Since "git log origin/master" uses dwim_log() to match
"refs/remotes/origin/master", it makes sense to do that for
"git log --reflog", too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If you say "git log -g --relative-date", it is very likely that
you want to see the reflog names in terms of a relative date.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In the context of reflog output the reflog message is more useful than
the commit message's first line. When relevant the reflog message
will contain that line anyway.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Do not allow uninteresting commits with --walk-reflogs, since it is
not clear what should be shown in these cases:
$ git log --walk-reflogs master..next
$ git log --walk-reflogs ^master
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
When called with "--walk-reflogs", as long as there are reflogs
available, the walker will take this information into account, rather
than the parent information in the commit object.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
