The three-way merge by git-read-tree does not complain about
presense of the file in the working tree that is involved in a
merge when the merge result needs to be determined by the
caller. Adjust merge-recursive so that it makes sure that an
untracked file is not touched when the merge decides the path
should not be included in the final result.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Most callers of write_sha1_file_prepare() are only interested in the
resulting hash but don't care about the returned file name or the header.
This patch adds a simple wrapper named hash_sha1_file() which does just
that, and converts potential callers.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Like xmalloc and xrealloc xstrdup dies with a useful message if
the native strdup() implementation returns NULL rather than a
valid pointer.
I just tried to use xstrdup in new code and found it to be missing.
However I expected it to be present as xmalloc and xrealloc are
already commonly used throughout the code.
[jc: removed the part that deals with last_XXX, which I am
finding more and more dubious these days.]
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This abstracts away the size of the hash values when copying them
from memory location to memory location, much as the introduction
of hashcmp abstracted away hash value comparsion.
A few call sites were using char* rather than unsigned char* so
I added the cast rather than open hashcpy to be void*. This is a
reasonable tradeoff as most call sites already use unsigned char*
and the existing hashcmp is also declared to be unsigned char*.
[jc: this is a follow-up patch for merge-recursive.c which is
not in "master" yet. The original was sent-in for "next" so
I splitted it out. ]
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When the cache is dirty, and we switch the index file from temporary
to final, we want to discard the cache without complaint.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It seems to be the only sane way to do it: when a two-head merge is
done, and the merge-base and one of the two branches agree, the
merge assumes that the other branch has something new.
If we start creating virtual commits from newer merge-bases, and go
back to older merge-bases, and then merge with newer commits again,
chances are that a patch is lost, _because_ the merge-base and the
head agree on it. Unlikely, yes, but it happened to me.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This fixes the coolest merge ever.
[jc: with two "Oops that's not it" fixes from Johannes and Alex,
and an obvious type mismatch fix.]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since there are no external calls left in merge-recur, we do not need
to set the environment variable GIT_INDEX_FILE all the time.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since merge-recur is in C, and uses libgit, it can call the relevant
functions directly, without writing the index file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To handle renames properly, we iterate through all file names of both
heads, the current one, and the one to be merged.
Only that there was a bug, where it was checked if the file name was present
in both heads, but the result of the check was never used. Instead, the
merge proceeded as if both heads contained that file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It would not make sense to parse a virtual commit, therefore set the
"parsed" flag to 1.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This could result in a nasty infinite loop, or in bogus names (it used
the strlen() of the newly allocated buffer instead of the original
buffer).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There were two TODOs to remove sha_eq() and to convert users of
struct stage_data to active_cache users, but this is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This contains mainly three sorts of fixes:
- get rid of small wrapper functions
- reuse the diff_filespec structure when sha1, mode & path are needed
- Junio's pedantic updates
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were
busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely,
there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO".
For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according
to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script.
But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are:
- there are still three external calls
- in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once
(just before exiting)
- a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter
BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree
does not handle renames at all.
This patch is meant for testing, and as such,
- it compile the program to git-merge-recur
- it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of
git-merge-recursive
- it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive
- it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache()
and refresh_cache_entry())
Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
