submodule's default behavior wasn't documented in both git-submodule.txt
and in the usage text of git-submodule. Document the default behavior
similar to how git-remote does it.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git submodule summary" subcommand showed shortened commit
object names by mechanically truncating them at 7-hexdigit, which
has been improved to let "rev-parse --short" scale the length of
the abbreviation with the size of the repository.
* sh/submodule-summary-abbrev-fix:
git-submodule.sh: shorten submodule SHA-1s using rev-parse
Until now, `git submodule summary` was always emitting 7-character
SHA-1s that have a higher chance of being ambiguous for larger
repositories. Use `git rev-parse --short` instead, which will
determine suitable short SHA-1 lengths.
When a submodule hasn't been initialized with "submodule init" or
not cloned, `git rev-parse` would not work in it yet; as a fallback,
use the original method of cutting at 7 hexdigits.
Signed-off-by: Sven van Haastregt <svenvh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
74d4731da1 (submodule--helper: replace connect-gitdir-workingtree by
ensure-core-worktree, 2018-08-13) forgot to exit the submodule operation
if the helper could not ensure that core.worktree is set correctly.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The submodule support has been updated to read from the blob at
HEAD:.gitmodules when the .gitmodules file is missing from the
working tree.
* ao/submodule-wo-gitmodules-checked-out:
t/helper: add test-submodule-nested-repo-config
submodule: support reading .gitmodules when it's not in the working tree
submodule: add a helper to check if it is safe to write to .gitmodules
t7506: clean up .gitmodules properly before setting up new scenario
submodule: use the 'submodule--helper config' command
submodule--helper: add a new 'config' subcommand
t7411: be nicer to future tests and really clean things up
t7411: merge tests 5 and 6
submodule: factor out a config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently function
submodule: add a print_config_from_gitmodules() helper
When the .gitmodules file is not available in the working tree, try
using the content from the index and from the current branch. This
covers the case when the file is part of the repository but for some
reason it is not checked out, for example because of a sparse checkout.
This makes it possible to use at least the 'git submodule' commands
which *read* the gitmodules configuration file without fully populating
the working tree.
Writing to .gitmodules will still require that the file is checked out,
so check for that before calling config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently.
Add a similar check also in git-submodule.sh::cmd_add() to anticipate
the eventual failure of the "git submodule add" command when .gitmodules
is not safely writeable; this prevents the command from leaving the
repository in a spurious state (e.g. the submodule repository was cloned
but .gitmodules was not updated because
config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently failed).
Moreover, since config_from_gitmodules() now accesses the global object
store, it is necessary to protect all code paths which call the function
against concurrent access to the global object store. Currently this
only happens in builtin/grep.c::grep_submodules(), so call
grep_read_lock() before invoking code involving
config_from_gitmodules().
Finally, add t7418-submodule-sparse-gitmodules.sh to verify that reading
from .gitmodules succeeds and that writing to it fails when the file is
not checked out.
NOTE: there is one rare case where this new feature does not work
properly yet: nested submodules without .gitmodules in their working
tree. This has been documented with a warning and a test_expect_failure
item in t7814, and in this case the current behavior is not altered: no
config is read.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With SHA-256, the length of the all-zeros object ID is longer. Add a
function to git-submodule.sh to check if a full hex object ID is the
all-zeros value, and use it to check the output we're parsing from git
diff-files or diff-index.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the 'submodule--helper config' command in git-submodules.sh to avoid
referring explicitly to .gitmodules by the hardcoded file path.
This makes it possible to access the submodules configuration in a more
controlled way.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git submodule update" is getting rewritten piece-by-piece into C.
* sb/submodule-update-in-c:
submodule--helper: introduce new update-module-mode helper
submodule--helper: replace connect-gitdir-workingtree by ensure-core-worktree
builtin/submodule--helper: factor out method to update a single submodule
builtin/submodule--helper: store update_clone information in a struct
builtin/submodule--helper: factor out submodule updating
git-submodule.sh: rename unused variables
git-submodule.sh: align error reporting for update mode to use path
This reverts commit 7e25437d35, reversing
changes made to 00624d608c.
v2.19.0-rc0~165^2~1 (submodule: ensure core.worktree is set after
update, 2018-06-18) assumes an "absorbed" submodule layout, where the
submodule's Git directory is in the superproject's .git/modules/
directory and .git in the submodule worktree is a .git file pointing
there. In particular, it uses $GIT_DIR/modules/$name to find the
submodule to find out whether it already has core.worktree set, and it
uses connect_work_tree_and_git_dir if not, resulting in
fatal: could not open sub/.git for writing
The context behind that patch: v2.19.0-rc0~165^2~2 (submodule: unset
core.worktree if no working tree is present, 2018-06-12) unsets
core.worktree when running commands like "git checkout
--recurse-submodules" to switch to a branch without the submodule. If
a user then uses "git checkout --no-recurse-submodules" to switch back
to a branch with the submodule and runs "git submodule update", this
patch is needed to ensure that commands using the submodule directly
are aware of the path to the worktree.
