When .git/refs/heads/frotz and .git/refs/tags/frotz existed, and
the object name stored in .git/refs/heads/frotz were corrupt, we
ended up picking tags/frotz without complaining. Worse yet, if
the corrupt .git/refs/heads/frotz was more than 40 bytes and
began with hexadecimal characters, it silently overwritten the
initial part of the returned result.
This commit adds a couple of tests to demonstrate these cases,
with a fix.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When both heads/foo and tags/foo exist, get_sha1_basic("foo")
picked up the tag without complaining, which is quite confusing.
Make sure we require unambiguous form, "heads/foo" or "tags/foo"
in such cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
One caller of deref_tag() was not careful enough to make sure
what deref_tag() returned was not NULL (i.e. we found a tag
object that points at an object we do not have). Fix it, and
warn about refs that point at such an incomplete tag where
needed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This does two things:
- we don't allow "." and ".." as components of a refname. Thus get_sha1()
will not accept "./refname" as being the same as "refname" any more.
- git-rev-parse stops doing revision translation after seeing a pathname,
to match the brhaviour of all the tools (once we see a pathname,
everything else will also be parsed as a pathname).
Basically, if you did
git log *
and "gitk" was somewhere in the "*", we don't want to replace the filename
"gitk" with the SHA1 of the branch with the same name.
Of course, if there is any change of ambiguity, you should always use "--"
to make it explicit what are filenames and what are revisions, but this
makes the normal cases sane. The refname rule also means that instead of
the "--", you can do the same thing we're used to doing with filenames
that start with a slash: use "./filename" instead, and now it's a
filename, not an option (and not a revision).
So "git log ./*.c" is now actually a perfectly valid thing to do, even if
the first C-file might have the same name as a branch.
Trivial test:
git-rev-parse gitk ./gitk gitk
should output something like
9843c3074d
./gitk
gitk
where the "./gitk" isn't seen as a revision, and the second "gitk" is a
filename simply because we've seen filenames already, and thus stopped
doing revision parsing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Martin Langhoff noticed that ref^0 barfed correctly when we did not
have the commit in a broken repository, but ref^{commit} didn't.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Existing "tagname^0" notation means "dereference tag zero or more
times until you cannot dereference it anymore, and make sure it is a
commit -- otherwise barf". But tags do not necessarily reference
commit objects.
This commit introduces a bit more generalized notation, "ref^{type}".
Existing "ref^0" is a shorthand for "ref^{commit}". If the type
is empty, it just dereferences tags until it hits a non-tag object.
With this, "git-rev-parse --verify 'junio-gpg-pub^{}'" shows the blob
object name -- there is no need to manually read the tag object and
find out the object name anymore.
"git-rev-parse --verify 'HEAD^{tree}'" can be used to find out the
tree object name of the HEAD commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-show-branch acquires two new options. --sha1-name to name
commits using the unique prefix of their object names, and
--no-name to not to show names at all.
This was outlined in <7vk6gpyuyr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The earlier fix incorrectly dropped the code the original had to
ensure the found SHA1 is at least unique within the same pack.
Restore the check.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Unlike cases where "no such object exists", the case where specified
prefix is ambiguous would confuse the user if we say "no such commit"
or such. Give an extra error message from the uniqueness check if
there are more than one objects that match the given prefix.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The original code did not even check alternates, and was confused if
an unpacked object was uniquely found when there was another object
that shares the same prefix in the pack.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This extends the ref reading to understand a "symbolic ref": a ref file
that starts with "ref: " and points to another ref file, and thus
introduces the notion of ref aliases.
This is in preparation of allowing HEAD to eventually not be a symlink,
but one of these symbolic refs instead.
[jc: Linus originally required the prefix to be "ref: " five bytes
and nothing else, but I changed it to allow and strip any number of
leading whitespaces to match what update-ref.c does.]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
get_sha1() would not do sha1 completion of short SHA1's when they were
part of a more complex expression. So doing
git-rev-parse 727132834e6be48a93c1bd6458a29d474ce7d5d5^
would work, and return 87c6aeb4ef. But using
the shorthand version
git-rev-list 72713^
wouldn't work.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The new notation is a short-hand for <name> followed by <num>
caret ('^') characters. E.g. "master~4" is the fourth
generation ancestor of the current "master" branch head,
following the first parents; same as "master^^^^" but a bit
more readable.
