1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-09 02:33:11 +01:00
Commit graph

126 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
af050219e4 Merge branch 'zj/diff-stat-dyncol'
By Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (8) and Junio C Hamano (1)
* zj/diff-stat-dyncol:
  : This breaks tests. Perhaps it is not worth using the decimal-width stuff
  : for this series, at least initially.
  diff --stat: add config option to limit graph width
  diff --stat: enable limiting of the graph part
  diff --stat: add a test for output with COLUMNS=40
  diff --stat: use a maximum of 5/8 for the filename part
  merge --stat: use the full terminal width
  log --stat: use the full terminal width
  show --stat: use the full terminal width
  diff --stat: use the full terminal width
  diff --stat: tests for long filenames and big change counts
2012-03-06 14:53:06 -08:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
df44483a5d diff --stat: add config option to limit graph width
Config option diff.statGraphWidth=<width> is equivalent to
--stat-graph-width=<width>, except that the config option is ignored
by format-patch.

For the graph-width limiting to be usable, it should happen
'automatically' once configured, hence the config option.
Nevertheless, graph width limiting only makes sense when used on a
wide terminal, so it should not influence the output of format-patch,
which adheres to the 80-column standard.

Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-01 09:15:58 -08:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
7a7159ace6 merge --stat: use the full terminal width
Make merge --stat behave like diff --stat and use the full terminal
width.

Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-01 09:14:16 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
d46f476cb2 merge: do not trust fstat(2) too much when checking interactiveness
The heuristic used by "git merge" to decide if it automatically gives an
editor upon clean automerge is to see if the standard input and the
standard output is the same device and is a tty, we are in an interactive
session.  "The same device" test was done by comparing fstat(2) result on
the two file descriptors (and they must match), and we asked isatty() only
for the standard input (we insist that they are the same device and there
is no point asking tty-ness of the standard output).

The stat(2) emulation in the Windows port however does not give a usable
value in the st_ino field, so even if the standard output is connected to
something different from the standard input, "The same device" test may
incorrectly return true. To accomodate it, add another isatty() check for
the standard output stream as well.

Reported-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-23 12:48:26 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
5cdc9fbb08 Merge branch 'jn/merge-no-edit-fix'
* jn/merge-no-edit-fix:
  merge: do not launch an editor on "--no-edit $tag"

Conflicts:
	builtin/merge.c
2012-02-12 22:41:51 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
fd6abd0c65 Merge branch 'jc/merge-ff-only-stronger-than-signed-merge'
* jc/merge-ff-only-stronger-than-signed-merge:
  merge: do not create a signed tag merge under --ff-only option
2012-02-10 14:08:02 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
3adab6f3a7 merge: do not launch an editor on "--no-edit $tag"
When the user explicitly asked us not to, don't launch an editor.

But do everything else the same way as the "edit" case, i.e. leave the
comment with verification result in the log template and record the
mergesig in the resulting merge commit for later inspection.

Based on initiail analysis by Jonathan Nieder.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-09 13:30:52 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
b5c9f1c1b0 merge: do not create a signed tag merge under --ff-only option
Starting at release v1.7.9, if you ask to merge a signed tag, "git merge"
always creates a merge commit, even when the tag points at a commit that
happens to be a descendant of your current commit.

Unfortunately, this interacts rather badly for people who use --ff-only to
make sure that their branch is free of local developments. It used to be
possible to say:

	$ git checkout -b frotz v1.7.9~30
        $ git merge --ff-only v1.7.9

and expect that the resulting tip of frotz branch matches v1.7.9^0 (aka
the commit tagged as v1.7.9), but this fails with the updated Git with:

	fatal: Not possible to fast-forward, aborting.

because a merge that merges v1.7.9 tag to v1.7.9~30 cannot be created by
fast forwarding.

We could teach users that now they have to do

	$ git merge --ff-only v1.7.9^0

but it is far more pleasant for users if we DWIMmed this ourselves.

