1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-09 02:33:11 +01:00
Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Rast
8f8f5476cd Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information
Add three new --pretty=format escapes:

  %gD  long  reflog descriptor (e.g. refs/stash@{0})
  %gd  short reflog descriptor (e.g. stash@{0})
  %gs  reflog message

This is achieved by passing down the reflog info, if any, inside the
pretty_print_context struct.

We use the newly refactored get_reflog_selector(), and give it some
extra functionality to extract a shortened ref.  The shortening is
cached inside the commit_reflogs struct; the only allocation of it
happens in read_complete_reflog(), where it is initialised to 0.  Also
add another helper get_reflog_message() for the message extraction.

Note that the --format="%h %gD: %gs" tests may not work in real
repositories, as the --pretty formatter doesn't know to leave away the
": " on the last commit in an incomplete (because git-gc removed the
old part) reflog.  This equivalence is nevertheless the main goal of
this patch.

Thanks to Jeff King for reviews, the %gd testcase and documentation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-19 22:28:26 -07:00
Jeff King
cd4371208a make oneline reflog dates more consistent with multiline format
The multiline reflog format (e.g., as shown by "git log -g")
will show HEAD@{<date>} rather than HEAD@{<count>} in two
situations:

  1. If the user gave branch@{<date>} syntax to specify the
     reflog

  2. If the user gave a --date=<format> specifier

It uses the "normal" date format in case 1, and the
user-specified format in case 2.

The oneline reflog format (e.g., "git reflog show" or "git
log -g --oneline") will show the date in the same two
circumstances. However, it _always_ shows the date as a
relative date, and it always ignores the timezone.

In case 2, it seems ridiculous to trigger the date but use a
format totally different from what the user requested.

For case 1, it is arguable that the user might want to see
the relative date by default; however, the multiline version
shows the normal format.

This patch does three things:

  - refactors the "relative_date" parameter to
    show_reflog_message to be an actual date_mode enum,
    since this is how it is used (it is passed to show_date)

  - uses the passed date_mode parameter in the oneline
    format (making it consistent with the multiline format)

  - does not ignore the timezone parameter in oneline mode

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-20 00:57:27 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
7b69b873fa git log -g: Complain, but do not fail, when no reflogs are there
When asking "git log -g --all", clearly you want to see only those refs
that do have reflogs, but you do not want it to fail, either.

So instead of die()ing, complain about it, but move on to the other refs.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-24 17:28:10 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
4e244cbc5c log --reflog: honour --relative-date
If you say "git log -g --relative-date", it is very likely that
you want to see the reflog names in terms of a relative date.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-08 16:20:52 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
4d12a47123 Fix --walk-reflog with --pretty=oneline
Now, "git log --abbrev-commit --pretty=o --walk-reflogs HEAD" is
reasonably pleasant to use.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-20 21:32:31 -08:00
Johannes Schindelin
8860fd42fc Teach the revision walker to walk by reflogs with --walk-reflogs
When called with "--walk-reflogs", as long as there are reflogs
available, the walker will take this information into account, rather
than the parent information in the commit object.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-20 21:32:31 -08:00