It is late in the release cycle, so revert the whole 3-patch series.
We can try again later for 2.20.
Reported-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
Helped-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git pull --rebase -v" in a repository with a submodule barfed as
an intermediate process did not understand what "-v(erbose)" flag
meant, which has been fixed.
* sb/pull-rebase-submodule:
git-submodule.sh: accept verbose flag in cmd_update to be non-quiet
This chews off a bit of the shell part of the update command in
git-submodule.sh. When writing the C code, keep in mind that the
submodule--helper part will go away eventually and we want to have
a C function that is able to determine the submodule update strategy,
it as a nicety, make determine_submodule_update_strategy accessible
for arbitrary repositories.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
e98317508c (submodule: ensure core.worktree is set after update,
2018-06-18) was overly aggressive in calling connect_work_tree_and_git_dir
as that ensures both the 'core.worktree' configuration is set as well as
setting up correct gitlink file pointing at the git directory.
We do not need to check for the gitlink in this part of the cmd_update
in git-submodule.sh, as the initial call to update-clone will have ensured
that. So we can reduce the work to only (check and potentially) set the
'core.worktree' setting.
While at it move the check from shell to C as that proves to be useful in
a follow up patch, as we do not need the 'name' in shell now.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a56771a668 (builtin/pull: respect verbosity settings in submodules,
2018-01-25), we made sure to pass on both quiet and verbose flag from
builtin/pull.c to the submodule shell script. However git-submodule doesn't
understand a verbose flag, which results in a bug when invoking
git pull --recurse-submodules -v [...]
There are a few different approaches to fix this bug:
1) rewrite 'argv_push_verbosity' or its caller in builtin/pull.c to
cap opt_verbosity at 0. Then 'argv_push_verbosity' would only add
'-q' if any.
2) Have a flag in 'argv_push_verbosity' that specifies if we allow adding
-q or -v (or both).
3) Add -v to git-submodule.sh and make it a no-op
(1) seems like a maintenance burden: What if we add code after
the submodule operations or move submodule operations higher up,
then we have altered the opt_verbosity setting further down the line
in builtin/pull.c.
(2) seems like it could work reasonably well without more regressions
(3) seems easiest to implement as well as actually is a feature with the
last-one-wins rule of passing flags to Git commands.
Reported-by: Jochen Kühner
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'mode' variable is not used in cmd_update for its original purpose,
rename it to 'dummy' as it only serves the purpose to abort quickly
documenting this knowledge.
The variable 'stage' is also not used any more in cmd_update, so remove it.
This went unnoticed as first each function used the commonly used
submodule listing, which was converted in 74703a1e4d (submodule: rewrite
`module_list` shell function in C, 2015-09-02). When cmd_update was
using its own function starting in 48308681b0 (git submodule update:
have a dedicated helper for cloning, 2016-02-29), its removal was missed.
A later patch in this series also touches the communication between
the submodule helper and git-submodule.sh, but let's have this as
a preparatory patch, as it eases the next patch, which stores the
raw data instead of the line printed for this communication.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All other error messages in cmd_update are reporting the submodule based
on its path, so let's do that for invalid update modes, too.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git submodule" did not correctly adjust core.worktree setting that
indicates whether/where a submodule repository has its associated
working tree across various state transitions, which has been
corrected.
* sb/submodule-core-worktree:
submodule deinit: unset core.worktree
submodule: ensure core.worktree is set after update
submodule: unset core.worktree if no working tree is present
The bulk of "git submodule foreach" has been rewritten in C.
* pc/submodule-helper-foreach:
submodule: port submodule subcommand 'foreach' from shell to C
submodule foreach: document variable '$displaypath'
submodule foreach: document '$sm_path' instead of '$path'
submodule foreach: correct '$path' in nested submodules from a subdirectory
"git submodule update" attempts two different kinds of "git fetch"
against the upstream repository to grab a commit bound at the
submodule's path, but it incorrectly gave up if the first kind
(i.e. a normal fetch) failed, making the second "last resort" one
(i.e. fetching an exact commit object by object name) ineffective.
This has been corrected.