When an integrator pulls in a topic from a lieutenant via a signed tag,
even when the work done by the lieutenant happens to fast-forward, the
integrator wants to have a merge record, so the integrator will not be
asking for --ff-only when running "git pull" in such a case. Therefore,
this change should not regress the support for the use case v1.7.9 wanted
to add.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05 16:30:26 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
873ce7c8d5 Merge branch 'tr/merge-edit-guidance'
* tr/merge-edit-guidance:
  merge: add instructions to the commit message when editing
2012-01-31 22:31:03 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
af6b37fab1 Merge branch 'jc/pull-signed-tag'
* jc/pull-signed-tag:
  merge: use editor by default in interactive sessions

Conflicts:
	Documentation/merge-options.txt
2012-01-31 22:30:42 -08:00
Thomas Rast
f26af3fcbc merge: add instructions to the commit message when editing
Before f824628 (merge: use editor by default in interactive sessions,
2012-01-10), git-merge only started an editor if the user explicitly
asked for it with --edit.  Thus it seemed unlikely that the user would
need extra guidance.

After f824628 the _normal_ thing is to start an editor.  Give at least
an indication of why we are doing it.

The sentence about justification is one of the few things about
standard git that are not agnostic to the workflow that the user
chose.  However, f824628 was proposed by Linus specifically to
discourage users from merging unrelated upstream progress into topic
branches.  So we may as well take another step in the same direction.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-31 12:04:38 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
f8246281af merge: use editor by default in interactive sessions
Traditionally, a cleanly resolved merge was committed by "git merge" using
the auto-generated merge commit log message without invoking the editor.

After 5 years of use in the field, it turns out that people perform too
many unjustified merges of the upstream history into their topic branches.
These merges are not just useless, but they are often not explained well,
and making the end result unreadable when it gets time for merging their
history back to their upstream.

Earlier we added the "--edit" option to the command, so that people can
edit the log message to explain and justify their merge commits. Let's
take it one step further and spawn the editor by default when we are in an
interactive session (i.e. the standard input and the standard output are
pointing at the same tty device).

There may be existing scripts that leave the standard input and the
standard output of the "git merge" connected to whatever environment the
scripts were started, and such invocation might trigger the above
"interactive session" heuristics.  GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT environment variable
can be set to "no" at the beginning of such scripts to use the historical
behaviour while the script runs.

Note that this backward compatibility is meant only for scripts, and we
deliberately do *not* support "merge.edit = yes/no/auto" configuration
option to allow people to keep the historical behaviour.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-23 14:34:55 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
5de89d3abf Merge branch 'jc/show-sig'
* jc/show-sig:
  log --show-signature: reword the common two-head merge case
  log-tree: show mergetag in log --show-signature output
  log-tree.c: small refactor in show_signature()
  commit --amend -S: strip existing gpgsig headers
  verify_signed_buffer: fix stale comment
  gpg-interface: allow use of a custom GPG binary
  pretty: %G[?GS] placeholders
  test "commit -S" and "log --show-signature"
  log: --show-signature
  commit: teach --gpg-sign option

Conflicts:
	builtin/commit-tree.c
	builtin/commit.c
	builtin/merge.c
	notes-cache.c
	pretty.c
2012-01-06 12:44:07 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
1aea303d7e Merge branch 'jk/maint-strbuf-missing-init'
* jk/maint-strbuf-missing-init:
  commit, merge: initialize static strbuf

Conflicts:
	builtin/merge.c
2011-12-22 11:27:31 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
f35ccd9be2 Merge branch 'nd/war-on-nul-in-commit'
* nd/war-on-nul-in-commit:
  commit_tree(): refuse commit messages that contain NULs
  Convert commit_tree() to take strbuf as message
  merge: abort if fails to commit

