Instead of intermingling success and failure, we now print:
1. all uptodate refs (if args.verbose is enabled)
2. successfully pushed refs
3. failed refs
with the assumption that the user is most likely to see the
ones at the end, and therefore we order them from "least
interesting" to "most interesting."
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This has always been slightly inaccurate, since it used the
new_refs counter, which really meant "did we send any
objects," so deletions were not counted.
It has gotten even worse with recent patches, since we no
longer look at the 'ret' value, meaning we would say "up to
date" if non-ff pushes were rejected.
Instead, we now claim up to date iff every ref is either
unmatched or up to date. Any other case should already have
generated a status line.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, we set all ref pushes to 'OK', and then marked
them as errors if the remote reported so. This has the
problem that if the remote dies or fails to report a ref, we
just assume it was OK.
Instead, we use a new non-OK state to indicate that we are
expecting status (if the remote doesn't support the
report-status feature, we fall back on the old behavior).
Thus we can flag refs for which we expected a status, but
got none (conversely, we now also print a warning for refs
for which we get a status, but weren't expecting one).
This also allows us to simplify the receive_status exit
code, since each ref is individually marked with failure
until we get a success response. We can just print the usual
status table, so the user still gets a sense of what we were
trying to do when the failure happened.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This lets us show remote errors (e.g., a denied hook) along
with the usual push output.
There is a slightly clever optimization in receive_status
that bears explanation. We need to correlate the returned
status and our ref objects, which naively could be an O(m*n)
operation. However, since the current implementation of
receive-pack returns the errors to us in the same order that
we sent them, we optimistically look for the next ref to be
looked up to come after the last one we have found. So it
should be an O(m+n) merge if the receive-pack behavior
holds, but we fall back to a correct but slower behavior if
it should change.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, we manually checked the 'NONE' and 'UPTODATE'
conditions. Now that we have ref->status, we can easily
say "only update if we pushed successfully".
This adds a test for and fixes a regression introduced in
ed31df31 where deleted refs did not have their tracking
branches removed. This was due to a bogus per-ref error test
that is superseded by the more accurate ref->status flag.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Completely-Acked-By: Alex "Sleepy" Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of keeping the 'ret' variable, we instead have a
status flag for each ref that tracks what happened to it.
We then print the ref status after all of the refs have
been examined.
This paves the way for three improvements:
- updating tracking refs only for non-error refs
- incorporating remote rejection into the printed status
- printing errors in a different order than we processed
(e.g., consolidating non-ff errors near the end with
a special message)
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ar/send-pack-remote-track:
Update the tracking references only if they were succesfully updated on remote
Add a test checking if send-pack updated local tracking branches correctly
* db/remote-builtin:
Reteach builtin-ls-remote to understand remotes
Build in ls-remote
Use built-in send-pack.
Build-in send-pack, with an API for other programs to call.
Build-in peek-remote, using transport infrastructure.
Miscellaneous const changes and utilities
Conflicts:
transport.c
Existing "git push --all" is almost perfect for backing up to
another repository, except that "--all" only means "all
branches" in modern git, and it does not delete old branches and
tags that exist at the back-up repository that you have removed
from your local repository.
This teaches "git-send-pack" a new "--mirror" option. The
difference from the "--all" option are that (1) it sends all
refs, not just branches, and (2) it deletes old refs you no
longer have on the local side from the remote side.
Original patch by Junio C Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When pushing to overwrite a ref that points at a commit we do
not even have, the recent "terse push" patch tried to get a
unique abbreviation for the non-existent (from our point of
view) object, which resulted in strcpy(buf, NULL) and
segfaulted.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is really an uninteresting detail, and it just takes
attention away from the actual push updates and posssible
errors.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This changes the output of send-pack to match the new,
more terse fetch output. It looks like this:
To git://host.tld/path/to/repo
+ f3325dc...3b91d1c hasforce -> mirror/hasforce (forced update)
f3325dc..bb022dc master -> mirror/master
! [rejected] needsforce -> mirror/needsforce (non-fast forward)
* [new branch] newbranch -> mirror/newbranch
* [new tag] v1.0 -> v1.0
instead of:
updating 'refs/heads/mirror/hasforce' using 'refs/heads/hasforce'
from f3325dca9c4a34d74012c0e159254f454930cec7
to 3b91d1c310ca9d7b547b85466dd876e143498304
updating 'refs/heads/mirror/master' using 'refs/heads/master'
from f3325dca9c4a34d74012c0e159254f454930cec7
to bb022dc363d5c2aa9aa3026beb9706d44fbe1328
error: remote 'refs/heads/mirror/needsforce' is not an ancestor of
local 'refs/heads/needsforce'.
Maybe you are not up-to-date and need to pull first?
updating 'refs/heads/mirror/newbranch' using 'refs/heads/newbranch'
from 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
to 3b91d1c310ca9d7b547b85466dd876e143498304
updating 'refs/tags/v1.0'
from 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
to bb022dc363d5c2aa9aa3026beb9706d44fbe1328
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also marks some more things as const, as needed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
