descendents, so the descendents would get cherry-picked with
their old, unwritten parents and essentially make the rebase a no-op.
This commit adds a $DOTEST/dropped directory to remember dropped commits and
rewrite their children's parent as the dropped commit's possibly-rewritten
first-parent.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
In case there is no commit to apply (for example because you rebase to
upstream and all your local patches have been applied there), do not
fail. The non-interactive rebase already behaves that way.
Do this by introducing a new command, "noop", which is substituted for
an empty commit list, so that deleting the commit list can still abort
as before.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
It is sometimes desirable to disable the safety net of pre-rebase hook
when the user knows what he is doing (for example, when the original
changes on the branch have not been shown to the public yet).
This teaches --no-verify option to git-rebase, which is similar to the way
pre-commit hook is bypassed by git-commit.
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The original git-rebase honored pre-rebase hook so that public branches
can be protected from getting rebased, but rebase --interactive ignored
the hook entirely. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
One would expect that the prepare-commit-msg hook gets 'squash' as the
second argument when squashing commits with 'rebase -i'. However,
that was not the case, as it got 'merge' instead. This patch fixes
the problem.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
"git rebase --continue" issued after git rebase being stop by "edit"
command is trying to amend the last commit using stage changes. However,
if the last commit is not the commit that was marked as "edit" then it
can produce unexpected results.
For instance, after being stop by "edit", I have made some changes to
commit message using "git commit --amend". After that I realized that
I forgot to add some changes to some file. So, I said "git add file"
and the "git rebase --continue". Unfortunately, it caused that the new
commit message was lost.
Another problem is that after being stopped at "edit", the user adds new
commits. In this case, automatic amend behavior of git rebase triggered
by some stage changes causes that not only that the log message of the
last commit is lost but that it will contain also wrong Author and Date
information.
Therefore, this patch restrict automatic amend only to the situation
where HEAD is the commit at which git rebase stop by "edit" command.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If git rebase interactive is stopped by "edit" command and then the user
said "git rebase --continue" while having some stage changes, git rebase
interactive is trying to amend the last commit by doing:
git --soft reset && git commit
However, the user can abort commit for some reason by providing an empty
log message, and that would leave the last commit undone, while the user
being completely unaware about what happened. Now if the user tries to
continue, by issuing "git rebase --continue" that squashes two previous
commits.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The existing parent rewriting did not handle the case where a previous
commit was amended (via edit or squash). Fix by always putting the
new sha1 of the last commit into the $REWRITTEN map.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
'git rebase -i -p' forgot to update the index and working directory
during fast forwards. Fix this. Makes 'GIT_EDITOR=true rebase -i -p
<ancestor>' a no-op again.
Also, it attempted to do a fast forward even if it was instructed not
to commit (via -n). Fall back to the cherry-pick code path and let
that handle the issue for us.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
In a rebase session where more than one commit is to be 'edit'ed, and the
user spends considerable time to 'edit' a commit, it is easy to forget what
one wanted to 'edit' at the individual commits. It would be helpful to see
at which commit the rebase stopped.
Incidentally, if the rebase stopped due to merge conflicts or other errors,
the commit was already reported ("Could not apply $sha1..."), but when
rebase stopped after successfully applying an "edit" commit, it would not
mention it. With this change the commit is reported.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Start preparing 1.5.6.4 release notes
git fetch-pack: do not complain about "no common commits" in an empty repo
rebase-i: keep old parents when preserving merges
t7600-merge: Use test_expect_failure to test option parsing
Fix buffer overflow in prepare_attr_stack
Fix buffer overflow in git diff
Fix buffer overflow in git-grep
git-cvsserver: fix call to nonexistant cleanupWorkDir()
Documentation/git-cherry-pick.txt et al.: Fix misleading -n description
Conflicts:
RelNotes
When "rebase -i -p" tries to preserve merges of unrelated branches, it
lost some parents:
- When you have more than two parents, the commit in the new history
ends up with fewer than expected number of parents and this breakage
goes unnoticed;
- When you are rebasing a merge with two parents and one is lost, the
command tries to cherry-pick the original merge commit, and the command
fails.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since the files generated and used during a rebase are never to be
tracked, they should live in $GIT_DIR. While at it, avoid the rather
meaningless term "dotest" to "rebase", and unhide ".dotest-merge".
This was wished for on the mailing list, but so far unimplemented.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also add some checks that --continue/--abort/--skip
actions are used without --onto, -p, -t, etc.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"merge" and "reset" leave the original point in history in ORIG_HEAD,
which makes it easy to go back to where you were before you inflict a
major damage to your history and realize that you do not like the result
at all. These days with reflog, we technically do not need to use
ORIG_HEAD, but it is a handy way nevertheless.
This teaches "am" and "rebase" (all forms --- the vanilla one that uses
"am" as its backend, "-m" variant that cherry-picks, and "--interactive")
to do the same.
The original idea and a partial implementation to do this only for "rebase
-m" was by Brian Gernhardt; this extends on his idea.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git rebase -i already supports 'p', 'e' and 's' as aliases for 'pick',
'edit' and 'squash', but one could know it only by reading the source
code. If a user rebases a lot, it's quite handy, so mention these short
forms as well.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the upstream argument to rebase (the first argument) was relative to
HEAD and the name of the branch to rebase (the second argument) was given,
the upstream would have been interpreted relative to the second argument.
In particular, this command
git rebase -i HEAD topic
would always finish with "Nothing to do". (a1bf91e fixed the same issue
for non-interactive rebase.)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When rebasing or stashing, chances are that you do not care about
dirty submodules, since they are not updated by those actions anyway.
So ignore the submodules' states.
Note: the submodule states -- as committed in the superproject --
will still be stashed and rebased, it is _just_ the state of the
submodule in the working tree which is ignored.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
