1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-11-13 20:53:02 +01:00
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff King
0f2d4476c1 revert: actually check for a dirty index
The previous code mistakenly used wt_status_prepare to check whether the
index had anything commitable in it; however, that function is just an
init function, and will never report a dirty index.

The correct way with wt_status_* would be to call wt_status_print with the
output pointing to /dev/null or similar. However, that does extra work by
both examining the working tree and spewing status information to nowhere.

Instead, let's just implement the useful subset of wt_status_print as an
"is_index_dirty" function.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-02 23:33:59 -08:00
Kristian Høgsberg
9e54dc6c12 Remove unecessary hard-coding of EDITOR=':' VISUAL=':' in some test suites.
They are already set and exoprted by sourcing ./test-lib.sh
in all test scripts.

Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-02 15:40:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
acb4441e0d Use merge-recursive in git-revert/git-cherry-pick
This makes revert and cherry-pick to use merge-recursive, to
allow them to notice renames.  A pair of test scripts
demonstrate that an old change before a rename happened can be
applied (reverted) after a rename with cherry-pick (with revert).

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-14 22:00:34 -08:00