* sb/submodule-update-try-harder:
git-submodule.sh: try harder to fetch a submodule
"git submodule update" and "git submodule add" supported the
"--reference" option to borrow objects from a neighbouring local
repository like "git clone" does, but lacked the more recent
invention "--dissociate". Also "git submodule add" has been taught
to take the "--progress" option.
* cf/submodule-progress-dissociate:
submodule: add --dissociate option to add/update commands
submodule: add --progress option to add command
submodule: clean up substitutions in script
* maint-2.16:
Git 2.16.4
Git 2.15.2
Git 2.14.4
Git 2.13.7
verify_path: disallow symlinks in .gitmodules
update-index: stat updated files earlier
verify_dotfile: mention case-insensitivity in comment
verify_path: drop clever fallthrough
skip_prefix: add case-insensitive variant
is_{hfs,ntfs}_dotgitmodules: add tests
is_ntfs_dotgit: match other .git files
is_hfs_dotgit: match other .git files
is_ntfs_dotgit: use a size_t for traversing string
submodule-config: verify submodule names as paths
* maint-2.15:
Git 2.15.2
Git 2.14.4
Git 2.13.7
verify_path: disallow symlinks in .gitmodules
update-index: stat updated files earlier
verify_dotfile: mention case-insensitivity in comment
verify_path: drop clever fallthrough
skip_prefix: add case-insensitive variant
is_{hfs,ntfs}_dotgitmodules: add tests
is_ntfs_dotgit: match other .git files
is_hfs_dotgit: match other .git files
is_ntfs_dotgit: use a size_t for traversing string
submodule-config: verify submodule names as paths
* maint-2.13:
Git 2.13.7
verify_path: disallow symlinks in .gitmodules
update-index: stat updated files earlier
verify_dotfile: mention case-insensitivity in comment
verify_path: drop clever fallthrough
skip_prefix: add case-insensitive variant
is_{hfs,ntfs}_dotgitmodules: add tests
is_ntfs_dotgit: match other .git files
is_hfs_dotgit: match other .git files
is_ntfs_dotgit: use a size_t for traversing string
submodule-config: verify submodule names as paths
Submodule "names" come from the untrusted .gitmodules file,
but we blindly append them to $GIT_DIR/modules to create our
on-disk repo paths. This means you can do bad things by
putting "../" into the name (among other things).
Let's sanity-check these names to avoid building a path that
can be exploited. There are two main decisions:
1. What should the allowed syntax be?
It's tempting to reuse verify_path(), since submodule
names typically come from in-repo paths. But there are
two reasons not to:
a. It's technically more strict than what we need, as
we really care only about breaking out of the
$GIT_DIR/modules/ hierarchy. E.g., having a
submodule named "foo/.git" isn't actually
dangerous, and it's possible that somebody has
manually given such a funny name.
b. Since we'll eventually use this checking logic in
fsck to prevent downstream repositories, it should
be consistent across platforms. Because
verify_path() relies on is_dir_sep(), it wouldn't
block "foo\..\bar" on a non-Windows machine.
2. Where should we enforce it? These days most of the
.gitmodules reads go through submodule-config.c, so
I've put it there in the reading step. That should
cover all of the C code.
We also construct the name for "git submodule add"
inside the git-submodule.sh script. This is probably
not a big deal for security since the name is coming
from the user anyway, but it would be polite to remind
them if the name they pick is invalid (and we need to
expose the name-checker to the shell anyway for our
test scripts).
This patch issues a warning when reading .gitmodules
and just ignores the related config entry completely.
This will generally end up producing a sensible error,
as it works the same as a .gitmodules file which is
missing a submodule entry (so "submodule update" will
barf, but "git clone --recurse-submodules" will print
an error but not abort the clone.
There is one minor oddity, which is that we print the
warning once per malformed config key (since that's how
the config subsystem gives us the entries). So in the
new test, for example, the user would see three
warnings. That's OK, since the intent is that this case
should never come up outside of malicious repositories
(and then it might even benefit the user to see the
message multiple times).
Credit for finding this vulnerability and the proof of
concept from which the test script was adapted goes to
Etienne Stalmans.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Add --dissociate option to add and update commands, both clone helper commands
that already have the --reference option --dissociate pairs with.
Signed-off-by: Casey Fitzpatrick <kcghost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The '--progress' was introduced in 72c5f88311 (clone: pass --progress
decision to recursive submodules, 2016-09-22) to fix the progress reporting
of the clone command. Also add the progress option to the 'submodule add'
command. The update command already supports the progress flag, but it
is not documented.
Signed-off-by: Casey Fitzpatrick <kcghost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'recommend_shallow' and 'jobs' variables do not need quotes. They only hold a
single token value, and even if they were multi-token it is likely we would want
them split at IFS rather than pass a single string.
