1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-10-30 05:47:53 +01:00
Commit graph

18 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
20fd60bf6a t1000: use "test_must_fail git frotz", not "! git frotz"
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-16 14:13:04 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
41ac414ea2 Sane use of test_expect_failure
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision.  Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:

    test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        what is to be tested
    '

And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests.  Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test.  The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.

This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:

    test_expect_success 'test title' '
	setup1 &&
        setup2 &&
        setup3 &&
        ! this command should fail
    '

test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass.  So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:

    test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
        rm -f bar &&
        git foo &&
        test -f bar
    '

This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 20:49:34 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
5be60078c9 Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02 22:52:14 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
ea4b52a86f t1000: fix case table.
Case #10 is not handled with unpack-trees.c:threeway_merge()
internally, unless under the agressive rule, and it is not a
bug.  As the test expects, ND (one side did not do anything,
other side deleted) case was meant to be handled by the caller's
policy (e.g. git-merge-one-file or git-merge-recursive).

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-10 12:55:51 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
5bd74506cd Get rid of the dependency to GNU diff in the tests
Now that "git diff" handles stdin and relative paths outside the
working tree correctly, we can convert all instances of "diff -u"
to "git diff".

This commit is really the result of

$ perl -pi.bak -e 's/diff -u/git diff/' $(git grep -l "diff -u" t/)

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

(cherry picked from commit c699a40d68215c7e44a5b26117a35c8a56fbd387)
2007-03-04 00:24:15 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
3e03aaf523 Update the case table in t/t1000.
It still talked about "the proposed alternative semantics" but we have
used those alternative semantics for quite some time.  Update them to
avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-28 12:56:18 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
4d3fe0c5f3 [PATCH] Add debugging help for case #16 to read-tree.c
This will help us detect if real-world example merges have multiple
merge-base candidates and one of them matches one head while another
matches the other head.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-10 18:27:42 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
215a7ad1ef Big tool rename.
As promised, this is the "big tool rename" patch.  The primary differences
since 0.99.6 are:

  (1) git-*-script are no more.  The commands installed do not
      have any such suffix so users do not have to remember if
      something is implemented as a shell script or not.

  (2) Many command names with 'cache' in them are renamed with
      'index' if that is what they mean.

There are backward compatibility symblic links so that you and
Porcelains can keep using the old names, but the backward
compatibility support  is expected to be removed in the near
future.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-07 17:45:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
036d51cc55 [PATCH] read-tree: loosen too strict index requirements
This patch teaches read-tree 3-way merge that, when only "the
other tree" changed a path, and if the index file already has
the same change, we are not in a situation that would clobber
the index and the work tree, and lets the merge succeed; this is
case #14ALT in t1000 test.  It does not change the result of the
merge, but prevents it from failing when it does not have to.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-12 20:40:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
32192e6622 [PATCH] Finish making --emu23 equivalent to pure 2-way merge.
This adds #3ALT rule (and #2ALT rule for symmetry) to the
read-tree 3-way merge logic that collapses paths that are added
only in one branch and not in the other internally.

This makes --emu23 to succeed in the last remaining case where
the pure 2-way merge succeeded and earlier one failed.  Running
diff between t1001 and t1005 test scripts shows that the only
difference between the two is that --emu23 can leave the states
into separate stages so that the user can use usual 3-way merge
resolution techniques to carry forward the local changes when
pure 2-way merge would have refused to run.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-12 20:40:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
e7f9bc411c [PATCH] read-tree: fix too strong index requirement #5ALT
This fixes too strong index requirement 3-way merge enforces in
one case: the same file is added in both branches.

In this case, the original code insisted that if the index file
has that path, it must match our branch and be up-to-date.
However in this particular case, it only has to match it, and
can be dirty.  We just need to make sure that we keep the
work-tree copy instead of checking out the merge result.

The resolution of such a path, however, cannot be left to
outside script, because we will not keep the original stage0
entries for unmerged paths when read-tree finishes, and at that
point, the knowledge of "if we resolve it to match the new file
added in both branches, the merge succeeds and the work tree
would not lose information, but we should _not_ update the work
tree from the resulting index file" is lost.  For this reason,
the now code needs to resolve this case (#5ALT) internally.

This affects some existing tests in the test suite, but all in
positive ways.  In t1000 (3-way test), this #5ALT case now gets
one stage0 entry, instead of an identical stage2 and stage3
entry pair, for such a path, and one test that checked for merge
failure (because the test assumed the "stricter-than-necessary"
behaviour) does not have to fail anymore.  In t1005 (emu23
test), two tests that involves a case where the work tree
already had a change introduced in the upstream (aka "merged
head"), the merge succeeds instead of failing.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-12 20:40:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
f225b21807 [PATCH] Add read-tree -m 3-way merge tests.
This adds a set of tests to make sure that requirements on
existing cache entries are checked when a read-tree -m 3-way
merge is run with an already populated index file.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 15:56:09 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
7d95ee9351 [PATCH] Tests: read-tree -m test updates.
This updates t1000 (basic 3-way merge test) to check the merge
results for both successful cases (earlier one checked the
result for only one of them).  Also fixes typos in t1002 that
broke '&&' chain, potentially missing a test failure before the
chain got broken.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-08 10:19:53 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
c3f13d59f7 [PATCH] 3-way merge tests for new "git-read-tree -m"?
The updated git-tread-tree -m is more strict in that it wants to
have the original cache up to date.  The initial part of t1000
(merge tests from hell) fails due to it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-05 23:33:38 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
2eab945e86 [PATCH] Make ls-* output consistent with diff-* output format.
Use SP as the column separator except the ones before path which
uses TAB, to make the output format consistent across ls-* and
diff-* commands.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-26 15:18:55 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
63713028cd [PATCH] Add tests for diff-tree
This adds and reorganizes some tests for diff-tree

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-20 09:27:43 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
de809dbbce Fix up previous commit
Add '-R' flag to diff-tree, and change the test subdirectory
shell files to be executable (something that Junio couldn't
get me to do through the pure patch with my current patch
handling infrastructure).
2005-05-19 22:39:27 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
2ecd90502f [PATCH] Add the merge test Linus called "test script from hell".
This is an adaptation to the test framework of a historic test
that was used before three way merge form of read-tree was
introduced, and subsequently used to validate the read-tree -m
merge works correctly.  It covers all the tricky cases known
back then and also have been updated to cover conflicting
files/directories cases since then.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
2005-05-15 01:44:30 +02:00