Tested on a plain Ubuntu Hoary installation
using subversion 1.1.1-2ubuntu3
1.1.x issues I had to deal with:
* Avoid the noisy command-line client compatibility check if we
use the libraries.
* get_log() arguments differ (now using a nice wrapper from
Junio's suggestion)
* get_file() is picky about what kind of file handles it gets,
so I ended up redirecting STDOUT. I'm probably overflushing
my file handles, but that's the safest thing to do...
* BDB kept segfaulting on me during tests, so svnadmin will use FSFS
whenever we can.
* If somebody used an expanded CVS $Id$ line inside a file, then
propsetting it to use svn:keywords will cause the original CVS
$Id$ to be retained when asked for the original file. As far as
I can see, this is a server-side issue. We won't care in the
test anymore, as long as it's not expanded by SVN, a static
CVS $Id$ line is fine.
While we're at making ourselves more compatible, avoid grep
along with the -q flag, which is GNU-specific. (grep avoidance
tip from Junio, too)
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is a very intrusive change, so I've beefed up the tests
significantly. Added 'full-test' a target to the Makefile,
to test different possible configurations. This is intended
for maintainers only. Users should only be concerned with
'test' succeeding.
We now have a very simple custom database format for handling
mapping of svn revisions => git commits. Of course, we're
not really using it yet, either.
Also disabled automatic branch-finding on new trees for now.
It's too easily broken. revisions_eq() function should be
helpful for branch detection.
Also removed an extra assertion in fetch_cmd() that wasn't
correctly done. This bug was found by full-test.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
The dash installed on my Debian Sarge boxes don't seem to like
<<'' as a heredoc starter. Recent versions of dash do not need
this fix.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Unlike my earlier test patch, this also checks svn:eol-style and
makes sure it's applied to working copy updates. This is
definitely more correct than my original attempt at killing
keyword expansions, but I still haven't tested it enough to
know. Feedback would be much appreciated.
Also changed assert_svn_wc_clean() to only work on the svn
working copy. This requires a separate call to assert_tree() to
check wc integrity against git in preparation for another change
I'm planning.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
