1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-10-31 22:37:54 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
57b58db74c merge: notice local merging of tags and keep it unwrapped
This also updates the autogenerated merge title message from "merge commit X"
to "merge tag X", and its effect can be seen in the changes to the test suite.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-07 14:06:39 -08:00
Matthieu Moy
13931236b9 Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C code
(Just like we did for documentation already)

In the process, we change "non-remote branch" to "branch outside the
refs/remotes/ hierarchy" to avoid the ugly "non-remote-tracking branch".
The new formulation actually corresponds to how the code detects this
case (i.e. prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes")).

Also, we use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages (by
merge an fmt-merge-msg).

Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03 09:20:47 -07:00
Jeff King
69a8b7c741 merge: indicate remote tracking branches in merge message
Previously when merging directly from a local tracking
branch like:

  git merge origin/master

The merge message said:

   Merge commit 'origin/master'

     * commit 'origin/master':
       ...

Instead, let's be more explicit about what we are merging:

   Merge remote branch 'origin/master'

     * origin/master:
       ...

We accomplish this by recognizing remote tracking branches
in git-merge when we build the simulated FETCH_HEAD output
that we feed to fmt-merge-msg.

In addition to a new test in t7608, we have to tweak the
expected output of t3409, which does such a merge.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-09 12:34:21 -07:00
Jeff King
751c59746c merge: fix incorrect merge message for ambiguous tag/branch
If we have both a tag and a branch named "foo", then calling
"git merge foo" will warn about the ambiguous ref, but merge
the tag.

When generating the commit message, though, we simply
checked whether "refs/heads/foo" existed, and if it did,
assumed it was a branch. This led to the statement "Merge
branch 'foo'" in the commit message, which is quite wrong.

Instead, we should use dwim_ref to find the actual ref used,
and describe it appropriately.

In addition to the test in t7608, we must also tweak the
expected output of t4202, which was accidentally triggering
this bug.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-09 12:34:20 -07:00
Jeff King
ce06461846 add tests for merge message headings
When calling "git merge $X", we automatically generate a
commit message containing something like "Merge branch
'$X'". This test script checks that those messages say what
they should, and exposes a failure when merging a refname
that is ambiguous between a tag and a branch.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-09 12:34:19 -07:00