'progress' is a boolean value. Treat it like the other boolean values in the
script by using a substitution.
Signed-off-by: Casey Fitzpatrick <kcghost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is the logical continuum of fb43e31f2b (submodule: try harder to
fetch needed sha1 by direct fetching sha1, 2016-02-23) and fixes it as
some assumptions were not correct.
The commit states:
> If $sha1 was not part of the default fetch ... fail ourselves here
> assumes that the fetch_in_submodule only fails when the serverside does
> not support fetching by sha1.
There are other failures, why such a fetch may fail, such as
fatal: Couldn't find remote ref HEAD
which can happen if the remote side doesn't advertise HEAD and we do not
have a local fetch refspec.
Not advertising HEAD is allowed by the protocol spec and would happen,
if HEAD points at an unborn branch for example.
Not having a local fetch refspec can happen when submodules are fetched
shallowly, as then git-clone doesn't setup a fetch refspec.
So do try even harder for a submodule by ignoring the exit code of the
first fetch and rather relying on the following is_tip_reachable to
see if we try fetching again.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This aims to make git-submodule foreach a builtin. 'foreach' is ported to
the submodule--helper, and submodule--helper is called from
git-submodule.sh.
Helped-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running 'git submodule foreach --recursive' from a subdirectory of
your repository, nested submodules get a bogus value for $path:
For a submodule 'sub' that contains a nested submodule 'nested',
running 'git -C dir submodule foreach echo $path' from the root of the
superproject would report path='../nested' for the nested submodule.
The first part '../' is derived from the logic computing the relative
path from $pwd to the root of the superproject. The second part is the
submodule path inside the submodule. This value is of little use and is
hard to document.
Also, in git-submodule.txt, $path is documented to be the "name of the
submodule directory relative to the superproject", but "the
superproject" is ambiguous.
To resolve both these issues, we could:
(a) Change "the superproject" to "its immediate superproject", so
$path would be "nested" instead of "../nested".
(b) Change "the superproject" to "the superproject the original
command was run from", so $path would be "sub/nested" instead of
"../nested".
(c) Change "the superproject" to "the directory the original command
was run from", so $path would be "../sub/nested" instead of
"../nested".
The behavior for (c) was attempted to be introduced in 091a6eb0fe
(submodule: drop the top-level requirement, 2013-06-16) with the intent
for $path to be relative from $pwd to the submodule worktree, but that
did not work for nested submodules, as the intermittent submodules
were not included in the path.
If we were to fix the meaning of the $path using (a), we would break
any existing submodule user that runs foreach from non-root of the
superproject as the non-nested submodule '../sub' would change its
path to 'sub'.
If we were to fix the meaning of $path using (b), then we would break
any user that uses nested submodules (even from the root directory)
as the 'nested' would become 'sub/nested'.
If we were to fix the meaning of $path using (c), then we would break
the same users as in (b) as 'nested' would become 'sub/nested' from
the root directory of the superproject.
All groups can be found in the wild. The author has no data if one group
outweighs the other by large margin, and offending each one seems equally
bad at first. However in the authors imagination it is better to go with
(a) as running from a sub directory sounds like it is carried out by a
human rather than by some automation task. With a human on the keyboard
the feedback loop is short and the changed behavior can be adapted to
quickly unlike some automation that can break silently.
Discussed-with: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The same mechanism is used even for porting this submodule
subcommand, as used in the ported subcommands till now.
The function cmd_deinit in split up after porting into four
functions: module_deinit(), for_each_listed_submodule(),
deinit_submodule() and deinit_submodule_cb().
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Port the submodule subcommand 'sync' from shell to C using the same
mechanism as that used for porting submodule subcommand 'status'.
Hence, here the function cmd_sync() is ported from shell to C.
This is done by introducing four functions: module_sync(),
sync_submodule(), sync_submodule_cb() and print_default_remote().
The function print_default_remote() is introduced for getting
the default remote as stdout.
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This aims to make git-submodule 'status' a built-in. Hence, the function
cmd_status() is ported from shell to C. This is done by introducing
four functions: module_status(), submodule_status_cb(),
submodule_status() and print_status().
The function module_status() acts as the front-end of the subcommand.
It parses subcommand's options and then calls the function
module_list_compute() for computing the list of submodules. Then
this functions calls for_each_listed_submodule() looping through the
list obtained.
Then for_each_listed_submodule() calls submodule_status_cb() for each of
the submodule in its list. The function submodule_status_cb() calls
submodule_status() after passing appropriate arguments to the funciton.