Conflicts:
	builtin/commit.c
	commit.c
	commit.h
2011-12-22 11:27:26 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
2e05710a16 Merge branch 'nd/resolve-ref'
* nd/resolve-ref:
  Rename resolve_ref() to resolve_ref_unsafe()
  Convert resolve_ref+xstrdup to new resolve_refdup function
  revert: convert resolve_ref() to read_ref_full()
2011-12-19 16:05:50 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
03f94ae9f9 Update jk/maint-strbuf-missing-init to builtin/ rename 2011-12-18 00:28:16 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
13f8b72d8c Convert commit_tree() to take strbuf as message
There wan't a way for commit_tree() to notice if the message the caller
prepared contained a NUL byte, as it did not take the length of the
message as a parameter. Use a pointer to a strbuf instead, so that we can
either choose to allow low-level plumbing commands to make commits that
contain NUL byte in its message, or forbid NUL everywhere by adding the
check in commit_tree(), in later patches.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-15 10:46:42 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
6b3c4c0547 merge: abort if fails to commit
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-15 10:26:40 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
424f30a5ae Merge branch 'nd/ignore-might-be-precious'
* nd/ignore-might-be-precious:
  checkout,merge: disallow overwriting ignored files with --no-overwrite-ignore
2011-12-13 22:55:07 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
96ec7b1e70 Convert resolve_ref+xstrdup to new resolve_refdup function
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-13 09:26:52 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
b7f7c07977 Merge branch 'nd/resolve-ref'
* nd/resolve-ref:
  Copy resolve_ref() return value for longer use
  Convert many resolve_ref() calls to read_ref*() and ref_exists()

Conflicts:
	builtin/fmt-merge-msg.c
	builtin/merge.c
	refs.c
2011-12-09 13:37:14 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
eb8aa3d2c2 Merge branch 'jc/pull-signed-tag'
* jc/pull-signed-tag:
  commit-tree: teach -m/-F options to read logs from elsewhere
  commit-tree: update the command line parsing
  commit: teach --amend to carry forward extra headers
  merge: force edit and no-ff mode when merging a tag object
  commit: copy merged signed tags to headers of merge commit
  merge: record tag objects without peeling in MERGE_HEAD
  merge: make usage of commit->util more extensible
  fmt-merge-msg: Add contents of merged tag in the merge message
  fmt-merge-msg: package options into a structure
  fmt-merge-msg: avoid early returns
  refs DWIMmery: use the same rule for both "git fetch" and others
  fetch: allow "git fetch $there v1.0" to fetch a tag
  merge: notice local merging of tags and keep it unwrapped
  fetch: do not store peeled tag object names in FETCH_HEAD
  Split GPG interface into its own helper library

Conflicts:
	builtin/fmt-merge-msg.c
	builtin/merge.c
2011-12-09 13:37:09 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
a4043aeafe Merge branch 'jc/request-pull-show-head-4'
* jc/request-pull-show-head-4:
  request-pull: use the annotated tag contents
  fmt-merge-msg.c: Fix an "dubious one-bit signed bitfield" sparse error
  environment.c: Fix an sparse "symbol not declared" warning
  builtin/log.c: Fix an "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" warning
  fmt-merge-msg: use branch.$name.description
  request-pull: use the branch description
  request-pull: state what commit to expect
  request-pull: modernize style
  branch: teach --edit-description option
  format-patch: use branch description in cover letter
  branch: add read_branch_desc() helper function

Conflicts:
	builtin/branch.c
2011-12-09 13:37:05 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
d5a35c114a Copy resolve_ref() return value for longer use
resolve_ref() may return a pointer to a static buffer. Callers that
use this value longer than a couple of statements should copy the
value to avoid some hidden resolve_ref() call that may change the
static buffer's value.