This will be used in the updated "git show-branch" command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I think Linus did a cut & paste from an early JIT code while
developing the current extended SHA1 notation, and left it there as a
courtesy, but the directory does not deserve to be treated any more
specially than, say, .git/refs/bisect.
If the subdirectories under .git/refs proliferate, we may want to
switch to scanning that hierarchy at runtime, instead of the current
hard-coded set, although I think that would be overkill.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
From nobody Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Subject: [PATCH] Add a new extended SHA1 syntax <name>:<num>
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: 1124617434 -0700
The new notation is a short-hand for <name> followed by <num>
caret ('^') characters. E.g. "master:4" is the fourth
generation ancestor of the current "master" branch head,
following the first parents; same as "master^^^^" but a bit more
readable.
This will be used in the updated "git show-branch" command.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
---
sha1_name.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
d5098ce769da46df6d45dc8f41b06dd758fdaea7
diff --git a/sha1_name.c b/sha1_name.c
--- a/sha1_name.c
+++ b/sha1_name.c
@@ -191,9 +191,29 @@ static int get_parent(const char *name,
return -1;
}
+static int get_nth_ancestor(const char *name, int len,
+ unsigned char *result, int generation)
+{
+ unsigned char sha1[20];
+ int ret = get_sha1_1(name, len, sha1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ while (generation--) {
+ struct commit *commit = lookup_commit_reference(sha1);
+
+ if (!commit || parse_commit(commit) || !commit->parents)
+ return -1;
+ memcpy(sha1, commit->parents->item->object.sha1, 20);
+ }
+ memcpy(result, sha1, 20);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int get_sha1_1(const char *name, int len, unsigned char *sha1)
{
int parent, ret;
+ const char *cp;
/* foo^[0-9] or foo^ (== foo^1); we do not do more than 9 parents. */
if (len > 2 && name[len-2] == '^' &&
@@ -210,6 +230,27 @@ static int get_sha1_1(const char *name,
if (parent >= 0)
return get_parent(name, len, sha1, parent);
+ /* name:3 is name^^^,
+ * name:12 is name^^^^^^^^^^^^, and
+ * name: is name
+ */
+ parent = 0;
+ for (cp = name + len - 1; name <= cp; cp--) {
+ int ch = *cp;
+ if ('0' <= ch && ch <= '9')
+ continue;
+ if (ch != ':')
+ parent = -1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!parent && *cp == ':') {
+ int len1 = cp - name;
+ cp++;
+ while (cp < name + len)
+ parent = parent * 10 + *cp++ - '0';
+ return get_nth_ancestor(name, len1, sha1, parent);
+ }
+
ret = get_sha1_basic(name, len, sha1);
if (!ret)
return 0;
The "get_sha1_hex()" function is designed to work with SHA1 hex strings
that may be followed by arbitrary crud. However, that's not acceptable for
"get_sha1()" which is used for command line arguments etc: we don't want
to silently allow random characters after the end of the SHA1.
So verify that the hex string is all we have.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
You can resolve a tag, and it does the right thing except that it might
end up writing the tag itself into the resulting HEAD, which will confuse
subsequent operations no end.
This makes sure that when we resolve two heads, we will have turned them
into proper commits before we start acting on them.
This also fixes the parsing of "treeish^0", which would incorrectly
resolve to "treeish" instead of causing an error.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-rev-parse HEAD^1 would fail, because of an off-by-one bug (but HEAD^
would yield the expected result). Also, when the parent does not exist, do
not silently return an incorrect SHA1. Of course, this no longer applies
to git-rev-parse alone, but every user of get_sha1().
While at it, add a test.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Everybody envies rev-parse, who is the only one that can grok
the extended sha1 format. Move the get_extended_sha1() out of
rev-parse, rename it to get_sha1() and make it available to
everybody else.
The one I posted earlier to the list had one bug where it did
not handle a name that ends with a digit correctly (it
incorrectly tried the "Nth parent" path). This commit fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