Function submodule_status() is responsible for generating the status
each submodule it is called for, and then calls print_status().
Finally, the function print_status() handles the printing of submodule's
status.
Function set_name_rev() is also ported from git-submodule to the
submodule--helper builtin function compute_rev_name(), which now
generates the value of the revision name as required.
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This could have been part of 48308681b0 (git submodule update: have a
dedicated helper for cloning, 2016-02-29).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We want to make sure that people who copy & paste code would see
fewer instances of "git-foo". The use of these dashed forms have
been discouraged since v1.6.0 days.
Signed-off-by: Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's an easy mistake to add a repository inside another
repository, like:
git clone $url
git add .
The resulting entry is a gitlink, but there's no matching
.gitmodules entry. Trying to use "submodule init" (or clone
with --recursive) doesn't do anything useful. Prior to
v2.13, such an entry caused git-submodule to barf entirely.
In v2.13, the entry is considered "inactive" and quietly
ignored. Either way, no clone of your repository can do
anything useful with the gitlink without the user manually
adding the submodule config.
In most cases, the user probably meant to either add a real
submodule, or they forgot to put the embedded repository in
their .gitignore file.
Let's issue a warning when we see this case. There are a few
things to note:
- the warning will go in the git-add porcelain; anybody
wanting to do low-level manipulation of the index is
welcome to create whatever funny states they want.
- we detect the case by looking for a newly added gitlink;
updates via "git add submodule" are perfectly reasonable,
and this avoids us having to investigate .gitmodules
entirely
- there's a command-line option to suppress the warning.
This is needed for git-submodule itself (which adds the
entry before adding any submodule config), but also
provides a mechanism for other scripts doing
submodule-like things.
We could make this a hard error instead of a warning.
However, we do add lots of sub-repos in our test suite. It's
not _wrong_ to do so. It just creates a state where users
may be surprised. Pointing them in the right direction with
a gentle hint is probably the best option.
There is a config knob that can disable the (long) hint. But
I intentionally omitted a config knob to disable the warning
entirely. Whether the warning is sensible or not is
generally about context, not about the user's preferences.
If there's a tool or workflow that adds gitlinks without
matching .gitmodules, it should probably be taught about the
new command-line option, rather than blanket-disabling the
warning.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When attempting to add a submodule with backslashes in its name 'git
submodule' fails in a funny way. We can see that some of the
backslashes are expanded resulting in a bogus path:
git -C main submodule add ../sub\\with\\backslash
fatal: repository '/tmp/test/sub\witackslash' does not exist
fatal: clone of '/tmp/test/sub\witackslash' into submodule path
To solve this, convert calls to 'read' to 'read -r' in git-submodule.sh
in order to prevent backslash expantion in submodule names.
Reported-by: Joachim Durchholz <jo@durchholz.org>
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to adding submodule.<name>.url to the config, set
submodule.<name>.active to true unless submodule.active is configured
and the submodule's path matches the configured pathspec.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Sync does some work determining what URLs should be used for a submodule
but then throws this work away if the submodule isn't active. Instead
perform the activity check earlier and skip inactive submodule in order
to avoid doing unnecessary work.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The user can specify a custom update method that is run when
"submodule update" updates an already checked out submodule. This
was ignored when checking the submodule out for the first time and
we instead always just checked out the commit that is bound to the
path in the superproject's index.
* sb/submodule-update-initial-runs-custom-script:
submodule update: run custom update script for initial populating as well
"git submodule add" used to be confused and refused to add a
locally created repository; users can now use "--force" option
to add them.
* sb/submodule-add-force:
submodule add: extend force flag to add existing repos
In 1b4735d9f3 (submodule: no [--merge|--rebase] when newly cloned,
2011-02-17), all actions were defaulted to checkout for populating
a submodule initially, because merging or rebasing makes no sense
in that situation.
Other commands however do make sense, such as the custom command
that was added later (6cb5728c43, submodule update: allow custom
command to update submodule working tree, 2013-07-03).
I am unsure about the "none" command, as I can see an initial
checkout there as a useful thing. On the other hand going strictly
by our own documentation, we should do nothing in case of "none"
as well, because the user asked for it.
Reported-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the submodule helper we did not correctly handled the display path
for initializing submodules when both the submodule is inside a
subdirectory as well as the command being invoked from a subdirectory
(as viewed from the superproject).
This was broken in 3604242f08, which was written at a time where
there was no super-prefix available, so we abused the --prefix option
for the same purpose and could get only one case right (the call from
within a subdirectory, not the submodule being in a subdirectory).
Test-provided-by: David Turner <novalis@novalis.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