The bug found by Tony Wang <wwwjfy@gmail.com> in builtin/merge.c
demonstrates this. The first call is in cmd_merge()

branch = resolve_ref("HEAD", head_sha1, 0, &flag);

Then deep in lookup_commit_or_die() a few lines after, resolve_ref()
may be called again and destroy "branch".

lookup_commit_or_die
 lookup_commit_reference
  lookup_commit_reference_gently
   parse_object
    lookup_replace_object
     do_lookup_replace_object
      prepare_replace_object
       for_each_replace_ref
        do_for_each_ref
         get_loose_refs
          get_ref_dir
           get_ref_dir
            resolve_ref

All call sites are checked and made sure that xstrdup() is called if
the value should be saved.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-05 16:21:06 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
9ef569791f Merge branch 'nd/maint-ignore-exclude'
* nd/maint-ignore-exclude:
  checkout,merge: loosen overwriting untracked file check based on info/exclude
2011-12-05 15:25:12 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
ce8781e8ab Merge branch 'vr/git-merge-default-to-upstream'
* vr/git-merge-default-to-upstream:
  Show error for 'git merge' with unset merge.defaultToUpstream
2011-12-05 15:24:14 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
c1d7036b6b checkout,merge: disallow overwriting ignored files with --no-overwrite-ignore
Ignored files usually are generated files (e.g. .o files) and can be
safely discarded. However sometimes users may have important files in
working directory, but still want a clean "git status", so they mark
them as ignored files. But in this case, these files should not be
overwritten without asking first.

Enable this use case with --no-overwrite-ignore, where git only sees
tracked and untracked files, no ignored files. Those who mix
discardable ignored files with important ones may have to sort it out
themselves.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-28 10:41:53 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
f44054c82f Merge branch 'nd/maint-ignore-exclude' into nd/ignore-might-be-precious
* nd/maint-ignore-exclude:
  checkout,merge: loosen overwriting untracked file check based on info/exclude
2011-11-28 10:41:43 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
fc001b526c checkout,merge: loosen overwriting untracked file check based on info/exclude
Back in 1127148 (Loosen "working file will be lost" check in
Porcelain-ish - 2006-12-04), git-checkout.sh learned to quietly
overwrite ignored files. Howver the code only took .gitignore files
into account.

Standard ignored files include all specified in .gitignore files in
working directory _and_ $GIT_DIR/info/exclude. This patch makes sure
ignored files in info/exclude can also be overwritten automatically in
the spirit of the original patch.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-28 10:37:50 -08:00
Vincent van Ravesteijn
5480207c4e Show error for 'git merge' with unset merge.defaultToUpstream
'git merge' can be called without any arguments if merge.defaultToUpstream
is set. However, when merge.defaultToUpstream is not set, the user will be
presented the usage information as if he entered a command with a wrong
syntaxis. Ironically, the usage information confirms that no arguments are
mandatory.

This adds a proper error message telling the user why the command failed. As
a side-effect this can help the user in discovering the possibility to merge
with the upstream branch by setting merge.defaultToUpstream.

Signed-off-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-21 09:29:06 -08:00
Jonathan Nieder
418c9b176c do not let git_path clobber errno when reporting errors
Because git_path() calls vsnprintf(), code like

	fd = open(git_path("SQUASH_MSG"), O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0666);
	die_errno(_("Could not write to '%s'"), git_path("SQUASH_MSG"));

can end up printing an error indicator from vsnprintf() instead of
open() by mistake.  Store the path we are trying to write to in a
temporary variable and pass _that_ to die_errno(), so the messages
written by git cherry-pick/revert and git merge can avoid this source
of confusion.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-17 15:06:27 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
c689332391 Convert many resolve_ref() calls to read_ref*() and ref_exists()
resolve_ref() may return a pointer to a static buffer, which is not
safe for long-term use because if another resolve_ref() call happens,
the buffer may be changed.  Many call sites though do not care about
this buffer. They simply check if the return value is NULL or not.

Convert all these call sites to new wrappers to reduce resolve_ref()
calls from 57 to 34. If we change resolve_ref() prototype later on
to avoid passing static buffer out, this helps reduce changes.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-13 12:21:06 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
ba3c69a9ee commit: teach --gpg-sign option
This uses the gpg-interface.[ch] to allow signing the commit, i.e.

    $ git commit --gpg-sign -m foo
    You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
    user: "Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>"
    4096-bit RSA key, ID 96AFE6CB, created 2011-10-03 (main key ID 713660A7)

    [master 8457d13] foo
     1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

The lines of GPG detached signature are placed in a new multi-line header
field, instead of tucking the signature block at the end of the commit log
message text (similar to how signed tag is done), for multiple reasons:

 - The signature won't clutter output from "git log" and friends if it is
   in the extra header. If we place it at the end of the log message, we
   would need to teach "git log" and friends to strip the signature block
   with an option.

 - Teaching new versions of "git log" and "gitk" to optionally verify and
   show signatures is cleaner if we structurally know where the signature
   block is (instead of scanning in the commit log message).

 - The signature needs to be stripped upon various commit rewriting
   operations, e.g. rebase, filter-branch, etc. They all already ignore
   unknown headers, but if we place signature in the log message, all of
   these tools (and third-party tools) also need to learn how a signature
   block would look like.

 - When we added the optional encoding header, all the tools (both in tree
   and third-party) that acts on the raw commit object should have been
   fixed to ignore headers they do not understand, so it is not like that
   new header would be more likely to break than extra text in the commit.

A commit made with the above sample sequence would look like this:

    $ git cat-file commit HEAD
    tree 3cd71d90e3db4136e5260ab54599791c4f883b9d
    parent b87755351a47b09cb27d6913e6e0e17e6254a4d4
    author Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1317862251 -0700
    committer Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1317862251 -0700
    gpgsig -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
     Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

     iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOjPtrAAoJELC16IaWr+bL4TMP/RSe2Y/jYnCkds9unO5JEnfG
     ...
     =dt98
     -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    foo

but "git log" (unless you ask for it with --pretty=raw) output is not
cluttered with the signature information.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-12 22:27:37 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
fab47d0575 merge: force edit and no-ff mode when merging a tag object
Now that we allow pulling a tag from the remote site to validate the
authenticity, we should give the user the final chance to verify and edit
the merge message. The integrator is expected to leave a meaningful merge
commit log in the history. Disallow fast-forwarding in such a case to
ensure that a merge commit is always recorded.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-09 10:29:42 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
274a5c06d5 merge: record tag objects without peeling in MERGE_HEAD
Otherwise, "git commit" wouldn't have a way to tell that we were in the
middle of merging an annotated or signed tag, not a plain commit, after
"git merge" stops to ask the user to resolve conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-08 10:36:53 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
ae8e4c9ce1 merge: make usage of commit->util more extensible
The merge-recursive code uses the commit->util field directly to annotate
the commit objects given from the command line, i.e. the remote heads to
be merged, with a single string to be used to describe it in its trace
messages and conflict markers.

Correct this short-signtedness by redefining the field to be a pointer to
a structure "struct merge_remote_desc" that later enhancements can add
more information. Store the original objects we were told to merge in a
field "obj" in this struct, so that we can recover the tag we were told to
merge.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-08 10:36:53 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
cbda121c99 fmt-merge-msg: package options into a structure
This way new features can be added more easily

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-07 15:34:30 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
57b58db74c merge: notice local merging of tags and keep it unwrapped
This also updates the autogenerated merge title message from "merge commit X"
to "merge tag X", and its effect can be seen in the changes to the test suite.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-07 14:06:39 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
d25a265220 Merge branch 'nd/maint-autofix-tag-in-head' into maint
* nd/maint-autofix-tag-in-head:
  Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD
  merge: remove global variable head[]
  merge: use return value of resolve_ref() to determine if HEAD is invalid
  merge: keep stash[] a local variable

Conflicts:
	builtin/merge.c
2011-10-21 10:49:26 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
3dfbe68fc2 Merge branch 'js/merge-edit-option'
* js/merge-edit-option:
  Teach merge the '[-e|--edit]' option

Conflicts:
	builtin/merge.c
2011-10-19 10:49:27 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
0fd8cb3fec Merge branch 'nd/maint-autofix-tag-in-head'
* nd/maint-autofix-tag-in-head:
  Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD
  merge: remove global variable head[]
  merge: use return value of resolve_ref() to determine if HEAD is invalid
  merge: keep stash[] a local variable

Conflicts:
	builtin/merge.c
2011-10-13 19:03:19 -07:00
Jay Soffian
66f4b98ad9 Teach merge the '[-e|--edit]' option
Implemented internally instead of as "git merge --no-commit && git commit"
so that "merge --edit" is otherwise consistent (hooks, etc) with "merge".

Note: the edit message does not include the status information that one
gets with "commit --status" and it is cleaned up after editing like one
gets with "commit --cleanup=default". A later patch could add the status
information if desired.

Note: previously we were not calling stripspace() after running the
prepare-commit-msg hook. Now we are, stripping comments and
leading/trailing whitespace lines if --edit is given, otherwise only
stripping leading/trailing whitespace lines if not given --edit.

Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-12 13:17:18 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
898eacd8ad fmt-merge-msg: use branch.$name.description
This teaches "merge --log" and fmt-merge-msg to use branch description
information when merging a local topic branch into the mainline. The
description goes between the branch name label and the list of commit
titles.

The refactoring to share the common configuration parsing between
merge and fmt-merge-msg needs to be made into a separate patch.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-07 10:11:47 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
c672f01c04 Merge branch 'jc/want-commit'
* jc/want-commit:
  Allow git merge ":/<pattern>"
2011-10-05 12:35:55 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
baf18fc261 Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD
HEAD and MERGE_HEAD (among other branch tips) should never hold a
tag. That can only be caused by broken tools and is cumbersome to fix
by an end user with:

  $ git update-ref HEAD $(git rev-parse HEAD^{commit})

which may look like a magic to a new person.

Be easy, warn users (so broken tools can be fixed if they bother to
report) and move on.

Be robust, if the given SHA-1 cannot be resolved to a commit object,
die (therefore return value is always valid).

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-18 14:11:40 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
894642f68d merge: remove global variable head[]
Also kill head_invalid in favor of "head_commit == NULL".

Local variable "head" in cmd_merge() is renamed to "head_sha1" to make
sure I don't miss any access because this variable should not be used
after head_commit is set (use head_commit->object.sha1 instead).

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-18 13:56:58 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
10b98fa5b3 merge: use return value of resolve_ref() to determine if HEAD is invalid
resolve_ref() only updates "head" when it returns non NULL value (it
may update "head" even when returning NULL, but not in all cases).

Because "head" is not initialized before the call, is_null_sha1() is
not enough. Check also resolve_ref() return value.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-18 13:55:56 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
6099835c19 Allow git merge ":/<pattern>"
It probably is not such a good idea to use ":/<pattern>" to specify which
commit to merge, as ":/<pattern>" can often hit unexpected commits, but
somebody tried it and got a nonsense error message:

	fatal: ':/Foo bar' does not point to a commit

So here is a for-the-sake-of-consistency update that is fairly useless
that allows users to carefully try not shooting in the foot.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-15 16:52:43 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
f946b465d7 Merge branch 'jk/color-and-pager'
* jk/color-and-pager:
  want_color: automatically fallback to color.ui
  diff: don't load color config in plumbing
  config: refactor get_colorbool function
  color: delay auto-color decision until point of use
  git_config_colorbool: refactor stdout_is_tty handling
  diff: refactor COLOR_DIFF from a flag into an int
  setup_pager: set GIT_PAGER_IN_USE
  t7006: use test_config helpers
  test-lib: add helper functions for config
  t7006: modernize calls to unset

Conflicts:
	builtin/commit.c
	parse-options.c
2011-08-28 21:19:16 -07:00